Things New and Old

Ancient truths revealed in the Scriptures are often forgotten, disbelieved or distorted, and therefore lost in the passage of time. Such ancient truths when rediscovered and relearned are 'new' additions to the treasury of ancient truths.

Christ showed many new things to the disciples, things prophesied by the prophets of old but hijacked and perverted by the elders and their traditions, but which Christ reclaimed and returned to His people.

Many things taught by the Apostles of Christ have been perverted or substituted over the centuries. Such fundamental doctrines like salvation by grace and justification have been hijacked and perverted and repudiated by sincere Christians. These doctrines need to be reclaimed and restored to God's people.

There are things both new and old here. "Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things"
2Ti 2:7.

Friday, June 30, 2023

Everlasting and forever - both have starting and ending points

That which was declared
 as everlasting and forever by God Himself
was brought to an end by God Himself too.

A searching soul inquired:
Thank you, pastor, for the explanation. The word everlasting, does it really mean last only until a time frame? And if the goats are the elect who are disobedient, does that mean God died for the goats too? Can I make that conclusion?
===========

An answer:
Let me commend your humble spirit of inquiring to understand the subject matter. May our gracious Lord bless you with understanding. Amen

"The word everlasting, does it really means last only until the appointed time by God" - phrased this way would be clearer; it has a time frame indeed, i.e. it began and will end at specific times appointed by God.

Everlasting ≠ eternal

Both "everlasting" and "for ever" are in the realm of time; there are beginning/ending points appointed by God.

Here are simple examples:

Genesis 17:8 KJT
And I will give unto thee, and to thy seed after thee, the land wherein thou art a stranger, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession; and I will be their God.

Genesis 48:4 KJT
And said unto me, Behold, I will make thee fruitful, and multiply thee, and I will make of thee a multitude of people; and will give this land to thy seed after thee for an everlasting possession.

The "everlasting possession" began at a specific point in time, and lasted as long as the LORD had ordained and willed it; until then, the gates of hell (e.g. the Assyrians, the Babylonians, the Medeo-Persians, etc) shall not prevail against it; and then, at the appointed time, the end came; theocratic Israel was long gone, formally ended in 70AD.

"For ever" ≠ eternal

Gen 13:15 KJT
For all the land which thou seest, to thee will I give it, and to thy seed for ever.

Exo 12:24 KJT
And ye shall observe this thing for an ordinance to thee and to thy sons for ever.

Even so, the "forever" ordinance was made obsolete and ended by the same LORD at the appointed time. Christ came and the old covenant ordinance was abolished.

That which was declared as everlasting and forever by God Himself was brought to an end by God Himself too.

May the Lord grant you, my dear ...,  understanding.

Keep asking questions. All I wish is that you UNDERSTAND what I'm saying - that's my role. Only the Spirit of God will show you the truth and enable you to embrace it for the good of your own soul.

Hell is real; God's children can avoid it during the intermediate state. Our blessed Redeemer declared so. I don't want to end up there by my failure of not warning Christ's little ones.

AMEN.

====== 

Thank you... And if the goats are the elect who are disobedient, does that mean God died for the goats too? Can I make that conclusion?

======

Christ Jesus, the blessed Redeemer, died to save all the elect from the eternal lake of fire. So, if the goats are the elect who are disobedient, then obviously they are also among those redeemed by the Saviour.

It is strange that many cannot and refuse to believe the obvious truth that there are disobedient ones among God's children. It's just so convenient to say the goats represent the non-elect! To do that, the necessary implications are:
- (i) that all the redeemed are obedient, and there are no disobedient among the redeemed by Christ;
- (ii) that the Lord REQUIRED the non-elect, dead in trespasses and sins (i.e. the goats), to do works of kindness to the His redeemed people (i.e. the sheep).

Each view has its necessary implications; take care of them.

The Scriptures speak of the disobedient people of God frequently. They are warned against the intermediate hell - they can end up there if they are disobedient.  BUT they are never warned against the eternal lake of fire, why? Christ has immutably saved them with eternal salvation from the lake of fire. Rev 20.15

All the elect whom Christ HAS SAVED with eternal salvation, they are effectually called by God, one by one at God's own appointed time, out of their native state of condemnation, death, and alienation INTO the state of grace and salvation in Jesus Christ. This alone makes them perfectly fit to be transformed/resurrected unto eternal glory.

Of all the effectually called, some are converted through the ministry of the word to various extents, while others are not.

Of those that are converted through the gospel ministry, some become good and obedient disciples - fruitful disciples represented by the sheep in the parable; others are not obedient, represented by the goats.

See Mt 13 on the parable of the 4 types of grounds.

Christ solemnly warned His own disciples of the danger of ending up in hell, exhorting them to take drastic actions to guard against sins, Mk 9.

The paragraph on the solemn warnings to His own disciples ( Mark 9:42-48) opens with these words -
42 ¶And whosoever shall offend one of these little ones that believe in me, it is better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he were cast into the sea.

Mt 25:45 reads
Then shall he answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to me.

Read the two verses slowly and you will notice they are closely related, and in the same context. 

May the Spirit of Christ give you understanding. Amen.

========

Preston
Matthew 7 seems to negate the goats being elect also. What say ye?
V23. I never knew you……

Sing F Lau
Preston, The 3-verse paragraph read thus:

Matthew 7
21 ¶Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.

22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?

23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.

Some observations:
It's about entering the kingdom of heaven, not heaven. God's children among the Jews were still in the earthly theocratic kingdom of Israel. Christ came to usher in the kingdom of heaven, and calling them to enter the kingdom of heaven.

Doing the will of the Father is the requirement... believing the One whom He has sent, even the Lord Jesus Christ, the promised Messiah.

God's children who are unbelieving in Christ turn their wonderful works into work of iniquity.

Matthew 17:5 KJT
While he yet spake, behold, a bright cloud overshadowed them: and behold a voice out of the cloud, which said, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; hear ye him.

God's will is, "Hear ye Him." But many of God's children among the Jews were unbelieving in Jesus Christ; He didn't fit their expectations of the promised Messiah.

Even so, today, many of God's children believe a christ not according to the Scriptures but various christs of man's imaginations and hallucinations.

In that sense Jesus never knew them: since they didn't believe Him as the Sent One; He acknowledged them not... though He knew them inside out.

Preston
Interesting thoughts, but I’m not making that theological jump.

Thanks for your thoughts.

Sing F Lau
Preston - Don't jump; avoid fractures!!

Bill Taylor
Sing - AMEN!

 

The Great Exchange - Double Imputation

In the Great Exchange, God executed the Double Imputation
God alone imputed Christ's righteousness to the elect;
He alone also imputed all the sins of the elect to Christ;
The elect is NOT INVOLVED in giving their sins to Christ;
this is a fable, a deformed fiction.


#the_great_exchange
#double_imputation
https://www.facebook.com/sing.f.lau/posts/pfbid02jQv3h73rBtD82XKKtse3zNM55pmDhYANR4yxwPpMYDMriNEDNiSvBoykHtUTdxB2l

[3/15/2021, 7:43 AM]

One Brother commented:
"One Great Exchange" indeed. It isn't an exchange at all when only one party decides to give as a Gift. When both parties willingly give then we would consider it as an exchange! The exchanges may not commensurate the same values; they do not matter as we are willing & happy in that exchange. In this One Great Exchange, only our God gives willingly. He imputed Christ's righteousness unto us AND takes all our sins away willingly on the cross of Calvary.

Yet, can it be an exchange when we struggle to hold on to the sins of our old self or even serving two masters? Do we struggle to give our parts when we exchange many things? Examples for services rendered in servicing our vehicles, paying doctors for consulted diagnoses or opinions or working for wages. Even with the tender love and care (TLC) of our parents towards us would they (hopefully) yearned for our love, obedience & many other positive responses to them.

Yet in the One Great Exchange I would reckon a hardly exchange at all. God imputed all Christ's righteousness unto us without waiting for us to give up all our sins willingly or otherwise. As thoughts run through mind, this is 'One Great Gift or Righteous Imputation'. We will still be glorified at the final judgement day even at our last breath we are still holding on to the last of our remnant sins. Our God guarantees! What a blessed assurance we have indeed!

