Things New and Old

Ancient truths revealed in the Scriptures are often forgotten, disbelieved or distorted, and therefore lost in the passage of time. Such ancient truths when rediscovered and relearned are 'new' additions to the treasury of ancient truths.

Christ showed many new things to the disciples, things prophesied by the prophets of old but hijacked and perverted by the elders and their traditions, but which Christ reclaimed and returned to His people.

Many things taught by the Apostles of Christ have been perverted or substituted over the centuries. Such fundamental doctrines like salvation by grace and justification have been hijacked and perverted and repudiated by sincere Christians. These doctrines need to be reclaimed and restored to God's people.

There are things both new and old here. "Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things"
2Ti 2:7.

Saturday, February 21, 2026

In what sense did God hate Esau and love Jacob?

Romans 9:13 KJT
As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.
How did God hate Esau?
By choosing the younger Jacob over the firstborn Esau...
when they were in the womb of their Mother.
This has nothing to do with their election to eternal salvation!


https://www.facebook.com/sing.f.lau/posts/pfbid0MYz4DZvoDxx5t8m2jea5pc6JLHEP45o8B1J65Y7ec7V3FUELdSerqvJetu3xxHQJl

Dear Brethren,
A Brother asked a question, one which I think, may have great implications in rightly dividing the word of truth.  The question stirs this question:

Is the divine distinction between Sarah and Hagar, Isaac and Ishmael, and Jacob and Esau relative to the eternal salvation or the temporal salvation?

I will really appreciate some thoughts.

Thanks.

Ante Zivkovic
I think it is eternal salvation. The promises are to the Seed not seeds (Isaac and Ishmael), and God hated Esau.

Sing F Lau
In what sense did God hate Esau and love Jacob?

Did God hate Esau by not electing him unto eternal salvation, or did God hate Esau by bypassing him, the older of the two, of being in the genealogical line of God's redemptive purpose?

How do your points " The promises are to the Seed not seeds (Isaac and Ishmael), and God hated Esau" demonstrate that eternal salvation is involved. Please elaborate. I want to understand.

Ante Zivkovic
Lol, i have no idea. I said I think, but the way I understand ROM 9 is that election was before anyone did anything yet and then Paul ties it to the fact that God will have mercy upon whom he will have mercy. Sure, election in ROM 9 could be temporal, but the context seems eternal to me.

Anecito Mesano
Isaac was the type of spiritual reality. There was no chance that Isaac will be born. Jacob had a regenerated spirit a works of the Holy Spirit.

Adam Wells
Couldn't we say that all who are saved temporarily are also saved eternally?

Dannie Loy
Sarah = Free woman
Hagar = Bond woman
Isaac = By Promise of God
Ishmael = By work of man

Jacob = Love of God
Esau = Hate by God

All of these illustrate a point in the Eternal Salvation of God. We were in bondage to sin by nature. We are made free by the work of Christ. Our being eternally free from sin is based upon the promise of God and not the work of man. God placed His love on the one that he chose to love. It was not based on their good or evil, but based on God's choice. All man are sinners with no good in them by nature for "all have sinned". So you can't point to the evil as reason God did not love one, for God hates all sin. "There is none that doeth good, no not one," so that eliminates any good as a reason God loved one and not the other.

God is sovereign in His choice of those He so loved. By promise, He devised means to establish their freedom by sending His Son to pay their sin debt. They are set at liberty and no longer in bondage to sin. All because of God's Love.

Sing F Lau
Election unto eternal salvation was executed before the foundation of the world.

The election of the YOUNGER Jacob over against the OLDER Esau was in time, and with respect to who will carry on the genealogical line leading to the promised seed!

Charles Page
I believe all the above-mentioned are the elect and have eternal salvation, and some of them experienced temporal/timely salvation.

Sing F Lau
Please explain, Charles.

Sing F Lau
Isn't Romans 9-11 Paul's explanation of the MYSTERY why some children of God among the Jews were unbelieving because they were not chosen to gospel salvation... Isn't that the CONTEXT in which the election of Jacob over Esau was mentioned?

Good night...it's past midnight here, 12.11am

I won't be around till Saturday evening.

Tomorrow late morning I leave for KL... have meeting with the saints there. At midnight I take a coach from KL down to Singapore. Have meeting with the saints there at 10am. I will catch a flight back to Penang late in the afternoon.

If you have heart for the Lord's work here, offer up a prayer on my behalf.

Thank you in advance.

Charles Page
Many are called, few are chosen? The Bible seems consistent with the fact that the unbelieving Children of God perish: Hagar, Ishmael, Esau...Cain, Baalam and Core

Jesus said the unbelieving will perish and not have eternal life.

Marty-Sandy Smith
I think the lessons of Romans 9 are eternal. But suppose the opposite: suppose they were temporal. Would not Romans 9:15-16 then drive us to the conclusion that temporal deliverance was unconditional? Then we would face a large contradiction with the many scriptures which teach conditions of belief and obedience for many aspects of temporal salvation.

Charles Page
Marty, what if I suggest that Pharoah was elect and has eternal salvation.

Marty-Sandy Smith
I could neither prove nor disprove your suggestion - I don't know! I assume you mean the Pharaoh who faced Moses. I could lean toward non-elect, since Pharoah says he knows not the Lord, nor will he obey the word of the Lord. I could lean toward elect, since he asks for Moses's blessing in Exodus 12:32. But I don't know.

