Things New and Old

Ancient truths revealed in the Scriptures are often forgotten, disbelieved or distorted, and therefore lost in the passage of time. Such ancient truths when rediscovered and relearned are 'new' additions to the treasury of ancient truths.

Christ showed many new things to the disciples, things prophesied by the prophets of old but hijacked and perverted by the elders and their traditions, but which Christ reclaimed and returned to His people.

Many things taught by the Apostles of Christ have been perverted or substituted over the centuries. Such fundamental doctrines like salvation by grace and justification have been hijacked and perverted and repudiated by sincere Christians. These doctrines need to be reclaimed and restored to God's people.

There are things both new and old here. "Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things"
2Ti 2:7.

Tuesday, February 18, 2025

Benjamin Keach on Justification


 

#soundbyte_on_condition

The woefully blind buy the Pearl with their own money!

I was looking for some information from old emails and came upon this mail.

=======

Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 22:45:29 +0800
Subject: Keach, quiche and peach?

Brother Tony and members of Ipoh East Church,
This is one last attempt to show you that you have gravely misunderstood Benjamin Keach, and remain in error.

You quoted Keach thus, and INSIST that Keach teaches that faith is the condition of justification and eternal life.

-----------

Quest. But doth not the gospel require faith as a condition of justification and eternal life?

1. Yea as a condition of connexion by way of order, as one thing dependeth on another (as our author observes) in logic, if a creature be a man, he is a rational creature; or if God be the first cause, he is the Creator of all things. and in this sense (saith he) creation is a condition of salvation, if a man be saved, he must be created; so if a man believe, he shall be saved; believing is a condition of connexion, a state of grace, is thus a condition of a state of glory, by way of connexion in the promise, but one is not the federal condition of another, but both come in as the gift of grace. In this sense the covenant contains all the conditions of order and dependence in the exhibition and performance; the hearing the word is the condition of faith, but hearing is not a federal condition; so the giving the Spirit is the condition of our union with Christ and of faith, and faith the condition of our receiving of pardon, and living a holy life - and holiness the condition of seeing God, and of having eternal life; but these kinds of conditions are federal entitling conditions to the promise, but are contained in the promise, and denote the connexion and dependence of one promise benefit with another.

2. Though faith be required of them that are saved, yea, and repentance, regeneration, holiness, and a new heart also; yet these blessings are all promised in the covenant, as part thereof. but faith itself is no federal condition, but only serves to show what God will do for, and work in such that he as an act of free grace will save.

From hence we may see how woefully blind they are, who assert faith, repentance, and sincere obedience are not only federal conditions of justification, but also are the matter or material cause thereof. And this is to buy the pearl indeed with our own money.

------------

From Keach's words, you INSISTED and RESOLVED as a Reformed Baptist church that believing (faith) is the condition of both justification and eternal life.

First, let me say that I don't claim to understand everything Keach said in the quote above. However, certain things are quite plain and without controversy.

Let me make one final attempt to reason with you concerning what Keach said is the biblical relationship between faith and actual justification and eternal life.

Keach mentioned at least THREE ways in which faith is seen as related to Justification.

1. Faith is understood by some as the "matter or material cause" of Justification. Simply stated, this view elevates faith to the same level as the righteousness of Jesus Christ. Of course, you are wise enough to reject this as an error. Those who see faith in this manner is described by Keach as 'woefully blind' concerning the gospel truth of Justification.

This view may be represented as:
Righteousness of Christ/Faith>> Justification

2. Faith is seen by others as the "federal condition" of Justification. Faith is a necessary condition that the unjustified condemned dead sinner must have in order to be Justified. This view does distinguish faith from the righteousness of Christ, but this view insists that there must be faith first before the righteousness of Christ is imputed to the condemned. From all that you have written, I understand that you hold to this view.

Keach plainly declares,  "faith itself is no federal condition." Those who see faith in this manner is described by Keach as 'woefully blind' concerning the gospel truth of Justification. How woefully blind they are who assert that faith is a federal condition of justification - only the woefully blind believes that the unjustified condemned can meet this federal condition.

This view may be represented as:
Faith >> Righteousness of Christ imputed >> Justification (Faith is the federal condition of Justification).

All your reading of Keach has not led you to the truth. Instead, you have misrepresented Keach in many ways.

3. Faith is seen by Keach as the "condition of connexion by way of order" of Justification. Put simply, faith is a condition, but a condition of connection by way of order to declare and attest the Justification that has taken place by God's free grace. In exactly the same SENSE, faith is the condition of connection by way of order to declare and attest to the eternal life that has been born by God's free grace.

This view may be represented as:

The righteousness of Christ APPLIED >> Justification + Eternal Life >> Faith (the instrument to declare and attest the Justification and Eternal life already bestowed by God's free grace.)

Sungai Dua Church holds to this third view.

God, by His grace, freely justifying the elect when in their state of condemnation and death IS THE CAUSE.

They, the justified ones, receiving and resting on Christ and His righteousness by faith IS THE EFFECT.

The CAUSE is distinct and separate and prior to the EFFECT.

Read 1689.11.1 and it is abundantly clear.

Brother, unless and until you get these basic and fundamental points into your head, you will keep going on in your confusion.

1. God imputing the righteousness of Christ to a person under the condemnation of death is Actual Justification. (an elect under the condemnation of death, i.e. unjustified, is dead and cannot possibly believe.)

2. God imputing the faith of a believer to him for righteousness is Declarative Justification. (An elect person who believes Declares and Attests that he is already in the state of grace and salvation - justified, regenerated and adopted. Faith declares and attests to that fact)

If your faith is before justification (Actual), you have made faith a federal condition of justification (Actual), the error of which is roundly condemned and censured by Keach.

A representative of the early Particular Baptist and respected by Calvinistic men of other denominations declared, "... no man is evidentially and declaratively justified until he believes." And this is nothing about Actual Justification by grace.  This is all about Declarative Justification by faith.

Thanks for listening. I have discharged my duty.

sing

"And some believed the things which were spoken, and some believed not" Acts 28:24

====

The Ipoh East RB Church disbanded not long after it decided to reject me as overseeing pastor.  The candlestick was removed.