1Kings 18:21
And Elijah came unto all the people, and
said, How long halt ye between two opinions? if the LORD be God, follow him:
but if Baal, then follow him. And the people answered him not a word.
Initially posted here:
September 18, 2013
https://www.facebook.com/sing.f.lau/posts/10200641997827853
Read this statement of faith below carefully,
and give your thoughts.
Can you rightly divide the several things
expressed? Thanks.
" We believe that the work of
regeneration, conversion, sanctification, and faith, is not an act of man's
free will and power, but of the mighty, efficacious, and irresistible grace of
God, through the preaching of the Gospel and the inner work of the Almighty
Holy Spirit of God."
=======
Bill Taylor
The sign says it all. Error is almost always
found wearing a thin cloak of truth. In this case, the cloak is too thin to
cover! That phrase, "through the preaching of the Gospel" takes the
truth expressed in the rest of the statement and completely turns it around to
be a non-truth.
Linda Lancaster
Faith has nothing to do with man. It is ALL
of God. Faith is a gift. Given by God to us at our point of salvation, which
also has nothing to do with man. WHY? Because then it would be credited to man
instead of GOD. We have nothing to do with the wonderful gifts of salvation,
justification, sanctification. It is ALL BY GOD'S ENABLING POWER IN OUR LIVES
CALL GRACE.
Jerry Chapin
I agree, Bro. Bill...the cart is before the
horse in this case. If he would have said. "the inner work of the Almighty
Holy Spirit of God" first, it would have been correct. The work of God
comes first [regeneration], then, the works of man [conversation] through the preaching
of the gospel...
Sing F Lau
How if we rightly divide the confused mess???
"We believe that the work of
regeneration... is not an act of man's free will and power, but of the mighty,
efficacious, and irresistible grace of God alone."
"We believe that the work of conversion, sanctification, and faith is through the preaching of the gospel and the inner work of the Almighty Holy Spirit of God."
Sing F Lau
The big problem with the reformed folks, who
love to call themselves Calvinists, and even the sovereign grace people is
basically very simple: they are either incapable of or wilfully refuse to
distinguish the eternal salvation by the monergistic activities of the triune
God, and the temporal salvation through the synergistic activities of God's
children in obedience to their Father's will.
The article of faith above, from a sovereign grace church is a classic example of the confusion.
Chase Harrison
Sounds like they have simply mistaken the
gospel call for the effectual call. Replace the phrase "through the
preaching of the gospel" with the phrase "through the voice of the
Son of God", and then I don't have much of a problem with it anymore.
Joe Chin
so they are saying without preaching,
irresistible grace is not so irresistible after all...
Sing F Lau
It is not so much that they mistake the
gospel call for the effectual call. They condition the effectual call upon the
gospel call!
Chase Harrison
Ah, yes, good point!
They believe the effectual call is always
through the gospel call!
Sing F Lau
Just as the sign indicates, the big clockwise
turn (of the mighty, efficacious, and irresistible grace of God) is
conditioned/dependent upon the little anti-clockwise turn (through the
preaching of the gospel AND the inner work of the Almighty Holy Spirit of God.)
Mark Thomas
They utterly fail to understand the simple.
Grace and works do not mix. When forced to mix they cannot retain their
original meanings and power and are no longer what they once were. Thank God
the dilution (delusion) is only in the minds of men and cannot affect the grace
of our Sovereign God.
Linda Lancaster
God will use whatever means He likes. He is
sovereign. What about those Muslims/anyone for that matter, who have never
heard the Word of God through preaching and had divine meetings with our God in
their closet? We are trying to box the Sovereign Lord, who does as He pleases.
Not as we want Him to.
Sing F Lau
God will use whatsoever means He wills. He is
indeed sovereign, and He has sovereignly determined NOT to use any means in the
work of regenerating His elect from their state of sin and death. Tooooo many
preachers are very unhappy about that. God has sovereignly determined that it
is foolish to involve fickle and feeble men in the work of regenerating His
elect found in every kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation.
