Things New and Old

Ancient truths revealed in the Scriptures are often forgotten, disbelieved or distorted, and therefore lost in the passage of time. Such ancient truths when rediscovered and relearned are 'new' additions to the treasury of ancient truths.

Christ showed many new things to the disciples, things prophesied by the prophets of old but hijacked and perverted by the elders and their traditions, but which Christ reclaimed and returned to His people.

Many things taught by the Apostles of Christ have been perverted or substituted over the centuries. Such fundamental doctrines like salvation by grace and justification have been hijacked and perverted and repudiated by sincere Christians. These doctrines need to be reclaimed and restored to God's people.

There are things both new and old here. "Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things"
2Ti 2:7.

Friday, February 13, 2026

Is your church standing or fallen?

 

#questiontime
#oldschool_vs_newschool

Question:
But did you really depart from the Reformed faith? Or u were just analysing it correctly? Coz you're still teaching the 1689 LBCF in your church, not only once, but 3 times. If you have departed from the Reformed Baptist faith, why did u teach the 1689 LBCF 3 times over the last 30 years?

-----------

 In essence, I went back to the faith held by the old school baptists who gave us the 1689 CoF.

The new school baptists like the Reformed Baptists have departed from what is faithfully summarized in the 1689 CoF - hijacked by the RBs as their Doctrinal Standard. 

I have studied and written extensively on the 1689 CoF... pointing out the glaring errors of the RBs. 

Here is an example on how the new is so different from the old:

The new: you believe in order to be justified by God;

The old: you believe because you have been justified by God.

Here is a classic example:

On Faith.and Justification

Dr John Gill: 1697-1771, was an old-school particular-baptist theologian, universally esteemed by his contemporaries of various denominations, and also by Dr Robert L Reymond (1932-2013), who was a renowned reformed theologian.

Dr Reymond said of John Gill:
"Gill (1697-1771), a Baptist puritan pastor, writes a thorough defence of Calvinistic theology."

- the above is listed under "Selected General Theological Bibliography" on page 1137 of Dr. Robert L Reymond's "A New Systematic Theology of the Christian Faith" Nelson, 1998.

Dr John Gill on faith and justification:
"Faith is not the cause, but an effect of justification; it is not the cause of it in any sense; it is not the moving cause, that is the free grace of God... nor even the instrumental cause... it is not in any class of causes whatever; but it is the effect of justification... Now if faith is not the cause, but the effect of justification; then as every cause is before its effect, and every effect follows its cause, justification must be before faith, and faith must follow justification."
- A Body of Doctrinal Divinity Book II, Chapter V, section II. (1769)

Dr Robert L Reymond on faith and justification:
"The New Testament everywhere makes it plain that faith in Jesus Christ is the instrumental 'precondition' [in italic] of justification before God... Therefore, faith in Jesus Christ... must precede justification as its logical (not chronological) prius... Thus we have the order: effectual calling... and faith in Jesus Christ, justification, and glorification."
- A New Systematic Theology of the Christian Faith, page 707. (1998, Nelson)

How vast is the difference between the old-school and the new-school theology - it is a gulf unbridgeable!

If the words of Mr Luther - "the doctrine of justification is the article of a standing or falling church" - were true, then how many of the reformed churches are standing churches today?

Is your church standing?