Things New and Old

Ancient truths revealed in the Scriptures are often forgotten, disbelieved or distorted, and therefore lost in the passage of time. Such ancient truths when rediscovered and relearned are 'new' additions to the treasury of ancient truths.

Christ showed many new things to the disciples, things prophesied by the prophets of old but hijacked and perverted by the elders and their traditions, but which Christ reclaimed and returned to His people.

Many things taught by the Apostles of Christ have been perverted or substituted over the centuries. Such fundamental doctrines like salvation by grace and justification have been hijacked and perverted and repudiated by sincere Christians. These doctrines need to be reclaimed and restored to God's people.

There are things both new and old here. "Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things"
2Ti 2:7.

Monday, April 8, 2024

Eternal salvation and Temporal salvation



#eternalsalvation
#temporalsalvation

Eternal salvation is freely applied to each elect personally when they are still in their native state of sin and death:

Ephesians 2:1
And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins;

Colossians 2:13
And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, hath he quickened together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses.

Temporal salvation is conditionally offered to those whom God has freely saved with eternal salvation:

Mar 16:16
He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.

Acts 2
21 And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved.
40 And with many other words did he testify and exhort, saying, Save yourselves from this untoward generation.

1Timothy 4:16
Take heed unto thyself, and unto the doctrine; continue in them: for in doing this thou shalt both save thyself, and them that hear thee.

Eternal salvation is monergistic: freely and sovereignly purposed by God, accomplished by Jesus Christ, and applied by the Spirit without any cooperation from the elect, who are by nature dead in trespasses and sins.

Once freely and sovereignly bestowed with eternal salvation, God holds His children responsible for working out their own salvation with fear and trembling through their obedience to their Father's will.

Blessed are you if you have understood these things; many theologians don't have a clue!


Fred
“But blessed are your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear. For verily I say unto you, That many prophets and righteous men have desired to see those things which ye see, and have not seen them; and to hear those things which ye hear, and have not heard them.”
Matthew 13:16-17 KJV

Lloyd
Some temporal salvations are conditionally offered to the children of God. Some are not. If you are unconscious, floating in the lake and I reach down and save you from drowning, that is a temporal salvation not conditionally offered to the children of God. 

Sing
Lloyd: "... unconscious, floating in the lake..." sounds like a dead decomposing man to me.
Thank you for saving me anyway.

Lloyd
Unconscious, not dead.

Low
Lloyd: if he is only unconscious and capable of floating he can surely save himself when he regains consciousness.. I don't see someone capable of floating being seen as drowning at the same time.. sounds oxymoron to me

Dan
Brother Lloyd raises a good point, one that is not often discussed on the topic of temporal salvation, namely the truth that some, but not all, TEMPORAL salvations are likewise monergistic acts of God. I would not describe them as "temporally offered" unless one was using "offer" in the sense of "declared for one's information" rather than "presented for one's rejection or denial thereof" - but this is admittedly a bit of a quibble.

Leaving that observation aside to state the matter more clearly: We shall all be temporally saved from another worldwide flood. That doesn't deliver anyone to eternal glory, but it does deliver us from that particular, temporal calamity. This deliverance is the result of an unconditional promise of God, that requires absolutely nothing of man whatsoever. Nevertheless, many temporal salvations in the scriptures are contingent upon the willing and active obedience of a child of God, and this aspect of temporal salvation is often the most emphasized as it provides the greatest contrast with monergistic eternal salvation and thus has the greatest explanatory benefit.

Donna
Lloyd: well, sir if u are unconscious, you are not able to do anything to help yourself, either.

Lloyd
Low: ah, yes, you raise a good point. By my not being precise and detailed with my example, it led to confusion and a misunderstanding on your part. Much like using a general term like temporal salvation, which can mean many things. If on the other hand, I had said that 2 boats had an accident. The man in one boat hit his head and was knocked unconscious before he fell face down in the water. The man in the second boat, thinking quickly, reached down and pulled the unconscious man out of the water before he could sink, saving his life. If he had not done so, the unconscious man, who was briefly floating face down, would have soon gone under and drowned. When describing temporal salvation, you must be precise in your meaning. There are an almost infinite number of temporal salvation types.

