Things New and Old

Ancient truths revealed in the Scriptures are often forgotten, disbelieved or distorted, and therefore lost in the passage of time. Such ancient truths when rediscovered and relearned are 'new' additions to the treasury of ancient truths.

Christ showed many new things to the disciples, things prophesied by the prophets of old but hijacked and perverted by the elders and their traditions, but which Christ reclaimed and returned to His people.

Many things taught by the Apostles of Christ have been perverted or substituted over the centuries. Such fundamental doctrines like salvation by grace and justification have been hijacked and perverted and repudiated by sincere Christians. These doctrines need to be reclaimed and restored to God's people.

There are things both new and old here. "Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things"
2Ti 2:7.

Wednesday, December 10, 2025

The New is Old, and Wright is Wrong!

The New is old, and Wright is wrong!

https://www.facebook.com/groups/successfulsavior/permalink/10163653338357519/

Please help.
What is the New Perspective of Paul's teachings one Mr Wright is advocating?
Thanks.

James
It's my understanding that Wright is mainly arguing for a new definition of Justification. And that he's moving away from Reformed views on Justification towards a view that would be more in common with Roman Catholicism, ie Justification is based on works.

Sing
James: Thank you. Is that it?
But the Reformed/Protestants' justification by faith is essentially justification by works.

John 6
28 ¶Then said they unto him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God?
29 ¶Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent.

James
Sing: I agree, but the difference is that Reformed Justification claims it's not by works, and it's my understanding that Wright isn't making that same claim. It seems that he's arguing for justification by works.

James
He makes other claims that I wouldn't agree with. Here's a transcript of a speech that outlines more of the issues. (Being a PB, I believe Ligoners Reformed doctrine of Justification is in error. But I think one can glean through it to see where their are problems with Wright's beliefs.)
https://learn.ligonier.org/articles/whats-wrong-wright-examining-new-perspective-paul?

Sing
James: Thanks.

Dan
James: Bit of a tight-rope act, using Ligonier as a guide, but I believe you're correct, provided one has the discernment to see where they jump the shark as well. I felt the same way about John W Robbin's criticism of The Gospel According to Jesus by John MacArthur. Many good observations in that essay, but a lot of reformed baggage as well. Proceed with caution. 🙂

James
Dan: I agree on the tightrope. I hesitated to share it because it's such a mess theologically.

Dan
James: I feel your pain, brother. Been there. It's been well said, "Eat the chicken, throw away the bones." Honestly, when reading "theological works" it's an essential skill.

James
Bro Dan, are you familiar with Elder Jimmy Barber and his book "Justification: The Heart of the Gospel"? It's an excellent biblical defence and historic account of Particular Baptist, and thence PB, doctrine of justification. Even though it was written in 1988, it answers all the errors that modern Reformed Baptists and Presbyterians are making against it now.

Dan
James: I have read it, and he does make several good observations regarding the doctrine of Justification. If memory serves, his assertions regarding the distribution of the gospel were problematic, IMO. Chicken and bones cautions apply...

Yes, God's own children can be gainsayers

Yes, God's own children can be gainsayers!

Please help with this passage.

Titus 1:9 KJV — Holding fast the faithful word as he hath been taught, that he may be able by sound doctrine both to exhort and to convince the gainsayers.

Q. Who are the gainsayers that can be convinced by the faithful word?
Q. What is it to be convinced by the faithful word?

Thank you most kindly.

==========

Michael
A gainsayer is an argumentative person who may be an unbeliever or a sceptical believer (one who believes Jesus is Christ but objects to biblical explanations as to who and how he saved). The word "exhort" conveys the idea of encouragement, and "convince" in the text conveys the idea of refuting and/or rebuking. Paul's instruction directs ministers to use content from God's word to form sound teaching that corrects error in ways that encourage gainsayers to believe the truth.

Contextually, the phrase "able by sound doctrine" infers using correct explanations and examples from God's word to express relevant, logically constructed and ethically delivered responses that refute objections to the gospel stated by unbelievers and also the objections of skeptical believers. In this regard, preachers must not resort to coercive sophistry nor sentimental methods of persuasion and neither must we ever be quarrelsome. Our goal is not to win arguments; but rather, it is to win people to the truth and therein become faithful followers of Christ.

Sing
Michael: Thank you, Sir.

Would Apostle Paul have God's children in mind when he instructed Titus to convince the gainsayers with the faithful word, since the faithful word requires spiritual discernment?

Can God's children be gainsayers?
(I think only gainsayers who are already God's children can be convinced by spiritual truth; spiritual things are spiritually discerned.

Michael
Sing: IMO, yes. His teaching in I Cor 2:14, "But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know [them], because they are spiritually discerned" supplies a logical basis to infer the gainsayers Paul intends are born again. Were the intended gainsayers unquickened how can they be encouraged by exhortation and convinced of truth by things that proceed from and/or relate to the Spirit of God? Paul explicitly states man in his natural state of sin cannot do so.

Joe
Precisely, Mike. A wise and Biblical preacher/pastor will lead by example and by gentle, but sound Biblical teaching, always building his case on “Book, chapter, and verse.” Never by despotic attitudes or methods.

Sing
Joe: Thank you, Uncle Joe.

Dan
This passage is Paul’s instruction to Titus regarding the qualification for elder in the Lord’s church. When it speaks of convincing the gainsayers, we should not lose sight of the audience for whom such conviction is possible. The natural (unregenerate) man cannot be convinced of spiritual truth.

“But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.” (I Corinthians 2:14).

The most sound, doctrinal argument from the scriptures has no convicting effect on a carnally minded man whose unregenerate disposition is enmity against God.

“Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.” (Romans 8:7)

While it is true that some “gainsayers” (i.e., those who reject and oppose biblical truth) are unregenerate, Paul’s suggestion is not directed toward convincing the unregenerate. God does not send his ministers on a fool’s errand. In this context, the “gainsayers” are those who are born again people, within the domain of an elder’s ministry, who actively oppose certain aspects of the truth. It is possible to convert these men to the truth through the consistent application of sound doctrine, rightly divided, and properly argued from the scriptures. I believe this is what the epistle of James is addressing in many places and it is for this reason that he concludes with:

“Brethren, if any of you do err from the truth, and one convert him; Let him know, that he which converteth the sinner from the error of his way shall save a soul from death, and shall hide a multitude of sins.” (James 5:19-20)

Notice that James is speaking to and about “brethren” and of the profitability of converting those who are in error. This is a primary function of gospel ministry within the Lord’s NT church and is instrumental to our growth in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

Sing
Dan: Thank you. That's exactly my thought. But you said it so well.

Dan
Sing: Thanks for the kind encouragement, brother Sing.

Sing
I asked about the above passage in another group...
Below is one reply... picking on the KJT used.

------

KJT hater
Sing, first of all, get rid of that kjb with its 16th-century English. It has over 300 archaic words in it.

Sing
Thank you, Sir.
Archaic words can be learned; bad translations with serious doctrinal implications are far more serious.

A little article explains it:
https://things-new-and-old.blogspot.com/2015/12/why-i-turned-to-kjb.html

KJT hater
Sing, Kjb is based on a text not codified till the 5th century AD and is a copy of a copy of a copy. It's a Freemason's bible.

---------

Ray
Sing, Thanks, sir.
Why I turned to the KJ translation...
THINGS-NEW-AND-OLD.BLOGSPOT.COM

Dan
Sing: KVJ hate is real and this objection is difficult to address. It takes a simple discussion of a particular passage (Titus 1:9, which is relatively straightforward) and turns it into an enormous debate on bible translations (which is a complicated and lengthy matter, to say the least). There are a lot of potential ways to handle this sort of objection, and I do not suggest that I have the best way. Nevertheless, in a situation like this, where a single passage is under consideration, I would probably ask, "Well, what does your preferred translation say?" I suspect that in most instances, no matter what translation is selected, there's no material difference in the implication of that passage or what is intended by "gainsayers" - regardless of what term or terms they have used in its place.

In my experience, many make a lot of the differences that exist between various bible translations while overlooking the overlap in meaning between them. Consider how the NIV renders this verse:

"He must hold firmly to the trustworthy message as it has been taught, so that he can encourage others by sound doctrine and refute those who oppose it." (Titus 1:9, NIV)

There's not a plug nickel's difference in meaning between how the NIV states this and how the KJV states it, so far as I can tell. One might say, "Yes, but in the KJV you had to look up GAINSAYER because it's an archaic word." Well, that may be true, but the need to look up certain English words when reading the bible is unavoidable, irrespective of the translation chosen. Upon closer examination, the NIV uses more archaic and difficult words in many places when held alongside the KJV, opting for "blustering" in stead of "strong" (Job 8:2), "colonnade" instead of "porch" (I Kings 7:6), "dejected" instead of "sad" (Genesis 40:6), and there are many such examples.

So, when facing such an objection to the KJV, one must apply wisdom in figuring out how best to address it. I'm not sure I have that wisdom, but I will pass along that I've found it helpful at times to retrain our attention on the verse under consideration, look at their preferred translation with them, hopefully find agreement in the meaning, and then plant a few seeds regarding the bible "version" issue as a follow-up to all of that. Getting someone to agree on what a a particular verse means is one thing. I suspect in many instances we will find significant common ground irrespective of translation. Getting someone to change bibles, particularly those who have been marinated by the wise and prudent regarding the superiority of Wescott/Hort, Nestle/Aland, "new manuscripts," who are surrounded by what they believe to be so great a cloud of witnesses (i.e., headcount fallacy)... like rebuilding the walls of Jerusalem, that work usually requires that we place stone upon stone over time with care.

Sing
Dan: Thanks. To me, English is my third language; to say that KJT is harder than other English translations is just a cauldron of cow dung!

Dan
Sing: This objection, which I have faced many times, is baseless. In my experience, those who say it are usually repeating the talking points of the wise and prudent.

Sunday, December 7, 2025

Imputation of Christ's righteousness

No righteousness of Christ, no gospel.
Christ's righteousness is imputed to the elect.


#righteousnessofChrist
#imputationofrighteousness

Inquirer
I have to say his arguments sounded very convincing.
He seems to be an Arminian, but he is Reformed. Anyway, he seems to know what he is talking about. And u were the one who attacked what he posted in his Reformed group on FB 😅. The post is here:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/775537956487669/posts/1492075451500579/

sing
Great. Which part convinced you?
I did not attack him.
I made a statement: "No righteousness of Christ, no gospel."  Unfortunately, he disputed the statement by saying things he knows not.

Inquirer
Well, he sounded like he knows his Scriptures. He said: Righteousness cannot be imputed, so is wrath.
U don't scold me, ya. U scold him.

sing
If righteousness cannot be imputed, what is your understanding of the doctrine of justification?

The imputation of Christ's righteousness to the elect is at the heart of the doctrine of justification.

Jesus suffered the wrath of God when He died the substitutionary death on the cross. Why? The sins of all His people were imputed to Him, and He suffered the full and complete penalty due to those sins.

The silly things he said are not worthy of scolding or debunking.

1 Corinthians 14:38 KJT "But if any man be ignorant, let him be ignorant."

sing
No imputation of Christ's righteousness to the justly condemned, no justification. This is absolutely elementary.

'Those whom God effectually calls, he also freely justifies,
- not by infusing righteousness into them,  [[POPULAR ERROR NEGATED]
- but by pardoning their sins, and by accounting and accepting their persons as righteous [THE TRUTH STATED] ;
- not for anything wrought in them, or done by them [POPULAR ERROR NEGATED],
- but for Christ's sake alone; [THE TRUTH STATED]
- not by imputing faith itself, the act of believing, or any other evangelical obedience to them, as their righteousness; [POPULAR ERROR NEGATED]
- but by imputing Christ's active obedience unto the whole law, and passive obedience in his death for their whole and sole righteousness [THE TRUTH STATED]

-----------------

The above is taken from the 1689 CoF chapter 11.

