Things New and Old

Ancient truths revealed in the Scriptures are often forgotten, disbelieved or distorted, and therefore lost in the passage of time. Such ancient truths when rediscovered and relearned are 'new' additions to the treasury of ancient truths.

Christ showed many new things to the disciples, things prophesied by the prophets of old but hijacked and perverted by the elders and their traditions, but which Christ reclaimed and returned to His people.

Many things taught by the Apostles of Christ have been perverted or substituted over the centuries. Such fundamental doctrines like salvation by grace and justification have been hijacked and perverted and repudiated by sincere Christians. These doctrines need to be reclaimed and restored to God's people.

There are things both new and old here. "Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things"
2Ti 2:7.

Sunday, November 28, 2021

Is this the norm? Effectual call and gospel call


From: KES <...@pd.jaring.my>
Date: July 20, 2007 6:03:26 AM GMT+07:00
To: sing <singpenang@gmail.com>
Subject: Is this the norm?

Dear Pastor,
Cornelius, the Ethiopian eunuch, Lydia are very good examples recorded for our soul. Regenerate and live a godly life prior to the response on the 
Gospel call.

Questions:
a. Is it the norm for thousands of years over the period of human history for regenerated people not to identify with the church or simply come out in the open to declare the glory of God. Understandable in the remote areas where those early times where the gospel could not be reached.

However, with the advances of communications, the gospel could not be reached to them.

b. If in the present era, regenerated people with the fore knowledge of God, do these people have no opportunity to join a church?

c. Then the next 
question is "how would the people of God praise HIM day and night?" The gathered church may be lacking in numbers to corporate prayers and worship. Then if the regenerated people are not called out to faith between birth and death, then how would the ordinance of baptism be meaningful to the godly and ungodly people as a reminder of the death and resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ?

By now you may have realized we asked amiss and stupid questions. What bothers me especially is "why should God allow His regenerated elect with full mental faculty to miss the opportunity for the fuller well-being of one's life while on earth. Declaring faith in the open would be like Adam & Eve in fellowship before their fall. Fellowship in the church is a type for the thing to come in heaven. Pastor, I am asking the ridiculous and putting forth questions with obvious answers. As you mentioned often, what is not said carries the true intentions.

Best regards
KES

Dear Brother Kes,
It is good to hear from you. Five or six years ago, I was also asking the same questions as you do... only I asked a whole lot more... So, keep asking, and you will help me to keep thinking and learning.

Here is one I just asked two days ago...

Dear Brethren,
Please help me with a question.
The Scriptures declares, "And they sung a new song, saying, Thou art worthy to take the book, and to open the seals thereof: for thou wast slain, and hast redeemed us to God by thy blood out of EVERY kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation..."(Revelation of John 5:9).

Does this statement help to answer the questions:
- Were there God's elect that perished in the great flood?'
- Were there 'kindred, and people, and nation' before the confusion of tongue at Babel?
- The period between Adam and the great flood was 1656 years (Antsey) - did 'kindred, and people, and nation' develop within this period?

 Any thought would be most welcome.

 sing

-------------

Please note that your question, 'is this the norm' necessarily implies the corollary idea of ' that is an exception.' I have forwarded you a post on this.

Below I will answer in your post. A bit long... but please read patiently. May our Lord bless you richly. Anything you don't understand, feel free to ask. Anything you don't agree, show me I am wrong. I am teachable and am still learning.

<<Cornelius, the Ethiopian eunuch, Lydia are very good examples recorded for our soul. Regenerate and live a godly life before the response on the Gospel call. Questions:>>

## Yes, God regenerates His elect WITHOUT the aid or cooperation of man. This is a given. I fathered ALL my children without their aid or that of the midwives!!! But many people are involved in giving a hand for their nurturing and well being and usefulness.

Please note that we must not commit the FATAL ERROR here, i.e. to construe from this fact that IF regeneration and living a godly life is prior to the response on the gospel call, THEN the gospel ministry is not necessary to God's children. Please do remember that though Cornelius - prior to hearing the gospel - POSSESSES eternal life and DOES fear God and work righteousness (if by this you mean 'he is living a godly life' - then, yes, he is), yet there is still so much deficiency in his discipleship as a child of God. He is ignorant of the truth of his salvation by God's free grace, His Father, His Saviour; he is still plagued with many superstitions, he is still burdened with many cares and worries of life, etc, etc. He is indeed a child of God, but ONLY a babe. The gospel ministry is most essential for the nurture and growth of the babe.

"All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: that the man of God may be perfect [complete, mature], throughly furnished unto all good works." (II Timothy 3:16- 17).

Every man of God began his spiritual life as a babe. Without the ministry of the gospel, a child of God remains a spiritual babe through much of his life on earth... and will die a spiritual babe. Whether a child of God died a spiritual babe or a spiritual giant... they are both EQUALLY justified, regenerated and adopted and indwelt by the Holy Spirit of God, and shall be equally glorified - all based upon the works and merits of Christ. This is the eternal aspect of salvation. There is the temporal or timely aspect here and now in this life. That's where the gospel ministry plays a most vital role.

 This work of making disciples of God's children - nurturing and instructing them all that Christ has commanded - has been committed to the church. Making disciples of God's children through the gospel ministry is a 1000 world of difference from making God's children through the gospel ministry. The standard reformed folks have confused and confounded the two... thus ending up with all the inconsistency and contradiction, and repudiating salvation by free grace alone by direct implication.

a. Is it the norm for thousands of years over the period of human history for regenerated people not to identify with the church or simply come out in the open to declare the glory of God. Understandable in the remote areas where those early times where the gospel could not be reached.

However, with the advances of communications, the gospel could not be reached to them.

## I am trying hard to understand your question - if you are asking a question at all. Maybe you are making a statement. Do you intend to write, 'IT IS the norm...' (a statement) or 'IS IT the norm...'? I am not sure... sorry, I can't read your mind.

