Things New and Old

Ancient truths revealed in the Scriptures are often forgotten, disbelieved or distorted, and therefore lost in the passage of time. Such ancient truths when rediscovered and relearned are 'new' additions to the treasury of ancient truths.

Christ showed many new things to the disciples, things prophesied by the prophets of old but hijacked and perverted by the elders and their traditions, but which Christ reclaimed and returned to His people.

Many things taught by the Apostles of Christ have been perverted or substituted over the centuries. Such fundamental doctrines like salvation by grace and justification have been hijacked and perverted and repudiated by sincere Christians. These doctrines need to be reclaimed and restored to God's people.

There are things both new and old here. "Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things"
2Ti 2:7.

Thursday, November 6, 2025

Questions on Gospel Regeneration and Millennium



Nov 6, 2010

Alan
Hi Sing, I'm just wondering what your view is, that if there is no point preaching to those who are dead in sins and trespasses, if you say then that was never true of the elect? in other words, as the elect of God, was there ever a time when you were dead in your sins and trespasses?

Sing
I am glad you are inquiring about what I believe. It is better that you do know what I believe, rather than misunderstanding or misrepresenting me. God bless you.

Will you please tell me the point of preaching the gospel to them that are still dead in trespasses and sins. I would like to hear. You know, superstitious Chinese loves to offer good food, really good food like roast chicken and roast piglets, etc. to the dead...

Jesus told Peter, "Feed my lambs.... Feed my sheep... Feed my sheep." Get the point. Jesus didn't say, "Lamb my lambs and sheep" or "Help me raise my dead sheep..."

You asked: as the elect of God, was there ever a time when you were dead in your sins and trespasses?

Let me put this in the simplest form:
- ALL MEN were conceived and born in sins, without exception.
All men by nature are described in Eph 2:1-3
1 ¶ And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins;
2 Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience:
3 Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others.

Note the various things said:
- dead in trespasses and sins;
- walked according to the course of this world,
- walked according to the prince of the power of the air
- were children of disobedience
- were children of wrath...
- EVEN AS OTHERS, even as the non-elect.

ALL THESE are as true of the elect in their NATURAL state, even as others.

Each individual elect is effectually called to grace and salvation at some point between their conception and death - directly and immediately by the divine activities of God, i.e. without man's aid or instrumentality.

And God sends out preachers to preach the gospel - the good news of what God has done to save His elect through His Son Jesus Christ - to such, so that they may be CONVERTED to the truth, and live as God's children...

I hope the above helps

Alan
And God sends out preachers to preach the gospel - the good news of what God has done to save His elect through His Son Jesus Christ - to such, so that they may be CONVERTED to the truth, and live as God's children...

So again, I agree with what you are saying; however, how do the preachers know to whom to preach the gospel to and how do they know when and where they are being sent? Sorry if I seem dense to you, but my way of thinking says the call is a universal call, but obviously the wind listeth where it wills and only those He blows on are quickened. See, many are called, few are chosen. Don't we beseech all men to repent and believe, knowing that God will give His own the internal call.

Sing
You asked, "However, how do the preachers know to whom to preach the gospel?"
=======
The preacher DOES NOT NEED to know who... and he DOES NOT know who among his hearers are the elect. BUT he must most certainly know that the purpose of his ministry is to reach God's children among his hearers, that his preaching the gospel is relevant ONLY to God's children, THAT IS, the elect whom the Spirit has regenerated. But God's children among his hearers will MANIFEST themselves through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ preached in the gospel.

The preaching of the gospel WILL BRING TO LIGHT, MAKE MANIFEST those that are God's children among the hearers - they will show themselves through their faith in their Saviour.

You asked, "How do they know when and where they are being sent"? Christ is the head of the church, and the Holy Spirit will lead those who are Christ's gift to the church.

"And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers; for the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ..."

Too many are called and sent forth by MISSION BOARD... and not by Christ! I see many missionaries as those on baptised exotic holidays paid handsomely by mission boards... mission boards have usurped the role of local churches and the Holy Spirit!

Public proclamation is by its very nature public. It is addressed to all... telling them the glorious gospel of what God has done for His elect people in Jesus Christ, and applied by the Holy Spirit, and calling the hearers to believe. And only God's children among the hearers will believe the gospel.

God's effectual call HAS TAKEN place BEFORE - BEFORE - BEFORE the gospel call issued by the preachers!

You are still stuck with the LIE of gospel regeneration... that God will give His internal call ONLY after the gospel call is issued! You still condition God's internal call to the man's external gospel call!

Oh, that seemingly INCURABLE disease! Worse than AIDS!

Sing
Alan@ "See many are called few are chosen."

Please take your time to consider this carefully.

The parable in Mt 22:1-14 ends with these words." For many are called, but few are chosen."

The phrase 'many are called but few are chosen' has been PROSTITUTED and ABUSED for SO LONG that very few understand what it means anymore.

The phrase must be understood in the context of the parable where it is found! Three rules of interpretation: Context, context, and context!

If the calling and choosing is not restricted to the context of the parable, then it is just plainly OUT OF CONTEXT. So, if 'chosen' is ...equated with 'choosing before foreknowledge' then it is plainly wrong! And if calling is related to gospel calling to eternal salvation, it is also plainly wrong.

The parable is not about getting eternal salvation. The parable informs us something about the kingdom of heaven - though many are called to enjoy its blessings, yet only a few are chosen to enjoy it.

The parable of the kingdom of heaven deals SPECIFICALLY with God's children among the Jews. The kingdom of heaven is a term used specifically to contrast with the earthly theocratic kingdom that God's children among the Jews are so familiar with. They are called to leave it, and to enter the kingdom of heaven... leave the old covenant kingdom to the new covenant kingdom.

That's the context of the 'many are called but few are chosen.'

Many of them are called by the gospel, but only a few of them were chosen to enjoy the blessings of the gospel.

Many of God's children among the Jews are called by the gospel. (NOT ALL of them are called by the gospel call.) Though many of them are called by the gospel call, yet only a few were chosen to believe and experience the blessings of the gospel.

Many of God's children among the Jews were blinded... only a remnant of God's children among the Jews were chosen to believe the gospel.

Read Romans 11...
25 For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.
26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:
27 For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins.
28 As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers’ sakes.
29 For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance.

Alan
Well, I again agree with you, especially about missionaries, if you're not called, stay home. Second, I am sure that God does not need men to save men. I myself came to believe that through no human agent. God alone quickened me through His Spirit. No, I think regeneration is a complete act of God through the Holy Spirit.

Alan
So Jesus is just addressing the Jews in the parable, I can see that in fact I think that is the case in a lot of the gospel; after all, He came to His own but His own did not receive Him.

Alan
What is your position on eschatology?

Sing
What about eschatology? Any thing specific?

Alan
Just wondering your position; what do you believe concerning the millennium; pre, A or post, I'm wondering because Gill was historic pre. I'm wondering do you hold to the same?

Sing
I believe the millennium is the period between the first and second coming of Christ.

At the end of the gospel age, Christ would return, general resurrection and transformation followed by the great judgment, and the ushering in of the eternal state of blessedness.

This is the beauty and simplicity of the gospel teaching on the millennium - to me anyway. I read the Bible, and that is what it says to me....

Alan
What would be Amil' I agree, can't get past one judgment of the righteous and the wicked,

Sing
This is a test... get a new believer who has never heard of the pre. post or a-mil stuff... get him to read the bible... ask him about the matter... and he will tell you just that... Christ will come at the end of the gospel age, accompanied by general resurrection and general judgment.... Then entering into the glorious eternal inheritance... WITHOUT that childish idea of another thousand years of this sin-sick and cursed world...

Alan
True when I first believed, that's how I read it. You have to do all sorts of theological gymnastics to come up with the dispensational view of end times; in fact, you just about have to re-write scripture, at best, their interpretations are novel. 

Thursday, October 23, 2025

Observing Communion Online?



