Things New and Old

Ancient truths revealed in the Scriptures are often forgotten, disbelieved or distorted, and therefore lost in the passage of time. Such ancient truths when rediscovered and relearned are 'new' additions to the treasury of ancient truths.

Christ showed many new things to the disciples, things prophesied by the prophets of old but hijacked and perverted by the elders and their traditions, but which Christ reclaimed and returned to His people.

Many things taught by the Apostles of Christ have been perverted or substituted over the centuries. Such fundamental doctrines like salvation by grace and justification have been hijacked and perverted and repudiated by sincere Christians. These doctrines need to be reclaimed and restored to God's people.

There are things both new and old here. "Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things"
2Ti 2:7.

Saturday, April 18, 2026

Christ came to seek and to save that which was lost.



May 16, 2013

Luke 19:10 For the Son of man is come to seek and to save that which was lost.

Who are the lost?

"The lost" presupposes ownership. Anything that does not have an owner can't possibly be said to be lost.

The lost refer to those who belong to Christ.
- They are Christ's possession, given to Him by God;|
- They are Christ's possession, purchased and redeemed by Him;
- They are Christ's possession, they are personally united to Christ at their effectual call to grace and salvation by God's free grace while dead in their native state of sin and death.

Though effectually called to that state of grace and salvation at effectual call, they are EXPERIENTIALLY still separated from Him... i.e. not yet brought to know and believe in their eternal salvation [ALREADY HAPPENED] by God's free grace in Christ Jesus.

ONLY SUCH lost sheep can be found through the gospel ministry, and be experientially united to Christ.

How many "missionaries" out there know this glorious and liberaing truth? Didn't Christ say, "For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light" Mt 11:30.

How many missionaries out there believe that their work is find, and turn dead goats into living sheep by their labours? Oh what oppressive burden sincere missionaries FOOLISHLY impose upon themselves!!!

See that lost sheep in the picture?

It is ALREADY a sheep, Christ's possession, and given eternal life. It is already alive but it is lost, i.e. not experientially united to Christ yet. The ministry of the gospel is to bring such to know the truth of their salvation by God's free grace in Christ!!!

The lost sheep has an owner - the shepherd. Luke 15:6 "And when he cometh home, he calleth together his friends and neighbours, saying unto them, Rejoice with me; for I have found my sheep which was lost."

The lost coin has an owner - the woman.

Luke 15:9 "And when she hath found it, she calleth her friends and her neighbours together, saying, Rejoice with me; for I have found the piece which I had lost.

The lost son has an owner - the father.

Luke 15:24 "For this my son was dead, and is alive again; he was lost, and is found."

Jesus came to save His people from their sin!

Is that difficult to understand, or is it too difficult to accept because it goes against your pet ideas?
========













Henry commented about Judas, and the post above was not discussed. 

------------ 

Henry
John 17:12 Judas , the son of perdition , was lost eternally.

2 Corinthians 4:3 But if our gospel be hid , it is hid to them that are lost...4) in whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believeth not....

Sing F Lau
Henry, you may wish to prove that Judas was lost ETERNALLY.

John 17:12 While I was with them in the world, I kept them in thy name: those that thou gavest me I have kept, and none of them is lost, but the son of perdition; that the scripture might be fulfilled.

"Those that thou gavest me I have kept, and not of them is lost..."

The disjunctive "but" - does it refer to Jesus purposely not keeping Judas so that the Scripture might be fulfilled, or that Jesus helplessly lost Judas? Pick your choice... just don't contradict Christ's word.

Sing F Lau
Henry, you may wish to prove first that all of Christ sheep will also hear and believe the gospel. Thanks.

2 Corinthians 4:3 But if our gospel be hid , it is hid to them that are lost...4) in whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believeth not....

The gospel does not need to be hidden from the spiritually dead...

The spiritually dead is blind enough already... the god of this do not waste time blinding them.

It is God's children that are prevented from believing!