However, please let me say this. It is obvious that if the gospel had not been brought to them... they would be no church there... and without the NT church there, there would be no identifying with the church. Wherever they are, because they are regenerated children of God, their lives would be comparatively quite different from those around them, like that of Cornelius, Lydia, and the Ethiopian eunuch in the NT... you can easily quote many of them in the OT... Abel, Enoch, Noah. Abimelech, etc.

During the OT, BEFORE the establishment of the distinct group of people who would eventually become the covenant nation of Israel, all God's children are scattered in EVERY kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation, they were WITHOUT any external INSTITUTION to identify themselves with. During the OT, AFTER the calling of Abraham, a specific group of God's people begins to become externally identifiable. These became a covenant nation of God's people... there was then an external institution with which God's children could identify themselves as God's children. Throughout the OT, we read of some Gentiles (God's regenerated children) that came to know and identified themselves with this external institution (Israel). But still, by and large, God's children in most parts of the world knew nothing about this external institution of God's people.

Please also remember that the people belonging to the special genealogical line that is carefully traced from Adam to Christ were NOT the only elect of God. So often people make the serious mistake to think that those people associated with that Christological genealogical line were the ONLY children of God and that there were none outside of it. There were, and are God's elect found in EVERY kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation.

Let me be realistic, and say that the advancement in communication does not help much in the matter for several very basic reasons. It has helped the situation SLIGHTLY only. Can you think of some?

b. If in the present era, regenerated people with the fore knowledge of God, do these people have no opportunity to join a church? Then the next question is "how would the people of God praise HIM day and night?" The gathered church may be lacking in numbers to corporate prayers and worship. Then if the regenerated people are not called out to faith between birth and death, then how would the ordinance of baptism be meaningful to the godly and ungodly people as a reminder of the death and resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ?

## Good questions... I had asked them myself... several years ago. All divine truth is consistent and harmonious.

By 'in this present era,' I supposed you mean the gospel age in the general sense, and the 21st century in particular, where advanced communication tools are available. I have suggested that the advancement in communication does not ensure, and remotely means that in this present era every regenerated elect will be reached with the gospel. I leave it to you to think why.

Do you know that Cornelius, before the gospel message was brought to him, prayed to God ALWAYS? "There was a certain man in Caesarea called Cornelius, a centurion of the band called the Italian band, a devout man, and one that feared God with all his house, which gave much alms to the people, and prayed to God always." Acts 10:1-2. One may object, 'O he learned to do so from the Jews.' Fair enough. Who taught Abraham to do the same? And who taught Enoch, and Noah, and Mechizedek? There were certainly no Jews then! And who teach those in every nation mentioned by apostle Peter in Acts 10:34-35, "Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth, I perceive that God is no respecter of persons: 35 But in every nation, he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him." Remember, Apostle Peter, under divine inspiration was MAKING A MOMENTOUS STATEMENT OF FACT. He did not say, in every nation, whosoever will fear God and will work righteousness, will be accepted with God, i.e. apostle Peter did NOT make a STATEMENT OF CONDITIONAL OFFER.

These people praise God day and night - PRIOR to and therefore WITHOUT the benefits of the gospel ministry - by their reverent fear of God and do works of righteousness. That's the way the most enlightened saints praise God day and night TOO. The great difference lies in the QUALITY of their respective praises. A child may know God as his Father (see Romans 8:14-15), and yet know next to nothing about him, and praise him and love him in a vague uninformed manner; and another child of the same Father, because of the benefits of a FAITHFUL and BIBLICAL (much is not) gospel ministry may know so much more about his Father, and much more... and praise Him and love Him in a much-informed manner. See the point?

<Then if the regenerated people are not called out to faith between birth and death, then how would the ordinance of baptism be meaningful to the godly and ungodly people as a reminder of the death and resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ?>

## If the regenerated people [i.e. already given eternal salvation by God's free grace] are not called out by the ministry of the gospel to faith, then they are deprived of all the blessings - including the instruction concerning how, when, and why of their eternal salvation in Jesus Christ, and the ordinance of baptism as a visible and vivid picture of those things -  that the gospel ministry is ORDAINED by God to bring them.

That is why the ministry of the gospel is VERY IMPORTANT... but ONLY VERY IMPORTANT for the purpose it was ordained for by God. It is VERY IMPORTANT, not to bring eternal salvation to God's elect, but it is very important as the means to bring temporal salvation in this life here and now.

A child of God that is deprived of the gospel ministry and all the temporal blessings that come with it is like a child that is deprived of the blessings of a loving home and all that comes with it. But whatever deprivation a child of God might suffer, he is not one iota less than a child of God. This statement DOES NOT lessen the urgency of seeking out God's children with the gospel ministry.

The 'standard reformed' folks insist that the gospel ministry is VERY IMPORTANT  because it is the means appointed by God, to be used by them, to give eternal salvation to the elect. This is erroneous.

God's children, in every generation, in every place, whether they have the benefits of the ordinance of baptism that comes along with the gospel ministry, unmistakably BEAR WITNESS to the truth that they have been raised to newness of life THROUGH their reverent fear of God and their works of righteousness. That separates them from all those around them who are still dead in trespasses and sin. The gospel ministry alone will give them light and understanding of what has happened to them by God's free grace.

Let me illustrate the truth. There was a time in high school when we begin to learn about the reproductive system in our science classes - about the wriggly sperms and the eggs, and fertilization, etc.  Before that, you and I know next to nothing about our origin, where we come from, etc. Then we were instructed those wonderful truths! Imagine our older siblings who never go to school... and remained ignorant of those wonderful truths about their origin, about the true identity of their parents, etc... their ignorance does not make them any less children or any less human. See the point.

Imagine one of the siblings died early... deprived of the benefits of medical help, and knew very little of his parents... these are all very great losses... but all these do not make him any less child or any less human than the other siblings.

OK, this leads naturally to the next BIG question... and I like this one. I have asked it myself too. So, men made wise by God think alike, and fool never differs!