Christ's active obedience secured the righteousness needed for the justification of His people. God FREELY applies this righteousness of His provision in Christ to each elect at their effectual calling out of their native state of condemnation.

Christ's passive obedience unto death bore the just and righteous wrath of God upon the sins of His people, AND SECURED the forgiveness needed for His people; He endured the wrath of God in their place.

(Please note that the popular fable of justification by faith is plainly repudiated in the statements above.)

I hope the above helps.

Friday, December 5, 2025

False this, and false that - a zero-sum game of many

Both are equally starfruit. 
One is not any less starfruit than the other. 

I harvested these 8 starfruit this morning from the same plant. They reminded me again of the popular nonsense spouted by self-righteous elitist exclusivists - they alone are true this and true that! Others are false this and false that! 
What arrogance and impudence!

False sheep... false church... false professors... false believers... etc.

A sheep is a sheep, as sheep as it could be...

No matter what adjective you want to describe a sheep, you are still describing a SHEEP, stupid! It is still as sheep as could be. It may be a sick sheep, a fleeced and conned sheep, a harassed sheep, a lost sheep, a wayward sheep... a naive sheep, a self-conceited sheep... a haughty unrepentant sheep... go add more adjectives to turn sheep into a goat!

The adjective 'true' is redundant.

A man is a man.... as true a man as can be... he may be a sissy man, a blind man, a weak man, a con man, a beastly man, a godly man... a great man... upright man... heartless brainless man... or blameless... black... beige... or brown like me... well formed or deformed... limbless man... he is a man STILL. You can never 'adjectivized' a man into a non-man!!! Even a dead man remains a man! 

These are all equally starfruits.
Not one is a false starfruit


Thursday, December 4, 2025

This is another gospel, which is no gospel

 

#Another_gospel

1. This is the gospel:

"Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus." Romans 3:24.

This is GOOD NEWS indeed to the condemned needing justification by God.

"freely by his grace" - the ALONE  method, the condemned are justified by God.

"... through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus" - the ALONE basis, the condemned are justified by God.

This is wonderfully good news!

2. This is another gospel:

"Being justified by your faith alone in Jesus Christ."

This is BAD NEWS (in fact, it is an injurious mockery) to the condemned needing justification by God. The condemned is just incapable of exercising faith in order to be justified by God. 

It was said, "
justification by faith is the doctrine by which the church stands or falls." If that's true, is your church standing or has it fallen? 

Have you understood?

Monday, December 1, 2025

The faith of God... the faith of Christ... your faith in them

The faith of God, the faith of Christ, and your faith in them

 
The faith of God... the faith of Christ... your faith in them.

Rom 3:3
For what if some did not believe? shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect?

Rom 3:22
Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference:

God has faith in Jesus, His only begotten Son. "This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased... be hearing him."

For thousands of years, God had freely justified multitudes of His elect and gave them eternal life based on what the promised seed of the woman would accomplish when the eternal Word was made flesh in time and begotten the Son of God.

How could God justly forgive the sins of His people prior to Christ making the actual payment for them on the cross?

Ro 3:24-25
24 Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: 25 Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God..."

In the above text...
- Through whose faith in Christ blood?

- What do 'sins that are past' refer to? Whose sins? 'Past' with reference to what?

- Is 'his righteousness' referring to God's attribute of righteousness, or to God's provision of righteousness?

- To what is the forbearance of God related? What would have happened if there was no such divine forbearance?


-----
Joe

I'll give you my view of the passage.

I believe Paul is referring to all the sins of God's elect that were committed prior to Calvary. God didn't save His people in the Old Testament era one way and now in the New Testament era another way. He saves all of His chosen ones alike.

If this be the case, God relied on the finished work of Christ for the salvation of His Old Testament people just as He does for us. From a human, temporal perspective, Paul could describe this work as the Father's faith in His Son's blood long before the Son came and shed His blood.

"Faith" in this sense certainly does not carry the notion of hope, or of trusting what we do not know. It rather carries the idea of perfect reliance. The Father applied the finished work of Christ to His elect in regeneration, fully relying on the work, although it was yet future. Hope this helps.

Dav

Q. Through whose faith in Christ blood?
A. God the Father’s – Knowing that the Son would be faithful to die for the sins of many.

Q. What do 'sins that are past' refer to? 'Past' with reference to what?
A. Sins of God’s children prior to the coming of Christ.

Q. Is 'his righteousness' God's attribute of righteousness, or God's provision of righteousness?
A. Christ’s righteousness as the only acceptable sacrifice.

Q. To what is the forbearance of God related?
A. God tolerated the sins of His people and considered them as already forgiven, even though the actual act of redemption had not been accomplished.

Bernie
Br. Joe, you have exactly expressed my understanding of Paul's language in these precise verses (Rom. 3:24-25).

People err when they attempt to define the Father's faith in His Son by applying Paul's faith definition that is labeled in Hebrews 11:1. This particular verse (11:1) describes the faith of the regenerated elect, not the faith God had in His Son. God's faith is that confidence and reliance had in His Son by reason of God's perfect, absolute knowledge.

Man's faith is variable (neither consistent nor absolute); whereas, God's faith is constant and is with the absolute perfection of certainty. Brother Joe's post is with such clarity of truth. Many thanks for it.

I appreciate this needed discussion

Wells
Thanks for your post, Bro. Sing. Just today I saw someone post this verse and then go on to say that "past sins" refers only to the sins of believers prior to regeneration. I appreciate your explanation.
========

This illustration will help...

