Things New and Old

Ancient truths revealed in the Scriptures are often forgotten, disbelieved or distorted, and therefore lost in the passage of time. Such ancient truths when rediscovered and relearned are 'new' additions to the treasury of ancient truths.

Christ showed many new things to the disciples, things prophesied by the prophets of old but hijacked and perverted by the elders and their traditions, but which Christ reclaimed and returned to His people.

Many things taught by the Apostles of Christ have been perverted or substituted over the centuries. Such fundamental doctrines like salvation by grace and justification have been hijacked and perverted and repudiated by sincere Christians. These doctrines need to be reclaimed and restored to God's people.

There are things both new and old here. "Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things"
2Ti 2:7.

Friday, July 5, 2013

"Whoever does A (believes) will receive B (everlasting life)" - a fowler's gospel


Charles shared a link:
Sing, here is one for you to read and tell us what you think!


Sing F Lau
Part of the 2nd paragraph of the article reads as follows:

What the text teaches is that everyone who believes in Christ will be saved. Whoever does A (believes) will receive B (everlasting life). The text says nothing, absolutely nothing, about who will ever believe. It says nothing about the fallen man’s natural moral ability. Reformed people and non-Reformed people both heartily agree that all who believe will be saved. They heartily disagree about who has the ability to believe.
===========

Since John 3:16 declares thus: "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life," then both the haughty Reformed people and the despised non-Reformed people are deceived and deluded!!!

What the text teaches is that everyone who believes HAS / POSSESSES eternal life, i.e HAS BEEN SAVED, HAS BEEN BESTOWED ETERNAL LIFE/SALVATION!

Everyone who will believe in Christ SHALL HAVE eternal life, and everyone who believes in Christ HAS eternal life are two ENTIRELY different gospels!!!

The text makes a grand and glorious declaration about every one/whosoever believes: all the believing ones HAVE, NOT will have, eternal life!

It says NOTHING about what one must do to be saved!!!


It makes a grand and glorious DECLARATION about the believing ones - they have ETERNAL/EVERLASTING LIFE, an evidence of having been SO LOVED of God.


It is like this simple and plain statement about the eating ones:
He who eats has life. This is a statement about those who eat. 

It says nothing about the dead eating in order to have life.

Beware, Sprouler the fowler is on the prowl for some to devour!


Charles 
Sproul just tweeted (perhaps from my remarks)
We are not loving people when we're telling them that God accepts them as they are w/out repentance, b/c we're lying to them. —RC Sproul


Sing F Lau  
We are most loving to people to tell them the truth God accepted His people in Christ Jesus when still dead in trespasses and sins, regenerated them with eternal life, made them fit for eternal glory... therefore repent and believe the truth! Whoever believes HAS everlasting life.

Any thing else would be telling them lies!
And telling them lies is not loving at all!
Tell the sprowler that!


Sing F Lau  
"Whoever does A (believes) will receive B (everlasting life)..

This a perversion of what the text says!!
The text declares:

Whoever does A (believes) HAS / POSSESSES B (everlasting life).

Doing A is evidence of possessing B!

Tell the sprowler that!
 

Charles
His very last sentence caught my attention!

Sing F Lau
His last sentence;

"It is so great that only the effectual grace of God working in his heart can bring him to faith."

What about it?
There is something rotten about it...
I'll let you have the honor to throw it out!


Charles
I tweeted back to sprowler: "we are deceiving them when we make repentance a condition for being born again.The Holy Spirit regenerates from their state of sin.


Tweeting is a good exercise in communications, you only have 140 characters to tweet

Charles
@Ligonier it is not about our love for them it is God's love we declare to the regenerated/already born again. II Cor 5:14-21

=========================================

A closely related thread:




"Whoever does A (believes) will receive B (everlasting life)" --- R C Sproul

This is the gospel of the Reformed people, that is, receiving B is conditioned on doing A!
This is most definitely a perversion of what John 3:16 says!!

The text declares:
Whoever does A (believes) HAS / POSSESSES B (everlasting life).
Doing A evidences the possession of B.

The former is no gospel... for one without everlasting life is incapable to do the thing needed to receive everlasting life!!! It is a cruel mockery and wicked taunting against the dead in trespasses and sins!