<By now you may have realized we asked amiss and stupid questions. What bothers me especially is "why should God allow His regenerated elect with full mental faculty to miss the opportunity for the fuller well-being of one's life while on earth. Declaring faith in the open would be like Adam & Eve in fellowship before their fall. Fellowship in the church is a type for the thing to come in heaven. Pastor, I am asking the ridiculous and putting forth questions with obvious answers. As you mentioned often, what is not said carries the true intentions.>

## I don't see nor realize any asking amiss or stew-pig questions. I think they are all legitimate, but whether they are ridiculous and have obvious answers, I can't say. I would be grateful if you can explain.

I am glad that you are especially bothered by this particular issue! You should be bothered by anything that is not consistent with the revealed Word of God, and seek for consistency by seeking to rightly divide the word of truth - "Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth." (II Timothy 2:15)

I want to suggest that behind your good question "why should God allow His regenerated elect with full mental faculty to miss the opportunity for the fuller well being of one's life while on earth" there lurks a presupposition or preconceived notion, even though such notion is unbiblical and contrary to all observable facts in life.

I surmise that the preconceived notion is this: It is God's will that ALL His children (i.e. the regenerated elect) with full mental capacity will hear the gospel preached and enjoy the opportunity for the fuller well being of their life while on earth... i.e. be gathered into the NT church with all the blessings that come with it.

How wonderful if this had been the case... I would to God that this is the case indeed. But it is most certainly not - not only contrary to Scriptures but also contrary to observable facts.

This notion leads to some strange ideas.

First, it assumes that there is no elect of God in all those places and all those people groups (i.e. ethnic nations) where the gospel has never reached; They presumptuous notion at best.

Second, it assumes that none of the regenerate (mentally capable) elect is MISSED by the ministry of the gospel in any place in any generation; i.e. the gospel ministry has reached every regenerate (mentally capable, understood... the gospel ministry is intended for such ONLY, to begin with) in every place in every generation. Worse than presumptuous to claim so.

Third, this notion is a twin of the related error... gospel regeneration. Such believes, 'no gospel preaching means no regeneration, no eternal life, and no eternal salvation,' period. This is plain ignorance and confusion. Scriptures plainly declare, 'faith comes by hearing,' and not life comes by hearing. It is no gospel no faith and no conversion.

The triune God has most assured declared that He will sovereignly and freely do certain things for ALL His elect people... Read this very popular by most misunderstood passage again,
"And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose. 29 For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren. 30 Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified." Romans 8:29-30.

This passage speaks of ALL the elect... ALL them that are called according to God's eternal purpose... and what God has sovereignly and freely done for these SAME people. So please NOTE very carefully what is specifically stated that God did for EVERY SINGLE ONE and ALL of His elect. Please note most carefully also what is NOT stated at all.

The things that God has sovereignly and freely done for ALL those that had been called according to His eternal purpose are THESE: foreknowledge, predestination, call, justification, and glorification. Here is a most wonderful and perfect and complete 5-links chain.

Please note carefully that these five are SO-LINKED in such a manner that they do not allow anything to come in between them. What God has joined together let not man put asunder by adding useless and odious links of their own invention to the perfect and complete chain. Man's activity in any form or degree is ENTIRELY and ABSOLUTELY excluded.

Foreknowledge (setting His eternal love) and predestination took place before the foundation of the world. The call takes place in time... at God's own appointed and accepted time - "Those whom God hath predestined unto life, He is pleased in His appointed and accepted time, effectually to call, by His Word [Christ] and Spirit, out of that state of sin and death in which they are by nature, to grace and salvation by Jesus Christ..." 1689.10.1. Justification mentioned here also takes place in time, in conjunction with the effectual call to grace and salvation. "Those whom God effectually calleth, He also freely justifieth..." 1689.11.1

Note most carefully that the effectual call to grace and salvation, have to be an effectual call and NOT the gospel call because it is obvious beyond a shadow of a doubt that there are elect that are not called by the gospel, but ABSOLUTELY everyone and all of the elect is effectually called to grace and salvation. Confused 'standard reformed' folks insist that this is a gospel call. These obtuse and stubborn folks refused to accept plain and obvious truth! To make the call here as gospel call destroys the chain... and excludes many elects from glorification.

Note most carefully too that the justification spoken about is a justification that must be true to EVERY SINGLE ONE and ALL of the elect of God. And this justification simply and obviously CANNOT be justification by faith through the hearing of the gospel. This is the justification by God's free grace that is true of EVERY SINGLE ONE and ALL of the elect of God. This happens when He declares an elect under the condemnation of death to be righteous by forgiving all his sins and imputing to him the righteousness of Christ. Confused 'standard reformed' folks insist that this is justification by faith. These obtuse and stubborn folks refused to accept plain and obvious truth! To make the justification here as evidential and experiential justification, they destroy the chain... and shall exclude many elects from glorification.

From this passage, you see the plain declaration of what God has willed, decreed, and ordained what He shall perform for EVERY SINGLE ONE and ALL of His elect. We must be careful not to break that unbreakable chain and add more useless and pathetic links of our own imagination... like the links of the gospel call, faith, repentance, progressive sanctification, etc... and force the Scriptures to say what it does not say. Let God be true and every man a liar!!!

God has most certainly commanded the NT churches to labour and to seek the lost sheep and gather them into the churches. And we are to do that faithfully and seek and gather them into the visible church. God ALSO cares for the well-being and comfort of His children while they travel through this world to their eternal home - that work is delegated to the church. At the best of times, most often the church fails very miserably. But sovereign grace alone ensures all God's elect shall be glorified. Very humbling and comforting.

Many deluded and misguided men think God needs them to house His elect in heaven!!! What arrogance and presumption. "Him that glories, let him glories in the Lord alone" - don't betray any indication that his eternal salvation is somehow remotely dependent upon something man does.