Sing
Brother Dan, I read your helpful exchanges with Brother Lloyd on the appropriateness of terminology in describing non-eternal salvation.

Greg
Lloyd: brother in the case you mention a condition was met, not on the part of the unconscious but on the part of the conscious having a heart for his helpless fellow man, which isn’t always the case. 

Lloyd
Greg, usually when we talk about salvation, conditional and unconditional is from the perspective of the saved (recipient of the salvation). From the perspective of the one doing the saving, it is always conditional. Even with God and eternal salvation. Unconditional for us, conditional for God. In other words, eternal salvation is conditional on God choosing us, Jesus dying for us, the Holy Spirit regenerating us or giving us that spiritual/eternal life. There are no conditions on us, but there are on God. God put those conditions on himself. After you are born again by the Spirit, you are able to believe that Jesus is God’s son and that He is the way, the truth, and the life. When you believe, you are saving yourself from a life of ignorance of the truth, you are saving yourself from a life that ultimately does not satisfy, you are saving yourself from a life where comfort, peace, and joy are fleeting not lasting, and you are saving yourself from many other things that come from a life without knowing who Jesus really is. I would rather give God’s little children that assurance rather than telling them: that if you believe in Jesus you can experience conditional time salvation. Oh, joy.

Greg
Lloyd amen brother, I was just poking at you, but I’m glad I did, I enjoyed the response.

I do think Bro. Sing was talking about walking in Jesus' teachings, being obedient and receiving promises made to those of God's children who walk in meekness before the Lord.

Maybe conditional time salvation is confusing to some but it seems simple to me “save yourselves from untoward generation “ it is something given to God's children to do, good works that God has foreordained that we should walk in them, to his honour and glory and to our benefit even in suffering for his name's sake.

Rayburn
Concur, the truth is the truth

Dan
Very clearly stated. It is certainly true that many if not most theologians seem to stumble over the distinction between monergistic eternal salvation by Christ's willing obedience and synergistic temporal salvation by our willing obedience to His precepts.

Sing
Dan: "synergistic temporal salvation by our willing obedience to His precepts"
- the salvation under consideration involves the spiritual well-being of God's children.
- the salvation under consideration requires the willing obedience of God's children.
- this helps to reduce confusion.

I use the distinction of our BEING and WELLBEING as God's children to illustrate the distinction between eternal and temporal salvation.

Dan
Sing- So you use them in this way....
BEING (eternal salvation) - in reference to our state of eternal grace conferred upon us by God alone.
WELLBEING (temporal salvation) - in reference to our subsequent state of obedience in discipleship.

Is that the distinction you make?

Sing
Yes. Our being as God's children is wholly monergistic; our well-being as His children is synergistic.

Dan
Sing - makes sense to me. Might have to steal that from you, brother Sing.

Kay
I have never understood that subject.

Dan
Kay: - I suspect that's because many ministers make it more complicated than it is.
1. Salvation to heaven is done by God alone.
2. Salvation from this untoward generation is done by God's promised enablement (the indwelling Holy Spirit, 1 Corinthians 10:13) and our willing and active obedience to the precepts of God (Isaiah 1:19).

We experience this in our everyday lives. We know God has saved us by his grace (Romans 8:16). We likewise know that when we sin, we do so in rebellion to what God has taught us and we deserve the temporal consequences that accompany our disobedience and God's chastisement thereof (Hebrews 12).

I understand your struggle with the subject and believe it is pretty common among the Lord's sheep. But striving for a better understanding of the matter is a worthy and profitable pursuit. I honour the admission that you have never understood the subject. In my own life, similar admissions have often been a requirement for gaining a better understanding later on.

Donna
Kay: Each time when u read the word save or saved in the BIBLE,do u apply it to eternal salvation,?

Kay
Donna: if it meant for eternal.

Donna
Kay: not every time you read saved or saved it does not mean to heaven.

Kay
I get the eternal salvation. The temporal, is that like our obedience saves us from consequences?

Sing
Kay: Yes, our obedience saves us from consequences in this life, i.e. temporal. Christ has saved us from the lake of fire, i.e. eternal salvation.

