#effectualcall #gospelcall
1689.10.3
"Elect infants
dying in infancy are regenerated and saved by Christ through the Spirit; who
works when, and where, and how He pleases; so also are all elect persons, who
are incapable of being outwardly called by the ministry of the word."
"... so also
are all elect persons, who are incapable of being outwardly called by the
ministry of the word," THAT IS, there are elect souls who do not have the
gospel sent to call them from darkness to light... EVEN THOUGH they are
effectually called out of their native state of sin and death to that of grace
and salvation.
The effectual call
and the gospel call are distinct:
- The former is
independent, both logically and chronologically, before the latter
- The former is
monergistic; the latter is synergistic.
- The former is the
free and sovereign application of the eternal salvation to each elect
personally, the latter brings experiential knowledge of the former.
- The former makes
the latter possible only.
- The former is
absolutely certain and immutable; the latter involves human factors, thus
involving variables.
- an elect who is effectually called but
without the gospel call and an elect who has both the effectual call and the
gospel call - both are equally saved in the eternal sense; the gospel call
brings a child of God varying degrees of practical/temporal salvation.
Thomas Paul Simmons'
statement implies that every elect soul, without exception. shall have the
gospel call out of darkness to light; that's a fable of many modern
neo-Calvinistic Baptists. They believe that the gospel call and effectual call
is a "package deal" - like McD's combo deal.
p/s
Yes, it is
"elect infants" and not just "infants"; chapter 10 is on the effectual calling of the ELECT,
therefore, the context demands "elect infants." Revisionists insist infants, even all the aborted and those infanticided.
--------
Reggie Lee
Well said!
Mark Thomas
Powerful truth
stated. Thank you, Bro. Sing.
Bill Taylor
Many have greatly
erred from this truth by ignoring or denying the last statement in your
response. "Revisionists insist infants." You are spot on that only
elect infants are considered.
========