Beware of sound bytes!

Get the sense!!! They are different things.

Hulan Bass
All Sheep and All Goats were lost in Adam's Fall, but on the SHEEP have a Redeemer - Matt. 25:31--34, 41.

Sing F Lau
Elder Hulan, are the goats among the lost in Christ's statement below:

Lu 19:10 For the Son of man is come to seek and to save that which was lost.

Thank you.

Hulan Bass
All Humanity, figuratively and in an analogy, is only listed as SHEEP and GOATS. Only the Sheep are IN Christ, and their names were written in the Lamb's Book of Life before the foundation of the World. Many texts for proof. Rev. 20:12---15.

Sing F Lau
Did you answer my specific question?

Hulan Bass
Only those LOST IN CHRIST were His Sheep. Even some of His Sheep get lost TIMELY or GOSPELLY. Read: Luke 15:1---6.

Henry
What I am trying to point out here brother Sing is the word "lost" can be used to a lost sheep or a lost person eternally like Judas .

Sing F Lau
I understand that's what you are saying... which is why I suggest that you may want to show us that Judas was lost eternally.

Henry
Son of perdition, means lost eternally .
Luke 22:3 Satan entered into Judas...
John 6:70 ... I chose twelve of you , and one of you is a devil .
Judas is a devil , son of perdition and is lost eternally .
Perdition means eternal damnation.

Sing F Lau
Where did you get the idea that perdition means ETERNAL damnation?
Please give some evidence! Thanks.

If Judas is a devil, Peter would be a satan!!! <LOL>

Dellis Worsham Sr.
Hi Sing, Is it Ok, if I share this thought with some friends of mine? The one in the OP?

Henry
There is no scripture that says Peter is a son of perdition or a devil or lost . I dont know about you brother Sing if you are just listening to your own opinion and not to the scripture . You are strange .

Where do you get the meaning of words bro Sing?

Henry
2 Thessalonians 2:3 Let no man deceive you by any means : for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first , and that man of sin be revealed , THE SON OF PERDITION;

How do you understand the son of perdition here bro Sing ? LOST SHEEP? 🙂

Sing F Lau
@ There is no scripture that says Peter is a son of perdition or a devil or lost .
=========
Mt 16:23 But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.

I don't know about you brother Henry if you are just listening to your own opinion and not to the scripture . You are strange!!!

Where do you get the meaning of words - Judas was LOST...
- LOST in what sense?
- In what sense was Judas was a son of PERDITION? What does that term mean?

You have ASSUMED that that means he was LOST ETERNALLY.

I'm only asking you to prove that assertion.

What does the term "child of hell" mean? Such is lost eternally too?

Mt 23:15 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.

Are you listening to your own voice, and inquire no further?

At least entertain my questions. If you think they are nonsensical, say it and tell us why?

Willy Keat
Sing, why I always see you debating and challenging other believers about the doctrine or your theology....why can't you share something about your work or church ministry to the people.........I think you wasted a lot of your time....hope you spend your free time visiting friends who are sick or needed help....

Sing F Lau
Hi Willy, my work and my ministry is not important. The truth of God is important... my calling is to be a pastor teacher.

You should visit the sick, and those in need of help. Jas 1:27 "Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world." This passage is addressed to believers in general.

You will probably say Lim Kit Siang wastes a lot of time debating about big issues in Parliament... you would advise him to make himself useful by turun padang and sort out the clogged drains, garbage collection, etc, etc.... Him debating against the unmo-ism and bn-ism is wasting a lot of time!!! Many say, "don't vote for Lim in Gelang Patah... because he will not be around to serve the people. Such stupid folks don't understand... Uncle Kit best serves the people by debating BIG issues of good governance in the Parliament.

A useful way a pastor teacher helps others is to direct them back to the word of God, and away from their imagination. If pastors teachers fail to do that, Christ's sheep will end up believing in FABLES!!!

