Things New and Old

Ancient truths revealed in the Scriptures are often forgotten, disbelieved or distorted, and therefore lost in the passage of time. Such ancient truths when rediscovered and relearned are 'new' additions to the treasury of ancient truths.

Christ showed many new things to the disciples, things prophesied by the prophets of old but hijacked and perverted by the elders and their traditions, but which Christ reclaimed and returned to His people.

Many things taught by the Apostles of Christ have been perverted or substituted over the centuries. Such fundamental doctrines like salvation by grace and justification have been hijacked and perverted and repudiated by sincere Christians. These doctrines need to be reclaimed and restored to God's people.

There are things both new and old here. "Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things"
2Ti 2:7.

Thursday, August 6, 2026

Shibboleth and religious jargon are not enough!


 
The preacher said,
'But in evangelism I have purposed to know nothing among people but Jesus Christ and Him Crucified and offer the salvation to all, leaving the hedging and selecting up to God.'

==========

An inquirer:

You preach Christ, and Him crucified! Good, Brother! The Lord bless you!

- Which Jesus Christ do you preach?

- Why did he come? To save! Save who? Tell the truth. Don't lie to the hearers. Don't hide anything from them!

- But why was He crucified? For sins. For whose sins? Tell the hearers the truth. Don't leave them to believe lies.

- Crucified for whom? Tell the truth. Don't lie to the hearers.

- What did his crucifixion achieve? Redemption? Whose redemption? Was the redemption accomplished for certain specific people, or was redemption made possible for all? Tell the truth. Don't deceive your hearers!

- You actually offer salvation? To who? The dead who need salvation? Would such be able to accept your offer?

- Did Christ send you to offer salvation?

You can preach Christ, and Him crucified, without proclaiming those gospel facts! What a wonder!

Shibboleth and religious jargon are not enough!

Give them the gospel truth!

 

Scruples about "once saved always saved."



LeongSy
Dr Ezra does not subscribe to the "Once saved always saved" mantra.
What do you think?

Sing
I assume that when a man disagrees with something, he MUST have understood what he disagrees with. Otherwise, he is at best unwise or at worst, foolish.

On "once saved always saved" - let me inquire,

Let him who disagrees with "once saved always saved" tell us, "once saved always saved by WHOM, and from WHAT?"

Can you tell us what "once saved always saved " means? Thank you

LeongSy
I don't call anyone a fool coz I don't think I am better than them. You may contact Dr Ezra directly if you want him to answer your questions.

Sing
You have an interest in the NPP scholars and Dr Ezra. I don't. So, you interact with them.

If you have specific questions, I can answer them. You don't need to tell me what this Dr. believes and what that Prof. doesn't. If you do, like you tell me about "once saved, always saved", then I have to help you think through the subject.

I'm not calling anyone a fool, but making a general statement that if a man disagrees with what he does even understand, then he is acting foolishly indeed.

So, once saved always saved by WHO, and from WHAT?

If a man can't answer these questions correctly, then what audacity to disagree with what he has not understood? If he can answer correctly, then he will see his obvious error.

The Bible does call a man a fool under various circumstances.

LeongSy
If I go n call everyone a fool, sooner than later I will hv no friends

Sing
Saying "a man who disagrees with what he does not even understand is foolish" is not the same as going around and calling everyone a fool. If you can't distinguish the two, then it would be difficult for you to rightly divide the word of truth.

LeongSy
Your words are too harsh. Honestly, you think that you are better than others

Sing
If they are, my apologies to the offended ones.

A man who denies once saved by God through Jesus Christ is immutably saved from eternal damnation preaches a different gospel; it's no gospel.

What kind of God does such a man believe - the God who has spoken in the Scriptures or a God of his own imagination?

Romans 8:30 KJV — Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified.

What does this Scripture speak on the subject of OSAS?

Matthew 23:15 KJV — Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.

Was Jesus harsh in calling the proselyters the children of hell, and their proselytes the same?

Galatians 1:8 KJV — But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.

Is Apostle Paul harsh here?

LeongSy
Once saved always saved from eternal damnation lo. How many times v hv to go through this?

Sing
Did you apply this truth in instructing your Dr Ezra about his error on OSAS?

LeongSy
Why should a 6 yo Christian teach someone with doctorate? I am not a fool who goes around thinking others are fools

Sing
I'm very sorry to hear your answer. It's God's word, the truth of the inspired Scriptures, not you.

Apollos was far superior to Dr Ezra, but Priscilla was comfortable teaching him what the Apostle Paul had taught her.  😊😊😊.

LeongSy
I don't want to go around correcting everyone by thinking I know better than them. Let God send someone else to correct them, if they need to be corrected. I don't qualify

Sing
James 5:
19 ¶Brethren, if any of you do err from the truth, and one convert him; 20 Let him know, that he which converteth the sinner from the error of his way shall save a soul from death, and shall hide a multitude of sins.

You don't need to go around; God, by his kind providence, brings them to you.

If you know the truth from the error on a particular subject, you are qualified and should feel responsible to tell the truth, or you just miss the opportunity of saving someone from the error of his way.. leaving the brother/sister to continue in his error.

Ok. I'm done. No need to stress you.

I'll take a month's leave. Let you interact with others.

The Lord bless you. 

Monday, August 3, 2026

For God hath appointed us to obtain salvation

#Appointed #Appointor #Appointees


Such an appointment presupposes a Divine Appointor, who freely and sovereignly appoints those dead in trespasses and sins and justly deserving of eternal wrath. No, He didn't consult you or ask for your approval or request your acceptance of the appointment. If He had done so, you would still be in your native state of sin and condemnation.

And the appointees are spared that wrath because the Redeemer appointed as their substitute bore and took away that wrath by His righteousness and blood, thus redeeming all them that were appointed unto salvation in Christ Jesus.

-------

appoint:
2 Determine or decide on
2.1archaic Decree.: ‘such laws are appointed by God’

‘As His sovereignty extends to His worship, so it is His sole prerogative to appoint the laws of His worship, to command of His subjects the way they ought to worship Him.’ See less

The Protestants' Priestcraft?