Lloyd
I appreciate this discussion brothers and sisters. Iron sharpens iron. God gives different gifts to His children to use in service and ministry in His kingdom. Let us all seek His wisdom in knowing and using ours to His glory. Different children learn and memorize in different ways. Let us all recognize that and seek the best way to share God’s truth.

Marty
I embrace the teaching of conditional "temporal salvation" or "time salvation". But it should be understood that God is the same in eternity and in time. Here is the viewpoint that helps me to understand God's unchanging nature in this:

God is a perfect parent. His love for his children, and the relationship he puts in place by grace, are everlasting. They will never be separated from him, and any human he loves will arrive safely in glory to dwell in his presence forever.

God is a perfect parent. He chastises his own children for their disobedience, and rewards them for their obedience. His fellowship with any of his children is conditioned on their thoughts, words, and deeds.

Therefore, "temporal" or "time" salvation occurs only in time, because his children will not disobey him any more when they are in heaven. The unchanging God is a perfect parent to his children.

Lloyd
Marty: I also agree with the fact that there are temporal or time salvations that are dependent on some conditions that man must fulfill. I don’t disagree with that concept from a theological perspective. But I don’t like the emphasis that is placed on the theological terminology that can be confusing to the folks in the pews. I prefer to encourage and comfort them with specific examples such as if you believe in Jesus … or if you obey Jesus … there is a salvation … in doing so. As a pastor, I have found that using these theological terms like conditional time salvation can be confusing and/or not applicable to their daily lives. And there may be a reason that our Lord and his apostles chose to use “save” “saved” or “salvation” without qualification in the inspired word. Salvation in scripture whether eternal or temporal in this world is a gift from God by his grace alone OR enabled by his grace with us following his commandments. I prefer that instruction for His little children. Otherwise, why would he have not instructed us differently.

Marty

Yes, the closer we can stay to scriptural language, the better for us and for those who hear us. And although the apostles did not qualify the use of the words about salvation the same way as modern theologians, the context of their words about salvation served to qualify them well.

When a child of God encounters the word "save" or "salvation" in the Bible, it does help to ask: "saved from what?" and "saved unto what" and "saved by meeting what conditions?" If the answer to these questions - especially the third one - is different than the answer in another text, then two different kinds of salvation, or aspects of salvation, are under consideration.

Saturday, April 6, 2024

Dichotomy or Trichotomy


Dichotomy or Trichotomy - that's the question that came to my mind by the meme. Let's look at a few relevant passages:

Gen 2:7
And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

(The body with the breath of life = a living soul. Man does not have a soul; he is a soul, a living soul when the spirit and the body are in union.)

Ecc 12:7
Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it.

(the spirit leaves the body, death occurs; if there is a distinct separate soul, where is it, and where does it go?)

1Co 6:20
For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God's

(A man consists of body and spirit; the Lord redeemed them both. If there is a separate soul, is it purchased?)

1Th 5:23
And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.

(When the body and the spirit are united, there is the soul. God is not the God of the dead but of the living; the whole man is a living soul, with body and spirit united.)

Your body and spirit are kept together by the power of God... remember that too.

Just some soulish thoughts.

Nevertheless, at thy word, I will...

Nevertheless, at thy word, I will...

 
Some lessons from Luke 5:1-11

"And Simon answering said unto him, Master, we have toiled all the night, and have taken nothing: nevertheless, at thy word, I will let down the net. - Luke 5:5

"Nevertheless, at thy word, I will..."

Mark these wonderful words well; may the Lord hear them from us often. Amen.

Let the wisest, most knowledgeable, and experienced men humbly defer to the Lord Jesus Christ.

Peter and other experienced veteran fishermen had returned from a long night of fruitless fishing.

Nevertheless, at the Lord's bidding, Peter reluctantly obeyed.

Lesson 1:
Blessings of hearing and obeying the Lord's commands no matter how His command may appear contrary to our experience and understanding.
- Peter was an experienced fisherman; he knew that it wasn't the best time for fishing. Nevertheless, he deferred to the Lord.