Willy, this is addressed to believers like you: "Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints." Jude 3

Willy, this is addressed to people like me:

4:1 ¶ I charge thee therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom;

2 Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine.

3 For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears;

4 And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.

5 But watch thou in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, make full proof of thy ministry.

Think about what I say, and may the Lord bless you.

Henry
Brother Sing , you need to go back to school and learn basic English .
In reference to Jesus calling Peter Satan , Satan is a name , it does not specify Peter . Satan being a prince of this world , only minds worldly things .

In other words , Jesus just likened him to Satan , no connection to the state of Peter .

Unlike lost , son of perdition , devil , are modifiers of a noun , specifies a noun , denotes the quality of a person and specifies the distinction to others .

Sing F Lau
Thanks. I go to school everyday... an e-school, learning from other students of God's word, and English as well from men like you!

Teach yourself with your own words....,

"In other words , Jesus just likened him (Judas) to a devil, no connection to the state of Judas."

Henry
"Lost" or " son of perdition " is an adjective . Not like" Satan " is a noun .

Sing F Lau
"Son of perdition" is a PHRASAL NOUN, not an adjective!
"Lost" in John 17:12 is a verb.
"Lost" can be a noun too, referring to that which is in the state of lostness, separated from the owner.

I know a little bit of English too! I do teach a little bit of English at secondary school to help meet the needs of the family.

Henry
Le me give you other interpretations of John 17:12

The Living Bible
John 17:12 During my time here I have kept safe within your family all of these you gave me. I guarded them so that none perished, except the son of hell , as the scriptures foretold . 
"none perished but Judas , the son of hell " the scriptures say "

"None of them is lost but Judas , the son of perdition "
Judas is lost , lost eternally and he PERISHED"
You are funny bro Sing...

Sing F Lau
Yes, I'm funny in that I love to point out the inconsistencies and contradiction in a interpretation.

John 17:12 "While I was with them in the world, I kept them in thy name: those that thou gavest me I have kept, and none of them is lost, but the son of perdition; that the scripture might be fulfilled."

John 6:39 "And this is the Father’s will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day."

Interpreting John 17:12 the way you do - i.e. Judas is ETERNALLY LOST - contradicts John 6:39. Such interpretation contradict Christ's very own words.

John 17:12 does say Judas is LOST. It is an IMAGINATION to say that he is eternally lost. Christ Himself declares in no uncertain term - All which the Father has given to Him, He should lose nothing ETERNALLY... i.e. raise them up at the last day... i.e. SAVED THEM ETERNALLY.

Yes, I'm funny. I just want to be honest with Scriptures... and abhor adding fancy ideas to it.

Thanks for the exchanges.

Henry
There is no contradiction brother Sing . You have to consider the sequence of the scriptures . John 17:12 came later and it superceded John 6:39 . If it is a book , it got revised . The two scriptures are still related but John 7:12 is more specific than John 6.39.

I like you brother Sing . You make me study harder . 🙂

Sing F Lau
Therein lies a big problem... you have just conceded that there are contradictions in the Bible.... one passage superseded the other!!!

The answer is not that one superseded the other.

The answer lies in RIGHTLY dividing the word of truth.

In one passage, Christ speaks of TEMPORAL salvation... John 17:12... i.e. salvation relating to Judas temporal well being and usefulness. In that sense, Judas was LOST, completely lost... with his premature and horrendous death with no further usefulness in Christ kingdom!!!! He messed it up big time!!!

In another, Christ speaks of ETERNAL salvation... i.e. John 6:39. Judas was one among all them that God the Father has given to Christ to redeem. Christ did not lose anyone.... "that of all which he hath given me, I should lose nothing." BUT you insist otherwise... that Christ did lose one, i.e. Judas is ETERNALLY lost!

I don't like you because you can ADD to Scriptures with such ease... <LOOOOOOOOOL> Like so many others, when the Scriptures say "life", they conveniently and CARELESSLY read it as "eternal life"!!! Even so, you insist that Judas is "ETERNALLY lost" even though the Scriptures say nothing to such effect!!!