#ComeTogether vs #online

Initially posted here:
https://www.facebook.com/sing.f.lau/posts/pfbid0WvnPqNamecjcCPCQezQphYQmMQpHxAbzPNEHUoP1AjaQJf4NdnsxsqvERmxPezs7l

(22:47, Aug 12, 2021)
Ficky
Sir, I need to check some Bible definitions with you.
For baptism, we refer to Philip and the Eunuch; Full immersion is required.
For Holy Communion, do we refer to the LORD'S supper?
Means, wine must be red, correct?
White is not acceptable?

sing
We refer to Jesus' baptism by John the Baptist.
John 1:33 KJV — And I knew him not: but he that sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and remaining on him, the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost.

Ficky
But it didn't say if full immersion is required, only Philip does it.
Yeah, I think you're right. Both were also baptized in the river.
So it rhymes.

sing
The fruit of the vine is understood as the wine that is made from grapes.

Ficky
Does it mean white is acceptable then?

sing
John 3:23 KJV — And John also was baptizing in Aenon near to Salim, because there was much water there: and they came, and were baptized.

Why go to the place where there is much water if sprinkling will do? More importantly, baptism must reflect the burial of the old man with Christ... this is ONLY properly expressed with immersion. No one half-buries a dead man.

Ficky
There's an argument that the Jewish burial is different, though.
But I believe in full immersion.

sing
There is no white wine... There is clear wine.
Red wine properly reflects the blood of Christ... unless some believe Jesus had clear blood!

Ficky
We're supposed to take communion at home this Sunday.
But I bought the wrong wine. Since no liquor store is allowed to open nearby because of the MCO (Movement Control Order), due to COVID-19.

sing
Read 1Cor 11... and note carefully the words "come together"  (assembled in one place ) and their relationship to observing the Lord's Supper. See verses 17,18,20, and 33.

Let me put it crudely: some have online sexual union, others will have online Holy Communion.

Be careful, my Brother.

(a few days later)

sing
Did you use unleavened bread for your online Holy Communion?

Ficky
I didn't. Please teach me how to make it.
BTW, my church suggested substituting with soda biscuits.

sing
You didn't??? You were so careful about clear wine or red wine, but couldn't care less about getting the other element right?
Is sola scriptura is just a religious shibboleth then!

=========

Reggie Lee
Keep ploughing and planting in that brother…. He may be easily swayed by the winds, but Truth saves a soul from them.


Wednesday, October 22, 2025

Righteousness Imputed, Applied, and Experienced

Be ye not as the horse, or as the mule, which have no understanding!
Righteousness Imputed Legally, Applied Personally, and Experienced 
In the fall, Adam's sin and condemnation were imputed
to all represented by him. 
At the cross, Christ's righteousness was imputed
to all represented by Him,
and all the sins of His people were imputed to Him; 
Christ bore all their sins and suffered the full penalty for them, 
to secure their eternal redemption. 
The righteousness which was imputed legally to all the elect
is applied to each elect personally at the time of their effectual calling 
out of their native state to grace and salvation in Jesus Christ. 

Initially posted here:
https://www.facebook.com/sing.f.lau/posts/pfbid02ZNY4Nk3sZaFfb9E2GmnoUPwrVxZNArdwpguPiygSmkDBRBcfXZQjp4wgf7aAra4bl

A Calvinist teacher insisted:
"At the cross, God made atonement for our sins... it has nothing to do with our imputed righteousness..!'

A student of the Bible inquired:
So, teacher, God DID make atonement for your sins at the cross! Good.

And your sins were ATONED for without Christ's righteousness IMPUTED to you??? Is that what you believe? Is there such a thing as an atonement without righteousness? Is that Calvinistic also?

But at the cross, you did not yet exist! So what sins are you talking about? Do you have sins to be atoned for when Christ died on the cross?

Think, teacher!!!
-----------

Robert Basham
My reply....That is hyper-Calvinism....My sins were laid on Christ the moment I trusted Him as my Lord and Saviour (in time)....Romans 5:1..

Sing F Lau
What is hyper-calvinism? You want to label many 'reformed' men you adore as hyper-calvinists also? <LOL>

You asserted, "My sins were laid on Christ the moment I trusted Him as my Lord and Saviour (in time)....Romans 5:1."

Supposing your notion is true, that your sins were laid on Christ the moment you trusted Him as your Lord and Saviour, AREN'T your sins laid on Christ TWO THOUSANDS years TOO LATE?

All sins not laid on Christ when He suffered on the cross are not suffered for by Him. Is that simple enough? You think Christ would have to die and suffer another time just for your sins?

You don't believe in the imputation of all the sins of all the elect on Christ when He died and suffered on the cross, do you? And yes, you are a Calvinist!

Robert Basham
Yes, but we do not know who are the elect....we are to witness the truth of Gospel Substitution to all men everywhere...and in all nations of the world..!

Sing F Lau
God knows everyone of His elect. He imputed Adam's sin to you when you (and all others) did not yet have personal existence... but you did exist in God's mind, and your name written in the Lamb's Book of Life.

EVEN SO, God imputed Christ's righteousness to you when He died and suffered on the cross for all His elect when you did not have personal existence.

What is so difficult about this?

Sing F Lau
You have just changed the subject. Don't do that yet. Let's stick to the subject, and examine the soundness of your CALVINISTIC notion.

We are talking about imputation of sins and righteousness, and when did the imputations occur.

Stay focus... don't be wandering stars!

Sing F Lau
And please remember that legal imputation and personal application of righteousness are separate and distinct matters.

A biblical distinction is the essence of sound theology!

Robert Basham
I think we have been through this before. God's decree to justify the elect and His act of justification (in time when we believe) are not the same. We do not see things from God's point of view all the time...I will not argue with you...you much better Bible student than me....🙂

Sing F Lau
This is not arguing. I just wish to point out to you the inconsistencies of your CALVINISTIC notions. If you don't admit them, it is because you are a good Calvinist! <LOL>

Dallas Eaton II
There is no atonement without blood...Christ did say, If I had not come and spoken to them...but now they have no cloke for their sins...here is the timely application of the eternal covenant of Grace...found to be bound in the Father's love dependent upon Christ's taking upon himself the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin condemning sin in the flesh. Prior even to that the surety of HIS faithfulness brings the imputation of His righteousness to all the elect for the praise of the glory of His grace.

Ashley Juliot

Robert Basham said, "My sins were laid on Christ the moment I trusted Him as my Lord and Saviour (in time)....Romans 5:1.."

Christ bore our sins in His own body on the tree, He was cursed for our sins, He put away sin by the sacrifice of Himself, He purged our sins when He sat down on the right hand of the majesty on high; and all this not because we trusted in Him, but entirely and only because of His free grace for wretched sinners.

Robert Basham
Read Pilgrims Progress. Experimentally, from our point of view, the burden of our sin is removed when by faith alone we trust in the imputed righteousness of Christ alone for our eternal salvation. This takes place in time when we hear the gospel...Romans 10:14 How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher?....Jesus said..My sheep hear My voice, and they follow Me...(this takes place in time when we are saved).

Ashley Juliot
Let us make a distinction between the burden of sin being lifted from our conscience when we believe and our sins being laid on Christ when He died. The burden of sin is lifted from our conscious when the Spirit opens our eyes to that glad tidings that Christ already bore our sins in His own body on the tree when He was made a curse for us.

The moment I trusted Christ, I believed that my sins were laid on Christ when He died. For the scriptures reveal to us, "All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the LORD HATH laid on him the iniquity of us all." (Isaiah 53:6)

Your statement, "...My sins were laid on Christ the moment I trusted Him..." is contrary to the free grace redemption in Christ Jesus.

Sing F Lau
Abraham, you stated it so well.
You appeal to Scriptures, Robert appeal to Bunyan!

How telling and revealing!

Robert decided to see as though he is an one-eyed jack... refusing to see with both his eyes what is LEGAL on the one hand, and what is EXPERIENTIAL on the other!

That's the sad part!
I read these words to remind myself this morning:

8 I will instruct thee and teach thee in the way which thou shalt go: I will guide thee with mine eye.
9 Be ye not as the horse, or as the mule, which have no understanding: whose mouth must be held in with bit and bridle, lest they come near unto thee.

Be ye not as the mule!

Please thank you for instructing and teaching me. Lord, help me not to be a mule. Instruct and teach me in the way I ought to go. 