Look at these examples:
i. Joshua 6 - such an unusual way to bring down the wall of Jericho. The LORD God commanded Israelites to march around Jericho once for 6 days; on the 7th day, they were to go around 7 times, and on the 7th round they were to raise a shout to bring down the wall.

ii. Isaiah  55:8-9 "For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts."

iii. Proverbs  3:5-7 "Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths. Be not wise in thine own eyes: fear the LORD, and depart from evil.

Lesson 2:
Success in their ministry depends on their obedience to His words, not on their own ability or strength.

Be mindful that our success or achievements is of the Lord.
- Psalms  127:1 Except the LORD build the house, they labour in vain that build it: except the LORD keep the city, the watchman waketh but in vain.
- John  15:5 I am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing.

Friday, April 5, 2024

"To day is the third day SINCE these things were done."

"These things" happened since THREE days ago.
Sunday was the THIRD day since those things happened.
Sunday - THIRD day SINCE those things happened;
Saturday - SECOND day SINCE those things happened.
Friday - FIRST day SINCE those things happened.
Thursday - THE day those things happened

Lu 24:21 But we trusted that it had been he which should have redeemed Israel: and beside all this, to day is the third day since these things were done.

Sing F Lau
Here is a simple observation.
On Sunday morning, two disciples were on their way to Emmaus, and they said to Christ, "But we trusted that it had been he which should have redeemed Israel: and beside all this, to day is the THIRD DAY SINCE these things were done."

"These things" - I take these things as referring to the trial, crucifixion and burial of Christ.

"These things" happened since THREE days ago. Sunday was the THIRD day since those things happened.

Sunday - THIRD day SINCE those things happened;

Saturday - SECOND day SINCE those things happened.

Friday - FIRST day SINCE those things happened.

Thursday - THE day those things happened.

If those things happened on Wednesday (with the Passover starting at Tues 6pm), then it would have been the FOURTH days since those things happened by Sunday morning.

I assume those two disciples know how to count!!!

Josiah Lau
dad what do you think of this?
https://www.logosapostolic.org/bible_study/RP208-4EmmausRoad.htm

Josiah Lau
The argument is that all the events of/surrounding Jesus' death properly ended with the sealing of the tomb and posting of the guards at his tomb, which took place on Thursday, the Passover high Sabbath. That makes Luke's account consistent with what Pr Crosby has here: http://www.letgodbetrue.com/bible/holidays/easter.php

Sing F Lau
I think his accounting is not sound... in fact bad!

Here's why. Quoting from his article:
## (Matthew 27:62) And on the next day, which is after the preparation, the chief priests and Pharisees had gathered together to Pilate.##

From this text we conclude that the tomb was sealed on the day AFTER the day called the preparation day.

We know that the preparation day was the day after the passover day - John 19:42 "There laid they Jesus therefore because of the Jews’ preparation day; for the sepulchre was nigh at hand."

Also the preparation day is known as the high day - the annual sabbath, distinct from the weekly sabbath.

Joh 19:31 "The Jews therefore, because it was the preparation, that the bodies should not remain upon the cross on the sabbath day, (for that sabbath day was an high day,) besought Pilate that their legs might be broken, and that they might be taken away."

The preparation was an annual sabbath day... "THAT day was a high day."

The day AFTER the preparation/high day was the weekly sabbath. So, it was ON Saturday that the chief priests and Pharisees gathered together to Pilate, requesting that the tomb be made secured during the night of Saturday 6pm to Sunday 6am.... because according to their reckoning from Christ's own words, they expected Him to raise WITHIN THAT period. That is the THIRD night of the "3 days and 3 nights" formula spoken. Guarding the tomb any earlier or any later would make them appeared as foolish! They did take Christ's words of 3 days and 3 night SERIOUSLY!

"3 days and 3 nights" - they guarded the tomb on the 3rd night, Sat 6pm to Sun 6am.

They were smart Jews who didn't waste resources, who took Christ's words seriously.

Christ came forth just before the dawn of Sunday morning!

Coming forth any earlier or any later would prove Himself wrong in His repeated words of "3 days and 3 nights."