For a good example Mt 7:13-14.

Henry
I did not add anything to the scriptures .They are both right at their own state . If you say they contradict and you are only siding on John 6:39 , then you are making the other verse wrong .

They are both right ! And again , John 7:12 is more precise ! It is the conclusion of John 6:39 . 🙂

John 7:12 ... None was lost but Judas!

...None perished but Judas!

Sing F Lau
Let the readers do their own conclusion then.

I must conclude that your interpretation requires that Jesus made an erroneous statement in John 6:39, which needed correction later on.

I said your interpretation makes the two passages CONTRADICT themselves.

I have shown you how the two passages are in perfect harmony when rightly divided. It is your interpretation that makes the two passages to contradict.

Of course you DID add to Scriptures... which is what started of this exchanges. You insisted that Judas was ETERNALLY lost.

Thanks.

Henry
Judas was called son of perdition .
Perdition means eternal damnation .
Damnation means the state of being damned.
Damn means to condemn to HELL !

Sing F Lau
You are REPEATING the same thing, and not proving anything.
Please prove that "perdition" means eternal damnation. That's all I'm asking. That would be an easy task if there is any truth in your assertion.

Repetition and assertion proves nothing! <LOL>

Henry
Thats what the scripture says . I dont have to prove anything .

 

Sing F Lau

"Damn means to condemn to HELL!"

May I help you?

Here are 3 occasions "damned" is used in the KJV.

Does your interpretation suit any of these?

Mr 16:16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.

(note that damned and saved are used as opposite. According to your definition, unbelief damns a man to hell; and belief saves a man unto heaven! It seems that your believe in a work-based salvation!!!)

Ro 14:23 And he that doubteth is damned if he eat, because he eateth not of faith: for whatsoever is not of faith is sin.

(according to your definition, he that doubted... is damned to hell... O Lord, have mercy!!!)

2Th 2:12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

(who does the pronoun "they" refer to? Are they damned to hell for their unbelief? Is that the only meaning of damned... unto hell?)

Henry
The subject here are entirely different .
Where is the word perdition ?
The origin of eternal damnation is the word perdition . NOT damn .
What you are stating bro Sing is entirely no relevance .

Sing F Lau
Thats what the scripture says . I dont have to prove anything .
======

Any fool can claim, "That's what the scripture says."

Henry
Any fool can claim? What verse ?

Sing F Lau
Henry, you said, "Damn means to condemn to HELL !"
I have just shown you that the word "damn" is not used with the sense you imposed upon it!!!

Sing F Lau
Any fool can claim ? What verse ?
=========
Any fool can claim his opinion as the teaching of Scriptures.
You INSISTED "Damn means to condemn to HELL!"
Yes, what verse say that "Damn means to condemn to HELL!"

Henry
Perdition is the key word bro Sing . NOT damn.
You said any fool can claim?
What verse or passage or scripture or holy writ ?

Henry
So a lot of senior pastors that taught me of what I am explaining now are fools also BUT you ?

Sing F Lau
Ok, since you are fixated on the word perdition, and INSIST that perdition means "eternal damnation consider these passages:

1Ti 6:9 But they that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, which drown men in destruction and perdition.

(who does the pronoun "they" refer to - God's children, or those dead in trespasses and sins. If the former, do God's children that will be rich drown in the damnation of hell?)

Heb 10:39 But we are not of them who draw back unto perdition; but of them that believe to the saving of the soul.

(God's children among the Jews who draw back into the old covenant... did they ended in eternal hell?)

Sing F Lau
Perdition is the key word bro Sing . NOT damn.
===========
You used both!!! Here.....
Judas was called son of perdition .
Perdition means eternal damnation .
Damnation means the state of being damned.
Damn means to condemn to HELL !

Henry
They , them - are pronouns for the lost.
We , us , you - are pronouns for the elect.