It would be wonderful if God had willed that each and every of His elect would enjoy the gospel blessings to the degree that apostle Paul had enjoyed... but God hasn't, otherwise His will shall surely come to pass.

I have rambled on, but hope it is not all wind,

sing 

Friday, November 26, 2021

Deformed ideas of adoption by a revered Calvinist

 

https://www.facebook.com/sing.f.lau/posts/2258872986794
November 26, 2011

"Nobody is born into this world a child of the family of God. We are born as children of wrath. The only way we enter into the family of God is by adoption, and that adoption occurs when we are united to God's only begotten Son by faith. When by faith we are united with Christ, we are then adopted into that family of whom Christ is the firstborn."

[A statement by a popular 'reformed' man. Don't worry about his name now.]

What do you think of his idea about adoption?

I say, at best, it is very deficient. At worst, it is HERETICAL.

17 Comments

Charles Page
I agree!

Cheri Thomas
He does not understand the process, nor evidently the significance of regeneration and justification; let alone and the difference betwixt goats and sheep. The child of God has always been the object of His love, from before the foundation of the world, in the Mind and Purpose of God. Scripture speaks abundantly to that fact, that even whilst we were at enmity with God, we were His children, whom He loves. We love Him because He first loved us.

But strictly keeping to his statement, what would he say in regard to the documented case of John the Baptist, who leaped for joy in the womb at the very approach of Mary, quick with the child Jesus? 😉

Cheri Thomas
As a general rule, I'm not much impressed by those who are adored of men. I'm just weird that way, I reckon.

Charles Page
No child can be adopted until it reaches an age of rational reasoning, then!!! conditional and merited adoption! LOL even adoption agencies reject this notion

Sing F Lau
The Scriptures declare these truths about the elects, their:
- Adoption to sonship PREDESTINED in Christ in eternity.
- Adoption to sonship was LEGALLY transacted by Christ at the cross.
- Adoption to sonship PERSONALIZED, vitally born as son and adopted into God's family at the effectual calling out of the native state of sin and death to that of grace and salvation.
- Adoption to sonship EXPERIENCED by faith in Jesus Christ, 'But as many as received him, to them gave he the power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name...'
- Adoption to sonship GLORIFIED on the day of resurrection.

Deficient:
He knows a fraction of the truth of adoption taught in the Scriptures. His picture of adoption is like a one-fingered hand, a hideous monstrosity.

Heretical:
- One whom God has not adopted as son is able to believe in order to be adopted by God as a son.
- One whom God has not united to Christ is able to believe in order to be united to Christ.

That's what a great and adored Calvinist believes, and teaches and trains other little Calvinists to believe!

They are sicker than BLACK FRIDAY we are witnessing in the USA!

Both have gone to the dogs!

Penny Karn
As thou knowest not what [is] the way of the spirit, [nor] how the bones [do grow] in the womb of her that is with child: even so thou knowest not the works of God who maketh all.

Sing F Lau
Penny, how does that passage relate to the topic of adoption?

Michael Lim
It only glorifies man, where is God in the picture? Pure grace without our works saving us gives us total and total assurance that we are saved, since God is perfect and he saved us, there is no flaw in eternal salvation.

Sing F Lau
The biblical teaching on adoption is like a wholesome well-formed 5-fingered hand...
1. Adoption to sonship PREDESTINED in Christ in eternity.
- Eph 1:5 Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will.

2. Adoption to sonship LEGALLY transacted by Christ at the cross.
- Gal 4:4 "But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law, 5 To redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons."

3. Adoption to sonship PERSONALIZED, vitally born as son and adopted into God's family at the effectual calling out of the native state of sin and death to that of grace and salvation.
- John 1:13 "Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God."

- Gal 4:6 "And because ye are sons [i.e. legally adopted], God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father [i.e. regenerated and adopted].

4. Adoption to sonship EXPERIENCED by faith in Jesus Christ.
- John 1:12 'But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name...'
- Rom 8:14 For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God. 15 For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear; but ye have received the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father.

5. Adoption to sonship GLORIFIED on the day of resurrection.
- Rom 8:22 For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now. 23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body. 24 For we are saved by hope: but hope that is seen is not hope: for what a man seeth, why doth he yet hope for?

Sing F Lau
The 'reformed' view expressed by acclaimed and adored calvinist Roaring Crazy Sprawl is really the Deformed and Deficient view on adoption.

Charles Page
LOL Paul washer and Ray comfort wannabees!! reformers alright (deformers)

Sing F Lau
That's calvinist DEFORMED version of salvation by God's free and sovereign grace!!! And so many love it!

Ken Savage
What about repentance?

Mark Thomas
What about repentance? Does repentance have a single thing to do with adoption or being fathered and born??? Someone needs to get their ducks in a row.

Mikal Smith
I agree!! We were "by nature" children of wrath, but God has not appointed us unto death!!! When was that appointment??? Well the same time all of God's decree was formed, sometime in eternity past, which never had beginning so has always been!! Goats do not turn into sheep! Jesus did not have a lost goat who he brought back and made a sheep!! Jesus told the religious leaders, "you do not believe because you are not my sheep" thus being a sheep is prerequisite to believing and not vice versa!! So short answer long, I believe that is incorrect teaching!

Sing F Lau
Sheep were given to Christ, but those sheep were lost sheep... separate from the owner because of sins. Jesus came to seek for them, and brings them to Himself.

He did that by giving Himself as a substitute for His lost sheep... to live the perfect sinless to secure the needed righteousness for His sheep, and to lay down His life be bear away their curse and condemnation upon himself.

Being a FOUND sheep, found by the Shepherd - purchased at the cross, and regenerated at effectual calling - is a prerequisite to believing.

Jonas NOg
:)dat s biblicall!! pastor sing! 🙂 no man can refute dat!

Are there no foes for me to face?

Are there no foes for me to face?

https://www.facebook.com/sing.f.lau/posts/10212781245421456
November 26, 2018

Are there no foes for me to face?

