Things New and Old

Ancient truths revealed in the Scriptures are often forgotten, disbelieved or distorted, and therefore lost in the passage of time. Such ancient truths when rediscovered and relearned are 'new' additions to the treasury of ancient truths.

Christ showed many new things to the disciples, things prophesied by the prophets of old but hijacked and perverted by the elders and their traditions, but which Christ reclaimed and returned to His people.

Many things taught by the Apostles of Christ have been perverted or substituted over the centuries. Such fundamental doctrines like salvation by grace and justification have been hijacked and perverted and repudiated by sincere Christians. These doctrines need to be reclaimed and restored to God's people.

There are things both new and old here. "Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things"
2Ti 2:7.

Tuesday, June 10, 2014

Divine grace frustrated because geographically isolated?

picture taken from : http://pbgrace.org/isolate.htm

Read the good article here: http://pbgrace.org/isolate.htm

Many elect may not be reached with the gospel - either due the lack of the gospel ministry or because of the inability to be outwardly called - yet NOT a single ONE is NOT reached with eternal life - at God's appointed and approved time, by the sovereign activity of regeneration by the Spirit of God, according to the will of the Father, and based on the merits of Christ's redemptive work.

The gospel regenerationists have a massive problem in their bosom!!!
May the Lord open their eyes to see it, and let it haunts them till their turn from their errors.

John 3:8 - The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit.

The eternal life-giving wind of the Spirit of God blows EVEN in places that no preachers have ever heard of, much less trod!!! Now, that's gospel. This fact alone will guarantee - "to the end the promise might be sure to all the seed."

No farmer is so stupid (i.e. lacking common sense) to believe that his presence or absence determines the activity of the wind blowing on his farm. But so many preachers are deceived and deluded to INSIST that unless they are present and preaching their (i.e. not "the") gospel, the Spirit of God is impotent to execute His divine work of regeneration.

According to this fable, logically many elect will have no hope of being regenerated whatsoever, and be left to perish in their native state death and damnation. The peddlers of such fable will retort will another fable of the "norm and exception" - the Spirit ordinarily regenerated with THEIR preaching, but extraordinarily regenerate without their preaching!

However in this - they have just repudiated the plain statement of Christ in John 3:8 stated above, namely, "

The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit."


SO IS EVERY ONE THAT IS BORN OF THE SPIRIT.

Did you read that? Do you believe Christ plain words?
How many ways did Christ say His elect are born again?

Let Christ be true, and every man a liar who contradicts Him.

Not being rude, just putting the matter simply, and plainly.
=========

Ron commented, and the following exchanges took place:
 

Ron   
Joh 3:18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.

Sing F Lau 
The wickedness of men, the many failures of preachers, or the inabilities of the elect of God themselves DO NOT in any way hinder their regeneration unto eternal life at God's own appointed and approved time.

 Ron
 Joh 3:36 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.

Sing F Lau  
Ronald, don't just quote Scriptures.
Tell us PLAINLY what the those Scriptures say.
With all due respect, the devil quotes better than you do, and I'm not impressed with him at all.

Ron 
 He elect some, rejected others. but those rejected by God before the world begun, some are abandoned from the gospel and some heard and rejected the gospel because they cannot able to accept it.

 But despite of all, as elect born from above, I need to obey my Lord to preach the gospel around the world even there is rejected people. Mat 28:18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth.
Mat 28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
Mat 28:20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen.

Sing F Lau
"He elect some, rejected others. but those rejected by God before the world begun, some are abandoned from the gospel and some heard and rejected the gospel because they cannot able to accept it."
========
Think through what you have written, and say it again before I show you that it is full of confusion and inconsistencies. THANKS.

Ron 
I'll never confuse about it. I am a believer of unconditional election and the same time I am obeying my God through Jesus Christ.

There are places that already judge by physical death because of their sins before the arrival by the Missionaries of God.