The author made a serious error stating this:
## "After the sealing of the tomb, no event is recorded in scripture of anything that happened until the women came to the tomb on Sunday morning. There are, therefore, two complete days, the 16th and 17th of Nisan, where nothing is recorded about what happened. Sunday was therefore the third day after the sealing of the tomb, the last scriptural event recorded until Sunday morning; the same day that the disciples were on the Emmaus road. This is what "this is the third day" (Luke 24:21) refers to."

No, after the sealing of the tomb, there was only the night from Saturday 6 pm-Sunday 6am left!!!

The author has to adjust all these days BECAUSE he started out with the WRONG PREMISE that Jesus died and was buried on Wednesday!!!

His first paragraph stated his dilemma neatly

"Note: What is the problem with this scripture? Simply it is the phrase "today is the third day" (Luke 24:21), and the fact that we have taught that Jesus died and was buried on a 14th Nisan, a Wednesday afternoon. Now if we count the days from then, Thursday would be the first day, Friday would be the second day, and Saturday would be the third day, but this conversation on the Emmaus road is Sunday afternoon. This we know because it is said to be "on the same day" (Luke 24:13), which refers back to "on the first day of the week" (Luke 24:1 KJV) or "on one day from the Sabbath" (Luke 24:1 RPT). So there is an apparent disagreement which needs to be explained."

"To day is the third day", and

"To day is the third day SINCE..." are NOT the same!!!

The Scriptures says:

Lu 24:21 But we trusted that it had been he which should have redeemed Israel: and beside all this, to day is the third day SINCE these things were done.

The chief priests and the Pharisees, as well as the two disciples from Emmaus, were ABLE to count far more accurately than many in the 21st century!!! <LOOOOOL>

Josiah Lau
okay I'm reading up a bit more... would you say your account matches closely with this? http://www.thesimpletruth.net/booklet/3d3n.html

Josiah Lau
Interesting additional note in the above link:

"NOTE: Those who believe in a Wednesday crucifixion have a problem -- 6 days before the Passover, if He was crucified on a Wednesday, would fall on a Friday. Thus Jesus would have had to enter the streets of Jerusalem riding on an ass on the SABBATH, a direct BREAKING of the Sabbath. Exodus 20:10 says all cattle and beasts of burden were also given a Sabbath of rest. Jesus never broke the Sabbath."

Josiah Lau
Can I also say, dad, that your account does not assume that 3 days and 3 nights = 72 hours, right? Because your account is incompatible with 72 hours.

Sing F Lau
Hardly anyone takes "3 days and 3 nights" as equivalent to exactly 72 hours in everyday speech!

Only someone desperate to make "3 days and 3 nights" fit into a preconceived idea would insist on such exactness! Those who insist that Christ's "3 days and 3 nights" EQUAL 72hrs must insist that Christ rose shortly after Sat 6pm.

Incompatible with 72 exact hrs is a far less problem than having to admit "to day is the FOURTH DAY SINCE these things were done."

Peruse a related article here:
Take a look here: http://things-new-and-old.blogspot.com/2010/06/three-days-and-three-nights.html

---------

Gen 1:5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.

The Jewish reckoning of a 24hr day consists of a 12hr evening (6pm-6am) and a 12hr morning (6am-6pm)

p/s  3 days and 3 nights (it's not 3 nights and 3 days!)
- part of 1st day: Thur 6am-6pm. The crucifixion and burial occurred 
- 1st night: Thur 6pm - Fri 6am
- 2nd day: Fri 6am - Fri 6pm 
- 2nd night: Fri 6pm - Sat 6am
- 3rd day: Sat 6am - Sat 6pm 
- 3rd night: Sat 6pm - Sun 6am
Christ rose shortly after Sun dawn... AFTER 3 days and 3 nights.  

Some silly but sincere folks say Jesus rose on Saturday at 6pm - based on the 3n3d=72hrs idea, i.e. from burial at Wed 6pm - Sat pm. He rose before the soldiers were posted for the night of Saturday. (Sat 6pm - Sun 6am)

Wednesday, April 3, 2024

Three Days and Three Nights = 72 hrs?