When I was growing up in a little village, my late father had to go away for work, often for weeks on end. He would make arrangements with the local grocery store to ensure that the shop would supply whatever his household would need in his absence. Dad would leave the family with a notebook; we would bring along that notebook to the shop to get whatever supplies the household required, and the shopkeeper, who had faith in my father, would gladly supply us with everything we had need of in Dad's absence, recording every item in the notebook.

When Dad returned, we would bring the notebook along and settled all the debts incurred. The grocer man had faith in Dad and supplied us the groceries on credit.

God had faith in the Word, the second person of the Godhead, absolutely confident that the eternal Word would be made flesh and be begotten the Son of God in order to execute the work of redemption for all those given to Him in the eternal covenant of redemption.

Friday, November 28, 2025

Are there different degrees of reward in heaven?

 And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me,
to give every man according as his work shall be.
Rev 22:12


October 29, 2011 https://www.facebook.com/groups/PrimitiveBaptistgroup/posts/257090227675784/

Are there different degrees of reward in heaven, or are those passages 
that speak of the rewards in the context of this life?
Please help me study this subject. Thanks.

===============

Dallas
We are blessed with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ Jesus. I believe our degrees of reward are related to timely obedience. In heaven, we will each equally testify to our cup running over and focus continually upon worship of our redeemer, my thoughts.

Sing
Supposing we define 'heaven' as that:
1. The intermediate state between death and resurrection
2. The state of glorification after resurrection, would your answer be any different for each state?

Keep thinking and talking... Thanks.

Cheri
Heaven is where God and Jesus are. to be absent from the body is to be present with God. There ain't no in between!

Sing
Supposing the intermediate state (the state between physical death and resurrection) is distinct from the glorified state at resurrection, is the former state in time or in eternity?

Dallas
Yeah, that's what I meant, I just not good at articulation. Very well stated, Elder Keith, Brother Sing, I also agree with Sister Cheri, I don't know anything of an intermediate state unless it is here and  now, I once had a Catholic ask me if I believed in Purgatory, we were standing on the third floor of a coal fired power plant beneath a conveyor dragging limestone into a crusher just above us as we were bending conduit (or attempting to) to run around the circular perimeter of three different silos on the 7th floor, I looked him in the eye and told him (yelling over the noise) "Yeah, that is where we are now, right?" He didn't reply, but the smile in his eye was enough. (is there anyone else I could tag in this reply?)

[Elder Keith has deleted all his comments.]

Sing
1Peter 1 KJT
3 ¶ Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which according to his abundant mercy hath begotten us again unto a lively hope by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead,
4 To an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, and that fadeth not away, reserved in heaven for you,
5 Who are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.
=======

That inheritance is to be revealed in the last time. What is the "last time" referring to?

Dallas
I will let someone more articulate answer. I will say this is related to the hope of glory that is in the saint by the indwelling of Christ, that is, the last time to me is the completion of that which the whole creation even now groaneth for, as we ourselves likewise, to wit, the resurrection, the redemption of the body. But I may be wrong, and I know I have not articulated it as well as many others would have been capable of stating the truth on this matter. For me there is here and now, possession of a hope of glory that is the last time. But, I am accustomed to thinking along lines of studying scripture, perhaps under the colour of my own shaded lens????

Sing
You won't acknowledge the simple fact that there is a distinct difference between the state you are in after death and the state you are in after resurrection? Hmmmmmm. Isn't that obvious? No? Why the need for resurrection then!!!

Isn't it obvious that your state after death and before resurrection is IMPERFECT and INCOMPLETE?

Dallas
Maybe I never acknowledged it because I am not wise enough to imagine or consider it? I know what Paul said, to be absent from the body is to be present with the Lord, I find no reason to disagree with your disntinction having read it as you state it, but I will not go too far along that road because it inmho will lead to the error of soul sleeping which many otherwise sound Baptists in history subscribed to but I do not and have no intention of having an appearance of it, though it may be believed that I have little concern of what appearances may be, I do and I am satisfied in not acknowledging or considering the distinction any further than your statement, as I said, I find no disagreement with it as you state it, yet I will go no farther along that road because, well I just see no reason for such supposition. The difference is limited to? The redemption of the body which is that of our redemption which draweth nigh, even now we who are quickened possess every wit of the redemption in soul and spirit that will shall in heaven, we look forward to the fullness of that redemption complete in the putting of death under foot of our Lord, your distinction is no problem to me, but that is as far as I will acknowledge it, I am in enough error without being supposed to embrace soul sleeping.

Sing
Soul sleeping? How could a LIVELY soul in an imperfect and incomplete state be soul sleeping? A glorified but disembodied soul may be incomplete, but how could it be sleeping?

Dallas
Brother Sing, I understand your point, I don't see any reason to belabour it. I believe it could be perverted to that degree, but I don't mean that toward you. I believe that incomplete state will be much to be desired even with my body returned to the dust from whence it came...still, that incomplete state will not, in mho, be incompletion.

Sing
Maybe I should have refrained from using 'intermediate state'.
Are there different degrees of reward in the disembodied state?
Is the disembodied state still in the 'temporal state' or the 'eternal state'?

Dallas
Yeah, I dislike the term 'intermediate'; disembodied is more exact in my poor mind's eye, sorry. I would say the disembodied state is in the eternal state, though separated from the body. I believe I will, or at least I do now, view this disembodiment as part of the eternal state. I believe this, but you do not, nor anyone else, have to agree with me about it though. <grin>

Sing
Brother Dallas, I don't take anything personally. I am only thinking and studying through this issue... thank you for being a sounding board.

Dallas
You are welcome. I am not taking it personally either. I am just saying, I don't know what others believe, I can only say what I believe. I believe the disembodied soul and spirit will be of the eternal state, I believe in the mind or view of God, we now stand in the eternal state, but we experience this in the temporal. but I think I would have always believed this, being present with the Lord as part of the eternal state, though I may be wrong.