Sing F Lau 
If you are never confused, tell us what is the ISSUE of this thread, and what are the issues you are raising?

If you can't stick to the issue here, RAVE somewhere else. Thanks.

Since you are never confused, I will not waste time showing you your confusions.

Ron  
Cannot tell you the issue because I am not confused. I have no problem in both side.

Sing F Lau 
 If you can't tell us the ISSUE, then why are you raving away like that???
And who is having problem with what, in whose side?

Sing F Lau  
Joh 3:18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
====
Who is he that believeth not? Who is warned - a child of God, or one whom you designated as "rejected"?

Who has an obligation to believe, and believe what?

Do those whom God did not choose, Christ did not die for, still dead in trespasses and sins - does God require them to believe? If yes, believe what?

WHO is he that if believes not is condemned already? And condemned in what sense?

It is time to move beyond cheap "Missionary" shibboleths!

Sing F Lau 
Joh 3:36 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.
======
"He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life" - this is a statement of fact, declaring the plain fact that a man who believes on the Son DOES SO because he POSSESSES everlasting. It is NOT a statement of offer, offering everlasting life to those who will believe.

It is like a simple statement of fact - he who eats has life. It is not offering life to the lifeless that if he will eat, he will obtain life.

"and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life" - who is under divine obligation to believe on the Son? Only those who are redeemed by Him, and are His. All such are under divine obligation to believe on the truth of their redemption in the Son of God.

God's children, those elect freely and sovereignly regenerated and given eternal life, who believe not shall not see life... shall not experience the abundance of life through the saving knowledge of Christ their Saviour!

God's children who believe not on the Son their Saviour are under the hot His displeasure.

Sing F Lau 
 "He elect some, rejected others. but those rejected by God before the world begun, some are abandoned from the gospel and some heard and rejected the gospel because they cannot able to accept it."
=======
There are lots of confusion here:

God did chose many. He rejected none. He BY-PASSED them. They rejected God and brought death and condemnation to themselves. God left them to their just desert.

Of those that were bypassed, the gospel was NEVER intended for them; the gospel did not have them in view; the gospel has no relevance to them.
So, they cannot be said to be abandoned from the gospel.

The gospel, the good news of what God has done to save His chosen people are solely and wholly intended for, and has relevance to God's elect alone. The gospel has NO REFERENCE to those by-passed by God, and left in their sin and condemnation.
So, they cannot be said to have rejected the gospel.

Since food is for the living, and was never intended for the dead (even though superstitious Chinese love offering delicious roast pigs to their dead!!!) it is lacking common sense (i.e. stew pig!) to say the dead rejected the food, or to say that the dead were abandoned from the distribution of the food.

The only bit that has some truth in it, "they cannot able to accept it" - but even that is OUT of context!

Sing F Lau  
Mat 28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
=========
Unto whom of all nations did the Lord instruct His apostles to TEACH, and BAPTIZE in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost? Those whom the Father chosen and given to Christ and for whom Christ redeemed, OR those bypassed by God?

Who are capable of being taught by the apostles and baptized in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost?

God's children that are already there by the free and sovereign regenerating work of the Spirit of God, or those that are still in their native state of sin and death?

Just WHO did the Lord Jesus had in mind when He give that command to the Apostle?
Charles
When God says he has a remnant of people these people on the Andaman Islands maybe those people. They are holy elect and precious in His sight. They should not be disturbed by us and left to the Holy Spirit to raise up preachers to go. The Lord will convert the Pagans when He is ready to convert them!
Have we heard that before?

Sing F Lau 
 The biblical concept of remnant refers to the MINORITY who are faithful in contrast to the MAJORITY who are unfaithful among His people. His elect who are still unconverted are not under the purview of the remnant concept.

That's my understanding - so I may be wrong! (with that, I'm covering my backside!
  ------
 

Monday, June 9, 2014

Where are you heading? Do you know? Do you care?