Command therefore that the sepulchre be made sure
until the third day, lest his disciples come by night,
and steal him away, and say unto the people,
He is risen from the dead:
so the last error shall be worse than the first.
============

Matthew 12:38-40 KJV
[38] Then certain of the scribes and of the Pharisees answered, saying, Master, we would see a sign from thee.
[39] But he answered and said unto them, An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas:
[40] For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.

Not a few sincere Christians decided that the phrase "three days and three nights" MUST BE UNDERSTOOD as exactly 72hrs of 3 12hr-day and 3 12hr-night, no more and no less; anything else would make Christ a liar, they insist.

Perhaps they should make the next phrase "in the heart of the earth" as literal as well!

These sincere 72hr-ists begin with an assumption and then work everything else to fit into that notion by any means even though such a sincere attempt is inconsistent with some stated facts of the Scriptures. What a bizarre phenomenon!

Ask some questions...
1. When were the soldiers posted to guard the tomb?
2. When were the soldiers seen rushing to the city to report the resurrection of Christ?
3. When did Joseph buy the clean linen to wrap the body of Jesus?
4. When did the women buy the sweet spices to anoint Jesus? Check Mark 16:1.
5. What day followed the Passover day?
6. How was the day of the preparation related to Passover day?

Check Mat 27:62; John 19:42
7. The two men returning to Emmaus from Jerusalem on Sunday morning (the first 12hr-day of the week, preceded by the first 12hr-night of the week) said it was the THIRD day since those things (i.e. the kangaroo court, the condemnation, and the crucifixion of Christ...) had happened.

Which day did those things happen?
8. And, was Christ literally in the heart of the earth?

Feel free to ask your questions.

We'll search the Scriptures to answer them together.

Thanks.

========

Comments

Reggie Lee
Ok...kinda excited about this...
I'm gonna follow these instructions and see if I can come to a conclusion.

As of right now, I’m saying...
“I am not sure what day Jesus was crucified and rose.... “
Starting from a blank slate! ”Tabula Rossa”

Mark Despi
Stand guard on the tomb is a culture in that time?

sing
Mark Despi, Look at this passage
Mt 27
62 ¶Now the next day, that followed the day of the preparation, the chief priests and Pharisees came together unto Pilate,
63 Saying, Sir, we remember that that deceiver said, while he was yet alive, After three days I will rise again.
64 Command therefore that the sepulchre be made sure until the third day, lest his disciples come by night, and steal him away, and say unto the people, He is risen from the dead: so the last error shall be worse than the first.

Mark Despi
Sir SingF Lau Thank you 🙂 

Fung Tze Sen
I believe in 3 days and 3 nights. Full stop.
No matter what the world says.

sing
Fung Tze Sen:  You are right, it matters not what the world says.
It is when ALL Christians say, "I believe in 3 days and 3 nights; period" - but end up with vastly different meanings, i.e. some say Wednesday morning crucifixion, others say Thursday morning, and very many say Friday morning - then you have some work to do. They can't be all correct.

sing
Mt 27
62 ¶Now the next day, that followed the day of the preparation, the chief priests and Pharisees came together unto Pilate,
63 Saying, Sir, we remember that that deceiver said, while he was yet alive, After three days I will rise again.
64Command therefore that the sepulchre be made sure until the third day, lest his disciples come by night, and steal him away, and say unto the people, He is risen from the dead: so the last error shall be worse than the first.
---------

Three separate days are indicated in verse 62.
The day of preparation, the day before that, and the day after that.

Pray tell, what's the day BEFORE the day of preparation, and the day AFTER?

Thank you.

Reed Luther
When Jesus refers to being in the grave 3days and nights he refers us back to Jonah being in the belly of the whale and says so as Jonah was so shall he be, I have no reason to believe Jonah was not literally in the whale's belly 3d 3n there's no figure of speech used in the context of jonah as "heart of the earth" you used to cast doubt on it being literal 3 days and night.

Does logic not tell us to reason from the literal sense first and if it doesn't make sense seek another sense.

We should have a simple approach to identifying and interpreting figures of speech.

We conclude we have a figure when a literal approach results in absurdity.

