Apostle
Paul has a wonderful way of dealing with errors; o.k., let us suppose that the error is true, then see some of its necessary implications.
Often
Christians can be sincerely muddled in their beliefs, believing the very
opposite of the gospel truth revealed in the Bible. However, they failed to see such a belief's necessary and dangerous implications. They are unable to see
that such beliefs actually deny the very gospel that they have embraced.
One
example concerns the resurrection of the dead dealt with by Apostle Paul in
1 Cor 15. It is not consistent to claim that you believe the gospel, and yet
deny the resurrection of the dead. They are inseparable twins, two sides of the
same coin.
Let
us suppose that there was no resurrection of the dead, what are some
necessary implications then?
-
Then not even Christ has been raised,
-
Then our preaching is vain,
-
Then preachers are false witnesses of God,
-
Then believers are still in their sins,
-
Then even those who died in Christ have perished,
-
Then believers are of all men most pitiable – they are deluded and most
mistaken about an empty hope, and
-
Then living for Christ is vanity and pitiable.
Fine,
believe what you want but live with the necessary implications!
The
same can be used to deal with fables like justification by faith alone, free
offer of salvation, gospel regeneration, etc.
-----------
Joe
Holder
Yes.
Beliefs, no less than actions, have unavoidable consequences.