August 3,  2021

#protestants_priestcraft
https://www.facebook.com/sing.f.lau/posts/pfbid033PXQnLsFmVYg99D4EFi8beBsKoa4pFFbPCSWjKHxkeRpBNNgaFz8SiAzLNfDfjeBl

Many preachers love one, and loath the other! Naturally! But when their hearers also love the same injurious lie, great indeed is the delusion! They foolishly rest their eternal salvation (since regeneration involves one's eternal salvation) in the hands of preachers, and some of them are no more than hirelings!

John 3
6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.
7 Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.
8 The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit.
- [i.e. no exception; every elect is regenerated the exact small way, IMMEDIATELY without means, not mediately with means. ]

Is it hard to understand this? Or is the truth too humbling for the high-minded preachers to swallow?

Supposing you were the dead Lazarus lying in the tomb, would you rather have Christ acting on you DIRECTLY, or would you rather have Him acting on you INDIRECTLY through the activities of His apostles, to bring you out of death?

The former keeps the apostles properly in their place, while the latter deceitfully elevates them to be mediators!

John 11
43 And when he thus had spoken, he cried with a loud voice, Lazarus, come forth.
44 And he that was dead came forth, bound hand and foot with graveclothes: and his face was bound about with a napkin. Jesus saith unto them, loose him, and let him go.

It was only AFTER Christ Himself had ALREADY raised Lazarus that He summoned His disciples to do something for living Lazarus, i.e. to set him free from the hindrances of the napkin and graveclothes on him! Preachers remove hindrances from men ALREADY MADE ALIVE by Christ!

While Lazarus was dead, Christ did not ask His disciples to do ANYTHING for him! Christ knew the HARSH realities... the disciples are completely impotent of doing any spiritual good with regard to the dead! He didn't depend on the disciples as the indispensable mediators to get Lazarus out of his deadness!

Christ divinely gives life to dead Lazarus;

the disciples free the living Lazarus from hindrances.

Get the point? That's not too hard to understand, is it?

Or is it an ADDICTION to a form of priestcraft!
========

Dhong Ejnar Rue
I love that illustration.
I'm glad that through the patient teaching ministry of the Holy Spirit I have come to the biblical understanding of the doctrine of Eternal salvation, especially on the subject of Regeneration👉Not Calvinistic, nor Arminian.

Bill Taylor
A perfect example of their ungodly error!

What is effectual calling? And what does it involve, and what is its effect?



https://www.facebook.com/sing.f.lau/posts/pfbid02JoxTRR3cYZRLf9YsAofXeWftGKScox15e4qzUXM7Lfp5S1D4vqUoUdPwCxU5jHgrl

I asked this on a Reformed Christian Coffeehouse:

What is effectual calling? And what does it involve, and what is its effect?

Someone gave this answer:
Q. 31. What is effectual calling?
A. Effectual calling is the work of God’s Spirit, whereby, convincing us of our sin and misery, enlightening our minds in the knowledge of Christ, and renewing our wills, he doth persuade and enable us to embrace Jesus Christ, freely offered to us in the gospel. (Westminster Shorter Catechism)

I asked further:
"Who are those that are effectually called, and what was their spiritual state?"

A reformed man gets very uptight with my question... for what reason I know not what - just proud and cocksure, I think.

What do you think of the answer provided by the WSC?

Do you agree with what it says?
-----------

PJ Walters
It is lacking. No, I do not agree.

Effectual calling is the work of God's Spirit being sent from the Father and vitally applying the righteousness and the blood of the Son to an elect.

Yes, effectual calling "renews our wills" and "enables us to embrace Jesus Christ."

No, effectual calling does not "convince us of our sin and misery" or "enlighten our minds in the knowledge of Christ" or "persuade us to embrace Jesus." The gospel call does these things.

Am I lacking in this? Should I give greater specificity?

Sing
Thanks for responding.

Why are reformed folks so reluctant to answer simple questions?
What are they fearful of if they have the truth?

So many [not all!] reformed people only know how to regurgitate what they have been stuffed with...lacking capability to digest what is fed to them. So they get uptight when queried.

What is effectual calling?
- who makes that calling?
- who are called, and what was their spiritual state?
- what is the end of that calling?
- what is the efficacy of that calling?

I fear the WSC's answer is confusing the effectual call and the gospel call, and obviously promoting gospel regeneration! I will come to that!

Adam Wells
Isn't it called the "effectual" call in order to distinguish it from the "non-effectual" call?

Jerry Chapin
"So many [not all!] reformed people only know how to regurgitate what they have been stuffed with...lacking capability to digest what is fed to them. So they get uptight when queried."

Bro. Sing, your statement reminds me of the Mormon 'Messengers' and Jehovah's Witnesses when asked a question...one can almost see the wheels turning...

Sing
Adam Wells, I believe your observation is on target.

God's calling of an elect OUT OF his native state of sin and death to that of grace and salvation is ALWAYS effectual, i.e. always, without exception, accomplishing its end and purpose of the call.

The divine call of an elect out of his native state of sin and death to that of grace and salvation is the direct and immediate work of the Spirit of God, THUS always effectual, accomplishing its end. This divine call is WITHOUT human instrumentality, completely the work of God.

This divine call, which is always effectual, is distinguished from the gospel call which is ministered through the gospel ministry, calling the hearers unto faith in Jesus Christ. The former is prior to the latter, both logically and chronologically. The former makes the latter possible. The former is solely through the free and sovereign activity of the Spirit of God, without means, The latter is through the instrument of the gospel ministry

This gospel call is intended SPECIFICALLY to call those already effectually called by God to believe the truth of their salvation. This call is not always effectual... which explains why many of God's children continue to wallow in lies and fables!

The divine call to grace and salvation, and the gospel call to faith in Jesus Christ are separate and distinct. But the reformed people, typically gospel regenerationists, confuse the two and understand the effectual call as the gospel call made effective to the regeneration of those dead in trespasses and sins by the Holy Spirit.

Distinction is the essence of sound theology.

Mikal Smith
Humbly disagree with the Reformed answer.

Sing
What is your reason for disagreeing?