Abraham's faith and justification


Initially posted here:
https://www.facebook.com/sing.f.lau/posts/pfbid02BE7ieQFar5MvEFpich4gX18UrMTYsHgFxnQGSKWTxkzkefg8AiQYf9xxrsk3Zzifl

Brother Gideon read from Hebrews 11 when he introduced the first service.

Heb 11:8 sheds much light on Gen 15:6.
May the Lord give you understanding. Amen.

Hebrews 11 - KJT
8 By faith Abraham, when he was called to go out into a place which he should after receive for an inheritance, obeyed; and he went out, not knowing whither he went.

Genesis 12 KJT
1 Now the LORD had said [past perfect - i.e. said to him way back in Gen 11] unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father's house, unto a land that I will shew thee...
4 So Abram departed, as the LORD had spoken unto him; and Lot went with him: and Abram was seventy and five years old when he departed out of Haran.

Abram was ALREADY a man of faith and obedience when he was called by the LORD to leave his father's house in the Ur of the Chaldees. Earlier, the LORD had effectually called him out of his native state of sin and death to that of grace and salvation in the promised Messiah.

To call an elect out of his native state of sin and death to that state of grace and salvation in Jesus Christ, these divine activities must take place in this number and logical order:
- justification by God's grace to deal with the condemnation; justification reverses the condemnation due to sins;
- regeneration by the Spirit of God to deal with the spiritual deadness due to sins; and
- adoption by the Father into the divine family to deal with the alienation due to sins. Adoption is always accompanied by the bestowal of the Spirit to dwell in the adopted.

These divine activities - three in number, and in that logical number - are necessary to bring an elect out of his native state of sin and death to that state of grace and salvation in Jesus Christ.

Abraham's faith and obedience when called to leave the Ur of the Chaldees is concrete evidence that he has been effectually called- i.e. justified, regenerated, and adopted - and bestowed with the Spirit of adoption to dwell in him.

If this is true, then what about the passage in Genesis 15?
What about it? Let's take a look.

Genesis 15 KJT
4 And, behold, the word of the LORD came unto him, saying, This shall not be thine heir; but he that shall come forth out of thine own bowels shall be thine heir.
5 And he brought him forth abroad, and said, Look now toward heaven, and tell the stars, if thou be able to number them: and he said unto him, So shall thy seed be.
6 And he believed in the LORD; and he counted it to him for righteousness.

Abraham believed in the LORD concerning His words on the promised seed; this promised seed is none other than Christ. (Galatians 3:16 KJT — Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.)

Abraham's faith, his act of believing the LORD's promise, was counted to him for righteousness, i.e. to experience the blessedness of his justified state by the free grace of God.

NOTE CAREFULLY, there is no accounting of Christ's righteousness to Abraham; therefore, there is no justification in this passage. Abraham's justification by the LORD had taken place long ago in Ur of the Chaldeans.

What happened here is Abraham experienced the blessedness of his justified state, by the LORD's free grace, through believing/faith in the promised seed.

Apostle Paul marshalled Abraham as a proof to repudiate the Judaizers' insistence that ceremonial laws must be observed. Abraham experienced that blessedness WITHOUT observing any ceremonial laws. PERIOD. Romans 4:1-5.

 

"Salvation by grace alone" is denied by new school Calvinists

Initially posted here: 
https://www.facebook.com/sing.f.lau/posts/pfbid02358LHQraEnUjfYdhk4TVYe1iGDswtihGExsE1PYDCcoMx65GDuxVFaCYV5xuHZ13l

The Calvinists DO NOT really believe that eternal salvation is by grace alone... because they insist that men MUST do something in order to appropriate that salvation for themselves.

The Scriptures teaches pure grace, and grace ALONE:
- God purposed eternal salvation for His elect...
- Jesus secured that eternal redemption for His elect...
- The Holy Spirit applies that eternal redemption to each elect at effectual calling when he is still in his native state of sin and death...

And once that eternal redemption is applied, by God's free and sovereign grace alone, an elect is perfectly fitted for eternal glory. Nothing more needed.

The gospel ministry is ordained, and is relevant, and intended for such only - i.e. those to whom God has freely and sovereignly applied eternal redemption personally - for their well-being as God's children here on earth.

This is salvation by grace, and grace alone. No human cooperation or aid at all.

Calvinists insist that a man must do something to appropriate the eternal redemption for himself - such as believing in order for the righteousness of Christ to be imputed to him!

BOTH the Calvinists and their cousins Arminians have made faith the instrumental means to obtain eternal salvation... while it is PLAIN as the noon day sun that faith is an effect and fruit of eternal salvation ALREADY applied by God's free and sovereign grace alone.
=========

Comments

Robert E Griffin [REG]
100% error. Sadly, Sing. Think before you type my brother.

Sing F Lau
SS, so, what is my misconception? Please elaborate. [SS has deleted all his comments]

Please remember, there are all sorts of 'calvinists' out there!

REG, which part that I have written misrepresent you a Calvinist?

Do Calvinists not believe that a man is justified by God, i.e. Christ's righteousness is imputed to him, when he believes? That's the uniform view of Calvinists that I am acquainted with.

Sing F Lau
The Calvinists DO NOT really believe that eternal salvation is by grace alone... EVEN though they claim and insist that they do... because they insist that men MUST do something in order to appropriate that salvation for themselves.

They confuse eternal salvation of the elect (in their native state of sin and death) solely by the free grace of God... which was purposed, accomplished, is applied and will be consummated all solely by God's free grace, and the temporal salvation of God's children conditioned upon their obedience to the will of the Father for them.

Sing F Lau
We believe that Christ's righteousness is imputed to us upon regeneration.
=======

Adam's sin was IMPUTED LEGALLY to all he represented in the fall.
EVEN SO, Christ's righteousness was IMPUTED LEGALLY to all He represented on the cross.

The condemnation of death of Adam's sin is APPLIED PERSONALLY at conception.

The justification of life by Christ's righteousness is APPLIED PERSONALLY at the effectual calling of an elect out of his native state of sin and death to that of grace and eternal salvation.

With the righteousness of Christ applied to an elect personally, the justification of life gave divine warrant for the Holy Spirit's wok of regeneration. The regenerated is adopted, and given the gift of the Spirit of adoption... who works all saving graces in the heart of a child of God.

The grace of faith is drawn forth by the gospel ministry... evidencing the PRIOR work free and gracious work of justification and regeneration.

Do Calvinists believe the same as this teaching from the Scriptures?

Bienvenido Kow
Yes and Amen. There are only two main characters in the bible. The first Adam and the second Adam. All are representative works of these two main characters.

Sing F Lau
"Faith is a necessary requirement for salvation, and Calvinists believe this. "
========

May I said this is the most illogical and nonsensical statement? That is why I say Calvinist DON'T believe in free grace salvation.

And here is the very simple and plain reason.
Faith is a saving grace, a FRUIT and EFFECT of salvation ALREADY bestowed, is it not? No? Will any Calvinist worth his salt DENY that faith is a fruit of salvation ALREADY bestowed?

Isn't faith, believing and resting in Jesus Christ, an EFFECT of the eternal life ALREADY bestowed by the free and sovereign act of effectual call to grace and salvation? No? Will any Calvinist worth his salt DENY that faith is a fruit of salvation ALREADY bestowed?

How can an FRUIT and EFFECT of salvation be the requirement for that salvation? Have Calvinists lost their mind?

No, no, no. Faith is the evidence and manifestation of the salvation ALREADY bestowed by God's free and sovereign grace.

It is 'the just shall live by faith.'

It is NOT NOT NOT, 'the unjustified shall be justified by faith and live.'

Calvinists DO NOT believe in salvation by God's free grace... though they are a little less inconsistent than their Arminian cousins they despise! <LOL>

Sing F Lau
Ephesians 2:8 "For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God,"
=====
I suggest that you read this. You may yet learn some truths, if the Lord is willing...

An exposition on Eph 2:8-9

https://things-new-and-old.blogspot.com/2008/01/saved-by-grace-through-faith-whose.html

Things New and Old: Saved by grace through faith – whose faith?

Sing F Lau
"Faith is a necessary requirement for salvation, and Calvinists believe this. "
======

This is like saying,
"Breath is a necessary requirement for life, and dead men believe this."
But breath is an activity of life, a manifestation of life already possessed!