I don't interpret the heart of the earth being literal because clearly, the earth does not have a red fleshly tissue that pumps blood throughout it. The heart of earth simply refers to the inmost part of the earth. Under the earth. While it's perfectly reasonable to take 3 days and 3 nights literally. Unlike the use of 1000 years which we do not take literally because elsewhere in scripture it's clearly not literal. God doesn't just own the cattle of a thousand hills but all cattle of every hill

sing
Reed Luther,
I didn't question the literalness of Jonah being swallowed up by a big fish, neither did I question the literalness of Christ being crucified and buried.

You don't interpret the heart of the earth being literal but you do interpret the 3 days and 3 nights to mean exactly 72hrs, no more and no less?

I asked, why must the phrase 3 days and 3 nights be understood as EXACTLY 72 hours - ESPECIALLY when this assumption and its conclusions fly in the face of biblical data?

Fung Tze Sen
Sing, I'm not sure if this is a translation problem or the choice of words.
In Mandarin translation, it is "...人子也要这样三日三夜在地里头。"
It simply means 3 days and 3 nights in the ground.
As I grew up with the Mandarin Bible, I have no such struggle as some might have with the English Bible.

sing
In this particular case, it's not the translation; it's interpretation.

Must "3 days and 3 nights" mean exactly 72hrs? Must 三曰三夜 mean exactly 72 hours? If you tell me you'll be away for two days and a night, must I make you to mean exactly 36hrs?

Fung Tze Sen
Sing, by right, u should.

sing
Fung Tze Sen Why? Because you speak as an engineer?

Fung Tze Sen
bcos son of man says so.

sing
me: If you tell me you'll be away for two days and a night, must I make you to mean exactly 36hrs?
you: by right, u should.
me: Why? Because you speak as an engineer?

LOOOOOOOOOL.
Sorry.

sing
OK, let's say you take the Lord's 3 days and 3 nights as exactly 72hrs, when did the 72hrs start, and when did they end? 

Reed Luther
I think the Lord said what he meant and meant what he said regardless of whether man's feeble mind can pin it down

Reed Luther
Jesus ate the Passover with His disciples on the evening of the fourteenth by Moses’ law (Ex 12:6-8; Matt 26:17-20; Mark 14:12-17; Luke 22:7-15).

2. The crucifixion began at 9:00 AM, and Jesus died after the darkness ended at 3:00 PM (Matthew 27:45-50; Mark 15:25,33-37; Luke 23:44-49).

3. Jesus was buried hurriedly as the preparation day ended and the high Sabbath day was about to begin (Mark 15:42; Luke 23:54; John 19:14,31,42).

4. The women who followed Jesus rested the high Sabbath day of the Passover before buying and preparing their spices (Mark 16:1 cp Exodus 12:16).

5. The women bought their spices and prepared them on the regular workday between the two Sabbaths days this week (Mark 16:1 cp Luke 23:55-56).

6. The women rested during the weekly Sabbath day after buying and preparing their spices the previous workday (Luke 23:55-56 cp Exodus 20:10).

7. Jesus rose from the dead as the weekly Sabbath ended – three days and three nights after burial – as prophesied (Matthew 12:39-40; Mark 8:31).

8. While it was still dark, the morning of the first day of the week, the women found the tomb already empty (Matt 28:1-6; Luke 24:1-3; John 20:1).

9. The gospel record of Jesus Christ’s death, burial, and resurrection prove His identifying sign of three days and three nights (Matthew 12:39-40).

10. Anyone holding to a Friday crucifixion and/or a Sunday morning resurrection is denying the very sign Jesus gave to prove He was the Son of God.

sing
Reed Luther Thank you for the neat points.

May I inquire, did you copy and paste, or did you think through and work out the above yourself. In case you wonder, does the question even matters; the simple reason is, if you have thought through and worked out the above, then I think it is worth asking you a few questions on some of the points you stated and also asking for your explanation on some passages of Scriptures. Thanks.

No, I don't hold to a Friday crucifixion; I do believe in the Sunday morning resurrection.

