Things New and Old

Ancient truths revealed in the Scriptures are often forgotten, disbelieved or distorted, and therefore lost in the passage of time. Such ancient truths when rediscovered and relearned are 'new' additions to the treasury of ancient truths.

Christ showed many new things to the disciples, things prophesied by the prophets of old but hijacked and perverted by the elders and their traditions, but which Christ reclaimed and returned to His people.

Many things taught by the Apostles of Christ have been perverted or substituted over the centuries. Such fundamental doctrines like salvation by grace and justification have been hijacked and perverted and repudiated by sincere Christians. These doctrines need to be reclaimed and restored to God's people.

There are things both new and old here. "Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things"
2Ti 2:7.

Tuesday, March 26, 2024

Mathematics and Hermeneutics

 


90% fail in their answers
Solve the following equation.

==================
Why 90% is wrong?

Similarly, why does a greater percentage fail to rightly divide the word of truth, the Holy Scriptures?

Putting aside the trick elements, the mathematical exercise below serves as a good example of the need to rightly divide the word of truth.

Assuming there is an equation, what constitutes the equation is the most basic question to ask. If we don't know the equation, how can we determine the answer?

Different people have different ways of seeing and assuming what constitutes the equation, thus ending up with different answers. Many do so by sight, WITHOUT observing or heeding any mathematical rules. Some do it by observing basic rules. Sometimes the problem lies in the so-called equation is expressed poorly or misleadingly.

Basic assumption: since this is a mathematical matter, basic mathematical rules apply.

So, what's your answer, and show us how did you arrive at it.

What constitutes the equation? Why?

Enjoy the discussion. Read the last comment at the bottom. 

=======

Katija Živković - 12

Kiantoro Lie - 30

Ann Atwood Fraley - 1, you want us to discuss why? because no matter what all the ones at the start add up to, when you multiply the sum by 0, you get 0. Then you add the last 1. The answer is 1.

Katija Živković
But first, you do the multiplying that the adding...
There are no brackets that would indicate you need to do the adding first...

Ann Atwood Fraley
I was doing it so that there was only one pass through the operations. I seem to remember now, singling out the multiplication and then going back through the adding and subtracting. This makes me feel really rusty.

Katija Živković
I wasn't too sure about it either, first I thought 12, than 1, than again 12 🙂

Kiantoro Lie
Don't forget, when you line up all the rows, there are 11 and 11

Katija Živković
Well then it's not math just a trick 😉

Cathy Hightower Comley - 1

Koh Han Seow 
Basic mathematical rule is to do the multiplication first and then addition. So 1x0=0 first and then add up the rest. The answer is 12.

Ann Atwood Fraley
So, two passes through the numbers.

Koh Han Seow
Look carefully again, the answer should be 2 because there are no connections for lines 1 and 2. The answer to 1+1x0+1=2.

Ann Atwood Fraley
Koh Han Seow so you're saying there should be plus signs at the end of each line?

Koh Han Seow
If you put 3 lines together, the answer is 30.

Jim Edwards - The answer is 1

Siong Hee Leong - 30

Catherina Lau - 0

Jerry McMinn - one

Regie Rhodes - 12

===============

Sing F Lau
Some thoughts.
1. No one seems to give a thought to the question, "What constitutes the equation?"
- one can assume that the three separate lines constitute an equation, and work from there. But is that assumption true then?
- one can demonstrate what actually constitutes the equation, and work out the answer from there.

2. To get 30,
- You need to join up the three lines into one like this, thusly:
1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 11 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 11 + 1 + 1 x 0 + 1 = 30.

You must falsely assume that there are two 11s. Then it should be written like this:
1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 11 +
1 + 1 + 1 + 11 +1 +
1 x 0 + 1 + = ?

Lesson: Don't imagine what's NOT there; don't READ INTO the Scriptures!

3. To get 12,
- You need to ADD two pluses + to the end of the first two lines, thus
1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 +
1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 +
1 + 1 x 0 + 1 = ?
1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1+ 1 + 1 x 0 + 1 = 12.

I suggest this method amounts to ADDING TO SCRIPTURES at best.
On what basis do you do it?

If you can arbitrarily imagine the two pluses, why not other mathematical signs such as "x", "-" or "/". And what if others choose other signs? How?

Imagine putting two "-" signs instead. Or two "/" or "x" signs or a mixture of any two of them!

Lesson: Don't imagine what's NOT there; don't READ INTO the Scriptures!

In terms of an equation, the first line is UNrelated to the second line; the second line is UNrelated to the third line; there is an equation in the third line, i.e. 1 + 1 x 0 + 1 + = ?

Therefore the answer is: 1 + (1 x 0) + 1 = 2.

However, at this stage, some would say the answer is 1. They would add up all the "1" first and then multiply that by "0", i.e. 12 x 0; and then 0 + 1 = 1.

Lesson: hermeneutical principles must be observed.