Sing F Lau
Yes, it is very easy for any one - whether senior pastor or professor to claim, "That's what the scripture says" to validate his opinions.

Perdition (8x) and destruction (5x) are translated from the same word "apōleia".

They do not means ETERNAL destruction as you insisted.

Sing F Lau
They , them - are pronouns for the lost.
We , us , you - are pronouns for the elect.
========

Therein lie your basic error.
If you are consistent, then you have say this:

======
They , them - are pronouns for the lost.
We , us , you - are pronouns for the saved.
======
Or
They , them - are pronouns for the NON-elect.
We , us , you - are pronouns for the elect.
======

Lost and Saved go together; and

Elect and Non-elect is a pair.

Let's go along with your idea that the lost are the NON-elect.

1Ti 6:9 But they that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, which drown men in destruction and perdition.

Why would Paul bother telling the NON-elect who are already under eternal damnation in their native state of FALLING into temptation and a snare... blah blah blah????

1Tim 6:9 is a COMPLETE waste and utterly foolish if it is speaking of the NON-elect!

It makes a whole lot of sense if Paul is warning against God's children that foolishly will be rich! There are God's children who are lost - much like the prodigal son!

Henry
2 Thessalonians 2:3 Let no man daceive you by any means: for that day shall not come , except there come a falling away first ,and that man of sin be revealed , the SON OF PERDITION ;

I asked you about this verse earlier bro Sing . How do you understand the "son of perdition" here ?

Lost sheep ? Eternally saved?

Sing F Lau
And from this verse you INSISTED that Judas was eternally damned???? Please show that it does that.

You insisted John 17:12 teaches that Judas is ETERNALLY damned. I asked you to prove your claim. Is 2Th 2:3 your proof?

I'll read your answer tomorrow. Knocking off now. Thanks. 

What's so obscure about Rev 20:14? And Rev 20:15?

14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire.
This is the second death.
15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life
was cast into the lake of fire.
Rev 20


Sir, may I ask. 
Smartyn said that we should only focus on the clearly stated things in the Bible and should not let 1 obscure verse throw us off course. I think he meant the Rev 20:14 verse.

What do you think?

-------

That's good advice. Things that are clearly stated enlighten those that are not so clearly stated - to rightly divide the word of truth. 

But remember, "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness." 2 Tim 3:16.

"All scripture" includes the so-called obscure passages.

The inspired Scriptures must be rightly divided.

"Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth." 2 Tim 2:15.

"Man shall not live by bread alone, BUT by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God." "Every word" includes those considered obscure passages. 

All Scriptures, rightly divided, are in perfect harmony and unity, without any contradictions.

What's so obscure about Rev 20:14? And Rev 20:15?

Which part is hard to understand? Which part is not clearly stated?
Rev 20:14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.
Rev 20:15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.

The claim of obscurity is just a pathetic and lame excuse to dismiss whatever one does not want to believe! Ask for clarity, and thou shalt find it.

So much for the shibboleth of sola scriptura! Just a cheapskate religious platitude to impress the gullible. 

It's cowardice to label a teaching as false without demonstrating its falsity. I will demonstrate the falsity of a teaching with the author, to make sure I have understood the author correctly, before I call it a falsehood.

Seriously, even a donkey can bray "falsehood" loud and clear for whatever he doesn't like or understand.

1 Corinthians 14:38 KJT — But if any man be ignorant, let him be ignorant.

Forget him and move on... till he comes begging for you.

Will Christ take you as His disciple?

Will Christ take you as His disciple?

Midweek evening bible study notes on 17 April 2024

We are going through the Gospel of Luke

Lk 14:25-35
Christ Laid Down the Conditions of Following Him.

a. Four observations were recorded from the incident at the Pharisee’s house on the Sabbath day:
- The healing of a man on the Sabbath (v1-6);
- Advice for the guests (v7-11);
- Advice for the host (v12-14);
- The parable of the great supper, warnings against spurning the invitation (v15-24).

b. From the Pharisee’s house, Dr. Luke takes us to the new scene - “great multitudes” were with Him.

