Things New and Old

Ancient truths revealed in the Scriptures are often forgotten, disbelieved or distorted, and therefore lost in the passage of time. Such ancient truths when rediscovered and relearned are 'new' additions to the treasury of ancient truths.

Christ showed many new things to the disciples, things prophesied by the prophets of old but hijacked and perverted by the elders and their traditions, but which Christ reclaimed and returned to His people.

Many things taught by the Apostles of Christ have been perverted or substituted over the centuries. Such fundamental doctrines like salvation by grace and justification have been hijacked and perverted and repudiated by sincere Christians. These doctrines need to be reclaimed and restored to God's people.

There are things both new and old here. "Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things"
2Ti 2:7.

Friday, February 6, 2026

Cross-Bearers and Crown-Wearers - are they co-extensive?



What do you think of Mr. Spurgeon's statement? 
Cross-Bearers and Crown-Wearers - are they co-extensive?

Sing
What do you think of Mr. Spurgeon's statement?
Thanks.

DS
SPURGEON: There are no crown-wearers in heaven who were not cross-bearers here below.

DS: If Spurge is correct, then every imbecile and every infant dying in infancy is burning in hell. This notion is evidently false by many bible proofs

1. Rachels’ Children (Jeremiah 31:15-17, Matthew 2:16-18)

2. Abijah (I Kings 14:13)

3. David’s son with Bathsheba (II Samuel 12:23)

DS: This is a good example of how Spurgeon's zealous rhetoric wanders outside the bounds of sound theology. It finds much reception among those with a zeal that is not according to knowledge in the form of “grace” that is not according to grace.

SUMMARY STATEMENT: Jesus instructed his followers to “take up their cross” and follow him.

DS: That is true (Matthew 16:24). It is also true that Jesus is speaking about the cost of discipleship, not how to obtain eternal salvation. To suggest the latter is to accuse Jesus of teaching eternal salvation by works. This is contrary to the bible’s teaching that salvation, “is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy.” (Romans 9:16), is “not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.” (John 1:13), and “Not by works of righteousness which we have done” (Titus 3:5). Confounding eternal salvation (sonship) and personal obedience (discipleship) is an error that is as enormous as it is common in our time. It is wrong division. Many sheep are misled by it.

SUMMARY STATEMENT: This implies a willingness to endure hardship, sacrifice, and even persecution for the sake of their faith.

DS: That men OUGHT to do this is certain. However, men are not eternally saved because they have done as they OUGHT. Men are eternally saved in spite of the fact they have not done as they OUGHT. They’re saved by grace. There will be many in heaven who did not endure as they ought, did not sacrifice as they ought, and did not withstand persecution as they ought while here below. I suspect that describes the lot. Heaven will be populated solely on the basis of the imputed righteousness of the One who did perfectly as he OUGHT in every circumstance.

DS: Spurgeon’s quote is a good example of why I rarely quote him. He said some clever things, but he spouted a lot of nonsense as well as this quote demonstrates. Good doctrine is not the “unique baby” of some particular minister such that we must quote that particular minister to have access to the truth. Where Spurgeon is concerned, I’m willing to throw out both baby and bathwater, knowing full well that the baby can be found in the care of better parents.

DS: A second cautionary note about Spurgeon (and any who possess similar rhetorical skills), a clever phrase is often received for its cleverness, rather than assessed on its merits. This too is a source of error.

Ron
DS. I guess it is good that I'm not very clever then! 😜

Mark
Amen!

Reggie
DS, excellent! My thoughts exactly!

Linda
DS, well said.

Sing
DS: If Spurgeon is correct, then every imbecile and every infant dying in infancy is burning in hell. This notion is evidently false by many bible proofs
-----------
That was the first thought that came to mind. Then I thought, Mr Spurgeon may retort, "Nay, nay, nay; such are in heaven, just crownless since they were not cross- bearers on earth.

Does his statement necessarily imply that the non cross-bearers shall not be found in heaven, or such shall be in heaven but not crown wearers?

DS
Sing - That is an interpretation that I did not consider, but I believe it is one that might be suggested by some. The crownless Christians. It seems difficult to reconcile with the idea of being a joint heir with Christ (Romans 8:17) who shall give us all things (Romans 8:32). Does that mean "joint heir except for the crown" and "all things but no crown"?

Reggie
Well, the Bible does say...