-----------

[3/16/2021, 1:51 AM]
Sing Lau:

THANK YOU for aptly reminding us that our activities are indeed involved when we speak of our practical discipleship; our discipleship requires our ACTIVE participation – working out our own salvation with fear and trembling.

In this, we are dealing with God our Father…

Ps 51:1 "Have mercy upon me, O God, according to thy lovingkindness: according unto the multitude of thy tender mercies blot out my transgressions. 7 Purge me with hyssop, and I shall be clean: wash me, and I shall be whiter than snow. 9 Hide thy face from my sins, and blot out all mine iniquities."

2Cor 7:1 “Having, therefore, these promises, dearly beloved, let us cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of the flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God.”

2Ti 2:21 "If a man, therefore, purge himself from these, he shall be a vessel unto honour, sanctified, and meet for the master's use, and prepared unto every good work."

1 John 1:9 "If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness."

Though none of these passages equates to us putting our sins to Christ, yet they all exhort us to deal with our sins as God’s children and Christ’s redeemed.

So, we must guard ourselves against thinking of the double imputation involving any human activities. That’s where the Reformed brethren are all messed up; they introduce human roles and activities in the double imputation. They have no clue about the distinct facets of salvation - eternal, legal, vital, practical, and final.

Sadly, of those who know the distinct facets of salvation, few know how to apply them to rightly divide the word of truth.

Let us rehearse a few things:

1. The double imputation is executed by the LORD God, the Father of Jesus Christ, at the cross
a.  It is termed double-imputation because it involved God’s free and sovereign acts of LEGALLY imputing/accounting/reckoning the righteousness of Jesus Christ to all the elect represented by Him as well as imputing all the sins of all the elect to Christ. Theologians sometimes called this double imputation the Great Exchange.

b. There is only ONE active party in this legal transaction, the LORD God the Judge; He alone is the active subject in executing the Great Exchange, – a legal transaction; He alone, as the Judge, executed this legal act of exchange. God alone imputed Christ's righteousness to the elect; He alone also imputed all the sins of the elect to Christ. The elect is NOT INVOLVE in giving their sins to Christ; this is a fable, a fiction. 

c. In this Great Exchange, though the whole elect of God is involved, yet none of them played any role whatsoever; all are completely passive. It was a legal transaction that happened without any one of them personally involved; many had no personal existence yet.

d. In this Great Exchange, Christ Jesus is personally involved. It was His righteousness – His life of active and perfect obedience to all the laws of God, even unto death - therefore, He would have concurred perfectly with God’s act of imputing His righteousness to His people. The three Persons of the Godhead are perfectly in harmony with their purpose of redemption.

I hope this helps to put the double imputation in its proper legal context.

Check here to read the fable that "we give Christ our sin...  
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10218480783386343&id=1097484914&mibextid=Nif5oz 

Tuesday, June 27, 2023

Treacherous Abners in the kingdom

Treacherous Abners in the kingdom
2 Samuel 2-3

https://www.facebook.com/notes/10217726027557919/

Treacherous Abners in the kingdom
2 Samuel 2-3.

1. Abner opposing the kingdom through defiance
a. Look at Abner’s action! Abner knew very well that the Lord had promised the kingship to David. Saul his master had also declared, 1 Sam 24:10, and Abner being Saul’s captain would have heard the truth with his own ears. But he had great self-interest to safeguard, and instead of giving up and bowing to the Lord’s anointed king, he opposed David’s kingship.
- Abner’s defiance of installing Ishbosheth as king was an open act of rebellion against the Lord's anointed, who had plainly rejected Saul and chosen David king over Israel. Even Saul himself was fully aware and admitted to it in the presence of his own army, and Abner had heard with his own ears.
- In opposing the Lord’s anointed king, Abner was opposing the Lord’s kingship and will. He knew the Lord's will but chose to fly in the face of it. Beware of enthroning your own Ishbosheths… to maintain your own interest in defiance of the Lord’s king!

b. In 2Sam 2, the kingdom of the Lord’s chosen king has met with rebellion and opposition. And this kingdom conflict will continue in one form or another until Jesus comes in power and great glory… when all shall be put under His feet. And please note that this conflict comes or arises from WITHIN the nation of Israel!
- Opposition to God's truth comes from within the church! Who are the champions of the false gospel? Who advocates the lies of free will? Who pushes the lies of sola fideism, justification before God by man’s faith alone? Calvinists and Arminians alike. Who spread the lies of gospel regeneration – that a man must hear the gospel to be regenerated? Calvinists and Arminians alike! Enemies are from within! Not the godless heathen.
- If we are among God’s faithful, we must not allow or tolerate the present-day Abners to deter or depress or discourage us. We would remain loyal and faithful to Christ even if we are among the minority. Our allegiance is to Christ, even if His kingdom appears small and insignificant. Let us remain steadfast.
-  Abners’ defiance can certainly deter and discourage the faint-hearted. Let us be found loyal to Christ and His truth, let us resist them, and fight the good fight of faith. Don’t walk away from the good fight of faith. Let us not become or behave like Abners. His self-interests are high – captain of Saul’s army and all the prestige and power and privileges that come with it. So Abners would not give up nor submit to Christ

c. Let us be among those who loyally follow the Son of David, the Lord’s anointed… even if the rest of Israel rebel against the Lord’s anointed king. That’s our place and calling, no matter what the circumstances may be.
- Let us not surrender or compromise the crown right of Jesus Christ for some conveniences or selfish consideration. There is every reason to insist upon it and fight against those who would oppose it.
- Any opposition to the Lord’s anointed will eventually be crushed… see Ps 2!

2. Abner resisting the kingdom by force  (v12-32)
a. Please note that Abner is the aggressor in the whole affair. We read his aggressor’s move in verse 12.  They were marching to Hebron, but was intercepted at Gibeon by Joab and his soldiers.
- The conflict we see in Gibeon was not a chance encounter and civil conflict between Saul’s and David’s armies, but Abner’s deliberate attempt to assert Saul’s rule on David’s kingdom! Abner was on the attack!
- He came on the offensive, and as an aggressor… he instigated the fight – v14,27. He resisted the kingdom by force!  We must not be diverted by his civility, i.e. warning to Asahel. He came to resist and to kill!
- And Abner’s action is all that more condemnable because Abner was clearly aware that the Lord Jehovah had promised the kingship to David. Even his own words condemned him, 3:9-10, 17-18.

b. How often many in the church behave like Abner – trying to impose their own will and their own ways… despite God’s plain words, despite their own testimony of God’s words, despite the testimony and exhortation of others.
- Like Abner, it is possible to know the truth but reject the truth, to quote the truth but not embrace the truth, to claim to hold the truth but yet attack the truth! Abners are everywhere, and that same spirit is found right within each one of us too.  Let us banish any trace of the spirit of Abner within us.

3. Abner seeking the kingdom for self-interest (3:1-12)
a. These verses highlight a contrast. Both verses 1 & 6 note the ongoing war between the house of David and the house of Saul. V1 indicates that David waxed stronger and stronger, and Saul’s house weaker and weaker.  Verses 2-5 give an example of the progress of David’s house during the Hebron days.

Abner too was making himself strong in the house of Saul, manifested in his taking one of Saul's concubines as his own! In the culture of those days, the man who took over the concubines of the deceased king thereby asserted his claim to succeed to the throne. We don’t how far Abner intended to go in usurping Ishbosheth for the kingdom.

Ishbosheth may have been a puppet and a weakling, but he was not stupid. He raised a big fuss over Abner’s ploy (v7) that Abner’s purpose was frustrated and hindered. Abner was made to appear treasonous! Being frustrated in his ambition, Abner out of spite and logic decided to switch allegiance and pull the army under his charge into the kingdom of David… read his own words in 3:9-10. And there was nothing Ishbosheth could do about it.

b. What explains Abner’s move or turnaround?
Abner was not driven to this act by the truth of God but by selfish motive. He did not seek to expand David’s kingdom because he believed the truth and submit to the authority of the Lord’s promise BUT because he sought his own advantage and advancement.