Photo: Beware who your shepherd-leaders are!!!
Where are they leading you to? 
Do you know? And do you care? 

They claim and boast to be teachers of the grace of God in Christ Jesus but understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm.

1Ti 1
5 Now the end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned:
6 From which some having swerved have turned aside unto vain jangling;
7 Desiring to be teachers of the law; understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm.

Such teachers will MESS up your lives big time. Apostle Paul warned thus:
 15 Meditate upon these things; give thyself wholly to them; that thy profiting may appear to all.
 16 Take heed unto thyself, and unto the doctrine; continue in them: for in doing this thou shalt both save thyself, and them that hear thee.

If Timothy fails to observe these commands, then he will make shipwreck of his faith, and of those who are under his charge!!!

Beware who your pastor-teachers are!!!
Where are they leading you to?
Do you know? And do you care?

They may claim and boast to be teachers of the grace of God in Christ Jesus but understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm.

1Ti 1
5 Now the end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned:
6 From which some having swerved have turned aside unto vain jangling;
7 Desiring to be teachers of the law; understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm.

Such teachers will MESS up your lives big time. Apostle Paul warned Pastor Timothy thus:
15 Meditate upon these things; give thyself wholly to them; that thy profiting may appear to all.
16 Take heed unto thyself, and unto the doctrine; continue in them: for in doing this thou shalt both save thyself, and them that hear thee.

If Timothy fails to observe these solemn commands, then he will make shipwreck of his faith, and of those who are under his charge!!!

When a nation GLAMORIZES murder...

When human life is treated like dirt!
Psa 94:3 "LORD, how long shall the wicked, 
how long shall the wicked triumph?"

Psa 119:53 "Horror hath taken hold upon me 
because of the wicked that forsake thy law"


Full article: http://www.malaysia-chronicle.com/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=298432:shocking-woman-films-her-own-abortion&Itemid=4#ixzz3479d215r

It takes 37 seconds and four cutaways for Emily Letts to explain she’s having an abortion. First the fresh-faced American is in a car, sans make-up, vulnerable, before the scene switches and we see her dressed up, and smiling at the camera. Then she’s in a dark room. The footage is grainy, like it’s being filmed on a smartphone. Finally, Letts is sitting in what looks like her living room. The shot is a close-up, the atmosphere almost confessional. “Hi”, she says to the camera, breathlessly, before explaining that she’s a counsellor working in a US abortion clinic and she’s pregnant. Suddenly Letts is walking into a procedure room in a surgical gown and hat, ready to have a termination.
The three minute long non-graphic video was uploaded to YouTube in March, and went viral after winning an award for breaking abortion stigma. For some, it is a taboo-breaking, stigma-busting triumph for the pro-choice movement. US website Feministing called it an “important, useful intervention” and praised Letts for helping to demystify abortion. Predictably, pro-life bloggers are up in arms, with some calling Letts - who let’s remember is only 25 - a “witch from hell”. For me, it’s an awkward and uncomfortable watch - there is barely a second of the video that did not make me squirm.

EMILY'S ABORTION VIDEO
=video removed=

Whatever you make of it, almost everyone has an opinion. The furore has prompted Letts to write an article in this month’s Cosmopolitan – which has kick-started the whole debate again. She explains that as she was in the first trimester of pregnancy she could have taken the abortion pill but instead decided to have a surgical termination with local anaesthetic to “show it wasn’t scary”.
As for her reason for taping the procedure? We have now learned that Letts wanted to show “there is such a thing as a positive abortion story”, plus she couldn’t find a video online of the procedure that focused on “the woman’s experience”. “We talk about abortion so much and yet no one really knows what it actually looks like”, she explained.

= picture removed =
But Letts’s video is not what an abortion looks like. This is termination as performance. It’s stylised, editorialised - there’s even a folk song playing in the background while she undergoes the procedure. After it’s over, Letts tells medical staff “you guys are my heroes” before looking straight up at the camera, right at her viewers.