Sing
Now in time, 'we experience this in the temporal...' and in the last time, we in our complete perfection shall experience it in the eternal.

Dallas
Let me put my understanding this way, Moses and Elijah stood on the Mt of Transfiguration with the Lord, they were recognised, I believe they were already in the eternal state, though they were not in their redeemed body.

Yeah, I believe this is why it is said that we possess this treasure in earthen vessels.

I believe you make valid points. I can see that the redemption is not yet 'full' until the resurrection of the body, but I believe at our death, to be present with the Lord is the eternal state.

Dallas
I believe our 'temporal' experience will have ended. that's all I can say. I am thankful you were able to understand my greater difficulty was with the term 'intermediate' if I were sitting in your congregation and you preached this I would not fall out with you over it at the least.

Dallas
Though sometimes I am physically unbalanced, and therefore liable to fall out at any moment, it would not be due to you teaching this concept...<grin> sometimes I simply grow faint on my stronger side and I have no support from the other, so falling has been something I have grown accustomed to, thankfully the Lord knew this about me and he made me tough as nails.

[Penny has deleted her disturbing comments]

Mark
Penny, I increasingly am curious as to your home church and pastor and found no answers on your home page wall. Please inform me of these. I figure you can gather the same from me on my wall........

Mark
Thank you. I appreciate the information. It helps me know how and when to answer when questioned.

Mark
Inheritance and rewards are inherently different. Give that some study.

Mark
You are very welcome.

Pj
Bro. Sing, it would appear that you may think there is a difference between paradise and heaven. Do you think that paradise is a temporal pre-resurrection abode and that heaven is the eternal post-resurrection abode of the elect?

Dallas
Yes, I would agree with that assessment. The Lord tells us that some of His children will bring forth fruit 30-fold, some 60 and others 100. The reward is in the 'walking' with the Lord and not measured according to the 'basket' I give to him as my "fruit" at the end of the row I am given to hoe, that would be in line with the labourers in the marketplace. If I hire on to cut tobacco for a local farmer, you hire in the am, I hire after dinner, we each get 15cents per stick cut, then at the end of that row your 'reward' is perhaps more in reference to the # of hours you engaged in cutting and sticking the tobacco in proportion my own would be less, provided that you had steadly brought forth the fruit of your labor toward the goal in service to the Lord, otherwise we two are paid (the reward) in an equal wage, the greater or lesser is not weighed in the 30, 60 nor 100 fold, but in the obedience because it is in that act and time that we enjoy the greater reward, otherwise, our reward remains equal in the Lord accordingly to our 'hire'

I would agree with your statement of your view, Brother Joe. In the eternal state we cannot be greater or lesser; in the present timely experience, we are equal in the Lord.

The Lord did make this statement, however...

Matthew 11:11 Verily I say unto you, Among them that are born of women there hath not risen a greater than John the Baptist: notwithstanding he that is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he.

Luke 7:28 For I say unto you, Among those that are born of women there is not a greater prophet than John the Baptist: but he that is least in the kingdom of God is greater than he.

I should study the context of this prior to comment too much more, however, I think the concept remains the same, the reward is equal, the experience of it is in the obedience to the Lord in our labors, not in the greater 'fruit' we bring forth, but for the fact that in this bringing forth we experience a greater time in communion and fellowship with our Lord.

Yeah, I agree very much with your statement, Brother Joe!

[Joe has deleted his comments too]

Dallas
Nope, I am not an elder. In order to make paragraphs simply press the shift key simultaneously with the enter key, thanks so much for your kind words, I do know your dad, Elder Stephen Conte and I am thankful to have him as a friend and Brother in the Lord for He has always provided me wise words founded upon scripture first...I agree with you, I am constantly amazed at the consistent connections between eternal truth of scripture and 'secular' scientific studies, I am into cognitive processes more particularly what makes ppl think the way and how they think, what makes them to think and act upon their thoughts. The scriptural connections of God's truth to the study of man and our physical world constantly seeing those connections, sometimes it gets me into trouble cause I seem to make connections that neither historic nor modern Baptists (though historic too) do or have made, then that causes problems, but I read scripture and see connections, now, that alone doesn't mean that my connections are not simply products of my own prejudices etc, but still, it remains difficult for me to read passages and not have a flood of passages come to my mind.

Again, thank you for your very kind words.

Dallas
Thank you Brother Joe. I appreciate your kindness and encouragement. I ask your prayers on my behalf. I know what you mean concerning FB. It is good to see you posting your thoughts from scripture on here, that is the purpose of this group, it is not to prove one wrong and another right, at least in my view, it is to study together that we may see iron sharpening iron.

Dallas
(I'm only about 6-7 years old------in our Lords eyes through baptism. : ).
This is a wonderful thought. I made a similar statement once. An elder reminded me that in the Lord's eyes we are not young, maybe according to obedience we are young, yet by what we can learn from scripture of the Lord saying things such as, 'thine they were', I know my sheep, they hear my voice and they follow me, (paraphrases), then we are no younger than any other in the view of the Lord, but in view of our timely experience of the Lord we would be certainly young.

Thus, we are young in the Lord would mean to me that youth is according to our obedience to the gospel in life experience. We may have been in possession of the Spirit of adoption several years prior to coming into the strait and narrow way of his body.

I have thoroughly enjoyed our discussions this evening. God Bless you, Brother Joe

Dallas
I have very little understanding in any points of scripture but most especially of this point, I sat for several hours with Elder Roger Campbell and debated and discussed this point "when he shall have delivered up the kingdom" and with some other Brethren from the Cookeville Church, I have grown somewhat since that time in 2004, but my understanding seems often to remain veiled by what I learned among another order of Baptists and that veil strains my already poor vision. However, the passage in Heb. 11:13 as Sister Penny points out is without doubt in my mind significant. The primary distinguishing point as many Primitive Baptist Elders have instructed me, if I remember correctly, shows us in 1 Samuel 8:1-22, the kingdom of God is Eternal and Timely, we see there Israel rejecting the reign of God, yet they remained in the kingdom of God, only rejecting his reign in time, this too is the throne of God that 'became' the throne of David, given then to the Son of David, a greater one than Solomon, thus, we see the parallel lines of the Kingdom of God and of Heaven in both time and Eternity...but my wading out into these depths perhaps only serves to muddy the waters more.