We sang this great hymn in our meeting yesterday. The line "Are there no foes for me to face?" struck me and got me musing.

The church of Jesus Christ has many foes, both within and without; those within are most hateful and vindictive, as the implacable Jews against Christ and His Apostles.

Each soldier of Christ has many foes, also both within and without the camp.

Do I have spiritual eyes to see my subtle foes;
And a sound mind to recognize their errors?
Can I spot ravening wolves in sheep's clothes;
And a bold spirit to face and expose the foes?

Beware of being seduced and neutralized by the enemies of the gospel. Beware of being tempted to accommodate things contrary to the word of God. You are not given such freedom nor liberty by your Captain.

If we are soldiers, we are to earnestly contend for the faith once delivered unto the saints. Saints need to face and fight whatever usurps and undermines the faith once delivered. Amen.

 #############

Am I a soldier of the cross,
A follower of the Lamb,
And shall I fear to own His cause,
Or blush to speak His name?
Must I be carried to the skies
On flowery beds of ease,
While others fought to win the prize,
And sailed through bloody seas?

Are there no foes for me to face?
Must I not stem the flood?
Is this vile world a friend to grace,
To help me on to God?
Sure I must fight if I would reign;
Increase my courage, Lord.
I’ll bear the toil, endure the pain,
Supported by Thy Word.

Thy saints in all this glorious war
Shall conquer, though they die;
They see the triumph from afar,
By faith’s discerning eye.
When that illustrious day shall rise,
And all Thy armies shine
In robes of victory through the skies,
The glory shall be Thine.

Thursday, November 25, 2021

Some notes on the gift (singular) of tongues (plural)

Act 2:4 “And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost,
and began to speak with other tongues,
as the Spirit gave them utterance.”

A dear Brother shared his understanding of the subject of tongues on the day of Pentecost thus:

"True Biblical Pentecost tongues would mean that I speak in English, and, as I speak, a believer who speaks and understands German hears my words as if I spoke German, and another believer who speaks French hears my words in French, while a third believer who speaks Greek hears as if I spoke in Greek. The Holy Spirit provided miraculous simultaneous translation from one known human language, Galilean, into seventeen other known human languages."

Comments:
This understanding is a novelty indeed; I’m hearing it for the first time.
It is quite contrary to the plain testimony of the Scriptures. Consider these passages:

Act 2:4 “And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance.”

i. And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost:
- they were endowed the spiritual gifts by the Holy Spirit; they had received the Spirit before, as the Spirit of adoption

ii. And [they] began to speak with other tongues:
- as a direct result of being filled with the Holy Ghost.
- They speak with other tongues, THAT IS, besides, and different from that in which they were born and brought up, and usually speak, i.e. Galilean.
- They began to SPEAK various languages, one spoke one language, and another, another language. The same person speaks with various tongues, sometimes one language, and at other times another language. [The singular gift of tongues enabled a man to speak numerous and diverse languages.]
- These are the new languages, Christ told them they should speak with, Mr 16:17, languages that they had never heard, learned, nor known before.

iii. as the Spirit gave them utterance:
-  The occasion was special and the opportunity unique – Pentecost. Devout Jews from all nations under heaven were gathered in Jerusalem. Thus, for the occasion, the Spirit specially guided their words, [in different distinct languages.]
- The Spirit of God guided them to speak on the wonderful works of God in saving His people, Acts 2:11, the great doctrines of the gospel of Jesus Christ.
- Even though they speak in different languages, yet in a very orderly and distinct manner, so as to be heard and understood by the people - because the Spirit gave them utterance.

Acts 2:6 Now when this was noised abroad, the multitude came together, and were confounded, because that every man heard them speak in his own language. 7 And they were all amazed and marvelled, saying one to another, Behold, are not all these which speak Galilaeans? 8 And how hear we every man in our own tongue, wherein we were born?
- When the news of the Apostles speaking with other tongues was spread ["noised abroad"] multitudes of those devout Jews gathered; they were astonished.
- They heard the uneducated Galileans speaking their languages; the uneducated Galileans DID SPEAK their languages; they were heard, and understood.
- Behold, are not all these which speak Galilaeans? Then why were they able to speak our languages? 
- The cause for amazement and marvel WAS the fact that the uneducated Galileans SPOKE the foreign languages.
- The cause WASN’T that the Galilean tongue was miraculously changed into, and heard AS many other languages. That’s just fiction!
- The miracle was the gift of tongues; the miracle was not the gift of the ears, nor a language morphing into another in transmission.

 Act 2:11 Cretes and Arabians, we do hear them speak in our tongues the wonderful works of God.
- “We do hear them SPEAK in our tongues”: the Apostles spoke different languages, plural tongues.
- What tongues they spoke, were the same tongues heard.

He continued,
“Thanks so much for the kind and encouraging note. I believe that the description to which I referred in Acts 2 is quite literal. The miracle of tongues that the Spirit empowered and administered appears in His immediate translation. The disciples spoke in Galilean, but people from the 17 languages named heard in their native language. That is the miracle.”

Comments:
- There was no immediate translation; no translation was needed. They spoke their languages and were plainly heard, and were understood as speaking of the wonderful works of God in redemption.
- The 12 apostles speaking different languages were able to address all the FOREIGN Jews with foreign tongues.
- There were 17 regions named, NOT 17 languages. 

He continued,
I believe the situation in 1 Corinthians 14 was perhaps an attempt to duplicate that miracle. However, Paul specifically requires a translator, and, even with a translator, he imposes a limit on the number of people speaking in a foreign language. The miraculous factor, I believe, is missing in 1 Corinthians 14. Paul requires an interpreter, Verse 27, but none was needed in Acts 2 because of the miracle of the Spirit’s administration. 

Comments:
- It wasn’t an attempt to duplicate the miracle of tongues. If the miracle is indeed the way you have understood, the need for translators is completely redundant!