How could breath be a necessary requirement for a dead man to have life?
Only a dead man that has been quickened has breath.

Breathing is an activity of life, thus it cannot be a requirement for life, i.e. to get life, MUCH LESS a necessary requirement!

Sing F Lau
Those are your words, not mine.

'Faith is a necessary requirement for salvation' is a plain example of the repudiation of salvation by sovereign grace.

Why don't Calvinists just admit it that from one side of their mouth they claim to affirm sovereign grace, and from the other side of the same mouth they repudiate sovereign grace... because of their inconsistencies?

Instead of insisting that faith is a CONDITION (a requirement is a condition that men must meet) for salvation, why don't just admit that faith is an EVIDENCE of salvation by God's sovereign grace?

What is the use of sarcasm?

Humble admission would be honourable.

Are the Calvinists so complete in their understanding that they have arrived, and have no inconsistencies and deficiencies to amend?

That statement is just one of them. There are several more serious than that...

I was a 'calvinist' for 20 plus years... I saw many contradictions and inconsistencies in the popular 'calvinism' zealously espoused by the 'Reformed' people.

==============================

Calvinistic-sounding Arminians

I wrote:
'The Calvinists DO NOT really believe that eternal salvation is by grace alone... because they insist that men MUST do something in order to appropriate that salvation for themselves.'

A Calvinist protested:

'I don't know which Calvinists you talk to, but it seems you're under a misconception. I'm a Calvinist, and what you're saying about us is simply not true.

Another, more stridently:
'100% error. Sadly, Sing. Think before you type, my brother.'

Then another Calvinist insisted:
"Faith is a necessary requirement for salvation, and Calvinists believe this."

The others expressed hearty amen to this statement.

See what I mean! They just prove my point!

That statement - Faith is a necessary requirement for salvation, and Calvinists believe this - is the most illogical and nonsensical statement. That is why I say Calvinists DON'T REALLY believe in free grace salvation. But they sincerely think so, but in reality, they repudiate it.

Faith is a saving grace, a FRUIT and EFFECT of salvation ALREADY bestowed, is it not? No? Will any Calvinist worth his salt DENY that faith is a fruit of salvation ALREADY bestowed?

Isn't faith, believing and resting in Jesus Christ, an EFFECT of the eternal life ALREADY bestowed by the free and sovereign act of effectual call to grace and salvation? No? Will any Calvinist worth his salt DENY that faith is a fruit of salvation ALREADY bestowed?

How can a FRUIT and EFFECT of salvation be the requirement for that salvation? Have Calvinists lost their mind? They haven't. Just confused.

Willy Keat
Mr Sing, your doctrine is very hard to understand.....

Bill Taylor
Per John's first epistle, Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ IS born if God. In this it is evident that the "borning" precedes the believing. Amen, Bro. Sing.

Sing F Lau
Willy, it is actually very simple if you would humbly accept the truth. All my 4 children have no problem understanding and believing.

Please tell me: do you breathe IN ORDER to get life, OR do you breathe BECAUSE you have life?

Do you understand this statement: life precedes all the activities of that life?

If you do, do you agree that it is a basic and fundamental truth?

"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him."   - Leo Tolstoy –

Sing F Lau
Herman, which species of tulip? I have heard of several... some very injurious to the truth! Seriously.

[Herman has deleted his comments]

Sing F Lau
Thanks, Brother Herman.
All the different species are called by a small acronym!
I like your 'original set' qualification! <LOL>

Dallas Eaton II
IS = 1+1+1= 3, or one plus one plus one is three.

Brother Herman, I am not arguing with you, but I see perseverance as a word describing what I do to remain in a certain condition. I would define preservation as that which maintains my condition despite my perseverance. I simply believe the elect are preserved, that many may and do persevere by Grace, but not all do or will persevere in Grace, but will instead fall from Grace, yet never fall from their positional condition in Christ. We can fall from Grace in many different ways.

Michael Lim
Thank God that He has revealed the truth to unworthy ppl like myself and others. I am not in a confused state now, or else I will be rambling some illogical thoughts out, and ppl will get confused. LOLZ!

How many members does Sungai Dua Church have?

Initially posted here:
https://www.facebook.com/sing.f.lau/posts/pfbid0ZbyDvtnKBenNtr9qxfW5uLUE2nKkPMy67a71FLVbSxec4ZqRQJWjeWbqFJzYP3yLl

[May 3, 2024, 6:24 PM]
Inquirer
Sir, if you don't mind telling me, Sungai Dua Church has how many members? But if you do mind, then you needn't let me know.

sing
That's a good question.
Until till middle of last year, we had 23 members, including those who were not in Penang (i.e. non-resident members). Over the years, some have moved away for further education or work. Some continue to maintain their membership with Sungai Dua Church because they can't bring themselves to unite with the churches they worship with.

Others managed to unite themselves as members with other churches where God has placed them. They have been taught good churchmanship as disciples of Jesus Christ.

Out of the Movement Control Order (Covid-19), two issues began to agitate some members:
- Non-resident membership (members who have moved away) cannot remain as members. 
- baptism and membership (baptism and membership are separate matters.)

We went through the issues, we studied and discussed the matter. We concluded and made things clear - so everyone understood the issues. Three families chose to follow an American teacher instead of the Bible; they left the church.

May 1, 2023, was also the church's 30th anniversary.

We took the occasion to renew the Covenant of Members.

Only 8 decided to renew the Covenant of Members.
- 8 non-resident members (2 in Perth, 2 in Singapore, 3 in KL, and 1 in Ireland) did not renew the Covenant. (The 2 in KL continue to come as much as they can. They will likely retire in Penang in the future, the Lord willing.)
- 5 resident members resigned (these protested against non-resident membership, but ended up as church-less! What an irony and a farce!)
- 2 resident members did not renew the Members' Covenant. One continues to come.

So, to answer your question, we have 8 members, 1/3 of "a very little" of what you see in Xrbc. I'm glad you asked.

[May 4, 2024 7:34 AM]
Inquirer

I guess small can be beautiful also. But how can your church survive with only 8 people?

s️ing
Indeed. Beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder; it depends chiefly on the beholder's heart - what he wants, what's important to him. Some are ashamed to be associated with a tiny church because the size of the congregation matters supremely to them. To others, other considerations are of utmost importance.

The good Lord has provided for the last three decades; the tiny church has not lacked financially in any way. The hearts of good men are in the hand of the LORD, as the rivers of water: He turneth it whithersoever He will. Pro 21:1

The people are giving freely and cheerfully; I live within and below my means by willing choice.

s️ing
The membership is 8; attendees are probably twice that number.
Today, few Christians have good churchmanship - they have a pathetic view of the church of Jesus Christ and His servants. The 1689.26 CoF lays down the principles of good churchmanship.

A man who is called by Christ will overcome hardship, deprivation, trials, etc. He will run the race and fight a good fight of faith.

May the Lord be with MW of Xrbc. Encourage him. Amen.

Inquirer
It must be sad for the pastor to see his flock leaving one by one or pass on.

sing
It's fine if one maintains a godly perspective, i.e. the sovereign Lord adds and He takes away. We rejoice when He adds to the church; we also rejoice when members, by God's providence, need to move on. We pray that they may be good disciples of Christ where they are.

[Sunday, May 5, 2924, 2:23 PM]
s️ing
Today, there were 19 in the congregation, 7 of them members. We observed the Lord's Supper.

We enjoyed our monthly fellowship lunch.

I preached from Song 4:1 and Ecc 12:1-2. We are going through these two books on Sunday, and the Gospel of Luke on Wednesday evenings.

I hope you have had a blessed time of worship and fellowship with God's
children... despite being church-less. Amen.

Take a look at this post:
https://www.facebook.com/sing.f.lau/posts/pfbid02ErEfj6isC4XNSQydEGAp3ZrkYFfoJfSmZt9SaBjEvkZbeTNPxvSvLLbT1LmexV1Ul

Monday, October 20, 2025

Many RBs are Diehard Gospel-Regenerationists

Are you really that confused?

