Things New and Old

Ancient truths revealed in the Scriptures are often forgotten, disbelieved or distorted, and therefore lost in the passage of time. Such ancient truths when rediscovered and relearned are 'new' additions to the treasury of ancient truths.

Christ showed many new things to the disciples, things prophesied by the prophets of old but hijacked and perverted by the elders and their traditions, but which Christ reclaimed and returned to His people.

Many things taught by the Apostles of Christ have been perverted or substituted over the centuries. Such fundamental doctrines like salvation by grace and justification have been hijacked and perverted and repudiated by sincere Christians. These doctrines need to be reclaimed and restored to God's people.

There are things both new and old here. "Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things"
2Ti 2:7.

Saturday, March 28, 2026

Salvation that enables faith and faith that saves

 


Only a man whom God has freely justified (yes, freely, not by your faith, an unjustified man is impotent to exercise faith!) and regenerated and adopted and given the Spirit of adoption to dwell in him is capable of believing because of the faith worked in him by the indwelling Spirit.

Eternal salvation by the free grace of God makes believing the truth of his salvation possible, and believing manifests his justified state, freely by the grace of God. "The just shall live by faith" is vividly demonstrated.

And believing the truth of his salvation, freely by the grace of God based solely on the righteousness and blood of Jesus Christ, saves a child of God from a whole host of evils, lies, errors and superstition, and secures a whole host of spiritual blessings in this life - i.e. temporal salvation.

From what did God, in Jesus Christ and through His Spirit, save a man?

From what does believing in the truth of the gospel save a man?

The same gospel is perceived differently by two distinct groups of people

The same gospel is perceived differently 
by two distinct groups of people:
 - "them that perish" and
"us which are saved."


The same gospel is perceived differently by two distinct groups of people - "them that perish" and "us which are saved."

1 Cor 1:18 "For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God."

The gospel ministry comes to two distinct groups of people. One group is designated as 'them that perish' (present participle, i.e. the perishing ones, a verbal noun).  To this group, the glorious gospel - the good news that declares God's power in saving condemned sinners - is perceived as foolishness.

The other group is described as 'us which are saved' (present participle, i.e. the saved ones, a verbal noun). To this group, the glorious gospel - the good news that declares God's power in saving condemned sinners - is perceived as what it is, the message declaring the power of God is saving them!

God HAS SAVED them (applied eternal salvation to them, i.e. effectually called them out of their native state of sin and death to that of grace and salvation) independent of, and apart from, the gospel ministry.

This passage repudiates the common fable of gospel regeneration, i.e. that the gospel ministry comes to those who are perishing, and through the preaching, and hearing of the gospel, the Holy Spirit regenerates those who are still dead in trespasses and sins, to enable them to believe the gospel in order to be saved.

The gospel comes to those that ARE SAVED, the SAVED ONES. Can anything be plainer? Only those who ARE SAVED are able to perceive the gospel for what it is, a message declaring the power of God in having saved His chosen ones.

The gospel is NOT the power of God; the gospel is the message declaring the power of God in saving His people. So many can't even distinguish the two!!!

Jesus is the power of God in salvation. The gospel is the good news which declares that power.

1Co 1:24 But unto them which are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God.

Romans 3:11 "There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God" -- that's the condition of a man by nature, if they are not saved by God's free and sovereign grace!!!

=========
Sing F Lau
Ro 3:11 There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God. -- that's the condition of a man by nature, if they are not saved by God's free and sovereign grace first!!!

Bryan Choo
Does this mean we are picked by God to be Christians, much as the Jews were a favoured race? And if that is true, is free will completely out of the picture?

PJ Walters
1 Corinthians 1:20 "Where is the wise? where is the scribe? where is the disputer of this world? hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world?

21 For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe."

Sing F Lau
Bryan, welcome here. I pray the Lord will help you to see the good green grass to nourish your inquisitive mind. I like your good questions already.

Q. Does this mean we are picked by God to be Christians much as the Jews were a favoured race?

Along the way, you will learn that precision, or rightly dividing the word of truth, is the essence of sound theology.

The Scriptures declare plainly that He elected and predestinated, before the foundation of the world, certain particular and specific people out of the fallen race of Adam to salvation and eternal glory. The rest he left them to their just destiny.

Those whom God elected and predestinated unto eternal glory, He effectually called them, individually, out of their native state of sin and death to that of grace and salvation, thus making them perfectly and completely fit for eternal glory. That effectual call by God's free and sovereign grace, WITHOUT any human aid or cooperation, turns a condemned dead rebel into a justified living son.

A son and a Christian are quite distinct terms. A son is the result of the divine work of regeneration. A Christian is a son of God (an elect who is regenerated already) who has been brought to faith in Jesus Christ.

The former is wholly monergistic, i.e. completely by God's free and sovereign grace. Man is completely passive.

The latter requires human instrumentality of preaching the gospel, and the human activity of hearing, understanding, believing the truth of the gospel, and resting in Christ... making a son of God a Christian.