- Apostle Paul was dealing with speaking in tongues in the context of a church gathered for public worship. There must be orderliness.

- Orderliness in public worship requires TWO things: The number permitted to speak in tongues, and there must an interpreter. This was when the gift of tongues was still in operation; the gift has since ceased.

1Cor 14: 27 If any man speak in an unknown tongue, let it be by two, or at the most by three, and that by course; and let one interpret. 28. But if there be no interpreter, let him keep silence in the church; and let him speak to himself, and to God.

Imagine a church meeting in Corinth in AD60. Let say some Hokkien businessmen from China were led by the Spirit to visit a church. A brother in the church was moved to speak in the Hokkien tongue for their sake. But if there is no interpreter/translator, he should shut up! Why? The rest in the church doesn’t know Hokkien! The church is NOT edified if there is no translator.

Read 1Cor 14:1-5

Expectations and Reasonable Service

Unrealistic expectation is the bitch of all frustration!

https://www.facebook.com/sing.f.lau/posts/10210468870813536
November 25, 2017

#reasonable_service
#expectations

The meme in this article, http://www.inspiremore.com/marriage-killer/, caught my attention; it illustrates an axiom, "unrealistic expectation is the bitch of all frustration"; closely related is "uncommunicated expectation is the bane of annoyance."

I substituted the noble word "mother" with one that is apt for the evil spawned.

The axiom probably applies to all sorts of relationships. Let your expectations of others match those that they have of themselves.

But if you are convinced that their expectations of themselves are below their persons or dignity, then help them to raise their expectations of themselves.

The gospel not only makes plain God's expectation of His children, but He also raises their expectation of themselves as God's redeemed and purified unto Himself.

Titus 2
11 ¶ For the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men,
12 Teaching us that, denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously, and godly, in this present world;
13 Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ;
14 Who gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works.

Romans 12:1
I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service.

"Except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish"

https://www.facebook.com/sing.f.lau/posts/1482222291012
November 25, 2010

Luke 13:3 "I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish."

17 Comments
=======

Alan
Sing sir, could you expound this scripture for me? it appears to me to have eternal consequences and to be speaking perhaps of (I would have to say make believers or false believers) that bear no fruit. That is if you read the parable that follows directly to illustrate our Lord's meaning. Where would that put supposed non-believing elect?

Sing
LIKEWISE... LIKEWISE... LIKEWISE... what kind of perishing is spoken of?

Alan
So if we don't repent we will die physically? yes but we will all die likewise, read on to the parable of the tree that does not bear fruit it will be thrown in the fire surely that speaks of something other than physical death.

Sing
Alan, look at the text carefully, PLEASE....

Here is the passage:
13:1 ¶ There were present at that season some that told him of the Galilaeans, whose blood Pilate had mingled with their sacrifices.
2 And Jesus answering said unto them, Suppose ye that these Galilaeans were sinners above all the Galileans, because they suffered such things?
3 I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish.

What happened... Galileans had died cruel and humiliating death under Roman's oppression. LIKEWISE happened in 70AD.

Concerning the parable of the tree that does not bear fruit... do you think Christ is expecting a dead tree to bear fruit, or do you think Christ expects living trees to bear fruit?

Do you think Christ expects those who have eternal life to bear spiritual fruit, or those who are in the state of sin and death to bear fruit?

If the latter, what kind of punishment will they get for their failure to be fruit? Eternal punishment, or temporal punishment...

Remember the parables were all addressed at God's children among the Jews.

Remember what Peter said to them on the day of Pentecost?

"40 And with many other words did he testify and exhort, saying, Save yourselves from this untoward generation."

That generation of Jews was destined for destruction in 70AD. Apostle Peter reminded them again in his epistles...

ANY salvation that requires man's action CANNOT possibly be ETERNAL salvation... because the bestowal of eternal salvation by God's free grace is ABSOLUTE, INDISPENSABLE, PRE-REQUISITE for man to act spiritually... and in acting, he secures TEMPORAL salvation, i.e. his well-being here in this present life.

If you understand the last statement, you are on a sound first base.

Alan
I understand the last statement. But let's back up a bit nobody said the tree is dead! You don't fertilize dead trees! now if you say then it is speaking of the elect it can't be because he says after fertilizing it if it doesn't bear fruit then it's off to the fire.

Sing
Ok, let's forget about the tree. The parable is about PEOPLE.
What kind of people?

Do you fertilize those dead in trespasses and sin? if you do, how do you do that?
Isn't it true that only the living can be fertilized... and only the living can be expected to produce fruit?

Fruitlessness is in the context of the living. Spiritual fruit can only be expected from spiritually alive people. It is the spiritually alive people that have the real problem of being unfruitful.

Fruitlessness is NEVER a problem of those dead in trespasses and sins.

All the above are basic and common sense.

Sing
Yes, they will perish in a like manner... LIKEWISE... LIKEWISE... LIKEWISE... in bloody and humiliating death in the hands of the Romans! Get the point!

Alan
so everybody who doesn't repent will die a bloody physical death. Hmmmn! really. oh except the believing and unbelieving elect of course, cos they can do as they please.

Sing
Please remember the context... context... context of those words spoken to some particular Jews in a particular situation inquiring about some particular issue.

If you want to draw a lesson, then it would be this: unbelief will bring its ill consequences.

Alan
but to who? surely not the elect.

Sing
What to who? Please explain.

Alan
@ Sing
If you want to draw a lesson, then it would be this: unbelief will bring its ill consequences.
not the elect though.

Sing
Oh yes, for the elect!
The elect is not exempted from ill consequences in this life. Scourging and chastisement are the lots of God's disobedient children!

6 For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth.
7 If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not?
8 But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons.

Alan
ok thanks.

Wednesday, November 24, 2021

Preach away from your pews!!