 Initially posted here:
https://www.facebook.com/sing.f.lau/posts/pfbid0MJwJASUg24bbrsNCrN8GFZrXHwHA1tuogPNc6yCyXhqz59QfztBoxNavYZ9Zb7tHl

How subtle and devilish is the perversion:
Faith is an instrument to MANIFEST the justification that has already taken place
HAS BEEN TWISTED into
Faith is the instrument to SECURE one's justification from God by His free grace - as if that is still justification by free grace!

Let me 
put it in a plainer manner
Breath is an instrument to MANIFEST life that one already possesses 
is twisted and perverted into 
Breath is an instrument to SECURE the life that a dead man does not possess. 

Faith manifests what you already have by God's free grace.
It is "the just (justified ones, by the free grace of God) that shall live by faith" - repeats the Holy Scriptures.

Faith DOES NOT SECURE your justification before God.

How can an unjustified man have faith to begin with? An unjustified man is still a man in his native state of condemnation and death! How could such a man exercise faith in order to secure his justification before God?

Might as well believe that a dead man may breathe in order to obtain life!

The old school Baptists declared:
"The reason why any are justified IS NOT because they have faith; but the reason why they have faith IS because they are justified."

But the new school Calvinists anathematise this statement of truth by the old school Baptists.

They cannot distinguish forensic justification by free grace, and experiential justification by their faith! And they are so cocksure of themselves!
=========

 Comments (some comments have been deleted by their authors) 

Trevor Christian Johnson
The instrumentality of the Word of God:
The truth is that God ordains that the Elect ordinarily should be saved through faith, upon the hearing of the Gospel. Infants and the mentally infirm constitute extraordinary cases, yet ordinarily the witness of Scripture states the following:

• “Ye are already clean because of [or through] the word I have spoken to you.” (John 15:3).
• “Of His own will he brought us forth by the word of truth, that we might be a kind of first-fruits of His creatures.”(James 1:18).
• "...knowing, beloved brethren, your election by God. For our gospel did not come to you in word only, but also in power and in the Holy Spirit and in much assurance." (1 Thess 1:4, 5).
• “Many who deny the instrumentality of the Word are often admirers of John Gill, and yet not even Gill supports their claims of “immediate regeneration.” Gill affirms, on page 534 of his Body of Divinity, the instrumentality of the Word:

"Though after all it seems plain, that the ministry of the word is the vehicle in which the Spirit of God conveys himself and his grace into the hearts of men; which is done when the word comes not in word only, but in power, and in the Holy Ghost; and works effectually, and is the power of God unto salvation; then faith comes by hearing, and ministers are instruments by whom, at least, men are encouraged to believe: 'received ye the Spirit', says the apostle, 'by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith': Ga 3:2 that is, by the preaching of the law, or by the preaching of the gospel? by the latter, no doubt."

The instrumentality of Faith
Again, Chapter 14, “Of Saving Faith”, in both the Westminster and the 1689 Confessions of Faith, summarizes well the role of faith as an instrument through which God saves the Elect:"The grace of faith, whereby the elect are enabled to believe to the saving of their souls, is the work of the Spirit of Christ in their hearts, and is ordinarily wrought by the ministry of the Word..."

The Belgic Confession (Article 2) explains further:
“Therefore we justly say with Paul, that we are justified by faith alone, or by faith without works. However, to speak more clearly, we do not mean that faith itself justifies us, for it is only an instrument with which we embrace Christ our Righteousness. But Jesus Christ, imputing to us all His merits, and so many holy works which He hath done for us and in our stead, is our Righteousness. And faith is an instrument that keeps us in communion with Him in all His benefits…”

Below is an explanation concerning the instrumentality of faith that I sent to one man who vigorously denied this truth, calling it a “works-righteousness.” Examine my explanation yourself to see if it accords with Scripture:

“The Elect are justified by or through faith (Rom. 1:17; 3:25, 28, 30; 5:1; Eph. 2:8; Gal. 2:16; 3:11, 24; Phil 3:9).

Faith is not the reason or ultimate grounds for the Elect’s justification. We are not saved because of our faith or on the grounds of our faith, as if we can produce a certain sufficient measure of this substance from within ourselves which God would then honor and allow us into heaven. This would be to make faith into a meritorious act and our work of producing enough faith of sufficient quality to be a work of righteousness able to commend us before God. This would be yet another form of works-righteousness. This may be part of your zeal in denying “duty-faith” – your legitimate desire to guard against any form of “works-righteousness.”

However, though we are not saved because of our faith, faith is the instrument through which God’s Elect are united to Christ. The expressions are thus—dia pisteos, ek pisteos, and pistei, which can all be translated as “by means of” or “through” faith.

Faith is the instrument which lays hold of Jesus. God, through free grace, enables a person to believe. It is a gift of grace, yet God does not believe for the man; the man must believe. Therefore, being an instrument and channel, faith does not come at some later time after a person is united to Christ, but a person is united to Christ by faith itself. Therefore, though it is proper to speak of a logical priority of regeneration over faith/conversion, God monergistically taking initiative to move the man, let us not mistake a logical priority with a chronological one; there is no perceptible chronological gap in time, nor are there any who are regenerate but who are yet to exercise saving faith. Everywhere we see faith we will see the new birth, and where we see the new birth we will see faith.

Again, Ek pisteos (“by”, “from”, or “out of” faith) describes faith as that which logically precedes a person’s justification. Faith is the gift of God which is given to us so that we may cling to Christ, though it is never the efficient or ultimate cause of justification, the dative use of the noun pistis being used in an instrumental sense (see also Rom. 3:28).”

Likewise, not only faith but repentance as well, is an essential grace-gift that the Elect must possess for salvation. Though faith and repentance are not produced within ourselves by our own merits, we still must possess these gifts of grace, wrought by the work of Christ for His Elect on the Cross, for us to see heaven. The Westminster Confession of Faith guards us from error in regard to the necessity of repentance:

"Although repentance be not to be rested in as any satisfaction for sin, or any cause of the pardon thereof, which is the act of God's free grace in Christ; yet is it of such necessity to all sinners, that none may expect pardon without it.” (The Westminster Confession of Faith, 15:1-3).

Thus, we see that an “instrument” is not the effective cause of a thing, and that God unites us to Christ by the instrumentality of faith upon the hearing of the Word. To believe these things is not “works-righteousness” but are truths defended both biblically and historically.

Kate Richardson
Hebrews 10:
14 For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified. 
15 Whereof the Holy Ghost also is a witness to us: for after that he had said before, 
16 This is the covenant that I will make with them after those days, saith the Lord, I will put my laws into their hearts, and in their minds will I write them;
17 And their sins and iniquities will I remember no more.

(If the preacher does any good, God has already been there first and done the work.)

Trevor Christian Johnson
Edmund, that sure is a lot of adjectives to use. Justification by faith is a central tenet of the Scriptures and one need not be a theolog to read and understand my plain scriptural proofs above that faith comes by hearing and hearing by the Word of God.

[Edmund has deleted all his comments}

Trevor Christian Johnson
Edmund, I agree with you that faith is not a cause of salvation. A thing can be an instrument without being a cause, hence ek pisteos in the greek (by, through) faith.

Sing F Lau
Trevor, I suggest that new school calvinists like you are confused on two basic points in the issue under consideration.

First, you confuse forensic justification by the free grace of God, with the experiential justification by believing. When you get this right, you will save yourself from lots of confusion and inconsistencies.

Every elect of God will experience forensic justification by God's free grace... no if and no but.

Not every child of God (an elect that is already justified, regenerated and adopted in his effectual calling from the state of sin and death to that of grace and salvation) will not experience experiential justification. Experiential justification is CONDITIONED upon faith... and hearing and believing is CONDITIONED upon the capability and opportunity to hear THE gospel.

That's the first matter. And it is intimately related to the next.

Second, you confuse the salvation (which is eternal in nature) that is by the free grace of God through the eternal redemption that is in Christ Jesus) with the salvation (which is temporal in nature, affecting the well-being of God's children) that is conditioned upon the responses of God's children to the ministry of the gospel.

No one is denying that the ministry of the word is ordained to save God's children... to ensure their WELL-BEING in this present life while they wait for their eternal glory, of which they have been perfectly and completely made fit, WITHOUT THE ministry of the word.

If you can get this two related matters, you will save yourself from lots of inconsistencies and contradictions... that are INHERENT in the new school calvinism.