All Christians are necessarily God's children, because only God's children has the eternal life to perform those spiritual activities. But not all God's children are Christians.

That's just a partial answer to your first question.

Election of individuals to eternal glory, and the election of the Jewish race for the outworking of His redemptive purpose are quite distinct.

Q2. And if that is true, is free will completely out of the picture?

This is an interesting subject. I will tell you what I do believe on the subject.

God created man in His image, a moral and rational creature that is capable of relating to his Creator.

Free will is part and parcel of the very constitution of man. A creature without free will ceases to be a man. Man before the fall has free will, and man after the fall still has free will. All his acts are never coerced from a force outside him, and he is wholly responsible for his actions. A man without free will cannot be held accountable for his actions; that is, God's moral government over man collapses. Man's free will is the foundation and basis of God's moral government over man.

Man's free will is determined by his nature. Before the fall, a man's free will is free to choose to obey God or disobey God. BUT ALAS, he chose to disobey God and chose to believe the lie of Satan. After the fall, man's free will can only freely choose sin and death... because that is all his fallen nature is capable of choosing.

For example, a fish has free will. His 'fishy' will freely choose to live in any part of the watery world. That's all his 'fishy' will is capable of choosing. His fully free 'fishy' will is utterly incapable of choosing to live outside of water. Such is contrary to his 'fishy' will.

Sinners have free will.... they freely choose to rebel against God; they freely will in enmity against God... their free will will never bring them to God... because their free will is hostile and in enmity against God. His free will freely chooses to remain in, and love sins. No man is ever coerced by some external force to sin against his conscience... He sins freely. Man's free will freely and voluntarily keep him in his condemned state.

In God's effectual call unto grace and salvation, regeneration brings a new nature to a child of God. He is commanded to choose to do that which is pleasing to God. His new nature has the capability of choosing that which is good... and God holds children responsible. So, free will still operate in God's children; their free will is now directed by their new nature of grace.

Free will is part and parcel of man's very constitution as man!

When so say that man has no free will, they actually mean that man in his native state of sin and death has no capability to choose God. Of course, incapability to choose God is not the same as having no free will. Incapability to choose God is having a free will that is incapable of choosing God... even though they freely will choose to sin and rebel against God very freely.

I hope I scratch your question a bit.

Robert Cook Sr.
Brother Lau gave a faithful explanation to Bryan - a very careful and complete, not overwhelming.

Wednesday, March 25, 2026

Canon of Dort 1.4 - truth or fable?

 


Take a careful look. Is this a gospel truth?

Do you agree with this statement?

"The wrath of God abides upon those who believe not this gospel. But such as receive it and embrace Jesus the Saviour by a true and living faith are by Him delivered from the wrath of God and from destruction, and have the gift of eternal life conferred upon them."  Canon of Dort 1.4

May I inquire:
1. Those who have not been delivered from the wrath of God - are they capable of receiving and embracing Jesus the Saviour by a true and living faith? 

2. 
Those who have not been conferred with the gift of eternal life - are they capable of receiving and embracing Jesus the Saviour by a true and living faith? 
- Those whom God has not conferred the gift of eternal life, are they capable of exercising a true and living faith? 
- Those whom God has not conferred the gift of eternal life, are they capable of receiving and embracing Jesus the Saviour? 

"Except a man be born again... (except a man be conferred eternal life), he CANNOT... CANNOT... CANNOT... "

======

Comments

Ronny 
This statement is to dispute the 5-point claim of the Arminians.

Sing
So what exactly is the Arminian error refuted by this article 4?

Ronny
#4 is just a statement of faith

Sing 
But you said, "This statement is to dispute the 5-point claim of the Arminians."

That's why I inquired, which particular point of the 5-point claim of the Arminians is disputed by Canon 1, Article 4.

OK. If #4 is just a statement of faith, do you agree with the statement? Why or why not?

Ronny
As a statement of faith... I must say that I do agree.

Sing
Do you agree that the statement teaches that eternal life is CONFERRED UPON THEM that receive the gospel and embrace the Savior by a true and living faith, that is, the conferral of eternal life is CONDITIONED upon some activities of man?

Do you agree that the statement teaches that deliverance from the wrath of God and from destruction (I assume that eternal destruction is meant) is CONDITIONED upon man's act of receiving the gospel and embracing Jesus the Savior by a true and living faith?

Do you agree that the statement teaches, by necessary implication, that a man not yet conferred with eternal life, therefore STILL dead in trespasses and sins, is able to receive the gospel, AND embrace Jesus the Savior?

Do you agree that the statement teaches, by necessary implication, that a man not yet conferred with eternal life, therefore STILL dead in trespasses and sins, is capable of a true and living faith?

Please correct me if I have read the statement incorrectly.

Thank you.

Ronny
It is now past midnight here; I'll read the questions tomorrow and comment.