Q. What was on the minds of these great multitudes? Why were they with Him? - The Lord took the opportunity to set before them, in the most solemn and emphatic manner, in uncompromising terms, the conditions of coming to Him as His disciples.

- “If any man come to me” – not outwardly like the “great multitudes” that were with him, but coming to Him as the Lord and Saviour, the Son of the living God, and willingly submit to His teaching and will.

Q. Who can come to Jesus Christ?
Q. Who is Jesus addressing in the great multitudes?
Q. Do all God’s children (elect that are effectually called) come to Jesus Christ? (in the context here)
Q. Can a natural man come to Jesus Christ?

1. Discipleship owns Christ above all human relationships (v26)
a. Various human relationships are named…
- lesser relationships in other spheres are included.
- Christ is Lord above all; don't like it? Then, not fit to be His disciple.

b. “… and his own life also”:
- This crucial aspect is not forgotten, SELF must be hated too. ALSO - in addition to all the rest.

c. “…and hate not…”: no proper/actual hatred is commanded by Christ; this would be contrary to God’s laws, Christ's own teaching, and the law of nature.
- What is intended is that these are not to be preferred to Christ, or loved more than He. (Mt 10:37)
- Christ must come first before all these; they are to be forsaken and turned from when they stand in the way of the honour and interest of the Lord.

d. “… cannot be my disciple…”:
- Christ is emphatic and categorical; He does not accommodate or tolerate any less. Bear that in mind. Why should He accept any less?
- Christ is Lord and Saviour; He is no beggar. He has a good name to uphold; tarnish not His name.
- sonship with God is FREE; discipleship with Christ Jesus is COSTLY; the latter relates to our temporal salvation, sonship relates to our eternal salvation.

Q. Why does Christ demand such loyalty? 
Q. How does the demand show that Christ is no cheapskate Master?
Q. Does Christ deserve such loyalty from His disciples? Why? Give some reasons.
Q.  Are all of God's children automatically Christ's disciples also? Why?

2. Discipleship embraces the cross-bearing (v27)

a. “… and his own life also…” is now elaborated.
- How does a disciple hate his own life?
- By bearing his own cross: suffer and endure all reproach, persecutions, afflictions, deprivations, and if need be death itself, cheerfully and patiently.
- Carry his own cross of godly living, Titus 2:12.
- Christ bore His cross for our eternal salvation; as His disciples, each one of us has our own cross for His name sakes. Mt 10:22, 19:29, 24:9, Act 9:16.
- Cross bearing for the Lord’s sake, and suffering for our own stupidity are not the same.

b. “… cannot be my disciple…”
- A disciple is not greater than his lord… John 13:16, 15:20
- A disciple who will live godly in Christ shall suffer persecution. 2Tim 3:12.
- The gospel of grace requires cross bearing: “teaching us, that denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously, and godly, in this present world.” Titus 2:12.

Q. Is Christ’s demand for a disciple to bear his own cross reasonable? Why?
Q. Why is Christ so open and honest about the cost of coming after Him?
Q. What does this speak of the person of Christ?
Q. Is Christ deliberately turning away potential disciples?

3. Two illustrations on counting the cost of discipleship (v28-32)

a. Building a tower: finish what you have chosen to start!
- A rhetorical question: only a fool does not count the cost of the project. A wise man will engage a qualified QS to make sure that he can afford to complete the project. Otherwise, he will suffer great loss and humiliation.
- Once a disciple of Jesus, always a disciple, no matter what.
- The same truth also applies to marriage and parenthood. Finish what you have chosen to start!
- Incomplete and abandoned projects are some of the saddest sights to behold; they are like lives cut short prematurely.

b. Waging a war: what's the probability of victory- A rhetorical question: only a fool rushes to war without weighing the probability of victory.
- A wise king will first consult his strategists about the likelihood of victory. Otherwise, he will sue for peace with the enemy.
- Discipleship is fighting a good fight of faith; it's a fight, a hard fight to victory in Christ.
- The same truth applies to arguments and theological disputes. When engaged, be prepared to admit defeat when shown to be in error! Otherwise, hold thy peace.