Speaking to yourselves in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs,
singing and making melody in your heart to the Lord;

https://www.facebook.com/sdcpenang/posts/2825841370990991

#singing
#the_songs_of_the_LORD
#prophesying

Preach away from your pews!!

1Chronicles 25:
1 Moreover David and the captains of the host separated to the service of the sons of Asaph, and of Heman, and of Jeduthun, who should PROPHESY with harps, with psalteries, and with cymbals: and the number of the workmen according to their service was:

2. Of the sons of Asaph; Zaccur, and Joseph, and Nethaniah, and Asarelah, the sons of Asaph under the hands of Asaph, which PROPHESIED according to the order of the king.
3 Of Jeduthun: the sons of Jeduthun; Gedaliah, and Zeri, and Jeshaiah, Hashabiah, and Mattithiah, six, under the hands of their father Jeduthun, who PROPHESIED with a harp, to give thanks and to praise the LORD...
6 All these were under the hands of their father for song in the house of the LORD, with cymbals, psalteries, and harps, for the service of the house of God, according to the king's order to Asaph, Jeduthun, and Heman.
7 So the number of them, with their brethren that were instructed in the songs of the LORD, even all that were cunning, was two hundred fourscore and eight.

Singing the songs of the LORD in the house of the LORD is prophesying,

The singers of the songs of the LORD are exercising a prophetic ministry through their singing; a prophetic ministry is a ministry of proclaiming and communicating the truth of God.

Note carefully the designation attached to each of these three leaders together, and singly: ‘of Asaph, of Heman and of Jeduthun, who should prophesy’ (v1); Asaph – ‘which prophesied according to the order of the king’ (v2); Heman – ‘the king’s seer in the words of God’ (v5); and Jeduthun: ‘who prophesied with a harp to give thanks, and to praise the LORD’ (v3).

These designations clearly indicate the prophetic nature of their singing ministry, i.e. songs must proclaim the glorious truth of redemption purposed, and executed/accomplished by the LORD, and applied to the benefits of His elect people.

Hymns properly sung is like preaching on the subject being sung. They are intended for the edification and sanctification of saints and the conversion of sinners.

Ephesians 5
18 And be not drunk with wine, wherein is excess; but be filled with the Spirit;
19 Speaking to yourselves in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody in your heart to the Lord.

Col 3:16
Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly in all wisdom; teaching and admonishing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing with grace in your hearts to the Lord.

Now everyone can prophesy/preach from the comfort of the pews... SING the songs of the LORD; sing heartily and lustily.

Beware of singing lies in the house of the LORD. Remember the warning against the sacrifice of fool - "Keep thy foot when thou goest to the house of God, and be more ready to hear, than to give the sacrifice of fools: for they consider not that they do evil." Ecc 5:1.

Let us all be preaching by singing the glorious truths of God and His work of redemption – to give thanks and praises unto our LORD.

The new covenant requires congregational singing in worship services – not solos, duets, or choir!

Monday, November 22, 2021

There are two distinct comings to Christ

https://www.facebook.com/sing.f.lau/posts/10217807520475191
November 21, 2020

#two_distinct_comings

There are two distinct comings to Christ

John 6:37
"All that the Father giveth me shall come to me;
... and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out."

TWO distinct comings are spoken of:
- The first coming involves the complete number of God's elect: 'all that the Father giveth me shall come to me.' Note the simple present tense "giveth" - this speaks of the Father's ongoing work of effectual calling individual elect. This is distinct from "all which he (Father) hath given me...." That means that not a single elect will fail to come to Christ in this manner. This is the coming to Christ as the effect of the effectual call of God, by His Spirit and the eternal Word. It is this effectual call alone that guarantees ALL that the Father GIVES to Christ (in the effectual call out of the state of sin and death to that of grace and salvation) shall come to Christ, shall be united to Christ. God, by Him sovereign almighty power, does the calling, and each elect is called out of the state of sin and death, brought to righteousness and eternal life in Christ Jesus.

John 6:45 "It is written in the prophets, And they shall be all taught of God. Every man, therefore, that hath heard, and hath learned of the Father, cometh unto me." [This coming is true of every elect... since every elect is taught of God at effectual calling].

Heb 10:15 "Whereof the Holy Ghost also is a witness to us: for after that he had said before,16 This is the covenant that I will make with them after those days, saith the Lord, I will put my laws into their hearts, and in their minds will I write them."

- The second coming in the same verse deals with each individual child of God - whom God Himself has drawn and united to Christ in the effectual calling - who do hear the gospel call and come to Christ. The words 'him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out' are obviously said to encourage and comfort those weary, heavy laden, and hesitating souls to personally and consciously draw nigh to Christ and rest in Him. If these words refer to each elect being drawn to Christ by the sovereign act of God, then these words of comfort and assurance are rendered incomprehensible and meaningless.

There are two comings: the coming to Christ by the effectual call of God, and the coming to Christ through the gospel call of a preacher.

Of the first coming, each and every elect of God will come unto Christ through God's sovereign act of effectual calling. John 6:45 speaks of the same.

Of the second coming, each and everyone who hears and believes the gospel comes to Christ through faith in Him.

Thursday, November 18, 2021

First death, second death...

Mat 27:52 "And the graves were opened;
and many bodies of the saints which slept arose..."
This is the first resurrection.




https://www.facebook.com/sing.f.lau/posts/10200999453124012
November 17, 2013

First death, second death...

I may sound silly. Still, I need to ask... I'm already notorious for asking questions.
Please help me with some light. Thank you in advance.

Q1. What is the first death - death in Adam, or death at the end of life?

Q2. Now the second death - when does/did it happen to a man? judgment at death at the end of life, or judgment on resurrection day?

Re 20:6 Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years.

Concerning Rev 20:6...

Q3. The reigning with him a thousand years: is the reign with Christ BEFORE or AFTER the second death?

Q4. Does "on such the second death hath no power" imply no such exemption from the power of the first death?

Q5. What is the power of the first death?

- Can such a man (those in Q4) do anything to avoid it?