If Ishbosheth was not going to toe his line and dance to his tune, then his next best option was to swing his support to David and use his powerful influence over Saul’s army as a bargaining chip with David, and thus securing for himself a powerful spot in David’s kingdom. Ah, how very self-serving!
- Abner quotes Scriptures only when it promotes and support pro-Abner’s move. Abner seeks the kingdom not because it is a matter of obedience to God but because it is a political move that is advantageous to him. It is not love for the Lord who redeemed him, but concern over his own benefits is all that matters to him!

c. And there are Abners in the church in every age. Abner’s syndrome is ever lurking within each one of us. Even faithful preachers, for example, who desire to proclaim and make plain God’s truth, know the temptation when they seem more concerned with whether God’s people will be impressed with them, like them, congratulate and praise them. The self-serving spirit of Abner is lurking within each one of us. Do we seek God’s kingdom for self-interest? To make a name for yourself? Or to elevate Christ? 

===========

Comments

Charles Page
Sing F Lau, I have had a lot of association with the US Military in a civilian capacity with all branches of service. And the war-like elements of Saul and David and their captains are in the military. Even in the best of military men, I seemed to sense almost a demonic spirit disguised as loyalty. Military people think differently than civilians. I remained a civilian in my work with the military and I saw things differently than most. Military loyalty is I suppose a necessary evil but in the final analysis, has to be disbanded. That is IMO why God choose Solomon over David to build His temple.

Uniformity and loyalty are a volatile mix! LOL, I am a barbaric Baptist soldier...what am I talking about!

Sing F Lau
Captain Charles, loyalty to Christ. Nothing more and nothing less. It is the spiritual warfare that we are engaged in.

It is the GOOD fight of faith. Shun all other fights!

Sing F Lau
By God's grace, I was instrumental in gathering the Ipoh East Church. The church was covenanted in Nov 2001, with the 1689 BCoF as its Doctrinal Standard. I ministered to the church for several years and taught the church the gospel of FREE grace. Towards the end of 2006, the church invited a certain RB Rev. from Sydney to minister for a month. After that, I was informed that the church had decided to reject my pastoral oversight because of doctrinal differences. I respected their choice.

The IEC called the pastor of another RB church to provide spiritual oversight.

I heard today that not long after he introduced the Ipoh East Church to the oversight of an Anglican pastor. The Anglican pastor advised the church to close shop and join with the Anglicans. And those RBs agreed!!!

3 For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears;
4 And they shall turn away their ears from the truth and shall be turned unto fables.
5 But watch thou in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, make full proof of thy ministry

Charles Page
treacherous indeed - we all have a warlike spirit within us (James 4) and it can be for the regenerate good or the bad.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ujBjUriUjI

from a PB to a RB to Anglaking to a toe kisser how high can you go?

Sing F Lau
Actually, many RBs are only baptized Presbies.... they drink deeply from Hodges, Berkhof, Murray, etc.
They are ignorant of the far richer heritage of the great old Baptists.

Sing F Lau
PB - Particular Baptist >>>> RB - Reformed Baptist >>>> UB - Undone Baptist.

Charles Page
Sing, aren't Hodges, Berkhof, and Murray moderated Calvinist - free moral offer to all instead of a particular atonement?

Charles Page
BTW what about Joab's treachery?

Sing F Lau
Joab has his own problems... and is dealt with accordingly.

Sing F Lau
Yes, they are new school Presbies... and RBs love them so.
The RBs slander the old-school Baptists as hyper... how convenient!

Charles Page
Sing, give me some names of old-school non-Calvinist Baptist preachers prior to Gill. Is there a historical continuity of Sovereign Grace Baptist preachers from the first century?

Is Augustine a part of that lineage?

Charles Page
Do you subscribe to the London confessions of the Particular Baptist? Some of the RBs believe they support their new school thought.

Sing F Lau
I do, and the new school are entirely deceived.

I have conclusively proven that the RBs are bastards, that is, they are not the true offspring of the Particular Baptists who framed that Confession.

Charles Page
Abner’s syndrome is ever lurking within each one of us. Sing, your post makes me feel sorry for Abner because I see myself in him. Zealous pride and loyalty, always subservient to greater personalities, torn between powers. He is a lot like the Saul of Tarsus concerned about being the greater of Pharisees than his own peers.

Sing F Lau
Triple like your comment above... Abner is ever lurking within this heart - this DECEITFUL heart.

Charles Page
Are you familiar with the Philadelphia Confession and in your opinion is it different than the 1689 London Confession?

Charles Page
looking forward to what you have to say about Joab. Joab is the regenerate person who will kill you thinking he is doing God a service.

Sing F Lau
I have heard of PC... but have never seen one.
I am quite familiar with the 1689 BCoF... having gone through it several times with the church on Wednesday evenings in the last 18 years.

Saul of Tarsus is the regenerate person who will kill you thinking he is doing God a service!

Charles Page
What about the games men play to demonstrate domination?
I've seen this in the ministry. dominion!!!

Sing F Lau
@ What about the games men play to demonstrate domination?
=======
SICKOS games... and ANTI Christ too!
It is a natural instinct to dominate.
It takes divine grace for this rotten heart to serve the saints!

Matt 23:
8 But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren.
9 And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.
10 Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ. 11 But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant.

In Christ's kingdom, true greatness is measured by one's servanthood to His redeemed.
I have personally known two men who practice ecclesiastical domination, whose empire now has collapsed! I am an eyewitness! Known them personally... cross swords with them two... their dream empire has collapsed.

God's meek children know how to rebel and fight to be Christ's free men too. Let the sickos be reminded!

Charles Page
"In Christ's kingdom, true greatness is measured by one's servanthood to His redeemed." ...his precious redeemed!

Sing F Lau
Seven Amen to "...his precious redeemed!"

Are you rich toward God?

Succulent longan!

 
Are you rich toward God?

Luke 12:21 "So is he that layeth up treasure for himself, and is not rich toward God."

 A Brother introduced our first service and read and exhorted us from Luke 12:13-34.

Verse 15 reads, "And he said unto them, Take heed, and beware of covetousness: for a man's life consisteth not in the abundance of the things which he possesseth."

When a child of God is deceived into thinking that his life consists of the possession of an abundance of the things in this brief life, he ends up laying up treasures for himself; he makes himself a pauper toward God.

"He also that received seed among the thorns is he that heareth the word; and the care of this world, and the deceitfulness of riches, choke the word, and he becometh unfruitful." Matt 13:22.

"So is he that layeth up treasure for himself, and is not rich toward God" - this is dealing with  God's children. He expects His children to be rich towards Him; this is a reasonable and just expectation since in Jesus Christ He has blessed with all the spiritual blessings in the heavenly places.

It warns His children against the prevalent danger - the deceitfulness of earthly riches, and the foolishness of labouring for and the propensity of even God's children trusting in earthly riches, making them poor towards God - unfruitful, barren.

"The life is more than meat, and the body more than raiment."

How to be rich toward God?

"But rather seek ye the kingdom of God; and all these things shall be added unto you." Luke 12:31.

As we seek to be rich toward God, He shall make us rich with our needs; as we seek the kingdom of God, He shall add to us all these things that we have need of.,

NO MAN IS POOR WHO SEEKS TO BE RICH TOWARD GOD; God has given His words, "all these things shall be added unto you."

That should settle the matter.

1689.11.1 - Justification by free grace stated and defined


1689.11.1 - Justification by free grace stated and defined

"Those whom God effectually calleth, He also freely justifieth,(1) not by infusing righteousness into them, but by pardoning their sins, and by accounting and accepting their persons as righteous;(2) not for anything wrought in them, or done by them, but for Christ's sake alone;(3) not by imputing faith itself, the act of believing, or any other evangelical obedience to them, as their righteousness; but by imputing Christ's active obedience unto the whole law, and passive obedience in His death for their whole and sole righteousness,(4) they receiving and resting on Him and His righteousness by faith, which faith they have not of themselves; it is the gift of God.(5) 1. Ro 3:24; 8:30. 2. Ro 4:5-8; Eph 1:7. 3. 1Co 1:30-31; Ro 5:17-19. 4. Php 3:8-9; Eph 2:8-10. 5. Jn 1:12; Ro 5:17.

