Things New and Old

Ancient truths revealed in the Scriptures are often forgotten, disbelieved or distorted, and therefore lost in the passage of time. Such ancient truths when rediscovered and relearned are 'new' additions to the treasury of ancient truths.

Christ showed many new things to the disciples, things prophesied by the prophets of old but hijacked and perverted by the elders and their traditions, but which Christ reclaimed and returned to His people.

Many things taught by the Apostles of Christ have been perverted or substituted over the centuries. Such fundamental doctrines like salvation by grace and justification have been hijacked and perverted and repudiated by sincere Christians. These doctrines need to be reclaimed and restored to God's people.

There are things both new and old here. "Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things"
2Ti 2:7.

Friday, September 26, 2025

What was counted unto Abraham for righteousness?

What was counted unto Abraham for righteousness?



https://www.facebook.com/sing.f.lau/posts/pfbid0dTWVAzcerFY2sb8mpxrxLiQtFBx2rLpwhLRxjm1y6hZFKmY4Y422G9etTL6zWwUEl

#justification

What was counted unto Abraham for righteousness?
And what does that mean?
Was Abraham an unjustified man (not justified by God) before Gen 15:6?
Tell us if you know the answers.
Thank you most kindly.

Genesis 15:6
And he [Abraham] believed in the LORD; and he counted it to him for righteousness.

Romans 4:3
For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.

Gal 3:6
Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness.

James 2:23
And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God.

p/s

I do assume that you know the difference between the two:
- accounting Abraham's faith to Abraham for righteousness

IS NOT THE SAME AS
- accounting Christ's righteousness to Abraham for his justification.

===========

Feston Konzani
Faith....he believed (had in faith in/placed all his undivided trust in) God and it was accounted to him for righteousness.....

sing
Feston So, in Gen 15:6, it was faith (Abraham's act of believing) that was accounted to Abraham.
When was Abraham justified by God. i.e. when did God account Christ's righteousness to Abraham?

Feston
Sing, I'd like to believe that Gen 15 was way before Christ and way before the law of Moses.

So, on account of Abraham believing God he was accredited with righteousness which is not of the works of the law.

Christ's righteousness was is/was the same righteousness which was accounted to him because as it is written "Jesus Christ is the same, yesterday, today and forever".

Sing
Feston, what's the point of saying that Gen 15 was way before Christ and way before the law of Moses?
That' there is no righteousness of Christ to speak of because Christ has not executed the work on the cross? That there is no justification before the cross? Tell us what you are trying to say.

John 8:58 KJV — Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.

But God's act of justifying the condemned unjust requires righteousness; sins brought condemnation, righteousness is a prerequisite to reverse that condemnation and secure justification.

Your "Abraham was accredited WITH righteousness" and
the Scriptures'
"... it (something, what is it?) was accounted to Abraham FOR righteousness,"
they are two entirely different things.
Beware of soundbytes.

Feston
Sing, sure..... So you mean John 8:58 would mean that Abraham was justified before the cross or after the cross?

Sing
FestonIn the covenant of redemption, each Person of the Triune God agreed to do His part in the redemption of each elect at God's appointed and accepted time.

The second person of the Godhead, the eternal Word, as the Redeemer, would be made flesh and accomplish the redemption for all the elect.

Before the cross, God the Father justified each elect based on the righteousness that Christ assuredly shall secure.

After the cross, God the Father justified each elect based on the righteousness that Christ HAS secured.

The ground of justification, both before and after the cross, is the same; it's based solely on the righteousness of Jesus alone.

Sins brought condemnation and death; righteousness alone can undo that to secure justification and life..

If there is no justification before the cross, then there no life before the cross; no accounting of Christ's righteousness, no life.

Romans 5:18 KJV — Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation [of death]; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.

Feston
Sing, are we then not on the same page? Or isn't that what I'd just said?

Sing
Feston, I understand you as saying that before the cross there is no justification because Christ had not actually secured the righteousness by His life of perfect and sinless obedience to all the laws of God; therefore, no righteousness was available for the justification of condemned sinners.

Have you answered the simple question: when was Abraham justified by God - before Gen 15:6 or at Gen 15:6?

Thank you.

Feston
Sing, this question may end up being theologically exhaustive.

1. Because it can be said that he was justified before Christ's death since the lamb of God was slain before the foundation of the world.

2. It can be said that he was justified after he believed as it is written in Gen 15:6.

Either way, the fact still remains that 'He was justified by faith and not the works of the law". If we can agree on this point alone then we'll have gone a long way somewhere into some understanding of this otherwise exhaustive topic.

Would you agree...?

Sing
Feston, If you have understood the subject, it takes a few sentences to state the truth.

You have misread Rev 13:8.

If Abraham was not justified by God before Gen 15:6, then Abraham was still an unjustified condemned man in Gen 12-14. That's the necessary conclusion.

I often say, "believe what you will, but live with the necessary implications of your beliefs."

Also, there is an unbridgeable gulf between

your justification by God and

your justification by your faith.

Ask, how does my faith justify me?

Ask, how did God justify me?

Feston
Sing, can you explain the difference?

Sing
Feston, The difference of what?

Feston

Sing, because what you have just said above is what I said earlier and you seemed to argue that it could not have been simply that he believed and that his faith was accounted to him as righteousness?

What am I missing? Please explain. Better still, let's take this up on WhatsApp. I already gave you my number. Please let me clearly see what I am missing in your argument.

Sing
Feston, You said, "So on the account of Abraham believing God he was accredited with righteousness which is not of the works of the law.

Christ's righteousness was is/was the same righteousness which was accounted to him because as it is written "Jesus Christ is the same, yesterday,today and forever".
-----------

You said in Gen 15:6, the righteousness of Christ was accounted to Abraham. Am I correct?

If I am, then Abraham was justified by God at Gen 15:6. Then Abraham was still an UNjustified man in Gen 12-14. What kind of a man do you see in Abraham when you read Gen 12-14?

Gen 15:6 does not speak of the accounting of the righteousness of Christ to Abraham for his justification. Gen 15:6 speaks of God accounting Abraham's faith to him for righteousness. The two are worlds apart. Is it clear now?

How did God justify you?

How does your faith justify you?

Are these questions too deep?

Feston
 Sing, yes.... So I said and that's according to Gen 15. He believed and it was accounted to him as righteousness.

Sing
Feston What was accounted to Abraham for righteousness - his faith or the righteousness of Christ? Which one did you say?

Feston
So God accounting Abraham's faith to him (who is this him? ) Abraham or God

Sing
Feston, Who do you think?

Feston
Sing, okay I think this has now become a circular argument, don't you think?
Which church do you go to?

Sing
Feston, I'm not arguing; I'm attempting to understand what you are saying exactly... so I ask questions.

I go to a little church in this town.