Any comment which can shed light to the above inquiry is very welcome.
======

17 Comments

Josiah Lau
Very pointed questions, dad, I'm just thinking that besides the answer to Q4 being a "Yes" - that it does have that implication - 'hath part in the first resurrection' also implies that one has died the first death. One can't be resurrected unless one is dead.

Josiah Lau
But I went off the point in my answer above... sorry. If your question goes toward to an implied non-exemption then it's a different one altogether.

Charles Page
1) death of Adam, we all die a natural death 2) 2nd death on resurrection/judgment day 3) before the second death 4) no one is exempted from the power of the first death 5) death Hell and the grave is the power of the first death and no you can't d… See more

Sing F Lau
Thanks, Josiah... I need a good sounding board to assist me to think.
"on such the second death hath no power"
======
On such that the second death has power, they end up in the lake of fire.
So, the questions:
On such that the first death has power, where do they end up with?
On such that the first death has NO power, where do they end up with?

Josiah Lau
Dad, I have been thinking a bit and here're some of my struggles with the chapter...
(a bit different from your line of thought)
At first, I thought the first death is death in Adam. We all died that first death in Adam. Our physical death is, I think, just a symbol for that.

Similarly, when we talk about Christ dying for our sins, Christ’s physical death never mattered. Christ shedding blood was like the shedding of the blood of animals, the figure of the actual death that he died for in our place – the spiritual death that is being forsaken by the Father, separation from God. The death that Christ died that saved us was Him taking our sins upon Himself and suffering the wrath of, and separation from, God. (Maybe related to this is how we see the Lord's Supper as a symbol, not literally 'this is my body'.)

Also, Enoch and Elijah never died the physical death but were taken up to glory. They would not have gone through the first resurrection if we understand that resurrection to be physical.

If death (assuming this is the first one) passed on all men through Adam, then Enoch and Elijah are part of that death, and this cannot include the physical death. Additionally, if we take 1 Thess 4:16-17 to have happened before this juncture, there will also be those Christians who are still alive and are caught up into the clouds. These also will not undergo the physical resurrection.

I'm curious to know whether you understand verse 1 onwards to be talking about Jesus Christ and the beginning of the gospel age. If that is the correct understanding (and pardon me if not) then that would explain why verse 5 says 'this is the first resurrection' because everything flows from verse 1 where Jesus Christ defeats the devil in the first resurrection and brings everyone from dead back to life (in the legal sense)

So I would (at least preliminarily, with my limited understanding) conclude that the first death speaks of Adam's death, the first resurrection speaks of our salvation in Christ, and the second death is judgment day.

Sing F Lau
What is the first resurrection? Most relate it to regeneration! And they quote John 5:25,28 to validate their idea.
25 Verily, verily, I say unto you, The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God: and they that hear shall live... 28 Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice.

The two verses are saying the same thing!!! See the parallels:

- "the hour is coming..." in both verses.
- "the dead shall hear..." "in the graves shall hear"
- "the voice of the Son of God..."

Why can't it be a true and literal resurrection, as indicated here...

Verse 28 reminds me of Mt 27
51 And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent;
52 And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose,
53 And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many.

And this: Rev 20
4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
5 But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.

I'm beginning to think that "the rest of the dead" here refers to the dead of God's children who were not resurrected in that FIRST RESURRECTION!!!

Charles Page
is this in reference to 70 AD? interesting!

Sing F Lau
John 5:25 Verily, verily, I say unto you, The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God: and they that hear shall live...
=======
If this is made to speak of regeneration, the necessary implication is that PRIOR to this there was NO regeneration.

If this refers to literal resurrection, it was fulfilled a little while shortly at Christ's own resurrection.

Is this valid?

Sing F Lau
John 5:28 Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice.
======

If this is made to refer to the resurrection at Christ's return, then the time frame "for the hour is coming" is entirely out of place. Something which is a few thousand years into the future cannot possibly be referred to in such an imminent time frame.

But some will retort with 2Pe 3:8 "But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day." Sound bytitis is not an uncommon disease!

Sing F Lau
Thanks, Josiah. Your point on the substitutionary death of Christ is interesting. You are right, it is not so much the physical aspect - else the redeemed wouldn't need to undergo physical death... rather it is being eternally forsaken by God, i.e. cast into the lake of fire.

Therefore only those whose names were not written in the book of life were cast into the lake of fire!

Sing F Lau
Q1. What is the first death - death in Adam, or death at the end of life?

Charles: 1) death of Adam , we all die a natural death.

Q1a: What about that statement in Hebrews: "And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment." Heb 9:27

Please tell, which death is this spoken of?

Charles Page
I am at a loss for an answer! I have been raised with the belief this was our end of life death. then would come our judgment but that was then...

Sing F Lau
The first resurrection was as real and literal as the second resurrection will be.
The first took place together with Christ's real and literal resurrection... Mt 27:51-53.

Charles Page
v53 after His resurrection
what am I missing about Heb 9:27?

Sing F Lau
The FIRST resurrection occurred right after Christ's resurrection...
Those resurrected in Mt 27:53 are referred to in Rev 20:4-6!

The first death is death at the end of life;
The second death at the great judgment.

"And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment" - necessary means the death spoken of is still future with respect to a man who is living... i.e death at the end of his life.

Charles Page
how do you make this connection of Mt 27:53 to Rv 20:4-6 not questioning the belief just curious about how you made this connection. Good morning!

Sing F Lau
Q1. What is the first death? Ans: Death at the end of one's life on earth

Q2. Now the second death - when does/did it happen to a man?

Re 20:6 Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years.

Concerning Rev 20:6...

Q3. The reigning with him a thousand years: is the reign with Christ BEFORE or AFTER the second death?

Q4. Does "on such the second death hath no power" implies no such exemption from the power of the first death?

Q5. What is the power of the first death?

- Can such a man (those in Q4) do anything to avoid it?