 

1. The Context of Justification
a. Effectual call to grace and salvation: ‘those whom God effectually called, He ALSO…’
- Therefore they are never separated! The effectual call to grace and salvation involves justification, regeneration, and adoption. 

b. ALL these THREE divine activities are necessary to bring an elect out of his native state of condemnation, death, and alienation to that of grace and salvation in Christ Jesus.
- These divine activities of justification, regeneration and adoption are necessary to UNDO the condemnation, death, and alienation respectively, bringing a man into s STATE of grace and salvation in Jesus Christ.

2. The Subject of Justification
a. It is God the Father: ‘He also…’ Whom He effectually calls, He ALSO justifies.
- He effectually calls those dead in trespasses and sins; He ALSO justifies such. God justifies the ungodly who are INCAPABLE of faith
- So the particular aspect of justification here is the applied/vital justification at the effectual calling by God the Father.

3. The Manner of Justification
a. It is freely by God’s grace: ‘He also freely justifieth.’
- Freely means without man meeting any condition… for an unjustified man, still in his native condemned state, can’t meet any! This is simple and plain enough.
- Freely means just that... without any condition on man's part.
- The fiction of justification by faith alone is repudiated! Do you get it?

4. The Essence of Justification
a. Errors negated: It is...
- ‘not by infusing righteousness into them…’

b. Truth affirmed:
: ‘but by pardoning their sins
: and accounting (a legal transaction)
: and accepting their persons as righteous…’
- God APPLIES the righteousness of Jesus Christ to them personally, and forgives them of all their sins; on this ground alone He accepts them as righteous.

5. The Ground of Justification
a. Errors negated:
- i. 'not for anything wrought in them, or done by them…’
- The grace of faith is a fruit wrought in them.
- Faith, (their act of believing) is something done by them.
- Both are excluded from justification by God.
- Sola fidei is repudiated. Do you read it? Is that too hard to understand, or is it of wilful unbelief???

ii. ‘not by imputing faith itself, the act of believing…’
- Therefore in Gen 15:6, where faith is imputed, is NOT NOT NOT talking about the justification of Abraham BEFORE God.

iii. ‘or by any other evangelical obedience to them, as their righteousness…”
- Faith, believing in Christ IS evangelical obedience. Isn't that simple and plain enough?
- The "justification before God by faith alone" (man's act of believing - an act of evangelical obedience) is fiction and fable plainly repudiated! Do you read it? Is that too hard to understand, or is it of wilful unbelief???

b. Truth affirmed:
i. ‘but by imputing Christ's active obedience unto the whole law …’
- Christ's active obedience to the whole law is the righteousness of God's own provision; justification before God requires the imputation of Christ's to the condemned.
- Imputation of the faith to the believing one, as in Gen 15:1-6, is NOT justification per se. That's a fable.

ii. ‘and passive obedience in His death …’
- In His death, Christ suffered and endured the curse and condemnation of sins in the place of His people, securing full forgiveness for all their sins.

iii. ‘for their whole and sole righteousness.’
- The righteousness of Christ (by His active and passive obedience is the whole (complete, nothing lacking) and sole (alone, only) righteousness of the justified.
- Man's faith is NOT, NOT, NOT in the equation of God's act of justifying the condemned; it is so carefully excluded. Isn't that simple and plain enough?

6. The Evidence of Justification
a. The pronoun "they receiving and resting..." speaks of those whom God has ALREADY freely justified. This is obvious.
- Those still in their native state of condemnation, dead, and alienated are INCAPABLE of receiving and resting on Christ and His righteousness by faith. To say otherwise is just stupid, i.e. lacking common sense.

b. Faith in the context is defined as ‘receiving and resting on Him [Christ] and His righteousness.’
- The application of righteousness by free grace precedes the reception of the same by faith in Christ.
- Justification by free grace is completed before believing its truth is possible!

c. Both the Calvinists as well as the Arminians fail to recognize this BASIC fact, and end up conditioning their justification before God upon their faith! What a gross and grievous error!
- Faith is the work of grace by the Spirit of Christ in the hearts of those already freely justified by God; it is not a native ability in an unjustified condemned man, exercised by the unjustified in order to be justified!

=======

Don't jump and say what about the next paragraph!
Just stay with Para 1 first. Any question?
Wait for the exposition on 1689.11.2

Saturday, June 24, 2023

The Alone Instrument of Justification... Yet not Alone in the Person Justified


This is what the old school Particular Baptists summarized in the 1689 CoF, the second paragraph of chapter 11:


2. Justification and its Relation to Man's Faith

Faith thus receiving and resting on Christ and His righteousness, is the alone instrument of justification;(6) yet it is not alone in the person justified, but ever accompanied with all other saving graces, and is no dead faith, but worketh by love.(7) 

6. Ro 3:28.   7. Gal 5:6; Jas 2:17,22,26.


Some observations on the above:


1. The essence of faith defined:

- ‘Faith, thus receiving and resting on Christ and His righteousness.’

- Justification before God is based on solely Christ and His righteousness alone, and thus justification manifests/evidences itself in the same, i.e. receiving and resting on Christ and His righteousness.

- This is the faith produced during the effectual call to grace and salvation, SPECIFICALLY, worked within the heart of a justified elect by the indwelling Spirit of God, the Spirit of adoption who works all the saving graces in an effectually called elect.

2. The function of faith as ‘the alone instrument of justification' :

a. Error negated

: it is not the function of an instrument to secure/obtain justification. This has been repudiated and denied multiple times in paragraph 1. Yet, this is the fiction believed by many who claim they hold to the 1689 CoF as their doctrinal standard.

b. Truth affirmed

: the function of faith as an instrument is to manifest, evidence, demonstrate, or attest to the justified state by God’s free grace.

: Faith is the instrument/means to experience the blessedness of the justified state by God’s free grace.

- The way faith is related to justification is like the way breath is related to life; they are both effects and manifestations.

3. Faith is a saving grace worked by the Holy Spirit in the person justified by God

a. ‘Yet it is not alone in the person justified.’

- The grace of faith can only be found in a justified man; it is an effect of justification. The just shall live by faith; it is only the justified that is capable of believing, i.e. living by faith!

- The unjustified is INCAPABLE of having faith in order to be justified before God. Sola fidei is just a lie and fable.

- But faith is NOT the only saving grace worked by the Holy Spirit in the justified ones. It is one of the many saving graces worked by the Spirit!

b. The grace of faith ‘is ever accompanied with all other saving graces.’

- All saving graces are worked WITHIN the child of God by the ONE SAME indwelling Spirit of adoption. Gal 5:22.

- It is like saying, "Breath is ever accompanied by all other life activities."


4. The liveliness of justifying faith (i.e. faith produced by God’s free and gracious act of justifying condemned sinners)

- Faith ‘is no dead faith, but worketh by love.’

- Dead faith is faith that is not active; dead faith is NOT false faith; it is barren faith. God’s children can sin into a state of dead faith, being fruitless, and barren. Mt 13:22 2Pe 1:8; Ja 2:26.

- A faith that works is a lively faith, it works by love; love towards God, His words, His righteousness, His ordinances, His people, etc.

Some questions for discussion:

Q. How do we know that faith is a saving grace, i.e. a fruit of salvation at effectual call?

Q. Why is faith ever accompanied by all other saving graces?

Q. How can one know whether his faith is saving faith?

Q. Why is faith the sole instrument to manifest the justification by God’s free grace? 


Thursday, June 22, 2023

The Place of the 5th Commandment

The 5th commandment belongs to the first table
 of the Ten Commandments,
which deals with what a man OWES
to the Lord God his Creator.
 
June 22, 2015
https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=10204539674707339&set=a.10204539629426207 

The place of the 5th commandment -
"Honour thy father and thy mother."

The brother who introduced the service this morning read from Romans 13, and exhorted briefly on "the powers that be ordained of God." He stated and illustrated the various spheres of authority ordained by God: e.g. husband-wife, parents-children, civil government-citizens, employer-employee, and pastor-flock.

What attracted my attention were verses 8 and 9, which read:

 8 Owe no man anything, but to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law. 9 For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.

Observe these few plain things:

1. Five of the Ten Commandments are enumerated.

2. All these five commandments deal with what a man OWES to his fellow man, what a man owes to another man. Not obeying these commandments towards a fellow man puts a man indebted to him.