Doing A is evidence of possessing B!
Doing A is the evidence of having been SO LOVED by God and bestowed everlasting life by His free grace.

That is the gospel - the good news of what God HAS ALREADY DONE... bestowed eternal life.
Whosoever believes HAS everlasting life.
That's good news!


Sing F Lau 
Take a look here - a short article on John 3:16 "How did God so love?"http://things-new-and-old.blogspot.com/2008/02/john-316-how-did-god-so-love.html

Sing F Lau
Here is another article on John 3:16 "But how did God so love?"
http://things-new-and-old.blogspot.com/2010/01/but-how-did-god-so-love-john-316.html

Canto
Bro Sing.... u don't agree with the Reformed view??

Sing F Lau  
Bro Cantoro, you don't agree with the Holy Bible?????

Canto
One of the reasons why we use KJV is because it is the Bible of the Protestant Reformation right?

Sing F Lau  
Cantoro, don't let your great mind wander so easily!  Stay focused lah!!! What do you want to talk about - John 3:16 or KJV or Protestant Reformation?

Which do you believe

"Whoever does A (believes) will receive B (everlasting life)"  or
"Whoever does A (believes) HAS / POSSESSES B (everlasting life)"?

Canto
I'm for TULIP!

Sing F Lau
You have not even dealt with John 3:16, you are already jumping to KJV, and Protestant Reformation, and now TULIP! You should be thrown into jail... because ORCHID is the national flower of Singapore, and not the dutchy tulip!!!

Good night! Please go to bed. Have a good rest... then come back and say something useful on John 3:16.


Canto
The context is that the Jews rejected Jesus Christ and saw Him as only a mere carpenter, not as the Son of God.

For us, we can only know the Living Word through the written word of God. So if we are convinced that Jesus is the Son of God, receiving Him as Lord and Saviour will give us everlasting life.

Sing F Lau  
Yes, you are INDEED a Reformed person!!!
You and RC Sproul think and believe alike:

Sproul: "Whoever does A (believes) will receive B (everlasting life)"
Cantoro: "receiving Him as Lord and Saviour will give us everlasting life."

I hear you loud and clear.

So, you are saying that a man WITHOUT everlasting life, i.e. STILL dead in trespasses and sin, is capable of receiving Jesus Christ as Lord and Saviour in order that his act of receiving will give him the everlasting life which he did not have? That's a very simple question for a Reformed man like you. So kindly answer it. Thank you.


Canto
My BP teachers have taught me:
John 6:37 All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.

Romans 8:29 For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.

I'd add that:

2 Corinthians 4:3-4 But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost: In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.

2 Corinthians 4:6 For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.

So to the elect, the gospel is effective in making them alive and bear good fruit from being dead in trespasses and sins.
 

Canto
The Spirit of God chooses whoever He wants to give everlasting life. Everlasting life is being born of the Spirit, begins at the moment of conversion.


By the irresistible, instantaneous act of conversion by the Spirit of God, the elect dead in trespasses and sins will receive Jesus as Lord and Saviour.



Sing F Lau  
Canto, you may be the THIRD person I'm saying this: the Devil can quote Scriptures better than you do!!!

OK now please explain John 6:37. Thank you.

John 6:37 "All that the Father GIVETH me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out."

John 6: 39 And this is the Father’s will which hath sent me, that of all which he HATH GIVEN me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day.

John 6:37 has "Father GIVETH" - present tense.
John 6:39 has "he HATH GIVEN" - perfect tense.

Now, please explain John 6:37.

The Devil can quote Scriptures better than you do!!!


Canto
From the perspective of Jesus as a human being, it was the present tense. But from the perspective of God from beginning to end, God the Father has decided who to give the faith to accept Jesus as Lord and Saviour.

I'd like to add also:

Romans 10:14-15 How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher? And how shall they preach, except they be sent? as it is written, How beautiful are the feet of them that preach the gospel of peace, and bring glad tidings of good things!

Makes sense offering the gospel to many willing to hear!

1 Peter 3:18-20 For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit: By which also he went and preached unto the spirits in prison; Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.

So the gospel is to save and condemn!

Mark 7:16 If any man have ears to hear, let him hear.


Sing F Lau  
Cantoro, Thanks for all your comments.
You are a perfect example of a deformed Arminian - having a reformed label but believe just like an Arminian!!!
Sorry, you are too smart alecky to learn the truth. You have been indoctrinated beyond cure. So I need to think if I should waste more time responding to your comments. Thanks.
  

