Things New and Old

Ancient truths revealed in the Scriptures are often forgotten, disbelieved or distorted, and therefore lost in the passage of time. Such ancient truths when rediscovered and relearned are 'new' additions to the treasury of ancient truths.

Christ showed many new things to the disciples, things prophesied by the prophets of old but hijacked and perverted by the elders and their traditions, but which Christ reclaimed and returned to His people.

Many things taught by the Apostles of Christ have been perverted or substituted over the centuries. Such fundamental doctrines like salvation by grace and justification have been hijacked and perverted and repudiated by sincere Christians. These doctrines need to be reclaimed and restored to God's people.

There are things both new and old here. "Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things"
2Ti 2:7.

Friday, April 12, 2024

"Sirs, what must I do to be saved?" asked the Philippian jailer

Sirs, what must I do to be saved?

April 11, 2012 

The Philippians Jailor - Acts 16
30 And brought them out, and said, Sirs, what must I do to be saved?
31 And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house.
32 And they spake unto him the word of the Lord, and to all that were in his house.
33 And he took them the same hour of the night, and washed their stripes; and was baptized, he and all his, straightway.

Q1. What does the jailor want to be saved from?

Q2. Is Paul addressing the same salvation that the jailor inquired earnestly?

Q3. How shall the jailor's believing in Christ save him and his house?

Q4. Who is the jailor's house?

Q5. When the jailor asked for a light, who brought it to him - his wife? his daughter? his subordinate?

Q6. Is Paul's reply declaring a salvation by proxy, i.e. the jailor act of believing shall save him AS WELL AS his house?

Q7. What is the salvation that is by proxy here?

If you can keep to the subject, I covet your comments. Thanks.
==========

Comments

Johnny Davis
1. Initially, saved from those above him. Paul turned on the term, "saved" to spiritual salvation.
2. Yes, in the same way that Paul spoke of the idol to the unkown god, being THE God. He had a way of doing that.
3. Yes. For by his belief, his household, of which he was head, also came to believe.
4. Have not studied this. I am assuming his family, though there may be more that one family in residence.
5. No, it is the words of the jailor to the others, the "hearing" that they came to believe, and become baptized ultimately.
6. I've never thought of salvation by proxy, except that Jesus voted for us, on the cross. We did not suffer the agony of death, spiritual and physical, becuase he was our proxy.

Sing F Lau
Thank you for doing better this time... i.e. responding to the specific questions asked.

A1. What do you mean by spiritual salvation? Eternal salvation?

A2. Your answer is gibberish to me.

A3. Apostle Paul said the jailor's believing would save NOT only him but also his house. Explain that... not something else. One man's believing will save him and others... What salvation is the talking about?

A4. I like honest answers... not imaginative ones.

A5. What are the words of the jailor to others? Where does it say in the text? Did he preach a sermon to others?

A6. I suggest there is salvation by proxy... not eternal salvation, but temporal salvation. Haven't you experienced it in life. Someone's act of obedience saves himself and others from certain disasters?

Sing F Lau
I added another question:

Q5. When the jailor asked for a light, who brought it to him - his wife? his daughter? his subordinate?

Johnny Davis
This will be "philosophical," so ignore without considering if you wish, Sing. You ask, what do I mean by physical salvation. All that is physical, man included, is such, only by the creation and will of God. We know what a cell is. We know laws of physics. We know that nothing in the physical remains without change, and physical life, though a mystery, is merely physical things, arranged to be able to move and think (in the case of humans). Everything physical passes. It all changes. It is never the same. It all eventually dies. The jailer was worried about his physical life, when he asked Paul, something like this: "How can you help ME (breathing, thinking physical ME) get out of being killed for allowing you to escape. I've got a family that needs me." Those folks spoke common language, and not the churchy lingo of the KJV, in all likelihood. Paul, very diplomatic and shrewd (real Philemon for a great example of this), seized the opportunity to teach, so that the jailor could hear, and believe (actually, he already "believed" having the receptiive heart of godliness), to tell the gospel of Jesus, which resulted in spiritual life forever with God, and the jailor told the same story to his family and household (servants, perhaps), and they too believed, resulting in eternal life. Now, how long the physical salvation from the Roman higher-ups lasted, we don't know. I'd bet the jailer gave a shot at speaking the gospel, before he was punished. Yet, we do know, all his family and household were ultimately saved (and baptized), and I look forward to meeting them, in whatever condition or reality God chooses for his sons and daughters to be.

Johnny Davis
As to the "light," let me read the scripture. Don't recall and have not thought of that one.

Charles Page
interesting, Sing, Paul referenced proxy baptism for the dead, salvation for the unbelieving spouse.

I am inclined to think that salvation that is referenced here in Acts 16 (10 as well) is not conceived in westernized individualistic terms but family/group units. Belonging is probably more central than believing.

Just thinking out loud by way of weird opinions!!!

Johnny Davis
Good thought, Charles, and in the culture of that day, the household probably went along with the man or head of the house, in everything. I suspect, though, that was done, in the Jewish culture, not out of fear, though that element may have been present. The hearts of the household would have to be receptive to God, for their conversion to have meaning, regardless if baptized or not, for example. As they were "saved" then that must have been their situation, not "obeying" the head, as the Muslim culture now requires, but from love.

Sing F Lau
Charles, when did you imbibe mormonistic idea of baptism for the dead?

Take a look here:
http://letgodbetrue.com/questions/baptism-for-dead.htm.
What is the Baptism for the Dead?

Sing F Lau
Hey look, I am an easterner. I think as an easterner, and reason as an easterner. So, where is the neutral zone we can talk some sense?

Charles Page
Didn't say i believe it...but that Paul referenced it in I Cor. I am not fully convinced that the parents cannot bring an infant to the pastor for baptism and not just dedication. There still seems to be an argument for proxy parenting for children.

We westerners are wierd! I know ...but my eternal salvation secured in heaven makes me feel free to think out of the box without fear of what men may think. I certainly would not be acting like a crazy man carrying signs in front of an institution that will never heed my call to repent.

Sing F Lau
I surely like that statement: "but my eternal salvation secured in heaven makes me feel free to think out of the box without fear of what men may think." I feel very liberated too... which is why I am learning precious truth because I dare question the great 'reformers'!

I believe there is salvation by proxy... in the temporal salvation. Believing parents save their children from the many evils that pervade the degenerating society now.

Charles Page
...but, it gets me in soooo much trouble! God wants our minds blazing and not just smouldering!

Johnny Davis
What about priests, and last rites (to "cover" sins not prayed for)? The scripture on "the dead" baptism, etc. was what? Need to study that.

Sing F Lau
I need no priest. Me myself and I am a member of the royal priesthood, with Christ alone as my High Priest.

If I hadn't believed in baptism for the dead, I would never have been baptized... it was because I was already dead in Christ, I submitted to baptism.

Baptism is for those who know they are dead in Christ!

Charles Page
My guess is that baptism for the dead was for those whose acquaintances had passed and though they had eternal salvation they had not lived up to temporal salvation and it was a possible measure to pray for their lives in hades they knew about and knew they were in need of desperate measures. If you participate in funerals you know there are people whose lives were not prepared for death. Arminians lose all hope that they are in the "lake of fire" but Bible-believing people know about eternal salvation and do not lose all hope but trust in a just God who does show wrath to ungodly regenerates.

Perhaps they are pleading for mercy. We have lost this today due to the Arminian heresies that are dominant today!