Please note that the 5th commandment, "Honour thy father and thy mother" is not one among those commandments a man owes to a fellow man. It does not belong to the second table of the Ten Commandments which deals with what a man owes to his fellow man.  This commandment belongs to the first table of the Ten Commandments, which deals with what a man OWES to the Lord God his Creator.

Apostle Paul makes a plain and clear distinction in the passage above. He leaves the 5th commandment in its rightful place - "honour thy father and mother" is not in the category of duty a man owes to a fellow man; it is a duty owed and done to God Himself. It is a tribute OWES to God Himself. God, by His sovereign choice and wisdom, appointed your parents for you; and you owe Him the duty to honour them whom He has chosen to be your parents.

This should help to restore the place and significance of the 5th Commandment "Honour thy father and thy mother."

Deuteronomy 5:16 "Honour thy father and thy mother, as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee; that thy days may be prolonged, and that it may go well with thee, in the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee."

Ephesians 6:2 "Honour thy father and mother; (which is the first commandment with promise;) 3 That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long on the earth."

The Gospel of Free Grace vs a Calvinistic Gospel

June 22, 2012
https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=3408799734244&set=a.1182086067794

The gospel of free grace declares Eternal Salvation, WITHOUT any human activity.

Romans 8
29 ¶ For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.
30 Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified.

These two verses of the Holy Scriptures are probably the most tortured and abused passages of the Bible. Even the Calvinistic folks messed it up big time!

A few obvious facts about the passage:

1. The object acted upon by the divine activities are co-extensive throughout, an EXACTLY SAME number and people are involved in each activity of God, not one more and not one less, that is, every action applies to EVERY elect, withOUT exception. That's pretty obvious... "whom he did... he also... whom he did... he also..." 

2. The divine activities here - foreknowledge, predestination, calling, justification and glorification - are all the activities of God. All these activities are by the free and sovereign grace of God, i.e. not conditioned upon anything in, by or of the objects. Those acted upon in these divine activities are completely passive, absolutely incapable of helping or even cooperating. In fact, they, by nature, were actively in ENMITY and REBELLION against God.

3. Those acted upon in these divine activities are EQUALLY ACTED upon - they are ALL EQUALLY foreknown, predestinated, called, justified, and glorified - no one more, and no one less. Every free grace divine action applies to ABSOLUTELY EVERY ELECT, to absolutely equal and same extent. No exception. The activities here deal with and secure ETERNAL salvation for the elect.

4. The divine activities stated here are all that is necessary for the ETERNAL salvation of every elect, without exception. There is no room to place other activities into the five-link chain. The five-link chain is complete and DOES NOT NEED other activities of God; it DOES NOT PERMIT any activities of man.

Why is there no mention of regeneration, adoption, sanctification, etc., etc.?

Why isn't there any mention of the gospel preaching, faith and repentance?
Why? Do you know? If you don't, why not ask?

5. This passage says ABSOLUTELY NOTHING, ZILCH about all those needful activities that involve human instrumentality (means) and activities that are needful for the TEMPORAL salvation of God's children already made fit for eternal glory. If you imagine that any such activities are necessary for eternal salvation, then you have prostituted the pure gospel of grace, deny true monergism, and end up with a synergistic view of salvation - which is so common even among many Calvinists!

When this passage is properly understood, then eternal salvation by God's free grace is adequately appreciated.

I know you may have some objections. I'm ready for them. If you can stick to the subject, comment. If not, don't!
=========

50 comments

Sing F Lau
There is the ETERNAL salvation which God in Jesus Christ has completely and perfectly worked out for His people, and applies to each elect by His Spirit, perfectly fitting each for eternal glory... no human instrumentality is involved the eternal salvation. God alone purposed it, Christ alone accomplished it, and the Spirit alone applies it.

- This is the true context/sphere of 'divine sovereignty' in salvation.

There is the TEMPORAL salvation which God's children (those already bestowed with eternal salvation by God's free grace) have to work out for themselves with fear and trembling for their well-being and usefulness in this present life.

The gospel ministry, administered through human instrumentality, is the divinely ordained means for this specific purpose of saints working out their own salvation:

"12 teaching us that, denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously, and godly, in this present world; 13 Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ;

14 Who gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works." Titus 2.

- This is the true context/sphere of 'human responsibility' in salvation. God's children are responsible to work out their own salvation through obedience to the Father's will.

The measure to which men cannot distinguish eternal salvation from temporal salvation is the same measure to which they are messed up in their understanding of salvation by grace alone! They give lip service to salvation by grace alone but in reality, are all work-based salvation to different degrees... EVEN the Calvinists!

Sing F Lau
1. The object acted upon by the divine activities are co-extensive throughout, an EXACTLY SAME number and SAME people are involved in each activity of God, not one more and not one less, that is, every action applies to EVERY elect, with an exception.
================

Necessary implications:

1. The call is the effectual call because ONLY IN EFFECTUAL CALL is every elect called. This is God calling an elect out of his native state of sin and death to that of grace and eternal salvation.

There is absolutely no gospel call here because there are God's children (regenerated elect) that are incapable of being called by the gospel, either because of inability or not being reached by the gospel call.

Gospel call has to do with the temporal salvation of God's children. And there are God's children who are not called by the gospel.

However, because the Calvinists are ignorant of the distinction between ETERNAL salvation and TEMPORAL salvation, they insist that the gospel call is necessary for one's eternal salvation!

2. The justification here is the vital justification by God's free grace because this aspect of justification is true of every elect. This is God's act of justifying the condemned by applying the righteousness of Christ to him personally and forgiving him of his sins... when he is utterly incapable of believing.

There is no justification by man's act of believing here because there are God's children who are INCAPABLE of believing... either because of their inability or not called by the gospel.

However, because the Calvinists are ignorant of the distinct aspects of justification, they confuse the VITAL justification by the free grace of God as the EXPERIENTIAL justification by faith in Christ.

Sing F Lau
Romans 8:29 ¶ For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren. 30 Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified.
===============

Question: why is nothing said about regeneration, sanctification, gospel preaching, hearing, faith and repentance, etc, etc... the MANY things that the Calvinists and Arminians alike insist must be added to the five-link chain?

Nick Migliacci
Here's what I came up with on this passage.
http://www.migliacci.com/articles/Rom.8.29-30.swf

Dellis Layne Worsham Sr.
Sing F Lau Question: why is nothing said about regeneration, sanctification, gospel preaching, hearing, faith and repentance, etc, etc... the MANY things that the Calvinists and Arminians alike insist must be added to the five-link chain? All are included but still accomplished by God. Regeneration makes it possible for the rest to happen, but still, we are fitted and framed together. The term "we must do these things" does not exist when it comes to eternal salvation, but temporal salvation is something I've never heard of except in the Arminian camp where Hebrews 6:4-6 clearly puts a reinstatement of temporal salvation to be non-existent meaning that if you lose it it is impossible to get it back if your temporal salvation refers to being able to lose one's salvation.

I also wasn't aware that the Arminian had a five-link chain. explain?

Sing F Lau
Dellis Layne Worsham Sr., temporal salvation is the salvation that those whom God has freely bestowed eternal salvation have to work out for themselves with fear and trembling through their obedience to the Father's will.

Temporal salvation has to do with the well-being of God's children while here on earth. Eternal salvation has to do with our being as God's children and our fitness and place in heaven with God.

Here is an example of temporal salvation that God's children must labour for themselves...

1Ti 4:16 Take heed unto thyself, and unto the doctrine; continue in them: for in doing this thou shalt both save thyself, and them that hear thee.

The salvation spoken of here has nothing to do with the eternal salvation that Christ ALONE has secured, and freely applied to each elect, perfectly fitting them for eternal glory.

Dellis Layne Worsham Sr.
Sing F Lau Like John 8:12 Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life.

Sing F Lau
Yes, he that follows Christ does so because ETERNAL SALVATION has been freely and sovereignly bestowed upon him... and following Christ will save him from darkness... following Christ a child of God shall have the light of life... his following Christ will secure him temporal salvation... ensures his well being as God's child!

Any salvation that requires the activities of man has to do with TEMPORAL SALVATION.