= picture removed = 
 
I am passionately pro-choice (so much so that a friend once jokingly referred to me as ‘the terminator’) and believe women can only be free when they are in control of their own fertility. I support Letts’s choice, and the choices of millions of women like her around the globe. But that doesn't mean I need to applaud her video stunt. A positive abortion story isn't about filming the procedure or doing a piece to camera a month later saying you have no regrets - it’s about the rest of the life you make for yourself afterwards.

= picture removed = 
 
Sure, Letts must have (figurative) balls of steel to put her abortion online and open herself up to the wrath of the pro-life movement. She has certainly sparked a debate. But do we really need to go to these lengths to talk about abortion in 2014? Plus I don’t want to see footage to demystify the process of termination, just like I do not need to watch someone else having a root canal on YouTube before going to the dentist. For those interested in breaking taboos Education for Choice, part of the young people’s sexual health charity Brook, is doing great work on abortion stigma without (to my knowledge) filming anyone in stirrups.



It’s estimated one in three women have had an abortion, one in two will have been physically or sexually assaulted, and most women who were born female will have had a period. I’m not denying there are still many things we need to demystify – I just don’t think those conversations should involve YouTube. For me, Emily Letts’s video just shows there are some taboos we just don’t need to break.

Sunday, June 1, 2014

"Rightly dividing the word of truth"


Watch this video, and learn a central truth.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cW2YhHAot6I

In the physical world, it is "rightly distributing the forces of gravity."

In the theological world, it is "rightly dividing the word of truth."

Confusion and chaos, delusion and deception, mischief and mess are inevitable when such fundamental maxims are ignored or despised in their respective realm.

When the sovereign free grace of the Triune God in the eternal salvation of His chosen ones is NOT rightly divided and firmly placed at its exact and proper place, everything falls apart, no matter how impressive and convincing any theological scheme may appear.

Take away, or move that feather from its exact and rightful place, and the whole balanced frame collapses and falls apart. The same happens to any impressive system or scheme of salvation if the divine grace is misplaced.

2Ti 2:15
Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.

Corporate Solidarity and Covenant Consciousness


Part-Whole principle in the NT
1Cor 12:12 "For as the body is one, and hath many members,
and all the members of that one body, being many,
are one body: so also is Christ."

Corporate Solidarity and Covenant Consciousness

Joshua 7:1
But the children of Israel committed a trespass in the accursed thing: for Achan, the son of Carmi, the son of Zabdi, the son of Zerah, of the tribe of Judah, took of the accursed thing: and the anger of the LORD was kindled against the children of Israel.

Achan's individual sin in the context of corporate solidarity (as a member of Israel) EQUALS "children of Israel committed a trespass."
Achan's individual sin in the context of corporate solidarity EXPLAINS why "the anger of the LORD was kindled against the children of Israel."

Joshua 7:15
And it shall be, that he that is taken with the accursed thing shall be burnt with fire, he and all that he hath: because he hath transgressed the covenant of the LORD, and because he hath wrought folly in Israel.

Achan's individual sin of transgressing the covenant of the LORD in the context of corporate solidarity (as the head of his house) INVOLVED him and all his household!
Achan's individual sin of transgressing the covenant of the LORD in the context of corporate solidarity (as the head of his house) IMPLICATED "all that he hath shall be burnt with fire."

How many members of churches today care about this solemn matter of their corporate solidarity with their churches, and their families?
How many members of churches today have the covenant consciousness of their corporate solidarity with the church of their membership????????

Beware my dear brethren, beware lest the wrath of the LORD, the covenant keeping God, is kindled against your church, and your FAMILY!!! The fact that there is no longer stoning under the new covenant does not diminish the truth of the matter. May our Lord guard our steps.

Read some comments here:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10202158927550148&set=a.10202158927430145.1073742468.1097484914&type=1&theater