Foolish and stupid preachers think God needs them and their ministry as means to father His children. I have never seen or heard of a mid-wife who insisted in helping the man father the child she helps to deliver! <LOL> The midwives know their place, deluded preachers don't!
Linda Lancaster
However, God also chooses to use us, infallible people, to further His Kingdom down here on earth. He chooses the
'foolish things of this world' the scripture says.
Linda Lancaster
I agree that He is determined NOT to use man
in regeneration. Because then it would be of 'works' again.
Sing F Lau
Oh yes, we need midwives to deliver the lives
that has been fathered, the well being of the new lives is dependent upon many
means - parenting, etc, etc.
Dellis Layne Worsham Sr.
Some people like to make the preacher look
soooo valuable. In one of the churches I attended years ago, every member was
judged on how many souls they had won to Christ. I often wondered if God was
ever counted as a member.
Sing F Lau
James, YES, I'm saying that God saves His
elect apart from the preaching of the gospel.
The preaching of the gospel INFORMS the
ALREADY SAVED what the Triune God has done to save them, and calling such to
believe the truth of their salvation.
http://things-new-and-old.blogspot.com/2012/09/is-it-alone-or-is-it-alone-some_8280.html
Sing F Lau
James, read and consider this short article: http://things-new-and-old.blogspot.com/2013/08/is-it-freely-by-his-grace-alone-or-is.html
Robert Cook Sr.
Saves his elect?? The (save) under
consideration must be defined before a teaching can be put upon it. God does
save the elect by the preaching of the Gospel, but this salvation can not be
eternal since Christ hath, HATH, hath, reconciled us unto God Having been made
sin for us, that we might be made the righteousness in him. So then, this
(save) must be something other than eternal, so what could that be? Let's
reconnoiter and define. The Gospel is the good NEWS that Christ HATH finished
the work, therefore there is now NO condemnation to those who are in Christ
Jesus, Good news does not pay for our sins in the court room of God, at His
holy throne, but believing the Gospel does remove the guilt of sin from our
consciences and we then have been reconciled to God in our understanding as to
where we stand by grace alone. We can only believe if we have ALREADY been born
again. natural man receives not the things of the spirit of God.
Robert Cook Sr.
All salvation is of God but all of God's
redeemed will not have knowledge of all that God accomplished in Christ here in
time. Most men declare a false Gospel and a perversion of the knowledge of God
I do not think God sent them to SAVE His elect with a lie! The Gospel pays for
no ones sin but it does bring the knowledge of eternal life to all those who
believe. Calvinism is a lie just as Arminianism is.
Robert Cook Sr.
Let the bible speak thru the Holy Spirit not
John Calvin's Commentary!
Josiah Lau
Just to interject briefly, I agree with Mr
Robert Cook's answer that Mr James Farley's words 'saves the elect' should be
first defined before an answer is attempted. Remember our own past confusion
about the different phases of salvation. 🙂 (addressed to my dad)
Sing F Lau
You are right, Josiah.
However, it is certain that Mr Farley's
question meant eternal salvation is bestowed through the preaching of the
gospel.
(I'm leaving for KL soon... so won't be
around till Sat even. I pray that you will have a good meeting tomorrow
morning.)
Josiah Lau
Okay. I'm sure you're more familiar with him
and understand his background/current position far better than I do. If you're
certain about that then alright.
Robert Cook Sr.
I think for the edification of all and a
reminder as to rightly dividing it is good to always reiterate for those who
have been lied to the differences between all words in context not just saved
Robert Cook Sr.
Many ignorant and timid folks read but are
afraid to post but can glean from careful explanations. It took me years of
study and weeping decades ago to reject the heresy of Arminian theology.
Robert Cook Sr.
Sing sometimes a man can only see his error
when he writes it out or speaks it audibly, I know a preacher who was born and
raised in the Arminian teaching and was ordained as such, was preaching a
sermon on the same topic 2 Corinthians 5: 18-21 and as he spoke he realized his
error, so sometimes patiently drawing out what a man says he believes will help
him see the error, after all my goal in my feeble way is to edify not destroy a
brother.