Dellis Layne Worsham Sr.
But I'm not supposed to believe that am I? I am a Calvinist 🙂

Nick Migliacci
I don’t think we can ever presume upon God and state that we have perfect knowledge about our salvation such that we know infallibly that we have been given this “eternal salvation,” as Sing calls it. Paul was humble enough to recognize that if he didn’t persevere, he would prove himself to be “disqualified,” which means lost. (The same word he uses in 1 Cor. 9:27 he uses in 2 Cor. 13:5). And again in Romans 11:21, he puts the fear of God in us lest we become so “sure of ourselves.” “He who endures to the end shall be saved.” That’s the salvation that takes you to heaven. What does Sing base his knowledge on that he has been given “eternal salvation?” That he prayed the sinner’s prayer? Surely not!

Therefore, there is no distinction between a so-called “eternal salvation” and a “temporal salvation.” The salvation we are commanded to “work out with fear and trembling” is the same salvation that will get us to heaven (if we do indeed work it out). Sanctification is part and parcel of being saved. No holiness, no heaven (Heb. 12:14). Sanctification is a prerequisite to going to heaven. If a person does not “keep themselves in the love of God” (Jude 1:21), then they would prove that God never gave them salvation—call it eternal or temporal if you want; there’s only one salvation.

I’m a Calvinist and I approve this message. 🙂

Dellis Layne Worsham Sr.
Nick@ I know where you are coming from but Sing F Lau does make sense, though what he teaches is true, the wording is different. EG. it is not our relationship that makes us Christians, it is our fellowship. However, Sing used the words sonship and discipleship in the same respect. Sanctification has more to do with God working in you, both to will and to do of His good pleasure. Chastening is the way God gets us to the point of sanctification while here on earth, but if you are regenerate then God has already eternally sanctified you. BTW, Calvinists believe OSAS.

Hebrews 2:11
For both he that sanctifieth and they who are sanctified are all of one: for which cause he is not ashamed to call them brethren,

Hebrews 10:10
By the which will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.

Hebrews 10:14
For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified.

The above scripture pertains to God's eternal purpose for us. 1 Corinthians 6:11
And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God. Paul never worried about the destiny of his soul, but he was concerned that his lifestyle in which others in the world saw him was a concern eg. He didn't want to appear to be a hypocrite by living a life that didn't reflect the hope within him. It was for that, that he said to work out with fear and trembling. He for sure knew that God had set him apart (sanctified) for the purpose of being an apostle to the Gentiles.

Sing F Lau
Nick Migliacci, you are indeed a Calvinist, a typical synergist in the doctrine of salvation.

You forgot what Paul said here:
38 For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come,
39 Nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.

That's eternal salvation secure for His people... nothing can undo it... not even Satan himself.

Paul is realistic about the real possibility of himself making a shipwreck of his faith... that's concerning his temporal salvation, his well-being as God's child.

Nick Migliacci
Yes, I believe the Gospel is “foolishness” to the unbeliever (1 Cor. 1:18; 2:14) and the “aroma of death” to him (2 Cor. 2:16). But that presuppose that he has heard it, does it not? He hears it, it’s foolish to him, and then at the appointed time, God regenerates him (if he’s elected) and it is no longer foolishness to him.

I can see where our views part ways. It’s this idea of “temporal salvation” versus “eternal salvation.” You mentioned Romans 8:38-39 and how absolutely nothing is able to separate us [you understand that to be those who have been granted eternal salvation] from the love of God. But I would point out that that promise is true only for those who are “in Christ.” So what I stated earlier was that none of us knows infallibly that we are in Christ, until we are on our deathbed and can say like Paul that we have fought the good fight. But as long as we’ve got lots of years ahead of us, there is still that possibility that we might make a shipwreck of our faith, and prove that God never did, after all, grant us [eternal] salvation. We deceived ourselves into thinking that He did. We would be like that soil which at first received the Word with gladness but later fell away because of tough times. It’s true that IF God grants [eternal] salvation, it can never be taken away. That is a blessed promise that we can cling to if we can see evidence of sanctification in our life. But it’s equally true that there are many religious people who have deceived themselves in thinking they have that [eternal] salvation when in reality they were lost along (Mt. 7:23). They don’t lose any salvation; they simply never had one.

Sing F Lau
Nick Migliacci, then I conclude that your eternal salvation finally depends on your perseverance to the end! I hope you make it. See, somehow human works must always sneak in to play a role in a man's eternal salvation!

I'm sorry you don't think Christ's work has made eternal salvation certain and assured enough for you, that you need to add a CONDITION to eternal salvation. I just hope you meet it!

Nick Migliacci
Christ's work does guarantee me heaven, IF it was for me He died! How do I know that? By looking at God's work of sanctifying me, because God sanctifies all whom He saves. So far, I have every reason to believe I will make it. I press on toward the goal.... I am what I am by the grace of God.

What proof do you have that you have eternal salvation? Because you prayed a sinner's prayer?

Nick Migliacci
(I'm glad we're able to finally see where our theologies differ.) I'm sure you are too. 🙂

Sing F Lau
Yes, finally.
Yours is grace PLUS conditions...
Mine is grace ALONE.

Yours: no hope for such as Lot, Saul, Solomon... since they did not persevere to the end, they were never saved by God.

Mine: they are as eternally saved as every elect, even though they messed up big time their well-being on earth.

See the difference. I hope you meet the conditions you have set for yourself.

Nick Migliacci
But how can you prove that Lot, Saul, Solomon, or anyone else has been "eternally saved", if not by their life (or what the Scriptures say about them, such as putting them in Hebrews 11, etc.)?

Also, the way people were saved before the Incarnation is the same way people are saved today: believing in Christ. Those in the Old Testament looked forward to Christ, today, we look back. Granted, we have more revelation than they did, but still, everyone is saved by looking to Christ. Genesis 3:15 is the "proto-good news". Galatians 3:8 - "And the Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, PREACHED THE GOSPEL TO ABRAHAM beforehand, saying, 'In you all the nations shall be blessed.'" So anybody who didn't believe in Christ went to hell.

You still haven't answered whether it's possible for a regenerate person to go to hell, in plain, simple language: yes or no. I have been clear with you, why won't you extend the same courtesy? Don't expect your Scriptures to have the same impact on me as they do you, because I don't come with the same presuppositions as you do. So just answer yes or no: Can a regenerate person remain an atheist all their life and go to hell?

Dellis Layne Worsham Sr.
Can a regenerate person remain an atheist all their life and go to hell? That's a kind of crazy question since being regenerated automatically makes you a spiritual being and makes you cease to be a natural man.

I have no presuppositions since all I know is from what God's word has taught me, well with the help of the comforter God gave me. If you think about it, those who spoke to God in the OT still had faith though they heard the audible voice of God, saw angels and prophesied according to visions. In the New Testament times, faith is in things not seen. So how is it that we are saved by the same faith as our father Abraham? As far as us hearing the gospel, think of it as one man hearing without understanding and the other hearing with it. Jesus said, "all that the Father giveth me shall come to me" so that makes your question about a regenerate atheist impossible. That should pretty much sum up the rest of the questions you posed. I feel I have been clear enough for a seemingly intelligent man like yourself to understand. If not, I ask, Are you a brother in Christ?

Sing F Lau
Nick Migliacci @ Also, the way people were saved before the Incarnation is the same way people are saved today: believing on Christ.

You are COMPLETELY WRONG on one point: Yes, the way people were SAVED by God is the same way people are saved today... there is only one way of salvation... and it is not by believing in Jesus Christ.

You most certainly believe in salvation by works... because believing in Jesus Christ is a work that God expects His children to work.

Here is the proof: John 6
28 ¶ Then said they unto him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God? 29 Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent.

IT IS by God effectually calling them out of their native state of sin and death to that of grace and salvation based on the righteousness of Jesus Christ.

Believing is an EVIDENCE that a man has been SAVED by God, by His free grace. Believing DOES NOT SAVE anyone. Believing evidences the ETERNAL SALVATION already freely bestowed. ONLY the SAVED by God can ever believe.

If eternal salvation is by believing in Jesus Christ, then MANY elect will go to the lake of fire, since many are either INCAPABLE of believing, or have no opportunity to believe because the gospel call to believe did not get to them.

Sing F Lau
Nick Migliacci @ "You still haven't answered whether it's possible for a regenerate person to go to hell, in plain, simple language: yes or no."

I will answer your WEIRD Q with a question: Can a child of God go to the lake of fire? Am I asking the same thing? If I am, then the answer is NO NO NO. Regeneration guarantees ETERNAL GLORY - without anything extra or condition on man's part. That's grace, pure unadulterated and uncontaminated grace.

But let me entertain your question: Is it possible for a regenerate person to go to hell, in plain, simple language: yes or no.

Jesus warns his disciples (apostles):
28 But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.
29 And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell.
30 And if thy right hand offend thee, cut it off, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell.

Is the warning of the Lord to the APOSTLES a vain warning? Isn't the warning that it is a REAL danger to the disciples...

And Nick, are hell and the late of fire the same in your understanding?

Sing F Lau
Nick Migliacci @ Therefore, there is no distinction between a so-called “eternal salvation” and a “temporal salvation.” The salvation we are commanded to “work out with fear and trembling” is the same salvation that will get us to heaven (if we do indeed work it out).
============

In this, you are most deluded and confused. You have MIXED eternal salvation by Christ's work. You have just DENIED the completeness and the perfection of Christ's work. You require Christ's work to be completed by yours! And you still blah blah blah salvation by grace ALONE. No, you should be honest and say, 'salvation is by grace PLUS my work.'

Christ's work ALONE secured your eternal salvation. It is based upon the finished work of Christ that God bestowed salvation to a dead condemned sinner.

Your work of obeying God will save you from 'hell' on earth, and bring you temporal blessings - blessings that pertain to/in this life.

Nick Migliacci
I still do not know what you believe. I'm getting closer, but it's like pulling teeth out of you. Why beat around the bush? Are you saying a regenerate person can remain an atheist all their life and still go to heaven? Do you believe that God will ENSURE that the regenerate all believe the Gospel at some point?

Nick Migliacci
Are you separating regeneration from sanctification, saying that it's possible to be regenerated but not sanctified?

Sing F Lau
Nick Migliacci @ Can a regenerate person remain an atheist all their life and go to hell?
=======
Have you read this:
Heb 8:10 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people.

Every regenerate elect KNOWS and WORSHIP God... even though he has never heard of the gospel of Jesus Christ. Look at Cornelius, the Ethiopian eunuch, Lydia... all those devout Jews CONVERTED on the day of Pentecost.

The gospel informs and instructs him about his eternal salvation by God's free and sovereign grace in Jesus Christ.

Hearing and believing the gospel SAVES and sets them free from superstition and lies and errors... teaches them to live soberly, godly and righteously... thus saving themselves from ungodliness and worldly lusts in THIS PRESENT LIFE. That's temporal salvation - i.e. salvation that pertains to THIS PRESENT LIFE.

ETERNAL SALVATION by Christ's work of redemption has ETERNITY in view... saves from eternal condemnation, even from the Lake of fire.

Sing F Lau
Nick Migliacci, just remember this:
Rightly dividing the word of truth is the ESSENCE of sound theology.
The biblical distinction between ETERNAL salvation by free grace alone, and TEMPORAL salvation through the obedience of God's children IS THE ESSENCE of sound theology.

Failure to make this biblical distinction will leave in a cesspool of confusion and contradictions and inconsistencies. Been there for 20 years... and it is a joy and delight to be out of it for 10 years now.

May our Lord set you free to see the glorious truth! Amen.

Sing F Lau
Nick Migliacci @ I still do not know what you believe. I'm getting closer, but it's like pulling teeth out of you. Why beat around the bush? Are you saying a regenerate person can remain an atheist all their life and still go to heaven? Do you believe that God will ENSURE that the regenerate all believe the Gospel at some point?
==============

Q1 - I don't ever beat around the bush. I am a slash-and-burn type of man <LOL>. Rinse your eyes with some eye salve to see better! <LOL>

Q2 - answered already. Read it.

Q3 - answered too, but you didn't read. Shame!

PJ Walters
"And his disciples came to him, and awoke him, saying, Lord, save us: we perish." Matthew 8:25
-----------------
Is the salvation under consideration in the context of this verse eternal or temporal?

Is the perishing under consideration herein eternal or temporal?

Take heed unto the doctrine, and save thyself and them that hear thee!

Sing F Lau
Nick Migliacci @ Are you separating regeneration from sanctification, saying that it's possible to be regenerated but not sanctified?
========
Which sanctification are you talking about - definitive sanctification or practical sanctification?

At regeneration, an elect is definitively set apart from sin and death to that of grace and salvation. This sanctification is once for all, non-repeatable, needs no improvement. Once set apart from sin and death to grace and eternal salvation, FOREVER set apart to grace and salvation. This definitive sanctification is WITHOUT human means - God does it ALL by Himself.

Understand?

Heb 10:14 For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified.

Calvinists like you have the audacity to ADD to this finished work by Christ... that without practical sanctification a man goes to hell! How much practical sanctification is needed to qualify for eternal glory - can you tell us? And just how does a man know he meets the requirement?

I know what's in your mind - it is practical sanctification that you are concerned with.

Practical sanctification is accomplished through the means of the gospel ministry in the context of the NT local church. Some children of God enjoy this means to a greater degree, others less, and still others NONE. Whatever amount they enjoy, they are all God's children, definitively sanctified, destined for eternal glory!!!

PJ Walters
What of the brother's question concerning an atheist?

Sing F Lau
Pj Walters, here it is, at the end of the paragraph.
======
"You still haven't answered whether it's possible for a regenerate person to go to hell, in plain, simple language: yes or no. I have been clear with you, why won't you extend the same courtesy? Don't expect your Scriptures to have the same impact on me as they do you, because I don't come with the same presuppositions as you do. So just answer yes or no: Can a regenerate person remain an atheist all their life and go to hell?"
----------------
I wonder what provoked him to ask such a WEIRD question?

Maybe Nick Migliacci might like to tell us!

PJ Walters
I'm still studying about hell and the separate state of the soul, so perhaps he may be able to tell us more!

Sing F Lau
No, Nick is far from that issue... 'hell' is just 'hell' to him - the eternal state.

Nick Migliacci
Sing, why do you call my question weird? You yourself said some regenerate people are never (temporarily) sanctified. Thus, they can be a (temporal) atheist, and still be regenerate and go to heaven. By making this man-made disconnection between regeneration and necessary (temporal) sanctification, you have people going to heaven who lived like the devil. Do I understand your view right? I certainly don't want to misrepresent you.

Nick Migliacci
My view, as you probably already know, is that God not only ensures the regeneration of His elect, but He also ensures their sanctification (which you call "temporal sanctification"). And in that way, He ensures they will go to heaven, because no holiness, no heaven. How can a sinner be holy? Only by the working of God in his life.

You may say I believe in a works-based salvation, but that is not accurate; I believe in a salvation based on God's work, and one of His works is His sanctifying work. Yes, I believe sanctification is synergistic (although my work depends on the monergistic initiative of God), but what makes this so different from the Arminian is this: I believe regeneration is wholly monergistic, whereas the Arminian believes in prevenient grace, making the dead man able to choose God. I do not believe dead men can choose God. But once a person has been given life, by all means, they are then made able to cooperate with the Spirit in sanctification. There is a difference between a dead man's abilities and a living person's abilities.

Sing F Lau
Nick Migliacci, I call your question weird because it is like asking, "Do God's children end up in the lake of fire?"

It is like asking, "Do my children have immortal souls? Do they need to live well in order to have immortal souls?"

Do God's children need to meet some condition in order to get into heaven?
Do you ever ask a question like that?

Sing F Lau
Nick Migliacci @ You yourself said some regenerate people are never (temporarily) sanctified. Thus, they can be a (temporal) atheist, and still be regenerate and go to heaven. By making this man-made disconnection between regeneration and necessary (temporal) sanctification, you have people going to heaven who lived like the devil.
=========

In discussion, you must guard yourself against putting your words into my mouth.

The idea that a regenerate, a child of God, can be an atheist is entirely your straw man... and you SHOULD BE ASHAMED of yourself for saying that though I have burned your straw man many times over.

A child of God believes God and fears and reverence Him, even though he may not have any knowledge of the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ yet. But you will call a man who has not heard of the gospel an atheist. Was Cornelius an atheist before Apostle brought to gospel to him?

A regenerate has eternal life and is perfectly fitted for eternal glory... nothing more is needed.