On a hill far away stood an old rugged cross
The emblem of suffering and shame
And I love that old cross where the dearest and best
For a world of lost sinners was slain
So I'll cherish the old rugged cross (rugged cross)
Till my trophies at last I lay down

I will cling to the old rugged cross
And exchange it some day for a crown
To the old rugged cross I will ever be true
It's shame and reproach gladly bear
Then he'll call me some day to my home far away
Where his glory forever I'll share

And I'll cherish the old rugged cross (rugged cross)
Till my trophies at last I lay down
And I will cling to the old rugged cross
And exchange it some day for a crown
I will cling to the old rugged cross
And exchange it some day for a crown

Aaron
I remember in school how we used to have different problems we would have to solve in math, or arithmetic as some call it. Some of those problems we used to have to work we also had to determine if we had enough info given to be able to get the answer to the question or tell if we didn’t have enough info to get an answer. This is kinda like that, there’s not enough info given in this to give an accurate answer without determining with more explaining what the answer would be. There are different answers to this based on how one views the statement made. Just like with this statement there’s not enough info given to get what someone might call the right or wrong answer. Could be called a loaded statement without further explanation.

Sing
Aaron, What additional information do you have in mind?

What is intended by the crown?

Will there be any "crown-less" redeemed in heaven?

Is every redeemed a cross-bearer?

Aaron
Sing, that was my point. His statement leaves unanswered questions. We are admonished to bear our cross and thus fulfill our roll as a disciple of Christ on earth. Not all Gods redeemed will bear their cross, if by their cross it is meant our service to God and not a means for wearing said crown in eternity. It could be implied by the statement made by Spurgeon that those who wear a crown in eternity do so because they bore their cross here on earth. This is simply not true. We wear crowns in heaven, that aren’t ours by the way they are given to us by the work of our Savior Jesus Christ, and we cast them at his feet when we return home meaning we cast honor and glory to him for what he did and not what we did or do. There is no place that I can recall in scripture that says we will glorify our efforts that were performed while on earth when we get to heaven. The statement made by spurgeon definitely requires clarification.

Reggie
It's cliche'. See #3 definition..

noun: cli·ché | \ klē-ˈshā , ˈklē-ˌshā, kli-ˈshā \
variants: or less commonly cliche
Definition
1 : a trite phrase or expression
also : the idea expressed by it
2 : a hackneyed theme, characterization, or situation
(3 : something that has become overly familiar or commonplace)

It's an idea by contrast...

“And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death.”

Revelation 12:11 KJV
So... If they did love their lives unto the end, they would not have a crown to cast at His feet.

“the four and twenty elders fall down before him that sat on the throne, and worship him that liveth for ever and ever, and cast their crowns before the throne, saying,”

Revelation 4:10 KJV

But, as you can see, the only ones who are mentioned to having crowns are the 24 elders...

So, it's kinda a leap to say we earn our crown.. it's Arminianism. Making the Bible about  you... rather than the actual people who are mentioned in the scriptures.

Joe
Brother Sing, the quote doesn’t harmonize well with John’s record.
Revelation 4:10-11 (KJV)
10 The four and twenty elders fall down before him that sat on the throne, and worship him that liveth for ever and ever, and cast their crowns before the throne, saying, 11 Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honour and power: for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are and were created.

It is my understanding of Scripture that heaven shall be all about our praising God for our redemption, not about wearing personal crowns.

Sing
Joe, I don't know what crown Mr Spurgeon meant.
The NT speaks of the crown of righteousness, the crown of glory, and the crown of life. Which crown is conditioned upon cross- bearing?

Aaron
Sing, the way that scriptures reads says that the cross we bear is what efforts we perform here on earth in regards to showing honor and glory, praise and thanks to our savior for his grace bestowed upon dead alien sinners. Knowing that scriptures speak plainly about our spiritual life having nothing to do with our efforts and all about the work finished by the resurrected and glorified Christ tells us that any cross to be borne is not a means to have a crown in eternity. If a crown in eternity is had based on any of our efforts here in this sin cursed land then Christ did not finish the work the Lord sent him to accomplish, meaning he then didn’t accomplish the work he was sent to finish. Given surgeons wording on the matter and him being a man therefore not having final authority in what he says, the word of God has the final authority, we have to be careful we don’t try to interpret scriptures by what Spurgeon has said but rather interpret what Spurgeon has said with scriptures. This is why I said his statement needs clarification. All who have a crown in heaven do so be the work of their savior Jesus Christ, not by their cooperation in bearing cross(s) here on earth. That said, someone who bears their cross here on earth have assurance that they are one of Gods. This does not apply to wolves in sheep’s clothing. I don’t know that they could be said to bear a cross for their fruits, what comes from their works, won’t manifest as one bearing a cross to those who are truly bearing their cross. Yet, it’s not for us to determine if one will have a crown in heaven or not based on any amount of cross bearing. We would also have to determine how much cross bearing is required to have the crown in heaven. We also won’t be looking to see who bore their cross on earth nor will we be seeing who did and did not bear their cross on earth when we are in heaven. It’s not a competition. It’s the completed work of Jesus Christ that we will be concerned with when we live in eternity and giving all praise honor and glory to him for the crown he has given us.

Don
Thank you for pointing out this errant teaching!