Dallas
I would have to study it further too. However, I am led to this thought, what was it that made Israel to adulterate their pure religion? Is that same thing a plague upon God's people in our present time?

It is, I think, never easy to 'come home' once a son, you are an heir of the King, yet in the pig sty of this world, even if such a son does come to his senses, it requires overcoming the desire(s) of the flesh to leave even that place, the nature of a pig enjoys walloring in the mud...we in our flesh are sometimes indistinguishably, so the difficulty level remains the same, the overcoming of our separation from the kingdom in time is the willingness to return to our Father's house and be satisfied with the status of a servant.

Dallas
I agree with your Brother Joe, however, we often fail, God does not fail us, when we fail it is important to have the witness of the saints of the Scripture and those around us that can serve as a continual reminder of the faithfulness of God, we still have this treasure (even the treasured experience of walking with our God who daily expresses His loving nature to us), in earthen vessels. For this reason, I think it is good to study and understand the experience of the saints of old.

Hulan
Dear Bro. Sing Lau, There are NO different degrees of rewards IN HEAVEN.
All benefits acquired by man, are found in this TIMELY or GOSPEL Frame.

Hulan
Mark,  Eternal heaven is an inheritance. Rewards are the result of labour sown. We can only reap where we sow. We sow here in time and thus reap in time. Christ alone could sow in heaven, mortals can't sow there.

Sing
Brother Hulan, thank you for your straight-to-the-point comment!
One related question:
Is the time between death and resurrection in the TIMELY realm or the ETERNAL realm?

Sing
Brother Mark, at death does a saint receive his inheritance of eternal heaven, or will that happen only at resurrection?

My mind has been on this subject... whether 'hell' is an extension of TIME up to the return of Christ, when ETERNITY for man begins. Just thinking.

Mark
At the death of the body, the soul/spirit is perfected and is instantly in eternal heaven in the presence of the Godhead. At that point the soul/spirit is no longer subject to time. The body does not experience eternal heaven until it shall be glorified and perfected on resurrection day.

Sing
Thanks. I do presently believe that too.
Is 'Abraham bosom' and 'paradise' the same as eternal heaven as well?

We use the adjective 'eternal' to describe heaven.

Is there a heaven that is not eternal?

Mark
Ahhh Brother Sing.........you do love hard questions! PB's tend to fall into at least two groups of interpretation regarding "Abraham's bosom". One group believe it should be interpreted literally. The other group believe it should be interpreted as parabolic or symbolic language. I am in the latter group. I do not think that the language in that passage refers literally to eternal heaven. Yes, I think there are other heavens than just eternal heaven. When the Spirit of God blesses with His felt presence, wherever one is becomes a "heavenly place."

Mark
If you think about it a bit Sister Penny, I think you will come to the conclusion that "rewards of grace" is an oxymoron. Since that kind of expression does not accurately convey either reward or grace, we should try to find words that better describe what we are trying to convey.

Mark
Trusting, believing, and the exercise of faith are all sown labour when you think about it for a while.

Mark
Time certainly shall continue until the Lord shall effectively and efficiently declare that time shall be no more. Who is and who isn't subject to time until that final timely moment comes has been often debated. Ability to recognize time and being subject to time are not the same thing.

Sing

Thanks. I am just beginning to learn... which explains the questions. I am very thankful for this electronic means of learning from the more learned saints. I am hundreds of miles behinds the PBs and need to learn from them.

And I am seriously thinking that the disembodied state before glorification at resurrection is still in the timely realm... I can't prove it yet.

There are all those warnings about hell directed at the disciples. Surely there is some significance.

I am beginning to see that TIME extends right up to the coming of Christ, with respect to EVEN the saints that have slept! May all giberrish!

Mark
I believe that there is an eternal hell. I also believe that sometimes we experience "hell on earth". I think some of the Lord's warnings to his disciples concerned experiencing "hell on earth".

Mark
When the Roman army surrounded Jerusalem in 69 AD, all those inside that city were, in my estimation, in "hell on earth".

Sing
It seems that 'heaven' between death and resurrection and the heaven after resurrection are different and distinct heavens; and the 'hell' between death and resurrection and the lake of fire after resurrection are also different and distinct.

I am beginning to see, maybe just hallucinating [sic], that there is a timely hell after death for God's children, just as Christ warned so often. Maybe... just hell while they live, as you say. That's what I believe so far... but it is being challenged by what I read in the Scriptures

And I am wondering whether hell and the lake of fire are distinct. The emptied hell was cast into the lake of fire, Rev 20:14. 

Mark
Some blessings are entirely of grace. Some are the result of obedience.

Mark
Bro. Sing, I have not been able to find a Scripture warrant for belief in a so-called 'intermediate state'. If you find a Scriptural warrant for such a belief, I would be glad to see the presentation of your study.

Sing

The Scriptures speak of hell often, but not once about eternal hell. There is 'eternal fire' once (Jude 1:7), and there is everlasting fire. There is the lake of fire after the general resurrection. Anyway, I am just tossing all these things in my head and seeking answers.

Mark
Bro. Sing, have you ever read the historical account by Josephus regarding the siege of Jerusalem in 69AD?

Sing
I believe the state of a man after death and before resurrection, and his state after resurrection, are different and distinct... whatever we call it. Does that need proof?

Benjamin
Not trying to ya or nay, just drawing from the essential basis for special recognitions.