I speak as a former new school calvinist for TWENTY years. The Lord shows pity on me and delivered me from all inconsistencies and contradictions.

May the Lord bless you in a similar manner.

Trevor Christian Johnson
Thank you for that information, Sing.

Sing F Lau
Trevor, you can qualify 'faith is the instrument of justification" ALL YOU WANT.
Enough of your reformed shibboleth! <LLLLLLOOOOOLLLL>

The PLAIN fact still remains: an unjustified man is incapable of believing. Why? An unjustified man is still under the condemnation of death.

Sins brought the condemnation of death.
Righteousness brings the justification of life.
That righteousness was IMPUTED at the cross to all elect.

That same righteousness is APPLIED to an individual elect PERSONALLY at effectual call out of the state of sin and death to that of grace and salvation

Romans 5:18 "Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life."

No justification, no righteousness; no righteousness, no life.

No life, no hearing; no hearing, no manifestation of faith.

Is that simple enough for SOUND MINDED new school calvinists?

Forensic justification involves RIGHTEOUSNESS.

Sing F Lau
Trevor, if you have 1% of John Gill's honesty, it would have done you great good.

You quoted from page 534. These words PRECEDED those you quoted from the same section 'Instrumentality of Regeneration', starting from the bottom of page 533.

Do you understand them? I know you rejected them, but do you understand them? John Gill knew what he was saying because he had a full grasp of the whole matter more completely than midgets like the new school Calvinists.

Gill was able to make the distinction between the EXERTION of the principle of grace without instrumentality of the gospel ministry, and the drawing it forth into act and exercise through the instrumentality of the gospel. I hope you get the point.

It is one paragraph... but I have broken them up into four parts, to highlight the middle parts of the paragraph. Take careful note of the 2nd and 3rd parts below. The portion you quoted is the 4th part of the same paragraph.

===========

Fourthly, The instrumental cause of regeneration, if it may be so called, are the word of God, and the ministers of it; hence regenerate persons are said to be "born again by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever" (1 Pet. 1:23), and again, "of his own will begat he us with the word of truth" (James 1:18), unless by the Word in these passages should be meant the Eternal Logos, or essential Word of God, Christ Jesus, since logov is used in both places; though ministers of the gospel are not only represented as ministers and instruments by whom others believe, but as spiritual fathers; "though you have ten thousand instructors in Christ", says the apostle to the Corinthians (1 Cor. 4:15), "yet have ye not many fathers, for in Christ Jesus I have begotten you through the gospel"; so he speaks of his son Onesimus, whom he had "begotten in his bonds" (Philemon 1:10)...

yet this instrumentality of the word in regeneration seems not so agreeable to the principle of grace implanted in the soul in regeneration, and to be understood with respect to that; since that is done by immediate infusion, and is represented as a creation; and now as God made no use of any instrument in the first and old creation, so neither does it seem so agreeable that he should use any in the new creation...

wherefore this is rather to be understood of the exertion of the principle of grace, and the drawing it forth into act and exercise; which is excited and encouraged by the ministry of the word, by which it appears that a man is born again; so the three thousand first converts, and the jailor, were first regenerated, or had the principle of grace wrought in their souls by the Spirit of God, and then were directed and encouraged by the ministry of the apostles to repent and believe in Christ: whereby it became manifest that they were born again.

Though after all it seems plain, that the ministry of the word is the vehicle in which the Spirit of God conveys himself and his grace into the hearts of men; which is done when the word comes not in word only, but in power, and in the Holy Ghost; and works effectually, and is the power of God unto salvation; then faith comes by hearing, and ministers are instruments by whom, at least, men are encouraged to believe: "received ye the Spirit", says the apostle, "by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith": (Gal. 3:2), that is, by the preaching of the law, or by the preaching of the gospel? by the latter, no doubt.

===============

If you have 1% of John Gill's honesty, you will tell us the WHOLE truth of what Gill said, and the precise distinction he made.

You have NOT represented John Gill truthfully!

I always wonder how new school calvinists who SLANDER and DESPISE Gill as a hyper will be able to represent him honestly!

Sing F Lau
Trevor @ "The instrumentality of Faith
Again, Chapter 14, “Of Saving Faith”, in both the Westminster and the 1689 Confessions of Faith, summarizes well the role of faith as an instrument through which God saves the Elect:"The grace of faith, whereby the elect are enabled to believe to the saving of their souls, is the work of the Spirit of Christ in their hearts, and is ordinarily wrought by the ministry of the Word..."
=============

Chapter 11.2 already stated without any ambiguity that the grace of saving faith is ONE of the SAVING GRACES that accompanies the forensic justification by God's free grace.

I sometimes wonder whether the new school calvinists ever study the 1689 for themselves.

Here is 1689.11.2
"Faith thus receiving and resting on Christ and His righteousness, is the alone instrument of justification;(6) yet it is not alone in the person justified, but ever accompanied with all other saving graces, and is no dead faith, but worketh by love. (7)".

Faith is one of the saving graces that accompanied a justified person.

This justification by God's free grace is spelt out in paragraph 1. Justification by God's free grace enabled a justified elect to believe and rest on Christ and His righteousness.

This act of believing and resting in Christ EXPERIENTIALLY justifies, demonstrates, certifies, evidences and manifests his justified state by God's free grace. Faith is the only instrument for the justified to EXPERIENCE the blessedness of his justified state by God's free grace. Gen 15:1-6 speaks of that - the experiential justification of Abraham. Abraham was forensically justified by God when God effectually called him out of the state of sin and death to grace and salvation when he was still in Ur.

In the same chapter, paragraph 4 reads:

"God did from all eternity decree to justify all the elect, (11) and Christ did in the fullness of time die for their sins, and rise again for their justification;(12) nevertheless, they are not justified personally, until the Holy Spirit doth in time due actually apply Christ unto them.(13)"

The above paragraph states three distinct aspects of justification:
- Justification was decreed for all the elect before time.
- Justification was legally accomplished for all the elect at the cross. IMPUTATION of righteousness took place.
- Justification was vitally applied to each elect personally at effectual call when Christ is actually applied unto each elect. IMPARTATION of righteousness to individual elect takes place.

When this happens, an elect is justified PERSONALLY.... in contrast to DECRETALLY, and LEGALLY.

When PERSONAL justification has happened by free grace ALONE, this makes believing possible. In believing and resting in Christ and His righteousness, the justified experienced the blessedness of his justified state by God's free grace. Faith alone does this, not any other saving graces (i.e graces that are effects of the salvation already bestowed by God's free grace).

Faith and works EVIDENCE the justified state of a man.

We see FOUR DISTINCT aspects of justification:
DECRETAL,
LEGAL/ACCOMPLISHED,
VITAL/APPLIED, and 
EXPERIENTIAL & EVIDENTIAL.

Faith has to do with the last aspect!
The new school Calvinists MESSED it up with the LEGAL and VITAL aspects!

Trevor Christian Johnson
Sing: In the quote by Gill that you used in your quote above (after you called me a liar), are these words:

"...which is excited and encouraged by the ministry of the word."
Gill connected regeneration with preaching and the Word.

Charles Page
Regeneration is connected by a subsequent chronological preaching; not concurrent with regeneration, and certainly not prior to regeneration.

Trevor Christian Johnson
So, Charles, people are regenerated first, before ever hearing any preaching, and then they hear preaching in a totally unconnected event after regeneration and are then converted?

Charles Page
Not an unconnected event; otherwise, you got it right.

Sing F Lau
Trevor, I did write: "You have NOT represented John Gill truthfully!" If that makes me call you a liar, THEN you said it.

That is precisely your problem. You would only choose Gill's words out of context, and those that suit your notion.

Just what EXACTLY is excited and encouraged by the ministry of the word? Please tell us.

In what way EXACTLY did Gill connect regeneration with preaching and the Word? How are they connected?

Is preaching connected with regeneration in that it is an instrument to bring about regeneration, OR OR OR is preaching connected to regeneration in that it evidences the regenerated state? Tell us the exact connection.

Please tell us. I promise you a good and honest hearing. But no shibboleth please.