Dell
Hello Brother
Sing can I borrow your post?
I believe it reinforces 1 John 5:1
King James Version (KJV)
5 Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: and every one that loveth him that begat loveth him also that is begotten of him.
10. He that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself: he that believeth not God hath made him a liar; because he believeth not the record that God gave of his Son.


Sing F Lau  
It is God's truth, our common heritage! Use it freely, Brother!

Dell
 :) O:)

Canto
Then give me a chance to comment abt VPP-KJV? ;)

Sing F Lau  
Don't ride your hobby horse here.
Ride it freely on your own turf!

You had better stay put of this BASIC issue of salvation first before drifting off to other subjects!!!

 

Angel
Excuse me Elders I think the subject of God's love is the elect people. Jn.3:16 are supported by Jn.17:5-24. please read, 4 kinds of world: #1cosmos world, #2world of all mankind, #3world of non-elect, #4world of the elect people.in matt.1:21 the mission of Jesus is to save all his people only and not all human being.

Canto

Angel P, I'm not an Elder =) haha, let me go to some farms which have sheep first... If I can look after them well for a few years, then maybe God may put the conviction in my heart to be an Elder... (Experiment w animals first!) Arrgh! Those animals... why don't just hire a shepherd dog??

Good to point out how cosmos is used. like Cesar commanded that the world be taxed.

It looks to me quite clearly there are sheep and goats predetermined. The Son of man came to seek them that are lost. Why lost? They once belonged to God. Now they are found! Rather than we found God, God found us!

Sheep that are lost were dead in trespasses and sins till they were found. In the parable of the prodigal son for eg, the thrust of the parable is about repentance. Christ came for His sheep - those the Father had given Him. Because those sheep were lost, needing a shepherd.


Sing F Lau 
Canto wrote:
The Spirit of God chooses whoever He wants to give everlasting life. Everlasting life is being born of the Spirit, begins at the moment of conversion.

By the irresistible, instantaneous act of conversion by the Spirit of God, the elect dead in trespasses and sins will receive Jesus as Lord and Saviour.
========

Canto, if you will pay some attention, I will expand some time teaching you some gospel truth, and wean you from some loooooose talk.

1. The Spirit of God DOES NOT choose whoever He wants to give eternal life! The Spirit of God works in perfect harmony with God the Father and God the Son.
- The Spirit of God gives eternal life to those ONLY and no one else whom God the father has chosen and predestined to glory, and whom the Son has redeemed for the same end.
- ONLY those whom Christ has redeemed are eligible recipient of eternal life... not whoever the Spirit of God wants!!!

2. Everlasting life is being born of the Spirit, begins at the moment of REGENERATION!
- You are quite confused and messed up about regeneration and conversion.
- Regeneration is always distinct and PRIOR to conversion. Learn this BASIC truth well, and it will save you from many errors.

3. The Spirit of God gives eternal life to the elect - chosen of God and redeemed of Christ - who are still dead in trespasses and sin.
- He gives eternal life NOT TO THOSE who believe.
- Those who believe ALREADY HAVE eternal life!
 
Sing F Lau
Angel said ---
"#1cosmos world #2world of all mankind #3world of non-elect #4world of the elect people.

I suggest the world spoken of in John 3:16 is the world in its ethical sense... a world that lies in death and wickedness and rebellion and enmity against God. Such is the world that God loved... which is why it is said He SO LOVED... He loved that which on every consideration are unlovable, but should be justly and righteously damned eternally.

That's the intent of the term "world" in John 3:16 - I believe.
To say the world refers to the world of the elect is too specious, and invite the wrath of the universalists for no good reason!!!





  

Thursday, July 4, 2013

A conditional man has scrupple with the declarative "have" in John 3:16!


Some musings on John 3:16

A brother said:
Below is an exegesis of one arminian friend who advocate the conditionality of John 3:16.

"John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

"WHOSOEVER believeth in him . . . HAVE everlasting life."
Is the grammar correct? WRONG! Or worse yet . . .

"WHOSOEVER believeth in him SHOULD . . . HAS everlasting life."
Is the grammar correct? WRONG!

To be declarative the verse should read -
"WHOSOEVER believeth in him . . . HAS everlasting life."
Is the grammar correct? Absolutely yes!
The only problem is "HAVE" is used in the verse and not "HAS."

This is what the verse actually says:

"WHOSOEVER believeth in him SHOULD . . . HAVE everlasting life."
Is the grammar correct? Absolutely yes!. The last part of the verse, therefore, is clearly CONDITIONAL."
==========

I would like to hear what you have to say on this. Grammatically, it seems accurate and right, but I would like to get your inputs.

Thanks.


My comments:
Here is the well known text:
John 3:16 "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life."

First,
The text says these:
1. 'whosoever believeth in him should not perish'
2. 'whosoever believeth in him have everlasting life'

The text DOES NOT say:
"whosoever believeth in him SHOULD have everlasting life."

Second,
the brother asserted thus --- "WHOSOEVER believeth in him . . . HAVE everlasting life."
Is the grammar correct? WRONG! Or worse yet... ---

And what is so grammatically incorrect with "whosoever believeth in him... have everlasting life"?

'Whosoever' is not necessarily singular. 'Whosoever' is often used collectively, meaning 'some of all types' or 'all'. That explains why it is followed by the plural verb 'have' and not 'has'. "Whosoever believeth" can mean "all believing ones." All the believing ones HAVE everlasting life.
http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=G3956&t=KJV

Third:
"believeth" is present active PARTICIPLE, i.e "the believing", functions like a verbal noun. 'Whosoever believeth' means "all believing ones", therefore followed by 'have'.
All believing ones HAVE everlasting life... that's a declaration of fact and truth!

"HAVE" is in the present tense, active voice. "The present tense represents a simple statement of fact or reality viewed as occurring in actual time. In most cases this corresponds directly with the English present tense."

Fourth:
'Should' is a modal verb related to 'perish', indicating the consequence of believing.

The consequence of believing is that the believing ones should not perish. The consequence of believing is not to have eternal life.Why?

It is eternal life ENABLES believing. Possession of everlasting life is THE reason there are believing ones. Believing is an effect of the possession of everlasting life.

Believing is OBVIOUSLY an activity of, and manifestation of the everlasting life. ONLY an insane man denies that life must precede the activities of that life. Believing is an activity of spiritual life.

Danny
Thank you brother Sing.
Is it not that "BELIEVETH" is a singular verb which stands for the modern form "believes" ?

Sing F Lau
‎'believeth' is a participle. Its parsing information:
Tense: Present
Voice: Active
Mood: Participle

participle |ˈpärtəˌsipəl|
noun Grammar - a word formed from a verb (e.g., going, gone, being, been) and used as an adjective (e.g., working woman, burned toast) or a noun (e.g., good breeding).

Therefore, "whosoever believeth" is a verbal noun, with the meaning, "all the believing ones."

Tuesday, July 2, 2013

A swine craving man hating the ancient pork loving Chinese!


Wifey bought this 4.2kg piece of belly pork (for RM70),
roasted it, and gave the best portion away as a present to her dear sister,
a very kind Christian who shows great kindness to our children.
To buy it ready roasted would cost more than twice as much!

Sing F Lau
Some tips to make your church very rich!!!
http://therealsingapore.com/content/analysis-wealth-city-harvest-church-cult
An analysis into the wealth of City Harvest Church (Cult)

Taylor
This model is the same one that many, many "television evangelists" across the globe have learned and use so successfully. I remember a line from a 1970s movie starring George C. Scott, called "The Flim Flam Man." That line was given in answer to someone asking the main character, a man who made his living cheating people out of their money, how he could live with himself. His answer was, "I never cheated an honest man." I believe that is why these charlatans are so successful. People are greedy and want something for nothing - or at least a lot for a little.

Matthiu
@Sing: Did you try to support their doctrine, BUT the doctrines from ROME is ok?

Sing F Lau
Matthiu, which axe of yours do you wish to grind?
Spell it out - what is their doctrine in question?
I don't tolerate potshot from you, not here, or anywhere.

I asked you some questions in another place... and as usual, as a coward who make cheap statements, you have not answered yet!

Matthiu
The doctrine that implied chinese has a covenant from the ETERNAL God of the Holy Scripture. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmyO7bC9E94

Sing F Lau
Please explain - What does it mean that the "Chinese has a covenant from the ETERNAL God of the Holy Scripture." What covenant? Please tell us!

I do believe that the ancient Chinese did know and worship the ETERNAL God of the Holy Scriptures - as well documented from their ancient literature.

Do you have problem with that? If you do, state your reasons.

You do HATE that idea, don't you? YOU would rather wallow in the fiction that the ancient Chinese were complete pagans, devoid of any knowledge of the Lord God of heaven!

"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclination, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." John Adams

An incorrigible fool like you despise historical facts!!!

Matthiu
From heathen religion writing? Yes. I am still utterly disgusted that the fact they were worshiping the god of this world, or goldern dragooon, as clearly shown in that place of abomination that because there ARE these verse that I found in OT given unto Moses:

That is the clear verse that direct contradicted the MYTH of that doctrine.
[Deuteronomy 14:2] For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God, and the LORD hath chosen thee to be a peculiar people unto himself, +++above all the nations+++ that are upon the earth.

[Deuteronomy 7:6-7] For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God: the LORD thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, +++above all people+++ that are upon the face of the earth. 7 The LORD did not set his love upon you, nor choose you, because ye were more in number than any people; for ye were the fewest of all people:

This verse was NEVER given to heathen chinese AS the promise they WERE the OT chosen people, which that doctrine.

They were devoid of any knowledge of the Lord God of heaven!
Your post suggested there WAS exception.
[Psalms 14:3] They are all gone aside, they are all together become filthy: there is none that doeth good, no, not one. This verse SHOWN there WAS NONE.

Your dispute is with the CLEAR scripture.

Sing F Lau 
Matthiu, you quoted:
Deuteronomy 7:6 For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God: the LORD thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, +++above all people+++ that are upon the face of the earth. 7 The LORD did not set his love upon you, nor choose you, because ye were more in number than any people; for ye were the fewest of all people:

Then you commented:
"this verse was NEVER given to heathen chinese AS the promise they WERE the OT chosen people, which that doctrine."

That verse was addressed to Israel - chosen as a special people. That DOES NOT mean that God DID NOT love the ancient Chinese or other people of the earth!

You make a fundamental error by concluding from that Scripture that God DID NOT love the ancient Chinese!

I dispute your TWISTING of that clear Scriptures. You have just TWISTED and PERVERTED that clear text to mean that God DID NOT love any other people other than the Jews!!!

You have perverted and twisted that glorious text to say that God DID NOT love any people except the Jews!!!

That text says that the Jews were a special NATION... no other people group was chosen to be a THEOCRATIC nation for God's redemption purpose.

But you have TWISTED and PERVERTED that passage to say that God DID NOT love any apart from the Jews... you use that passage to exclude the love of God for the ancient Chinese who gave every evidence that they did worship the Jehovah God of heaven. Their ancient writings stand as an evidence of that fact.

You are just an incorrigible fool... I can say this of you because you sat under my ministry and I know you PERSONALLY! You have sat and ate at my table... If there is anyone out there on FB who know you, I AM the one... Matthiu! And the men of SDC know you well enough - a proud incorrigible fool.

Matthiu
Oh Queen, live forever and thou shalt not see wicked days.

Sing F Lau
Matthiu, when did you begin to worship Mary the Queen of heaven?
Seriously, stick to the subject. Don't make a fool of yourself.

Sing F Lau
Matthiu, you are just SO OBSTINATE... like a mule.
You keep looking at the modern Chinese, your fellow swine loving idolatrous Chinese and rightly curse them of their idolatry and heathenism... and draw the stupid conclusion that the Chinese had always been that.

"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclination, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." John Adams

Read the extant historical records about the religious practices of the ancient Chinese. Let the bare historical facts speak for themselves. If you are incapable, or refuse to do that, I suggest you stop raving and babbling... go and enjoy your roast pork, and then enjoy childish poking fun at those who consider swine as unclean.

[You have foolishly equated the simple statement that God has a chosen people among the ancient Chinese as EQUIVALENT to the "
chinese has a covenant from the ETERNAL God of the Holy Scripture" like the Jews had a covenant from the ETERNAL God! You are just incurably obtuse and confuse!!! 

And being incorrigible, you will not admit the errors of your way! The same with your silly idea about Adam calling the woman Eve!]