Q. How do the two illustrations used by Christ show the wisdom of counting the cost of discipleship?

4. Discipleship relinquishes all to Christ’s Lordship (v33)
a. “… forsaketh not all that he hath…”: it’s a zero-sum game; it’s all or nothing.
- Following Christ means willing, when need be, to lose everything we possess for His sake.
- The Lord does not intend His disciples to sell or give away all they own and take the oath of self-imposed poverty.
- What He requires is subjecting all that one have to His Lordship and disposal SUCH THAT these things do not hinder us following His as a disciple..
- Otherwise, one is not fit to be His disciple.

Q. What have you consciously forsaken to follow Christ?
Q. Why does Jesus demand this “all or nothing” requirement?
Q. Are there things you possess/love that hinder you from following Christ faithfully? Vocation? Hobbies? Leisure? etc.

Shepherding the flock of God

Battering the sheep of God!

https://www.facebook.com/sing.f.lau/posts/pfbid02eWftjeYMRSfiaHgFbY7iyYf6g7aX5nVPEg8VoBNS1NaC79Gmvz7KKvz6c2BoM2Gbl

December 07, 2022

#shepherding
A man asked these questions:
- What is heavy shepherding?
- Examples of heavy shepherding?
- In contrast, is there light or no shepherding? What are the examples?
- What are the biblical examples of good spiritual shepherding?
---------

Thank you for asking these good questions.

Let me repeat (I have said this many times) an important truth related to your excellent questions.

- The CHIEF manner an under-shepherd (a pastor) shepherds the sheep of Christ (members of a local church under his oversight) is the faithful preaching of the word of God. 2Tim 4:1-5.

- The CHIEF way in which the rule of Christ is administered in a local church is through the preaching of His word; His truth and His will are made known and applied to His sheep.

- “All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness.” The word faithfully preached is shepherding rightly discharged

- The public ministry of the word may need to be followed up/augmented by the personal ministry; some members may need to be reminded personally what has been preached and speaks to their circumstances.

 

1. Heavy Shepherding
a. What is heavy shepherding?
- Heavy shepherding is lording over the Lord’s people; infringing upon the liberty of church members.
- 1Pet 5:1 "The elders which are among you I exhort, who am also an elder, and a witness of the sufferings of Christ, and also a partaker of the glory that shall be revealed: 2 Feed the flock of God which is among you, taking the oversight thereof, not by constraint, but willingly; not for filthy lucre, but of a ready mind; 3 Neither as being lords over God's heritage, but being ensamples to the flock.

b. Examples of heavy shepherding?
There are endless examples…
- “Brother John, it’s time for you to retire; resign and move to Penang.”
- “Brother Buoy, look for another job that does not hinder you from the assembly of the saints.”
- “Brother Won, invite Errol home for lunch.” 
- “Brother… tell your wife to dress decently.”
- “Sister, your dress hem should be 4 inches below your knees…”
- Visiting homes of members unannounced/uninvited to check on their family life.
- Checking with members how much they have been giving.
- Using the pulpit to attack/pick on the members personally, etc.

 2. Is there light or no shepherding?
a. Yes. Neglecting to instruct the people to embrace the doctrines and the practices of the gospel of Jesus Christ. Not all activities in a church equal/ amount to biblical shepherding.

b. What are the examples?
- Neglecting to exhort the non-resident members to observe good churchmanship in a local church.
- Ignoring wayward church members.
- Sweeping under the carpet problems and issues in the church. 