Sing F Lau
,Trevor @ So Charles, people are regenerated first, before ever hearing any preaching and then they hear preaching in a totally unconnected event after regeneration and are then converted?
======

May I inquire, was the Ethiopian eunuch regenerated BEFORE he trudged on his donkey-drawn Rolls Royce all the way to Jerusalem to worship God, or when he heard the gospel from Philip?

May I also inquire, was Cornelius regenerated before Peter was sent to preach the gospel to him? Or was he regenerated under the preaching of Peter?

Acts 2
5 ¶ And there were dwelling at Jerusalem Jews, devout men, out of every nation under heaven.

Those devout Jews, from out of every nation under heaven, who made the arduous journey to Jerusalem to worship the God of Israel, were they already regenerated before coming to Jerusalem, or were they regenerated [SIC] by the preaching of Peter on the day of Pentecost?

And please, if this fact has escaped your notice until now - why did apostle Paul describe the recipients of his epistle to the Romans as "the called of Jesus Christ... beloved of God, called to be saints..." EVEN THOUGH they were still in urgent need of hearing the gospel from Apostle Paul. Paul gave every indication that those he termed as "the called of Jesus Christ... beloved of God, called to be saints..." have not heard the gospel from others.

Ro 15:20 Yea, so have I strived to preach the gospel, not where Christ was named, lest I should build upon another man’s foundation:

Please answer these inquiries from the perspective of your gospel regeneration notion. Then I will see how idea measure up to these observations. I will your your view SERIOUS consideration.

Sing F Lau
Trevor @"The truth is that God ordains that the Elect ordinarily should be saved through faith, upon the hearing of the Gospel. Infants and the mentally infirm constitute extraordinary cases, yet ordinarily the... witness of Scripture states the following."
=============

This idea of 'ordinarily' and the 'extraordinary' ways in regeneration is a LIE to cover another lie - i.e. regeneration through the instrumentality through the gospel ministry.

The words of the Lord Jesus Christ are sufficient to repudiate both.
"8 The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit."

Please note those words, "SO IS EVERY ONE THAT IS BORN OF THE SPIRIT."

These words EXCLUDE the silly and fanciful notion of 'ordinary' and 'extraordinary' cases, the so-called 'normal' and 'exceptional' cases. Take it or leave it - there is only ONE WAY for every elect of God... either it is EVERY ELECT regenerated by the immediate and direct activity of the Spirit WITHOUT the gospel instrumentality, or it is EVERY ELECT regenerated by the Spirit THROUGH the gospel instrumentality.

The 'normal' and 'exceptional' view is invented to COVER UP the lies of gospel instrumentality in regeneration.

A lie always needs another lie to cover it up!

I have never heard of a farmer who claims that the activity of the wind upon his farm is dependent upon his presence and activity at the farm. Of course I don't know that many farmers, even though I was a farmer for 20 years. However I have heard very many seminary-trained new school Calvinists who insist that ordinarily the Holy Spirit depends upon their presence and activity for Him to regenerate the elect.

I think a few years of hard knocks on a farm may knock some sound sense into their woolly heads <LOL>.

Sing F Lau
Yoel@ I hope as a good pastor, you weep in your inner man while correcting us from error.
=======
[Yoel has deleted all his comments too.]

It is because I weep for my new school Calvinists brethren here in Malaysia - we were together as Reformed Baptists for many years, and when the Lord taught me the errors of my way and left the new school Calvinism, I was branded a heretic - that I raise these matters often. Trevor and his fellow RBs in the Philippines joined hands with them in their fight against me!

Now the pseudo RBs here, because they reacted against the truth I brought to them, are swinging further away... and are becoming more and more Arminians! That's the reports I get from friends in those churches!

Sing F Lau
Trevor@ The Belgic Confession (Article 2) explains further:

“Therefore, we justly say with Paul, that we are justified by faith alone, or by faith without works. However, to speak more clearly, we do not mean that faith itself justifies us, for it is only an instrument with which we embrace Christ our Righteousness. But Jesus Christ, imputing to us all His merits, and so many holy works which He hath done for us and in our stead, is our Righteousness. And faith is an instrument that keeps us in communion with Him in all His benefits…”
============

Faith is only an instrument with which we embrace Christ our righteousness - AMEN and AMEN.

The justification of life is that which enables the justified to embrace Christ by faith. So, faith is not in any way an instrument to secure justification. Rather, it is the instrument with which a justified man embraced Christ!

New school Calvinists, with their colored glasses, read the Belgic Confession as saying faith is the instrument of securing justification before God, which is clearly NONSENSE, because an unjustified man is still under the condemnation of death.

The Confession also says, "And faith is an instrument that keeps us in communion with Him in all His benefits." EXACTLY. We are justified by God's free grace. All the righteousness of Christ was IMPUTED legally, and APPLIED to us personally by God's free grace... and faith is the instrument to keep us in communion with Christ in all His benefits.

There is NOTHING, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING said about faith being the instrument to be justified before God. That is a LIE invented by the new school Calvinists!

Our faith justifies us in an experiential ("keep us in communion with Christ in all His benefits") and evidential (evidences that we are indeed among God's children) manner.

But the confused and haughty new school Calvinists messed it up with the forensic justification by the free and sovereign grace of God!

Sing F Lau
Trevor@ "Faith is the instrument which lays hold of Jesus. God, through free grace, enables a person to believe. It is a gift of grace, yet God does not believe for the man; the man must believe. Therefore, being an instrument and channel, faith does not come at some later time after a person is united to Christ, but a person is united to Christ by faith itself. Therefore, though it is proper to speak of a logical priority of regeneration over faith/conversion, God monergistically taking initiative to move the man, let us not mistake a logical priority with a chronological one; there is no perceptible chronological gap in time, nor are there any who are regenerate but who are yet to exercise saving faith. Everywhere we see faith we will see the new birth, and where we see the new birth we will see faith.
============

Faith is the instrument which lays hold of Christ
IS NOT THE SAME as
Faith is the instrument to get one justified before God.

If you think they are the same, then you are very confused! The former is true, the latter is a lie.

How does God, through free grace, enable a man to believe? HOW? HOW? Except a man be born again, he cannot - no ifs and no buts. No man dead in trespasses and sins is enabled to believe! And a man cannot be born again UNLESS righteousness has be applied to him personally, i.e UNLESS the justification of life has taken place, with regeneration and adoption as the necessary and logical consequences.

Trevor, you rightly said, "God monergistically taking initiative to move the man..."

Just what is that initiative? I will spell out what the Scriptures say: God effectually call, by His free and sovereign grace, yes, MONO-ergistically - an elect out of his native state of sin and death to that of grace and salvation. This enables him to believe.

To effectually call an elect out of his state of sin and death, these divine monergistic activities must take place:
- forensic justification to remove condemnation of death through the APPLICATION of Christ righteousness to that individual elect personally.
- the forensic justification by God, based on Christ's righteousness, gives warrant to the Holy Spirit to regenerate the justified elect.
- that whom the Spirit regenerated, the Father adopts into the divine family and gives to all the rights and privileges of God's children.

The above monergistic activities of God (in that logical order and number) ENABLE a child of God to believe. IF and WHEN the gospel of what God has done to save him is brought to him, he is CAPABLE of being called to believe the gospel.

Being enabled to believe is just that. The grace of faith is worked in him by the indwelling Spirit in his heart. This grace is to be called forth or drawn out by the preaching of the gospel. If the gospel ministry does not reach them, that grace of faith in them is not called forth, and no believing is manifested. 

Rom 10:17 "So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God." Tragically, too many flippantly read this as "So then regeneration cometh by hearing!"

Sing F Lau
Trevor @ "let us not mistake a logical priority with a chronological one; there is no perceptible chronological gap in time, nor are there any who are regenerate but who are yet to exercise saving faith. Everywhere we see faith we will see the new birth, and where we see the new birth we will see faith."
========

May I inquire AGAIN: when was Cornelius regenerated; before Peter was sent to him, or when Peter was preaching to him?

Was Cornelius exercising saving faith - i.e. receiving and resting on Christ and His righteousness - before he heard the gospel or after he heard the gospel from Peter? Do remember that 'faith comes by hearing'? That's the faith we are talking about.

And what about the eunuch? And Lydia? And the devout Jews converted on the day of Pentecost?

