Things New and Old

Ancient truths revealed in the Scriptures are often forgotten, disbelieved or distorted, and therefore lost in the passage of time. Such ancient truths when rediscovered and relearned are 'new' additions to the treasury of ancient truths.

Christ showed many new things to the disciples, things prophesied by the prophets of old but hijacked and perverted by the elders and their traditions, but which Christ reclaimed and returned to His people.

Many things taught by the Apostles of Christ have been perverted or substituted over the centuries. Such fundamental doctrines like salvation by grace and justification have been hijacked and perverted and repudiated by sincere Christians. These doctrines need to be reclaimed and restored to God's people.

There are things both new and old here. "Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things"
2Ti 2:7.

Sunday, December 7, 2025

Imputation of Christ's righteousness

No righteousness of Christ, no gospel.
Christ's righteousness is imputed to the elect.


#righteousnessofChrist
#imputationofrighteousness

Inquirer
I have to say his arguments sounded very convincing.
He seems to be an Arminian, but he is Reformed. Anyway, he seems to know what he is talking about. And u were the one who attacked what he posted in his Reformed group on FB 😅. The post is here:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/775537956487669/posts/1492075451500579/

sing
Great. Which part convinced you?
I did not attack him.
I made a statement: "No righteousness of Christ, no gospel."  Unfortunately, he disputed the statement by saying things he knows not.

Inquirer
Well, he sounded like he knows his Scriptures. He said: Righteousness cannot be imputed, so is wrath.
U don't scold me, ya. U scold him.

sing
If righteousness cannot be imputed, what is your understanding of the doctrine of justification?

The imputation of Christ's righteousness to the elect is at the heart of the doctrine of justification.

Jesus suffered the wrath of God when He died the substitutionary death on the cross. Why? The sins of all His people were imputed to Him, and He suffered the full and complete penalty due to those sins.

The silly things he said are not worthy of scolding or debunking.

1 Corinthians 14:38 KJT "But if any man be ignorant, let him be ignorant."

sing
No imputation of Christ's righteousness to the justly condemned, no justification. This is absolutely elementary.

'Those whom God effectually calls, he also freely justifies,
- not by infusing righteousness into them,  [[POPULAR ERROR NEGATED]
- but by pardoning their sins, and by accounting and accepting their persons as righteous [THE TRUTH STATED] ;
- not for anything wrought in them, or done by them [POPULAR ERROR NEGATED],
- but for Christ's sake alone; [THE TRUTH STATED]
- not by imputing faith itself, the act of believing, or any other evangelical obedience to them, as their righteousness; [POPULAR ERROR NEGATED]
- but by imputing Christ's active obedience unto the whole law, and passive obedience in his death for their whole and sole righteousness [THE TRUTH STATED]

-----------------

The above is taken from the 1689 CoF chapter 11.

Christ's active obedience secured the righteousness needed for the justification of His people. God FREELY applies this righteousness of His provision in Christ to each elect at their effectual calling out of their native state of condemnation.

Christ's passive obedience unto death bore the just and righteous wrath of God upon the sins of His people, AND SECURED the forgiveness needed for His people; He endured the wrath of God in their place.

(Please note that the popular fable of justification by faith is plainly repudiated in the statements above.)

I hope the above helps.