The little article is found here:
https://things-new-and-old.blogspot.com/2010/06/three-days-and-three-nights.html

Ante Zivkovic
To me, the part that is weak is this: we know they bought spices before and after the sabbath ( though this after the sabbath could as well be on Saturday night). It took them a whole day to prepare the spices (why?), then they rested on the sabbath and went to the tomb before dawn. Jesus was by then already 3 days in the tomb so balming would in a way also be pointless. So between Mark 16:1 and 2, there are 2 days in between. To me that is stretched, and that they needed the whole day to prepare the spices. It would make more sense then to go to the tomb on Friday. They had the whole day to do so. In the proposed sequence of events, they waited 2 days for balming, after He was in the tomb already for a day, and then rushed first thing in the morning to get to the tomb. Seems stretched. When I read Mark 16 there is a sense of urgency, and because they couldn’t go on the sabbath, so they went the first chance they got. Sunday morning, having bought the spices the night before. I wouldn’t be surprised if you could buy stuff in Israel the minute that the sun sets after the sabbath.

sing
Ante Zivkovic, 
Thanks for your thought.
- You are right. It is UNLIKELY anything to do with embalming. Joseph and Nicodemus already did that. [It is stated specifically that it was to anoint Him; anointing and embalming are different.]

John 19
38 And after this Joseph of Arimathaea, being a disciple of Jesus, but secretly for fear of the Jews, besought Pilate that he might take away the body of Jesus: and Pilate gave him leave. He came therefore, and took the body of Jesus.
39 And there came also Nicodemus, which at the first came to Jesus by night, and brought a mixture of myrrh and aloes, about an hundred pound weight.
40 Then took they the body of Jesus, and wound it in linen clothes with the spices, as the manner of the Jews is to bury.

I don't know why a weekday between High Sabbath and weekly sabbath is plucked out of thin air just to accommodate the women buying their sweet spices.

Joseph of Arimathea had time to buy the fine linen for graveclothes on the day Christ was crucified; Nicodemus bought his myrrh and aloes - nearly a hundred pounds too. Why couldn't the women have bought their sweet spices for anointing on the same day? Christ was crucified by 9am. Men and women with some common sense and love and devotion for their Lord have the foresight to get those things ready.

Mark 16:1 gives an indication.
And when the sabbath was past, Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James, and Salome, had bought sweet spices, that they might come and anoint him.

Some conclude that this is Saturday evening that those women went to the tomb when it was getting dark! And they insist that Mt 28:1 confirms their opinion.

Mt 28:1 "In the end of the sabbath, as it began to dawn toward the first day of the week, came Mary Magdalene and the other Mary to see the sepulchre."

BUT it does NOT read "... as it began to dawn toward the first NIGHT of the week". The first night of the week is Saturday 6pm - Sunday 6am; the first day of the week is from Sun 6am to Sun 6pm.

Incidentally, the sabbath as in "in the end of the sabbath" is in the plural (not the usual singular) - indicating the annual high sabbath and the weekly sabbath.

Back to Mk 16:1

It reads "And when the sabbath was past, Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James, and Salome, had bought sweet spices, that they might come and anoint him."

Read it like this: Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James, and Salome, HAD BOUGHT sweet spices, and when the sabbath was past that they might come and anoint him.

The past perfect HAD BOUGHT indicates that the purchase was made before the sabbath - since no purchase could be made on the both high sabbath and the weekly sabbath. They bought the sweet spices on the day Christ was crucified... but there was not enough time to do the anointing on that day. But those devoted women must do their anointing, no matter what. What lesson!

Ante Zivkovic
I read it more like they actually bought more spices right after the sundown on Sabbath, and slept and went in the morning when there would be light.

Reed Luther
When we read of Jonah being in a ship and swallowed by a fish do we first reason that it is a figurative fish and a figurative ship absolutely not, because the literal sense makes sense. we must start from somewhere is not the literal meaning the most logical and reasonable thing to do?

sing
Reed Luther, You are barking up the wrong herring!
Some have something to say; Others have to say something. 😉

Marty-Sandy Smith
For consideration:


sing
Marty-Sandy Smith Thank you. That's the neatest diagram I've come across - three columns for the three different timelines

sing
Marty-Sandy Smith Brother, where do you get that extra day between the high sabbath and the weekly sabbath? Thanks.