Q3. What are the biblical examples of good spiritual shepherding?
a. The epistles of the Apostles are great examples of good spiritual shepherding…
- All the epistles deal with doctrines (what the recipients ought to believe), and the applications of those doctrines (how the recipients ought to conduct themselves, their duties to God, and fellow believers.
- Real issues faced by the church are discussed and resolved with the Bible’s authority.

I hope these help. You probably have some better ideas.

Battered sheep


 

https://www.facebook.com/sing.f.lau/posts/pfbid02hq6jEkPFD5ey8FHawN8YNypy5rWvo8KGUwkrnmtfj9kS1Lk2S4vdRL1dtsHRYR11l

From: sing <singpenang@gmail.com>
To: Dr. Sanny
Date: Apr 10, 2011, 7:07 PM
Subject: Battered sheep

Dear brother Sanny,
Thank you for the article “When Should a Christian Leave a Church? (Part 3)” by John G Reisinger.

John is a younger brother of Ernest C Reisinger. Though brothers, they differ quite vehemently over some of the doctrinal issues.  Mr Ernest pastors a typical RB church, claiming 1689 as the doctrinal standard. John moves in the right direction… but is labelled as antinomian!

John is dealing with a typical problem that prevail in not a few Reformed Baptist churches, in the USA and elsewhere... where authoritarianism and heavy 'shepherding' and lording over the flock is the norm. Many such big RB churches have eventually disintegrated when people come to their senses. The churches pastored by Mr. Martin and Mr Hogg (and our friend, BS, knows both these men) have crumbled because of this authoritarianism.

It all began with the plurality of elders pushed beyond the biblical bounds. 'Plurality of elders' becomes a smokescreen for authoritarianism. Also, a false and forced and deliberate distinction between the membership and the eldership is another instrument... like the Romish distinction between the clergy and the laity.

You have used two apt words - "preposterously dangerous." I have seen and experienced some of it while in Sydney and in KL... and I am determined to guard the liberty of Christ's sheep.

Some RB churches have crippled and messed up the lives of God's children through authoritarianism and lording over them. Others have done the same harm by neglecting to exercise care over them. From my own experience, and in accordance with the Scriptures, I regularly teach my people that each one of them is a FREEMAN in Christ and answerable to Christ alone, and that I am committed to guard their, and my freedom under Christ.

Every member of a church, including the pastor and elders, is EQUALLY under the authority of Jesus Christ alone, they are all equal as brothers and sisters in Christ; Christ alone is Lord and above us. And elders are there to minister to the sheep, and not to lord over them. Eldership is not an office of authority, but an office of ministering the RULE OF CHRIST over the saints.

If one thing needs to be emphasized and pointed out regularly, it is the elders' solemn responsibility to nurture and guard the spiritual well-being of Christ's sheep. 1Tim 3:1 reads, "This is a true saying, If a man, desire the office of a bishop, he desireth a good work."  See the word WORK... WORK... WORK. Eldership is an office of WORK... WORK... WORK... to feed, nurture, defend, train, comfort, exhort, rebuke, admonish, etc.; it is not an office of authority to lord over God's heritage!

What elders say is NOT the last word. Every member can challenge the elders' words from the Scriptures... make our people bold to do so... and it is well for everyone... for the pastor and elders too... so that everyone is guided by the Scriptures alone, and not by Scriptures INTERPRETED by the elders alone!

I have said too much.

Must get ready for the evening service.

Your brother and servant in Christ,

sing
======

John 21 KJT
¶ 15 So when they had dined, Jesus saith to Simon Peter, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me more than these? He saith unto him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I love thee. He saith unto him, Feed my lambs.

John 21:16
¶ 16He saith to him again the second time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me? He saith unto him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I love thee. He saith unto him, Feed my sheep.

John 21:17
¶ He saith unto him the third time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me? Peter was grieved because he said unto him the third time, Lovest thou me? And he said unto him, Lord, thou knowest all things; thou knowest that I love thee. Jesus saith unto him, Feed my sheep.

Act 20:28
Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood.