Things New and Old

Ancient truths revealed in the Scriptures are often forgotten, disbelieved or distorted, and therefore lost in the passage of time. Such ancient truths when rediscovered and relearned are 'new' additions to the treasury of ancient truths.

Christ showed many new things to the disciples, things prophesied by the prophets of old but hijacked and perverted by the elders and their traditions, but which Christ reclaimed and returned to His people.

Many things taught by the Apostles of Christ have been perverted or substituted over the centuries. Such fundamental doctrines like salvation by grace and justification have been hijacked and perverted and repudiated by sincere Christians. These doctrines need to be reclaimed and restored to God's people.

There are things both new and old here. "Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things"
2Ti 2:7.

Sunday, February 22, 2026

"Once saved, forever saved" is misunderstood by many

"Once saved, forever saved."
Start by asking a few questions.
Once saved by who? 
What kind of salvation is spoken of? 
Who secured that salvation?
How is that salvation applied to you?
Did you play any part in that "once saved"?


[15/01/2021, 15:43] Sing:

Brethren,
An intelligent inquirer said these pious words:
"I don't believe that nonsense, once saved, forever saved."  I don't stand with either Calvinism or Arminianism; I only believe in what the Bible says."

The inquirer made an interesting statement on "once saved, forever saved."

An Arminian curses this as a damnable heresy; some Calvinists glory in it.

How will you, who is neither an Arminian nor a Calvinist, assist someone in understanding the word of God more perfectly who opines "once saved, forever saved"?

Are you skilled enough to minister to others?

Aquila and Priscilla - the tent-maker couple, instructed by Apostle Paul - were skilled enough to assist the theologian Apollos.

Let's discuss.

[15/01/2021, 18:22] Sunny:
1. Does Esther know the eternal salvation of God vs conversion?

2. The Armenians condemn "once saved, forever saved"; they claimed God keeps on adding names in the Lamb's book of life. Most of them are of the opinion people are saved on earth through the hearing of the Gospel only and not eternally- given life waiting for regeneration or conversion. Because of such a lack of belief that God's chosen saints are bequeathed with eternal salvation.

3. However, Calvinists, on the other hand, believe in the election of saints... everyone would be found in heaven at the end time. Those not found or gathered at the end time are spurious and unbelievers.

4. The Calvinists believe the true elect will not lose their salvation on the ground that once saved forever saved.

However, there is a mega church where the main Pastor preached once saved, forever saved. No matter how one saint lives temporally.

5. Our belief is grounded in our bible stipulated:
a. Eternal salvation
b. Legal salvation by our eldest brother
c. Vital calling or conversion at the proper time.
d. Temporal salvation
e. Glorification at the great judgement Day.

Yes, we must be clear we are eternally saved n our names in the Lamb's book of life. But we must be converted daily in our lives as working out our salvation with fear and trembling. We must have faith in God that His salvation is efficacious. But we must qualify our faith in Christ with good works. Yes, Esther stated her notion as once saved forever. But we have to listen n get to know her better, why she couldn't stand either Arminian or Calvinistic beliefs. Maybe she has discovered more from our bible we could have overlooked.

Just my opinion...and understanding. However, to be corrected from our bible so I will have more complete knowledge of knowing our Lord 🙏🙏🙏

[15/01/2021, 23:50] Sing
Sunny @ 1. Does she know the eternal salvation of God vs conversion?

I think you meant this: Does she know the distinction between eternal and temporal salvation? (Eternal salvation and temporal salvation form a contrasting couplet just as regeneration and conversion do likewise.)

I'm not sure; probably not. Few do. We need to find out.

It would be great if our people are skilled to assist those who would bring up the issue of "once saved, forever saved" - whether they are for or against it.  We want to be Aquila and Priscilla to show them the way of God more perfectly. Acts 18:26. But just be aware that those with the teachable spirit of Apollos are uncommon.

An excellent way to find out is to ask them innocent questions so that we understand what they do, and don't believe about the matter. Asking apt questions will also inevitably expose their inconsistencies and contradictions; this will then will the opportunity to show them the truth.

"Once saved, forever saved" is both true and false at the same time but in a distinct and different sense.

Only those who know and understand the distinction between eternal salvation by grace alone and temporal salvation conditioned upon the obedience of God's children can adequately explain the matter.

What useful questions can we ask to assist them in understanding the issue correctly?

As indicated by Brother Eng Sun, both the Arminians and the Calvinists are quite confused about the matter because they don't see the distinction between eternal and temporal salvation.

[16/01/2021, 00:44] Sing
Sunny, The Arminians (followers of the teaching of Jacobus Arminius; Armenians are the people of Armenia) condemn "once saved forever saved" because they do indeed read in the Scriptures that they must work out their own salvation... Esther aptly quoted Phi 2:12 to prove her point. There are many passages that speak of the active role of believers for them to be saved, and stay saved. So, from their perspective, "once saved, forever saved" is plainly contradicting the Bible.

We know where the problem lies: the salvation spoken of in those passages that involve the ONGOING activities of men is only temporal salvation; they understand them as speaking of eternal salvation.  In their understanding, their eternal destiny hinged upon their activities to be saved, and stay saved!

To some haughty stiffnecked ones, I have said sweetly, "I wish you the best of luck, I sincerely hope you will do well enough to enter heaven." Elijah did use sarcasm; Apostle Paul, too.

To others, we want to patiently and graciously help them to see the distinction between eternal salvation by the sovereign activities of the Triune God ALONE in our eternal salvation, which makes it possible for His children (i.e. the elect that are already effectually called) to obey/do the will of their Father to save themselves with temporal salvation.

O the joy and comfort and assurance of salvation in knowing the distinction.
God's activities of saving His elect are certain, effectual, and immutable - once saved BY GOD, a man is 
certainly, effectually, and immutably SAVED to the uttermost. He is perfectly made fit for eternal glory. 

Let us lead others into this joy, comfort, and assurance.

How can a man honestly have assurance if his eternal salvation is indeed conditioned upon his activities in whatsoever way???

[16/01/2021, 06:01] Sunny:

Correct! Arminians instead of Armenians, the people. Bro Jonathan, in his bible study before on comparison of Arminians, Calvinists and Bible-believing Christians, mentioned to beware of the word Arminians and Armenians. Sorry

Pastor, thank you for your simple yet complete understanding of the difference. It is indeed a precis, instead of being wordy.

I learned one important lesson here. Practice makes perfect, simply doing it better each time. Put them in writing, even better each time. May our Lord bless our conscientious effort as a local church!

[17/01/2021, 17:17] Sing:

Sunny @ 3. The Calvinists indeed believe the doctrine of election; and they rightly conclude that every elect will finally be in heaven. All biblical and sound.

John 6:39 KJV — "And this is the Father's will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day."

However, the Calvinists introduce a human element into that divine equation that completely destroys the certainty of the salvation of each elect given to Christ.

What's the human element that the Calvinists introduce in the divine equation? It is their misguided doctrine of the Perseverance of the Saints.

First, the Calvinists twisted this doctrine. The original intent of this doctrine states that all those whom God effectually called out of their native state of sin and death into that of grace and salvation will *immutably remain* in that state of grace and salvation in Christ Jesus. This deals with our eternal salvation. The Calvinists turn this into the saints' act of persevering in a life of faith and holiness as a condition and evidence of their eternal salvation.

Romans 8:
38 "For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come,
39 Nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord."

The love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord, deals with our eternal salvation.

The perseverance of the saints in faith and holiness relates only to their spiritual well-being, i.e. temporal salvation.

The Calvinists - because of their ignorance of the distinction between eternal salvation by the free and sovereign grace of God alone and temporal salvation by the obedience of men to God's will - like their first cousins Arminians, have also introduced their works, i.e. their perseverance in a life of faith and holiness, into the equation of salvation.

They will rant, " Oh, God saved us by His grace, but we must work out that salvation."

No, no, no! There are two distinct salvations. It is like the life our parents gave to us, and the life we must labour to get for ourselves are different life. Until they see the distinction, they remain in confusion and pervert the gospel.

[17/01/2021, 21:50] Sing:
Consistent Calvinists will insist that people like Lot, Samson, Solomon, etc, who did not persevere in a life of faith and holiness to the end of their lives, are eternally lost. To them, the failure to persevere to the end of their lives is proof that they are not God's elect. Their assumption is "God's children will persevere to the end of their life; God's grace guarantees that."

It is like saying, "those Americans who did not attain the American Dream are not Americans." Or saying, "men who are not healthy and robust to the end of their lives are not men." 😢😢😢.