Definitive sanctification and Ongoing sanctification

Definitive sanctification - once for all effectually called
out of the native state of sin and death
into that state of grace and salvation in Jesus Christ.


#definitive_sanctification
#ongoing_sanctification

LeongSy
1 Peter 1:2 "Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ: Grace unto you, and peace, be multiplied."

Is sanctification of the Spirit the same as regeneration?
--------

sing
God PURPOSED eternal redemption for His elect;

Christ ACCOMPLISHED the redemption for the exact same people;

The Spirit of God/Christ APPLIES the redemption to each of the elect personally, thus separating him from his native state of sin, condemnation, and death to that state of grace and salvation in Jesus Christ.

This is also known as the DEFINITIVE (once for all) sanctification, in distinction from the PRACTICAL sanctification which is lifelong. The definitive sanctification happens at the effectual call.

The effectual calling of an elect out of his NATIVE state of sin, condemnation, and death in Adam into that SPIRITUAL state of righteousness, justification and eternal life in Jesus Christ describes the Divine act of SETTING APART an elect to Christ, i.e. it is UNITING him to Christ and Christ unto him.

The effectual call EMBRACES these divine acts:

- justification, i.e. applying the righteousness of Christ to an elect personally (to deal with condemnation),

- regeneration (to deal with spiritual deadness),

- adoption (to deal with alienation).and

- bestowal of the Spirit of adoption to dwell within the child of God.

WITHOUT any of these free and sovereign activities of God, an elect IS NOT brought out of his native state in Adam into the spiritual state in Christ, an elect IS NOT united to Christ.

In the effectual call, the eternal salvation PURPOSED by God and ACCOMPLISHED by Christ is freely APPLIED to an elect personally by the Holy Spirit. The three Persons of the Triune God are in PERFECT UNITY and HARMONY of PURPOSE in the redemption of God's elect.

Salvation APPLIED to an elect personally makes it possible for him to hear and respond to the gospel, leading to salvation EXPERIENCED (temporal salvation)

Please read the above slowly and grasp the things said. If you understand the above, you are ahead of many theologians on the doctrine of salvation.

LeongSy

So the effectual calling can take place when we are not yet born? But what we are able to experience (obviously after we have been born) is when we hear and respond to the gospel (aka temporal salvation)?

sing
Effectual calling takes place when an elect ALREADY has personal being, i.e. conceived.

The effectual call of an elect can happen any time between his conception and death - the old school Baptists put it this way "... Those whom God hath predestinated unto life, He is pleased in His appointed, and accepted time, effectually to call," 

The imputation of Christ's righteousness to the elect at the cross, just as the imputation of Adam's sin to the human race in the garden of Eden - being LEGAL TRANSACTIONS - does not need our personal existence.

What was IMPUTED legally to the elect is then APPLIED vitally to each elect personally at the effectual call. Even so, what was IMPUTED legally to Adam's race is applied to each one personally at conception; thus, each is conceived in sin.

The effectual call (completely, wholly, solely by the sovereign and gracious activities of God) enables a child of God (an elect that has been effectually called) to hear the gospel; spiritual things are spiritually discerned; except a man be born again, he cannot. Period. Spiritual life MUST PRECEDE spiritual activities.

May our Lord grant you understanding. Amen.  

Effectual Calling and Justification by Grace



Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 10:38:22 +0800
Dr Lee inquired:

Pastor Lau,

Thanks for the comprehensive reply. (here https://things-new-and-old.blogspot.com/2026/08/he-also-freely-justieth-1689111.html )

I have some agreement with most of what is said, but a few I'm still grappling with. Some further questions:

1) Maybe I read your reply too quickly, but I still don't have an idea of where you place the Effectual call in relation to Justification.

2) If justification has to precede regeneration (I'm still not convinced that this is the correct order, but then who knows?), and justification has occurred at the cross, surely the OT saints were regenerated before justification?

3) If you are saying that the elect is justified at the cross, then are you also saying that the state of condemnation of all the elect is lifted at the cross?

The Puritans wrote about Virtual, Actual and Declarative Justification.

The first is at the cross, the second by faith and the third by faith and works. (I think I have represented that somewhat correctly!!). I find that to be a helpful way of understanding the whole doctrine of justification.

Tony
-------

Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:19:45 +0800

Brother Tony,

My comments in your post are indicated by ##

Tom == Thanks for the comprehensive reply. I have some agreement with most of what is said, a few I'm still grappling with. Some further questions:

## I have said nothing new in my reply. I am mostly repeating what has been expressed before. We will work together to grapple with, and hopefully resolve, the few that remain.

Tom == 1) Maybe I read your reply too quickly, but I still don't have an idea of where you place the Effectual call in relation to Justification.

## I am glad you ask. I am a poor communicator. Read less quickly, and I may make more sense to you.

The effectual call is that divine calling "out of that state of sin and death in which they are by nature, to grace and salvation by Jesus Christ."

Calling an elect out of the state of sin and death in which they are by nature, to grace and salvation requires justification (freely by God's grace), regeneration and adoption - in that logical order and number.

That's the teaching summarised by the Confession, and I do agree with it. If you don't agree, show me what it does say.

Effectual calling involves the justification (the vital/applied aspect), regeneration and adoption of an elect - they are necessarily involved in the calling an elect "out of that state of sin and death in which they are by nature, to grace and salvation by Jesus Christ." 

Without any of the three free and gracious saving activities of God, an elect CANNOT be brought OUT OF his native state of condemnation, death and alienation INTO the state of grace and salvation in Jesus Christ.

Justification and regeneration and adoption are divine acts subsumed under the theological term of effectual calling to grace and salvation. Think of ONE medical surgery that requires SEVERAL distinct and logical procedures.

Tom == 2) If justification has to precede regeneration (I'm still not convinced that this is the correct order! but then who knows?), and justification has occurred at the cross, surely the OT saints were regenerated before justification?