Noel
Embracing the Lordship of Christ is not mentioned.... therefore, it is not a gospel.
Correct me if i'm wrong

(DanDel has deleted his comments)

Sing
DanDel, you have a good point there! Thanks.

'... ARE DELIVERED... HAVE .... CONFERRED UPON THEM...' >> HAVE BEEN DELIVERED... HAVE BEEN CONFERRED.

Ronny
All I need to do is correct my first comment: it should read, "the entire canon of Dort is to dispute the 5 points of the Arminians". Secondly, for me, regeneration is monergistic ( God alone) and never synergistic.

Sing
Ronny, does the Holy Spirit need the preaching of the gospel to regenerate those dead in trespasses and sins?

The LORD hath a controversy with his people

"Hear ye now what the LORD saith; Arise, contend thou before the mountains, and let the hills hear thy voice. Hear ye, O mountains, the LORD’S controversy, and ye strong foundations of the earth: for the LORD hath a controversy with his people, and he will plead with Israel. O my people, what have I done unto thee? and wherein have I wearied thee? testify against me." Micah 6:1-3

Sing F Lau
We went through Micah 6 for our Wednesday evening church bible study.

What a frightening reality - God's people are capable of great evils. "My people are bent on backsliding..."

Jason Sides
Aww but greater still is his mercy to bring his children out of the cess pool of sin.

Sing F Lau
I fear very often God leaves His children to wallow in the cesspool of sins they have chosen for themselves!

I read this in the latter part of Micah 6:
13 Therefore also will I make thee sick in smiting thee, in making thee desolate because of thy sins.
14 Thou shalt eat, but not be satisfied; and thy casting down shall be in the midst of thee; and thou shalt take hold, but shalt not deliver; and that which thou deliverest will I give up to the sword.
15 Thou shalt sow, but thou shalt not reap; thou shalt tread the olives, but thou shalt not anoint thee with oil; and sweet wine, but shalt not drink wine.
16 For the statutes of Omri are kept, and all the works of the house of Ahab, and ye walk in their counsels; that I should make thee a desolation, and the inhabitants thereof an hissing: therefore ye shall bear the reproach of my people.

Every sin has BOTH its eternal consequences and temporal consequences.

Christ's work of redemption has saved us from sins' eternal judgment and condemnation. His work of redemption DOES NOT save us from temporal judgment and condemnation. Our own work of salvation (Phil 2:12) will save us from the temporal consequences of our sins.

God will scourge and chastise His children - they shall suffer the temporal consequences for their sins.

Sing F Lau
Many of God's children lived and died like their cousin Lot. Few live and die like their father Abraham!

Jason Sides
You should do a commentary on children of God who backslide and how to reconcile it with 1st John would be very interested in your thoughts.

Sing F Lau
Have you not read, "My people are bent on backsliding"?
What is 1st John saying to you?

Jason Sides
It is not what it says to me but everyone.

Sing F Lau
Yes, I meant what does 1John say?

Jason Sides
1st John 2:18-27 Warning and assurance 3:6-10.
My question is your commentary on how to reconcile the text listed above with the children of God who backslide.

Sing F Lau
I think there may be some serious misunderstanding!
1Jn 2:18-27 DOES NOT SPEAK of backsliding!
It speaks of the denying and rejecting of Christ - "Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son."

Those who are backslidden, they still profess Christ, they are still practising Christians, like so many claim in America, and around the world.

Your theology would probably have no place for such people among God's children and would conveniently pronounce them as counterfeit and false believers! That's one possible explanation.

To say that God's children SHOULD be fruitful (which is biblical)...

Is very different from saying that each and every child of God WOULD be fruitful (just man's wishful and legalistic idea)...

And to conclude that those who are not fruitful can't possibly be God's children at all (this is VERY injurious and presumptuous, and ignorant).

Everywhere in the Scriptures, God deals with His people and children in their sins! - ALL over the Scriptures.

I have preached through 1John twice in my nearly 20 years in the ministry. I do know something about the teaching of 1John, if I am not deceived.

Hold fast!



#holdfast

to hold fast - to keep secure, keep firm possession of.

Are you holding fast to these things?

Job 27:6
My righteousness I hold fast, and will not let it go: my heart shall not reproach me so long as I live.

1Th 5:21
Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.

2Ti 1:13
Hold fast, which thou hast heard of me, in faith and love which is in Christ Jesus.

Heb 3:6
But Christ as a son over his own house; whose house are we, if we hold fast the confidence and the rejoicing of the hope firm unto the end.

Heb 4:14
Seeing then that we have a great high priest, that is passed into the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, let us hold fast our profession.

 Heb 10:23
Let us hold fast the profession of our faith without wavering; (for he is faithful that promised;)

Rev 2:25
But that which ye have already hold fast till I come.

Rev 3:3
Remember therefore how thou hast received and heard, and hold fast, and repent. If therefore thou shalt not watch, I will come on thee as a thief, and thou shalt not know what hour I will come upon thee.