The scriptures do say much about certain ones of the patriarchs and matriarchs. That said the scriptures also overlay, so to speak, the foundations of the Old, New Testaments and the New Church Kingdoms' entrance with the recognition of the patriarchs, matriarchs and the apostles.

It is easy to see that the scriptures are used by some, who, likely for carnal support, define this as being some form of merited eternal recognition. Indeed, we have support for this time world, for so long as it stands, to give acknowledgement to those who did carry terrible burdens and suffered so much for the Gospel of God. And then we have what is commonly referred to as the "Mount of Transfiguration." The Apostles not only recognised those gone before, who spoke with Jesus, (Having never seen them or any image(s) of them), there was discussion about building a symbolic place of worship in their names.

We will appear, "As we are known in the purpose of God," in eternity, what that is and why we will be recognised as ourselves and not others is not scripturally definite. I do believe this, yet it is not of somewhat value other than to acknowledge who and what we are or were by the grace of God.

For me, these are peaceful thoughts, for our mental and emotional selves, are not going to be whitewashed, so to speak into an unrecognisable instance of us, ignoring who we became by the indwelling of the Holy Spirit and the Grace of God.

Sing
Mark, I have read some... I have an old copy of the 'Works of Josephus.' Anything specific? It was pathetic and horrendous - a mother actually ending up eating her own child. O that perverse and wicked generation was the most demon-possessed generation... not only their hatred against the Messiah, but also their suicidal mode when under siege!

Mark
Yes, read some there about the valley of Gehenna. In the very place that the Israelites sent children into the sacrificial fires of idols, the dead bodies were thrown during the destruction of Jerusalem. Horrendous indeed. The valley was entirely filled with the dead bodies and those bodies were set on fire so that more could be thrown in there. Consider that as you think about the lake of fire.

Sing
What does Ecc 12:7 prove? Please state the specific application you wish to make. Is this speaking of all men? And is 'returning unto God' the same as entering ETERNAL heaven? 

Pj
Bro. Sing, I often ponder over the state of man between death and resurrection, also.

Sing
PJ, and what is the product of your musing?

Mark
Brothers and Sisters, my ponderings are done for this evening. Enjoyed the discussions! G'night!

Dallas
Brother Sing, I can see your point of the distinction between the Lake of Fire and Hell, the scripture does tell us that 'death and hell' shall give UP the dead that are in them,

I am satisfied to believe that hell is the grave, it is possible to suffer hell on earth, which in that sense of the word is likened to suffering, if not death itself, the continual knowledge and fear of death or dread of it...this is, to me, the result of disobedience in the child of God, for Christ came to deliver us from the bondage of the fear of death in which we were held by satan; further, I understand that the term 'hell' has come to be recognized by some as the same place as the lake of fire. I have no problem with that recognition, it remains that in making this distinction one would have to clarify a continual acknowledgment of literal hell, or else would seem to be denying the existence of the place, not saying that is what I think you are doing, but this is how I developed my thinking along what I believe to be similar lines as yourself.

In regards to any intermediate state, I have not grasped hold of that idea for reasons we discussed earlier; I simply believe as Paul stated, to be absent from the body is to be present with the Lord, while being in the body means being absent from the Lord in his Presence and Glory.

I do understand your thinking I have considered this many times, but I am unable to cling to any idea of an intermediate state.

The present body, even of the wicked will be resurrected by the power of Christ's resurrection, I believe by His resurrection even the wicked will be raised, though in a body prepared for everlasting torment in the Lake of Fire, I believe their torment will be as it were in the Presence of the Lamb and His Angels whom they hated in their carnal bodies, I believe that is also taught in the book of Revelation, I think chapter 14.

I would not hold to this dogmatically were Brethren to find disagreement in it, but I believe it. As to intermediate states, I cannot now say anymore toward that as I just do not see it.

Sing
Brother Dallas, whatever we want to call it, the state between physical death and the resurrection on the one hand and the state after resurrection are most certainly distinct and different... as different as the disembodied state and the glorified state. 

Pj
It is unsettled in my mind. I want to believe that the spirit of man returns to God upon death, but I feel other things tugging at my soul.

Sing
There is only one mention of the 'lake of fire' in the Scriptures. And everlasting fire is NOT spoken of in connection with it.
Rev 20:12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works. 13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works. 14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.

Mt 25:41 Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels.

"Everlasting" is by nature in the realm of time; it lasts as long as time lasts. 

Preston
Mark 9
4 And there appeared unto them Elias with Moses: and they were talking with Jesus. 
5 And Peter answered and said to Jesus, Master, it is good for us to be here: and let us make three tabernacles; one for thee, and one for Moses, and one for Elias.

Here is an example of where at least 2 chosen by God are....

Dallas
Well, for the spirit returning to God that gave it, would it not be an eternal state at that point? The present body is dead because of sin however we look at it and unless the Lord returns prior to my death, my present body will see corruption in the grave, yet for Christ in me the hope of Glory, I know that my redeemer liveth and I shall see him in the last day with my own eyes and not with another...seems to me, the eternal state begins at the moment the spirit is absent from the body and present with the Lord.

Pj
My spirit is with God now, so is yours.
[sing: with God in the paradise or in heaven?]

Sing
Joe, no one is talking about eternal torture. That WON'T begin until one is cast into the lake of fire at resurrection.

Dallas
Yeah, brother Sing, though I may be in error on this, I believe Hell in that context is the grave that will be cast into the lake of fire; I believe this is part of His having put all things under his feet, death being the last thing, where is the abode of this body dead because of sin? the grave...

Brother Pj, I understand your statement, I think the Lord now dwells in us by His Spirit and we in that sense are in His presence, but I don't think we are now in His Eternal Presence, that would involve the fullness of His glory, we have a sight of this when we are lifted up to heavenly places as Brother Mark spoke earlier, there are I think varying degrees of this experience; yet I do not believe that constitutes my spirit now being in the eternal presence of God in the heavenly place constituting the Holy of Holies. Just my thinking perhaps, but it is where I am at.