## There are several issues here.

a. Your 'if... ' and 'surely...' logic betrays an obvious confusion and deficient understanding. Let's look at your argument. You said: == “If justification has to precede regeneration (I'm still not convinced that this is the correct order! but then who knows?), and justification has occurred at the cross, surely the OT saints were regenerated before justification?”==

You are equating and confusing justification applied to individual elect personally [Puritan's 'Vital'] at the effectual call with the justification accomplished for all the elect legally [Puritan's 'Virtual'] by Christ at the cross. So, the 'difficulty' is the result of the confusion and failure to recognise the different and DISTINCT aspects of justification. I am saying with the Confession that justification applied at effectual calling logically precedes the regeneration at effectual call - and this logical order is true of each elect at any time in the redemptive history of the elect, i.e. whether in the OT or NT, see 1689.11.6.

I am saying with you that the experiential justification by faith in Christ and evidential justification by works and faith in Christ FOLLOW AFTER regeneration. We are adequately agreed here. Without regeneration, there can be no believing by us to be imputed to us for our experiential [Puritan's 'Declarative'] justification. Isn't this SO SIMPLE???

The justification that occurred at the cross is legal [virtual] justification of ALL the elect. (EVEN So, the legal condemnation imputed to all represented by Adam at the Fall.

The justification that occurs at effectual calling is legal justification applied to each individual elect personally; thus what was legal becomes 'Vital.'

The justification that occurs at conversion is Vital justification EXPERIENCED by faith in Christ and evidenced by works and faith in Christ.

 It is said of all the elect: "The just (a verbal noun meaning 'the justified ones by the grace of God') shall live by faith" - all those that believe do so because they are JUSTIFIED ONES... and God alone does that when they were UNGODLY, and when enemies.

b. Chronologically, justification and regeneration and adoption happen simultaneously at the effectual calling of EVERY elect to grace and salvation.

- This is quite obvious from the Confession. Effectual call from sin and death to grace and salvation by Jesus Christ MUST REQUIRE justification (freely by grace), regeneration and adoption.

c. Logically, justification precedes regeneration, and regeneration precedes adoption. Common sense, simple logic and theology require such logical order. This order is as plain as noonday sun from the Confession for anyone who can read and whose mind is not prejudiced. Words do have meaning, and the framers were logicians as well as theologians. Whether you are convinced or not is another matter.

I do sincerely hope that you are willing to learn and grow in grace and knowledge here. I will make some extra effort... So kindly reciprocate, and please read carefully and with patience.

d. There are various aspects or facets of justification plainly spoken of in the Scriptures. The Confession affirms this simple, but wholly neglected and despised fact, despised because it debunks erroneous soteriology.

Three years ago, at the beginning of my short-lived discussion with the RB pastors and leaders, I said, "There are more streets than one in the Justification Town." Shortly after, I was hastily declared to be in 'serious and fundamental error' by the local 'standard' RB men. I was merely calling their attention to look at 1689.11.4. Nobody cares to even consider it!!!

First, let me quote 1689.11.4 for your consideration and study:

"God did from all eternity decree to justify all the elect, and Christ did in the fullness of time die for their sins, and rise again for their justification; nevertheless, they are not justified personally, until the Holy Spirit doth in time due actually apply Christ unto them."

Note the 3 distinct aspects of justification specifically mentioned above. Faith in Christ enters into the picture ONLY AFTER the Holy Spirit has in due time ACTUALLY applied Christ unto them... i.e. at effectual call, of course.

First, God did from all eternity decree to justify all the elect: 
- there is the DECRETAL aspect: God did decree to justify ALL the elect before time. All the elect are justified decretively before time. They were actually justified decretively before time began. Rom 8:29-30. What was decreed before time took place in time.

Second, Christ did in the fullness of time die for their sins, and rise again for their justification:
- there is the LEGAL aspect: Christ did justify ALL the elect by his death and resurrection. Christ's righteousness is legally imputed to all God's elect. All the elect are justified in the legal sense. This is a ONCE-FOR-ALL gracious act of imputing the righteousness of Christ to ALL His elect. This cannot be, and has no need of being, repeated. Rom 5:12-21. (EVEN SO, was the condemnation of the whole of mankind in Adam through his act of rebellion).

By Christ's life and death, ALL the elect are LEGALLY justified, but they are not PERSONALLY justified "until the Holy Spirit doth in time due actually apply Christ unto them" at effectual calling. At the effectual calling to grace and salvation, Christ's righteousness is applied to each elect personally; in the OT, it was based prospectively on what Christ will do; and in the NT, it's based retrospectively on what Christ has done. Read 1689.11.6.

Third, they are not justified personally, until the Holy Spirit doth in time due actually apply Christ unto them:
- there is the Personal/Vital aspect: the Holy Spirit APPLIES the righteousness of Christ to each INDIVIDUAL elect personally at God's appointed and approved time, i.e. at the effectual call to grace and salvation. The personal aspect is applied to ALL the elect, to each one when 'ungodly,' 'without strength,' 'dead in sin,' 'a child of wrath,' when in the state of sin and death, etc. When Christ's righteousness is applied to an elect personally - by free grace alone - the condemnation of death is removed, and righteousness of life applied personally, on that basis, the Holy Spirit regenerates the justified elect individual. No justification applied, no regeneration! The Spirit of God works in harmony with God the Father: His Spirit regenerates ONLY those whom He has justified personally by the righteousness of Christ.

When God has FREELY and SOVEREIGNLY done the above, i.e. when Christ has been APPLIED to an elect personally at the effectual call to grace and salvation, that elect is enabled to believe in Christ through the preaching of the gospel. The time lapse between the effectual call and conversion at the gospel call varies widely. Conversion through the gospel preaching does not even take place for some of the sentient elect - read 1689.10.3. Are you shocked by this statement?

The actual application of Christ's righteousness to each elect personally - whether in the OT or the NT - is based solely and wholly upon the righteousness of Christ at the cross; For the OT saints, the righteousness of Christ was applied to them based on what Christ would accomplish. For the NT saints, the righteousness of Christ is applied to them based on what Christ has accomplished.

1689.11.6 states this plain truth: "The justification of believers under the Old Testament was, in all these respects, one and the same with the justification of believers under the New Testament."

However, whether before or after the cross, justification APPLIED always precede regeneration. Removal of the condemnation of death on the elect personally and the giving of the righteousness of life to him personally by God (justification applied) MUST logically precede the giving of eternal life by the Holy Spirit (regeneration).