Sing F Lau
Nick Migliacci @ "By making this man-made disconnection between regeneration and necessary (temporal) sanctification, you have people going to heaven who lived like the devil."
===========
"You have people going to heaven who lived like hell' is another cheap straw man - that's your imagination. I didn't say anything like that.

Because you CANNOT accept the idea that there are God's children who do not hear the gospel, you conclude that there are God's children who live like the devil and go to heaven - that's too puerile to even requires a rebuttal! The straw man does not warrant wasting a stick of precious matches.

It is a biblical fact that there are God's children who have no ABILITY to hear and believe the gospel, and also those who have no OPPORTUNITY to hear and believe the gospel.

The Scripture itself makes the NEEDFUL distinction, but you want to join them together and end up with all sorts of contradiction - i.e. salvation by grace PLUS works.

You join the CAUSE and the effects together.

A man like you rave and rant and foam the whole day long that 'salvation is by grace alone' from one side of your mouth, and then screams from the other side that "salvation by grace is complemented/completed by works."

Nick Migliacci
I've created a Forum where you can clearly explain your position, here:
http://www.migliacci.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=109

What Saith The Scriptures: View Forum - "Eternal Salvation" & "Temporal Salvation"
MIGLIACCI.COM

Sing F Lau
There are many useful articles on the subject. Go and read them and understand them before you start discussing them.

In a nutshell:
The saving activities of God secured ETERNAL salvation for His people.

The responding activities of God's children (having been bestowed eternal salvation by God's free grace) secured temporal salvation for this temporal life on earth.

It is that simple and easy.

Heard this saying before? Think about it.

"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him." - Leo Tolstoy –

Thanks for the conversation... I'm thoroughly acquainted with your position... was there for 20 years.

Dellis Layne Worsham Sr.
It makes sense that you can't teach anything to anyone who already knows it all.

Nick Migliacci
I like that quote by Tolstoy.

Why do you suppose God has not secured temporal salvation for all for whom He secures eternal salvation? Doesn't God care about both equally?

Sing F Lau
Nick Migliacci @ "Why do you suppose God has not secured temporal salvation for all for whom He secures eternal salvation? Doesn't God care about both equally?
==========
HARD Scriptural FACTS!
HARD Scriptural FACTS!
I don't suppose anything.
It is you who supposes a whole lot of things.
Nick, supposing God cared about both EQUALLY, then every elect would be equally saved with eternal salvation, and ALSO equally saved with temporal salvation. The former is true, the latter is an obvious fable!

It is true that every elect is equally saved with eternal salvation, because their salvation is BASED upon the same basis (Christ's righteousness), the same manner (God's free grace) and the same means (regeneration by the Holy Spirit). This is the sole work of the Triune God alone.

It is just a PLAIN LIE that says temporal salvation is equally true for every child of God for the simple reason that temporal salvation is CONDITIONED upon many human factors... which directly affect the degree to which temporal salvation is attained and experienced by a child of God.

If God divinely ENSURES temporal salvation to each of His children, then EVERY ONE of them will enjoy the same degree of temporal salvation, otherwise God's work of ensuring it is just a SHAM and a FICTION!

If God ENSURES temporal salvation, then everyone will know AS LITTLE or as MUCH of the gospel of free grace as you do!!! [no typing mistake!].

Nick Migliacci
You assume that, if God ensures temporal salvation, that it's God's will that everyone enjoys it to the same degree. I don't believe that. I believe it's God's will that some enjoy sanctification (temporal salvation) more than others, and others enjoy it less. Although, I don't use the word "enjoy." I would say it's God's will that some are more sanctified than others, and others are less sanctified than others.

Nick Migliacci
But one thing is sure (as far as what I believe): I believe God does ensure SOME level of sanctification to all the elect. How much sanctification is ultimately up to Him, but there WILL be a difference (2 Cor. 5:17) between the regenerate and the unregenerate.

Sing F Lau
Nick Migliacci, @ "I would say it's God's will that some are more sanctified than others, and others are less sanctified than others."
=========
Then you have to prove that such is God's will indeed, otherwise it is your fable.

But the Scriptures is PLAIN AS THE NOON DAY SUN that the level of PRACTICAL sanctification is dependent and determined by the effort of God's children.

"Work out your own salvation..."
"Feed... feed... feed..."
The definitive sanctification for each elect is as complete and perfect as ENSURED BY GOD. Even God's elect who died in infancy are as perfectly and completely sanctified definitively. Even those who have no opportunity to hear, God ensured that they are as perfectly and completely sanctified definitively.

But in terms of practical salvation, such have NONE, ZILCH. So, according to your fiction, God FAIL MISERABLY in His work of ensuring some temporal salvation in such. Or maybe in such, God ensured that they die without practical sanctification.

I would take that your idea is an evil fiction that impugns upon God's character than that God should fail in His work of ensuring a different measure of temporal salvation to His children.

If He does ensure temporal salvation at all, it would be right to believe that God ensures each child to be equally alike like men such as John Gill or Spurgeon, or Apostle Paul?

Your fiction comes toooooo pathetically far short of God's power and glory! You might as well say it is God who ensures that some have NO practical sanctification.

It is like saying a wicked father ensures that some of his children receive no food, others have little and others have a bit more.

Nick Migliacci
You said, "You might as well say it is God ensures that some have NO practical sanctification. ... It is like saying a wicked father ensures that some of his children receive no food..."

That is where we draw the line. Recall the Parable of the Four Soils. Those who produced ZERO fruit were not saved at all. God ensures that His children bear SOME fruit, some 30-fold, some 60-fold, and others (like John Gill, et. al.) 100-fold.

It's true that we, humans, do have to work out our salvation, but it's God who works in us to do and to will of His good pleasure. So at the end of the day, God is sovereign over how much fruit a person bears. To leave God out of the equation is to deny His sovereignty over man's (temporal) sanctification.

Sing F Lau
Thanks Nick Migliacci. Go your way, brother.
Let me conclude what YOU INSIST:

- God ENSURES that all His children experience temporal salvation.
- God also ENSURES that some of His children experience ZERO temporal salvation.
- The parable of the sower shows God ENSURES some of His children to be fruitless and BARREN.

Please note: the parable of the sower ADDRESSES THOSE THAT ARE IN THE KINGDOM... not how to get into the kingdom, how to be saved, and remain saved, and ensure a place in heaven.

That is your BASIC and fundamental error in understanding the parable.

So, you don't believe that God's children can be fruitless. You insist that the fruitless are not God's children, to begin with.

That's a plain contradiction of the plain teaching of the Bible:

Apostle Peter writing to "them that have obtained like precious faith with us through the righteousness of God and our Saviour Jesus Christ" warns them in these SOLEMN words: "For if these things be in you, and abound, they make you that ye shall neither be barren nor unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ."

Apostle writing to ALL THOSE SAINTS in Corinth and Achaia these words, "We then, as workers together with him, beseech you also that ye receive not the grace of God in vain."

God's children who are careless will be fruitless. Christ said it, and His apostles warn against it solemnly... but Nick rejects it!

Thanks... keep your work-based salvation. I hope you do well enough to qualify for a place in heaven.

Dellis Layne Worsham Sr.
I found that while I was a child coming up that many times I did something wrong, something in which my dad would definitely not approve of. While in err I felt guilty and as though I wasn't at peace with Dad, if he found out what I had done from someone else, things would just be worse. Our fellowship was lost because of my guilt...I eventually couldn't take it any, or am told him what I had done and ina lot of cases he confessed to already knowing but out of love for the fellowship, he waited for me to confess. He was always faithful and just to forgive, though sometimes a punishment came even after the confession...That reminds me of temporal salvation. Eternal salvation is always on this wise. No matter what sins I commit while here, Christ, my advocate, takes the blame and paid the price and sees to it that all that is given to Him are never lost....this ensures that we will, one day, stand before God as sons of God without blame. If you want to have a closer walk with Christ, while here on earth, stay and be honest with Him because if you try to hide your sins from Jesus, you are only fooling yourself...He already knows.

King David lost a child because of his unconfessed infidelity and murder...He was punished during his temporal salvation but it affected his eternal salvation none...We workout out our own temporal salvation, God worked out the eternal one.

Sing F Lau
Good illustration. Thanks Dellis.