Charles Page
God said, "I have raised thee up that I might show my power in thee." What happens when God raises the unregenerate to show his power? Would he raise the non-elect unregenerate to show his power?

Marty-Sandy Smith
Who knows? He has suffered Satan to retain power for many ages.

Charles Page
He didn't raise up Satan to show His power (I bet the Calvinists believe that), however he suffered the usurpation of power by Satan. Not quite the same with Pharaoh!

Marty-Sandy Smith
In Romans chapters 9 and 10, the Holy Spirit inspired Paul to write about the condition of widespread unbelief among ethnic Israelites. Paul shows that not all descendants of Abraham or Isaac were chosen of God, and uses those examples to support the fact that not all natural descendants of Israel are chosen of God. Later, at the end of chapter 9 and in chapter 10, he shows that many Gentiles are chosen of God, and thus members of "the Israel of God".

Charles Page
called or chosen?

Marty-Sandy Smith
I think God hated Esau in the same sense we are to hate father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters as Jesus Christ taught in Luke 14:25-26.

Before the children were born, God knew that both would be sinners, and both would deserve destruction at His hands. But He, in love, chose Jacob before the foundation of the world, and did not choose Esau. Justice is expected; grace is amazing.

Before it ever comes to a choice between Jesus Christ or father, mother, wife, children, brethren, sisters, a true disciple needs to have chosen Jesus Christ in advance. Perhaps it will never come to such a choice, but that selection needs to be made in advance of the event. That is the necessary hate.

Charles Page
I think God hated Esau in the same sense we are to hate father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters as Jesus Christ taught in Luke 14:25-26. Lawd ha murcy, Marty!

This is the very reason I should avoid conversations with PBs on Sing's thread. You and elder Hulan (unfortunately most PB elders) can say the most senseless things.

If I follow up on that statement I will arouse the anger of the "true vine" and perhaps endanger my temporal salvation which heretofore I cherish!

Marty-Sandy Smith
OK

Ante Zivkovic
But Marty has a point about ROM 9:15-16. It does then make temporal salvation unconditional??!! Other than that, Rom 9 is THE text on unconditional election. Also, v 13, Paul applies it personally even though Malachi applies it nationally.

Charles Page
Temporal salvation is conditional, and as I read over and over Romans 9:15-16 it is God in relation to our temporal salvation.

In our relationship as His children, he shows mercy and compassion to whom he chooses to show mercy and compassion.

Charles Page
Here is an interesting post from another discussion group that may pertain to the discussion of Jacob and Easu.

John XXXXXXXX
God's "Hatred" of Esau: To "Love Less"?

Arminians often argue that while the scripture declares God "hated" Esau, it is merely a figure of speech, hyperbole, denoting a comparative condition to His "favour/love" of Jacob. They say that it is similar to Jesus' word "If any come after me and does not HATE his father, mother, wife, brother, sister, yes even his own life, he cannot be My disciple" (Lk 14:26). Since Jesus' command is that we love one another, not hate our relatives, this is a hyperbolic expression on His part, denoting the idea of "loves LESS".

It is the same with God's "hatred" of Esau, they say.

O.k. Let's assume for a moment they are correct, and by "hate" God "really meant" He loved Esau LESS than Jacob.

Q. HOW did God express HIS "hatred" of Esau?

A. God Himself answers and illustrates the comparative differences between HIS love of Jacob and hatred of Esau. We read God's words:

“I have loved you,” says the Lord.

“But you ask, ‘How have you loved us?’

“Was not Esau Jacob’s brother?” declares the Lord. “Yet I have loved Jacob, 3but Esau I have hated, and I have turned his hill country into a wasteland and left his inheritance to the desert jackals.”

Edom may say, “Though we have been crushed, we will rebuild the ruins.”

But this is what the Lord Almighty says: “They may build, but I will DEMOLISH. They will be called the Wicked Land, a people ALWAYS under the wrath of the Lord." (Mal 1:2-4).

God said "I HATED Esau", "I turned his hill country into a WASTELAND", "I left his inheritance to desert jackals"

Edom (Esau's descendants) said "We will rebuild"! GOD said "I will DEMOLISH"...adding to the clincher, "THEY (Esau's descendants) will be called a people ALWAYS under the WRATH of the Lord"!

Loves "less"? O.K. ...and scary stuff indeed!

Arminians often FAIL to cite the entire reference....understandable in the light of what it says.

...and Paul cites this very passage in Romans 9 while teaching NEW TESTAMENT doctrine about God's SOVEREIGNTY in showing and exercising His mercy.

May God give light! (Lk 24: 45)

Sing F Lau
How do we hate those we love? By choosing Christ over them.

This sounds simple, but it's hard and costly. Do you love Christ enough to do it? Will you be His disciple? Hear what He says.

Luke 14:26 KJT
If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.

How do you hate them? By choosing Christ over them.

John 12:25 KJT
He that loveth his life shall lose it; and he that hateth his life in this world shall keep it unto life eternal.

How do we hate our own life in this world? By choosing Christ over our own as long as He lends us breath.

Hebrews 1:9 KJT
Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity; therefore God, even thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows.

How did Jesus hate iniquity? By choosing (loving) righteousness over iniquity

Romans 9:13 KJT
As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.
How did God hate Esau?
By choosing the younger Jacob over the firstborn Esau.

Is our love for Christ lively enough for us to hate those we love dearly?

Luke 14:26 KJT
If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.