This leads us to the next aspect:

- The Experiential aspect: This is what we read in Gen 15, in Cornelius, in those converted on the day of Pentecost, in the eunuch, Lydia. Through the preaching of the gospel, God blessed the faith of a believer in the promised Seed, worked in them by the indwelling Spirit, to experience the blessedness of his justified state by God's free grace. 'His faith is accounted to him for righteousness.'

God justifies the UNGODLY - the righteousness of Christ applied personally.

Faith justifies the BELIEVERS - the blessedness of the imputed and applied righteousness experienced personally.

What God declares about the UNGODLY CONDEMNED SINNER is very different from what faith declares about a believer. The former is forensic, and the latter is experiential.

Not all the elect of God enjoy experiential justification through the ministry of the word. Some are not reached with the gospel. Others are incapable of being reached with the gospel. The new school Baptist soteriology has no place for such... contrary to 1689.10.3.

Experiential and evidential justification FOLLOW regeneration. New school Baptists take this as the ONE and ONLY street in Justification Town, and worse still mistake these two streets as the Forensic Avenue.

- The FINAL aspect: God shall vindicate EVERY AND EACH of the elect He has decreed to justify, and Christ has died for their legal justification and whom the Spirit has applied the same for their vital and personal justification. "Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world." The GRAND BASIS of this final VINDICATION is : inherit the kingdom prepared for you from before the foundation of the world; GRACE - GRACE - GRACE.

Let's apply all these to Abraham:

Abraham lived before Christ had executed and accomplished redemption. So Christ's righteousness was applied TO HIM PERSONALLY by God based on the redemptive work that Christ would accomplish. God has faith in His Son doing so.

Christ's righteousness was APPLIED to Abraham personally when he was an ungodly, idolatrous man in Ur, dead in trespasses and sin, without strength, etc., etc., This happened when God, by His free and sovereign grace, called Abraham out of his state of sin and death to grace and eternal salvation. Because of that free and gracious and sovereign act of God, Abraham was a changed man; his works of obedience in Gen 12-14 are the CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE of his justified state.

The full and complete righteousness of Christ was applied to Abraham personally, once-for-all, unrepeatable, and cannot be improved upon. With the righteousness of Christ applied personally, Abraham is clothed with the righteousness of Christ and stands COMPLETELY and ETERNALLY righteous before God.

Gen 15 records the INITIAL EXPERIENCE of Abraham concerning his justified state before God by His free grace and mercy. He has never experienced the blessedness of his justified state before the event recorded in Gen 15:1-6. It was at this event that it is recorded that his faith was accounted to him. Never before in Gen 12-14 do we read that his faith was accounted to him personally to EXPERIENCE the blessedness of his justified state by God's free grace through the righteousness of Christ applied to him when he was still an ungodly man in Ur.

This EXPERIENTIAL aspect is repeatable and ongoing throughout life. It begins with INITIAL faith in the promised Seed, even the blessed Lord Jesus Christ. Ongoing faith in Christ Jesus is accounted to us to experience this blessedness of our justified state by God's free grace through the imputed righteousness of Christ.

Our LEGAL justification - both secured at the cross and applied to us at effectual calling - is OBVIOUSLY by God's grace alone through Christ's righteousness alone... and NOT - NOT - NOT by our faith in Christ alone. Until the justification is applied to us personally, we were under the condemnation of death, dead in sin, and an alien.

It is our EXPERIENTIAL justification that is by our faith in Christ alone... VERY SIMPLY because it is faith in Christ alone, and never our works, that is accounted to us to personally experience the blessedness of our justified state by God's free and sovereign grace.

> 3) If you are saying that the elect is justified at the cross, then are you also saying that the state of condemnation of all the elect is lifted at the cross.

Again your 'if.. then...' logic betrays confusion and failure to distinguish the different aspects of justification.

Legal Justification of all the elect took place at the cross: that is the ONLY time when double imputation actually took place: all the sins of all the elect were imputed to Christ at the cross, and the righteousness of Christ was imputed to all the elect. This is purely a legal transaction. What is legally transacted is applied to each elect personally at God's appointed and approved time.

Yes, I am saying that LEGALLY, that condemnation that came upon ALL the elect because of Adam's transgression is lifted at the cross. But UNTIL the righteousness of Christ - that lifted that legal condemnation and secured legal justification - is applied PERSONALLY at the effectual call of each elect at God's appointed and approved time, the elect is still dead in sin, a child of wrath, in enmity against God, etc...

Legal justification is applied to each elect personally at effectual calling out of sin and death to grace and salvation. Only when the legal justification has been applied personally, an elect is able to exercise faith, i.e. to receive and rest in Christ through the gospel call... thus experiences justification.

Tom: The puritans wrote about Virtual, Actual and Declarative Justification. The first is at the cross, the second by faith and the third by faith and works. (I think I have represented that somewhat correctly!!). I find that to be a helpful way of understanding the whole doctrine of justification.

You are nearer to the truth now that you have recognised and acknowledged the various aspects of justification. However, I doubt you have represented them correctly. If you have understood them, you would not have those difficulties expressed in your 'if... then...' type of logic in your rhetorical questions.

Whatever terms people use, let them define the term they use. Different terms by different people may actually be stating the same truths and principles. [Similarly, the same terms by different people may be used to denote different things.]

The legal aspect is at the cross - by the faith OF Christ alone, all the elect are LEGALLY justified, double imputation having taken place at the cross. Maybe this is virtual...

The applied/personal aspect is at the effectual call - by grace alone, freely.
- What is legal is now applied to each elect personally - obviously by God's free alone. In applying Christ's righteousness to an elect personally, God declares an elect PERSONALLY righteous. Maybe this is Actual (Vital/Personal), the person is not just legally, but Vitally (Personally) justified. [But this took place when an elect is in the state of sin and death – incapable of believing.]

The experiential/practical aspect is at initial conversion - by faith IN Christ alone. Faith in Christ is Declarative of the justified state of an elect by free grace. Faith in Christ is always accompanied by all other saving graces. Works and faith declare evidentially, i.e. works and faith justify evidentially that the person is indeed a true child of God.