And think about Abraham, won't you? When was Abraham regenerated? And when did he exercise saving faith? Simultaneously, or a wide gap of many years in between?

I think it is quite self-evident that if you are willing to answer these simple questions, your own answers will debunk your notion of the simultaneity of regeneration and gospel conversion! You are still stuck with gospel regeneration.

Gospel regeneration is very attractive because it gives it adherents an aura of indispensability in the eternal salvation of God's elect... in helping God to produce His children.

You would agree that helping God to produce His children is a WIDE WORLD OF DIFFERENCE from helping God in nurturing His children whom He has produce all by His free and sovereign grace.

Trevor Christian Johnson
Yoel, Thank you for your testimony. I was blessed by it.

Trevor Christian Johnson
Here is more from Jon Gill showing that he linked the word of God in Scripture to the work of regeneration:

Gill says "that the ministry of the word is the vehicle in which the Spirit of God conveys himself and his grace into the hearts of men; which is done when the word comes not in word only, but in power, and in the Holy Ghost; and works effectually, and is the power of God unto salvation" (Body of Divinity, Chapter XI, Book VI).

Again, Gill's Commentary:
Commentary on John 11:43
"Ver. 43. And when he had thus spoken,.... To God his Father, in the presence and hearing of the people; he cried with a loud voice; not on account of the dead, but for the sake of those around him, that all might hear and observe; and chiefly to show his majesty, power and authority, and that what he did was open and above board, and not done by any secret, superstitious, and magical whisper; and as an emblem of the voice and power of his Gospel in quickening dead sinners, and of the voice of the archangel and trumpet of God, at the general resurrection;

Lazarus come forth; he calls him by his name, not only as being his friend, and known by him, but to distinguish him from any other corpse that might lie interred in the same cave; and he bids him come forth out of the cave, he being quickened and raised immediately by the power which went forth from Christ as soon as ever he lifted up his voice; which showed him to be truly and properly God, and to have an absolute dominion over death and the grave."

Gill linked the word of God with regeneration.

Trevor Christian Johnson
Yoel: I am merely illustrating that Gill cannot be used as an ally for Hardshell beliefs.

Sing F Lau
Yoel, I was never an anti-Gill, much less a hardcore one. I heard much about him through C.H. Spurgeon. What surprised me most is that Spurgeon greatly recommended Gill, but Gill was universally slandered and despised, left and right, by new school Calvinists who adored and admired Spurgeon

I felt that something was terribly wrong somewhere. It slowly dawned upon me over the years that even though Gill was recognised and honoured as the epitome of 'Calvinism' of his era, he is now slandered and despised by later Calvinists. I concluded that the new school Calvinists have moved away from the gospel. And instead of damning themselves as semi-Arminians, the slandered Gill as hyper!

Sing F Lau
Trevor, in Gill's understanding, in many places in the Scriptures, the term "word of God" refers to the life-giving divine person, the eternal Logos, the second person of the Trinity. The eternal logos, the word of God, is indeed directly and immediately linked with regeneration.

Joh 10:28 And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand.

John 17:2 "As thou hast given him power over all flesh, that he should give eternal life to as many as thou hast given him."

Concerning John 11:43, it was the life-giving voice of Christ, the Word of God, who brought Lazarus, from the dead, without any aid or help from men.

Gill wrote this: didn't you read? " he being quickened and raised immediately by the power which went forth from Christ as soon as ever he lifted up his voice; which showed him to be truly and properly God, and to have an absolute dominion over death and the grave."

There is NOTHING, NOTHING whatsoever attributed to the preached word by the apostles or any man. You picked the wrong passage. It is a passage that debunks your notion!

You will notice, it is ONLY AFTER Christ Himself has brought Lazarus to life, that the apostles played some role... in removing the grave clothes. BEFORE that, the apostles CAN DO NOTHING! Well, they did stand HELPLESSLY by the tomb! Ya, they did do something, after all! Maybe, had they been absent, Christ would have been IMPOTENT to raise Lazarus! <LOL>

After Christ brought Lazarus to life, ALL BY HIMSELF, he told the disciples, "Loose him, and let him go."

What a picture of the role and function of the gospel ministry: to set free those who Christ Himself has brought to eternal life: to loose them from errors and falsehood and superstitions, and to set them free by the gospel truth.

You can always, if you want to, find in Gill's writing things that will give semblance and impression that the preached word is instrumental in regeneration. Either Gill was being inconsistent, or his understanding on the subject developed and grew for the better over the long years of his ministry, or he is misread by readers who wear colored spectacles.

People can even pick verses in the Bible that support all sorts of vain notions... all the easier for you to do so with Gill's writings!

Sing F Lau
The chapter on Regeneration (Book VI, Chapter 11) in Gill's Body of Divinity, let me summarise:

Section II - The springs and causes of regeneration: efficient, moving, meritorious, instrumental.

(sing: very few modern theologians are capable of making these distinctions, much less understanding what Gill wrote!)

1. The efficient cause of it, who is not man, but God.
a. First,
i. Not man; he cannot regenerate himself
ii. The nature of the work clearly shows that it is not in the power of men to do it;
iii. Regeneration is expressly denied to be of men
b. The efficient cause of regeneration is God only
i. God the Father, who is the Father of Christ
ii.. God the Son has also a concern in regeneration,
iii. The Holy Spirit of God is the author of regeneration

2. The impulsive, or moving cause, is the free grace, love and mercy of God

3. The resurrection of Christ from the dead is the virtual or procuring cause of it;

4. The instrumental cause of regeneration, if it may be so called, are the word of God, and the ministers of it.

In the last section on instrumentality, he mentioned about the word of God as the instrument and made THREE IMPORTANT OBSERVATIONS. New school calvinists are oblivious to these:

1st, that the 'word of God' meant the Eternal Logos when found in the context of regeneration.

2nd, that the common notion of the instrumentality in regeneration is inconsistent with the principle of grace.

3rd, the 'word of God' (i.e. the ministry of the gospel) must be rightly understood as the instrument to MAKE MANIFEST the regeneration that has taken place by God's free and sovereign and immediate activity.

I thought that was plain and simple. Take off your COLORED glasses, and read what is there! And please don't pick and choose. Let Gill speak for himself.

In any case, read the whole paragraph for yourself!

"Fourthly, The instrumental cause of regeneration, if it may be so called, are the word of God, and the ministers of it; hence regenerate persons are said to be "born again by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever" (1 Pet. 1:23), and again, "of his own will begat he us with the word of truth" (James 1:18), unless by the Word in these passages should be meant the Eternal Logos, or essential Word of God, Christ Jesus, since logoV is used in both places; though ministers of the gospel are not only represented as ministers and instruments by whom others believe, but as spiritual fathers; "though you have ten thousand instructors in Christ", says the apostle to the Corinthians (1 Cor. 4:15), "yet have ye not many fathers, for in Christ Jesus I have begotten you through the gospel"; so he speaks of his son Onesimus, whom he had "begotten in his bonds" (Philemon 1:10) yet this instrumentality of the word in regeneration seems not so agreeable to the principle of grace implanted in the soul in regeneration, and to be understood with respect to that; since that is done by immediate infusion, and is represented as a creation; and now as God made no use of any instrument in the first and old creation, so neither does it seem so agreeable that he should use any in the new creation: wherefore this is rather to be understood of the exertion of the principle of grace, and the drawing it forth into act and exercise; which is excited and encouraged by the ministry of the word, by which it appears that a man is born again; so the three thousand first converts, and the jailor, were first regenerated, or had the principle of grace wrought in their souls by the Spirit of God, and then were directed and encouraged by the ministry of the apostles to repent and believe in Christ: whereby it became manifest that they were born again. Though after all it seems plain, that the ministry of the word is the vehicle in which the Spirit of God conveys himself and his grace into the hearts of men; which is done when the word comes not in word only, but in power, and in the Holy Ghost; and works effectually, and is the power of God unto salvation; then faith comes by hearing, and ministers are instruments by whom, at least, men are encouraged to believe: "received ye the Spirit", says the apostle, "by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith": (Gal. 3:2), that is, by the preaching of the law, or by the preaching of the gospel? by the latter, no doubt."

Sing F Lau
What are Hardshell beliefs?