Thank you for your interest and patience. Some things need repetition, so please do pardon.

sing

"And some believed the things which were spoken, and some believed not" Acts 28:24

"He also freely justieth..." 1689.11.1



Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:31:36 +0800
Dr Lee wrote:

Pastor Lau,
Thanks for that. From the statement of the confession: [1689.11.1]
“Those whom God effectually calleth, he also freely justifieth, not by infusing righteousness into them, but by pardoning their sins, and by accounting and accepting their persons as righteous; not for anything wrought in them, or done by them, but for Christ's sake alone; not by imputing faith itself, the act of believing, or any other evangelical obedience to them, as their righteousness; but by imputing Christ's active obedience unto the whole law, and passive obedience in his death for their whole and sole righteousness by faith, which faith they have not of themselves; it is the gift of God.”

This is what I understand it to say:

1) It is God who justifies the elect
2) He does that by pardoning their sins, accepting them as righteous
3) He accepts them as righteous not by anything done in them or done by them
4) He accepts them as righteous not by imputing faith (act of believing), or any other evangelical obedience
5) He accepts them as righteous by imputing Christ's active obedience (to the law) and passive obedience in His death
6) The imputation of righteousness is "by faith", which is a gift of God.

"Faith thus receiving and resting on Christ and his righteousness, is the alone instrument of justification; yet it is not alone in the person justified, but is ever accompanied with all other saving graces, and is no dead faith, but worketh by love." [1689.11.2]

7) This faith acts by receiving and resting on Christ and his righteousness
8) This faith, by receiving and resting on Christ, is the sole instrument of justification.
9) However, in the person justified, faith is not now present alone, but is accompanied by other saving graces (doesn't this also assume regeneration has already taken place?)

Assuming you are in agreement with #1-5, how do you understand the 'by faith' in the first paragraph?

How do you understand para 2, where faith is described as being the 'instrument' of justification?

Tony

 ====================

Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 17:51:31 +0800

Brother Tony
I'm glad that you are interested in considering the Confession, which I take as a faithful summary of the Bible's teachings. It has much to teach us what the old-school Baptists did believe, and where the new-school Baptists (Fullerites) have gone wrong.

You have made some good observations and asked some good questions. I will try to interact with your observations and make some comments, marked ##. (Some uppercases are for emphasis, not shouting!)

Please take time to read... and feel free to ask further...

From the statement of the Confession [1689.11.1], please note the words in red.

"Those whom God effectually calleth, he also freely justifieth, not by infusing righteousness into them, but by pardoning their sins, and by accounting and accepting their persons as righteous; not for anything wrought in them, or done by them, but for Christ's sake alone; not by imputing faith itself, the act of believing, or any other evangelical obedience to them, as their righteousness; but by imputing Christ's active obedience unto the whole law, and passive obedience in his death for their whole and sole righteousness; [they receiving and resting on Him and His righteousness] by faith, which faith they have not of themselves; it is the gift of God.” [1689.11.1]

Tom == This is what I understand it to say: 1) It is God who justifies the elect.==

This is a faithful statement, and an excellent place to start, too.

It is God who justifies... i.e. God the Judge has the sole prerogative to declare a guilty condemned sinner not guilty but righteous. He does this entirely by His sovereign and free grace, based solely on the merits of Christ's righteousness, not conditioned upon anything wrought in them, or done by them.'

The good statement begs a question: WHEN does God justify the elect?

Put it in another way - in what spiritual state are the elect when God justify them?

Scriptures say, God justifies the ungodly; new school Baptists insist God justifies the believing. Scriptures do say that faith and works justify, not forensically as God justifies, but evidentially, demonstrating that they are indeed God's children, i.e. justified, regenerated and adopted by God.

Note these plain words, 'Those whom God effectually calleth, he also freely justifieth...'

Consider the relationship between the two.

Please remember that the effectual call is that divine calling of the elect "out of that state of sin and death in which they are by nature, to grace and salvation by Jesus Christ."

New school Baptists think of the effectual call as the gospel call blessed by the Spirit to bring conversion. That's a most serious error. The effectual call is the divine call, therefore always accomplishing its end, that brings the elect out of that state of sin and death in which they are by nature, to grace and salvation by Jesus Christ."

And please remember that effectual call is not - not - not regeneration (see 13.1 where the two are clearly distinguished). Effectual calling "out of that state of sin and death in which they are by nature, to grace and salvation by Jesus Christ" requires far more than regeneration. It requires justification to remove the just condemnation and the bestowal of the righteousness of life by the Father. Justification gives divine warrant for the Spirit's work of regeneration. Them whom the Spirit regenerates, the Father adopts and receives into the divine family.

What do the words, "Those whom God effectually calleth, he also freely justifieth..." indicate about the relationship between the effectual calling and the justification of the elect? I suggest that in the mind of the Framers, effectual call and justification occur simultaneously... 13.1 indicates that effectual call and regeneration happen simultaneously too.

The spiritual state in which the elect are effectually called is the SAME STATE in which the elect are justified. The spiritual state in which the elect are effectually called is the SAME STATE in which the elect are regenerated. And the regenerated are adopted as sons.

The Confession bears out these truths in plain, unmistakable statements.

10.1 "Those whom God hath predestined unto life, He is pleased in His appointed and accepted time, effectually to call... out of that state of sin and death in which they are by nature, to grace and salvation by Jesus Christ." [This is 'definitive sanctification.]

11.1 “Those whom God effectually calleth, He also freely justifieth...”

12.1 “All those that are justified, God vouchsafed, in and for the sake of His only Son Jesus Christ, to make partakers of the grace of adoption, by which they are taken into the number, and enjoy the liberties and privileges of children of God..."

(One is made a partaker of the grace of adoption through regeneration. Justification PRECEDES both regeneration and adoption - isn't this plain enough from the words of the Confession?)

13.1 "They who are united to Christ, effectually called, and regenerated, having a new heart and a new spirit created in them through the virtue of Christ's death and resurrection, are also farther sanctified, really and personally..." (Note the distinction between effectual call and regeneration. They are NOT the same.)

The PLAIN ORDER, if anyone wants to know what the 1689 says, is simply this:
10.1 says about the effectual call;
11.1 says about justification in the effectual call.
12.1 says about the grace of adoption; and
13.1 says about regeneration in the effectual call...

Justification PRECEDES regeneration, and regeneration precedes adoption... in that logical order. The effectual call "out of that state of sin and death in which they are by nature, to grace and salvation by Jesus Christ" requires these acts of God (simultaneously but in that logical order):

Justification (the application of Christ's righteousness to an elect personally) to remove the condemnation of death.
Rom 5:18 "Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life."
- Removal of the condemnation of death through the justification of life LOGICALLY LEADS to the bestowal of life through Regeneration. 

Regeneration removes the spiritual deadness, and bestows eternal life.

Adoption, with the gift of the Spirit of adoption to dwell within a child of God, working in him all the graces of salvation, including faith. Adoption into the divine family gives access to all the privileges that belong to God's children.

ONLY when these gracious and free and sovereign acts of God HAVE TAKEN PLACE, is an elect able to exercise faith. If you disagree, please say so. Only those that ARE SAVED are enabled to believe. The gospel ministry is to call such to faith in what is ALREADY true, 'the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation.'

THINK ABOUT THESE STATEMENTS very carefully - these truths deserve your careful attention and believing.

The simple fact is, only an effectually called person - i.e. justified, regenerated and adopted - has the ability to believe. Put it in other words, only one who is already DEFINITIVELY SANCTIFIED by the effectual call (i.e. once-for-all separated from sin and death to grace and salvation) can be FARTHER SANCTIFIED by Christ's Word and Spirit dwelling in them (i.e. a life-long process of separation from ignorance and falsehood to knowledge and truth both in doctrines and practice) That's what Chapter 13 is about. Chapter 14 takes up the grace of faith as the chief means by which God's children are further sanctified. Just take your time to read 1689.10-14 slowly and notice the flow of careful and tight logic upholding the truth of the Scriptures.


Tom == 2) He does that by pardoning their sins, accepting them as righteous.

## That's a faithful statement: "... by pardoning their sins, and by accounting and accepting their persons as righteous."

The question is: what is the spiritual state of the elect when God pardon their sins, and accepts them as righteous: when they are in a state of sin and death, or when are they in a state of grace and salvation - that is, when they believe?

The elect is either in the state of sin and death or in the state of grace and salvation. Only when they are effectually called out of the former and into the latter are they able to exercise the grace of faith. There is no middle ground - that's obvious enough.

If you disagree with my simple conclusion, please kindly indicate.

Tom == 3) He accepts them as righteous, not by anything done in them or done by them

## This is a faithful and true statement - "... not for anything wrought in them, or done by them."

The Framers say 'faith' is wrought in them - "The grace of faith, whereby the elect are enabled to believe to the saving of their souls, is the work of the Spirit of Christ in their hearts..." 1689.14.1 In this sense, 'faith' is a gift of God because it is a saving grace worked by the Spirit of Christ WITHIN them. Faith is NOT a gift in the sense that salvation (Eph 2:8), eternal life (Rm 6:23), righteousness (Rm 5:17) and justification of life (Rm 5;16,18) are spoken of as gifts - something coming to us from ABOVE and WITHOUT, James 1:17.

I think you would agree that believing is a spiritual act done by them. You would also want to agree that spiritual life MUST PRECEDE any spiritual activities. (The term 'spiritual life' is not found in the Bible... but of course, eternal life is spiritual in nature). If you disagree, please state so, and say why.

Some new school Baptists, e.g. Pastor Ho, define regeneration as giving spiritual ability, and this spiritual ability must be exercised to believe, and in believing one is given eternal life. So, he agrees that 'regeneration' must precede faith, but his definition of regeneration is a plain and open perversion of the biblical regeneration. Some standard reformed people can speak of spiritual ability apart from spiritual life!

I conclude that justification before God - to be declared by Him as righteous, and not guilty - cannot possibly be by the instrumental means of faith in Christ. It is explicitly and plainly repudiated by the Confession.

Tom == 4) He accepts them as righteous not by imputing faith (act of believing), or any other evangelical obedience.

## This is a good statement. The Framers explicitly warn against a very common error embraced by so many new school Baptists (same with the paedobaptists) - grievously mistaking the imputation of faith as having anything to do with forensic justification by God.

Romans 4:3 For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it [Abraham's believing] was counted [imputed] unto him for righteousness. 4 Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt. 5 But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted [imputed] for righteousness.

Gen 15:6 "And he believed in the LORD; and he counted it to him for righteousness.”

There is NO - NO - NO forensic (Actual) justification here in Gen 15:1-6. There is NO - NO - NO imputation of Christ's righteousness involved here... There is the imputation of the believer's faith, and the Confession plainly warns against the common error of mistaking the imputation of faith as involving justification.

Abraham was justified by God while UNGODLY in Ur. His believing in Gen 15 vindicates the glorious truth, 'the just shall live by faith.' Abraham's faith DEMONSTRATES and GIVES EVIDENCE of his just state by the grace of God when an ungodly idolatrous man in Ur. Gen 12-14 gives us a picture of a justified man by God's free grace.

Faith and evangelical obedience VINDICATE and CERTIFY their justified state by God's free grace.

His faith is accounted to him for righteousness means through his faith, he was blessed to experience the blessedness of his justified state. The Scriptures say, 'whoever believes HAS eternal life.' Whoever believes experiences the blessedness of having eternal life.

Tom == 5) He accepts them as righteous by imputing Christ's active obedience (to the law) and passive obedience in His death

## This is a faithful statement. His active obedience secures the righteousness of life needed, and his passive obedience atones for the sins and bears away the just condemnation.

The Scriptures speak of the faith OF - OF - OF Christ. The old-school Baptist who knew the KJT speaks of the faith of Christ - His believing and obeying the will of the Father for Him as the Redeemer of His people.

By the faith OF Christ, the elect is justified before God.

By the believer's faith IN Christ, they demonstrate and give evidence that they are God's children - i.e. justified, regenerated and adopted.


Tom == 6) The imputation of righteousness is _by faith_, which is a gift of God.

## Please check your quotation of the paragraph carefully and see whether you have missed some important words. Otherwise, you would never come up with such a popular and misunderstood notion from the Confession. This statement - if you can find it from 1689.11.1 - plainly contradicts the other statements in the paragraph.

Mine have these words at the end, "... righteousness; [semicolon] they receiving and resting on Him and His righteousness by faith, .." Please note the SEMI-COLON after the righteousness - the semicolon distinctly SEPARATES the imputation clause from the receiving and resting clause which follows. I will deal with the significance of this phrase later.

If imputation of righteousness is by faith - conditioned upon the instrumentality of faith, then;

- The statement 'he also freely justifieth' is contradicted and repudiated. If imputation is by faith, then justification is conditioned upon faith. It is no longer 'freely' by God's grace.

- The statement 'not for anything wrought in them, or done by them' is also contradicted and repudiated. Faith is a grace wrought in them; believing is the grace of faith exercised, something done by them.

The imputation of righteousness is NOT - NOT - NOT by faith! It is NOT in the Confession. It is the imagination of the new school Baptists. The imputation of righteousness is FREELY by God's grace. See Pruning pp. 172-4 on what William Kiffin, signer of both the First (1644) and Second London Baptist Confession of Faith (1689) say on the role and function of faith.

The Confession does say, "they receiving and resting on Him and His righteousness by faith." God justifies FREELY by His grace, and His children receiving and resting on Christ and His righteousness by faith are TWO very distinct and different actions. The former is God's action upon the ungodly justly condemned sinners dead in sin; the latter are acts of God's children in obedience to the gospel call.

God's free grace justification (necessarily accompanied by regeneration and adoption at effectual call to grace and salvation) enables the elect to exercise faith to receive and rest on Christ and His righteousness through the ministry of the gospel. There are sentient elect who are incapable of being outwardly called...

I have used this illustration often in SDC. Towkay, by his free grace, credited a million dollars into a coolie's account. Towkay sends his messenger to tell the coolie the good news (what ALREADY happened). Coolie believes and goes to the bank to receive the money. The crediting is done before the news comes... the crediting produces the good news... the crediting is not conditioned on the coolie going to the bank.

“Faith thus receiving and resting on Christ and his righteousness, is the alone instrument of justification; yet it is not alone in the person justified, but is ever accompanied with all other saving graces, and is no dead faith, but worketh by love.” [1689.11.2]

Tom == 7) This faith acts by receiving and resting on Christ and his righteousness

## Justification by God's free grace is based solely upon Christ and His righteousness... "Those whom God effectually calleth, he also freely justifieth... for Christ's sake alone... by imputing Christ's active obedience unto the whole law, and passive obedience in his death for their whole and sole righteousness."

That being the truth, faith in Christ, i.e. receiving and resting in Christ and His righteousness, is understandably the sure and certain evidence and proof of one's justification by God's free grace.

Remember a MOST basic truth... ONLY the justified, regenerated and adopted elect is capable of exercising faith, of receiving and resting in Christ and His righteousness. He is already in Christ and clothed with Christ's righteousness by grace... that is why he is able to receive and rest in Christ.

Tom == 8) This faith, by receiving and resting on Christ, is the sole instrument of justification.

## An instrument serves a function or purpose. A telescope is an astronomical instrument. A voltmeter is an electrical instrument. A stethoscope is a medical instrument. What is the relationship between these instruments and their purpose? Are they not to make manifest the presence of those things they were designed and purposed to do? The telescope discovers and makes manifest those celestial objects that are already present there. A voltmeter detects the presence of voltage already in the circuit; it is not an instrument to bring voltage to the circuit. A stethoscope is not an instrument to bring heartbeats to a patient; the heart must be beating for the stethoscope to detect the heartbeats.

Faith, receiving and resting in Christ, is the sole instrument to manifest and disclose the justified state of a person. Works cannot be the sole instrument... first, works are not the ground and basis of justification before God, second, works are shown by those who reject Christ.

But saving faith is always accompanied by all other saving graces. The effectual call out of sin and death to grace and salvation equips a child of God with all the graces of salvation, NOT just faith. The gospel ministry is ordained to cultivate and bring these graces out in the lives of God's children. Faith that is alone, not accompanied by other saving graces, is a suspect faith at best, and the faith of the devil at worst. The Holy Spirit DOES NOT just work faith in the person indwelt by Him... He works all the saving graces... "But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, temperance..."

Tom == 9) However, in the person justified, faith is not now present alone, but is accompanied by other saving graces (doesn't this also assume regeneration has already taken place?)

## Faith and all other graces are only to be found in a justified person - simple grammar tells us that justification precedes faith. It is like saying, breath and other activities of life are found in a resuscitated person.

Only in the justified person is faith found. A justified person is a regenerated and adopted person, with the Spirit of God dwelling in him. Only a regenerated person can exercise faith. A regenerated person is one born with eternal life and indwelt by the Spirit of God. A living person evidences their life in so many ways. Even so, a regenerated person manifests his life through his faith, accompanied by all other saving graces. Faith is accompanied by all other saving graces - i.e. graces produced by the effectual calling to grace and salvation.

Tom == Assuming you are in agreement with #1-5, how do you understand the 'by faith' in the first paragraph? How do you understand para 2 where faith is described as being the 'instrument' of justification?

##Reception of the righteousness already freely imputed by grace is by faith. Abraham was imputed with righteousness when he was an ungodly man in Ur. Abraham experiences the blessedness of his righteous state by faith in Gen 15:1-6.

Imputation/Application of righteousness is NEVER by faith; it is by God's free grace.

Imputation of righteousness is a once-for-all legal act by God.

Receiving and resting in Christ is a lifelong experience by faith in Christ.

If anything is unclear, please feel free to ask further questions. I have not lost all hope that you might come to see the plain old truth and be instrumental in saving my RB brethren from their grievous errors, James 5:19.

I also learn as I interact with you. Thanks for the opportunity. Please feel free to forward the exchanges to others in your church to read.

sing