Sing
Sister Penny, flee far away from the corpse of 'soul sleep' please!

Dallas
I did make mention of it from Revelation 14, I think of the eternal torment of the wicked, in relation to the bodies of the wicked being resurrected and prepared for that eternal condition.

Pj
Lazarus and the rich man were not asleep! Moses and Elijah were not asleep!

Pj
Interesting thoughts, Bro. Dallas.

Dallas
Yeah, Sister Penny Karn, but I don't see that as being in the eternal presence of God now. I do see that eternal seed as preventing my ultimate fall, but when I do fall, I am in that sense separated from the joy of the Salvation of the Lord, hence, David's plea for the restoration of that joy, hence, the idea that the saints can experience 'hell' on earth in their life experiences, if I am now in the presence of the Glory of God, all that is passed wholly away, the full realization of the Glory of the Godhead.

Pj
It is better to not know, Penny... Lest your mind become corrupted by its poison.

Sing
If at death Lazarus entered eternal heaven, wouldn't his resurrection by Christ back to this earthly life be a big setback?

Dallas
Yeah, but it is likewise good to know that your mind not be usurped by the seeping of poison...

Dallas
I have read that is true Brother Sing, the Jews I think by Josephus reported that all the days of his life after that event, Lazarus was saddened.

Pj
My mind meditates on that one, Bro. Sing...

Pj
Soul-sleeping... Oh, boy...

Preston
Joh 11:15 And I am glad for your sakes that I was not there, to the intent ye may believe; nevertheless let us go unto him.

Make sure we read all of the story of lazarus ........

Preston
Joh 11 KJT
11 These things said he: and after that he saith unto them, Our friend Lazarus sleepeth; but I go, that I may awake him out of sleep.
12 Then said his disciples, Lord, if he sleep, he shall do well.
13 Howbeit Jesus spake of his death: but they thought that he had spoken of taking of rest in sleep.
14 Then said Jesus unto them plainly, Lazarus is dead.
15 And I am glad for your sakes that I was not there, to the intent ye may believe; nevertheless let us go unto him.

Mark
Psychopannychism is commonly called "soul sleep". It is not a true Biblical doctrine. Here is the dictionary definition.

Theology: the doctrine that death causes the soul to sleep until the day of resurrection.

Sing
Sister Penny, you asked, "What is "soul sleeping" everyone disdains?"
You have expressed it, "Blissfully unaware of anything on earth, or in Heaven for that matter."

And that is simply not true to Scriptures.

'We are asleep in Jesus' simply means we shall be awaken at resurrection. It is not meant to teach 'soul sleep', i.e. a state of existence when one is 'Blissfully unaware of anything on earth, or in Heaven for that matter.'

Mark
Ok, now I am really headed to bed! G'nite!

Dallas
His body wasn't in heaven, but his spirit was immediate in the presence of the glory of God, this is how I believe Paul teaches it and the why of the reason I disbelief soul sleeping, Christ did speak of Lazarus as sleeping, but I think he was speaking of his body, in the grave not of his spirit and or soul sleeping. Or else the testimony of Paul in saying to die is gain cannot be taken until after the resurrection, it is not until the resurrection that the full redemption of body, soul and spirit are realized by the power of holiness raising us from the grave to wit the redemption of our bodies (at this time our bodies are adopted into the family of God) at present, our body is dead because of sin, but the spirit is life because of Christ. That is the distinction, at my death, it is my ground of hope and faith that my spirit shall be immediately in the presence of the Lord in His Eternal Glory and Godhead, my body will remain in the grave until 'time' is ended according to God's appointed purpose, then My body will be resurrected, the fullness of the redemptive work of Christ will be accomplished in His putting death under his feet.

Mark
Y'all are keeping me up! It is all your fault so y'all can explain it to Cheri in the morning........... Heavens no we do not believe in free floating souls on earth..............! We believe that the soul/spirit at the death of the BODY goes directly and instantaneously into the presence of God in eternal heaven!

Dallas
Jesus saved us from many things, in many ways, but first he saved us from our sins, he saved us from the bondage of the fear of death, he saved us from the fear that death is an ultimate annihilation of our bodies and souls and spirits, look at Paul's teaching concerning those who sleep in Jesus, he is referring to the resurrection of the body, then in that sense, the body does sleep, though it is death of the body because of sin, but the soul and spirit of man redeemed is immediately in the presence of the Lord and the fulness of the Godhead, as he, the Lord is the fulness of the Godhead bodily, this is the Eternal Glory of God.

[Jesus' redemptive works saved His people from the lake of fire. Proof:
Rev 20:15 "
And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire." That is, whosoever was found written in the book of life was NOT cast into the lake of fire but ushered into the eternal heaven.] 

Mark
AWAKE! Just like me now ...... LOL.

Dallas
Yeah, awake. good night Brother Mark, (Sister Penny, the resurrection is related to the body, not the soul/spirit). At present our bodies are not part of the family of God by the Spirit of Adoption, this is why Paul speaks in Romans 7 & 8 of the warfare between the flesh and the spirit of the new man created in us, in the latter passages of Romans 8, Paul shows us the whole creation groans with us waiting to witness the redemption of our bodies, that is the resurrection, when the body shall experience the adoption into the family of God by the Redemptive work of Christ.

Mark
The body "sleeps" or is at rest in a sense at death. At the resurrection the body is reconsituted and in a moment - the twinkling of an eye - that corruptible body is glorified and made like unto the immortal and glorified body of Jesus Christ. Body, soul, spirit are then reunited, meet Christ in the air and are transported to immortal glory by Christ!

Dallas
Gotta get off for a while, g'nite Brothers and Sisters, love ya'll.

Sing
Mt 25:46 And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.
===========

These words OBVIOUSLY imply that up till that point no wicked has entered into their everlasting punishment, nor the righteous into life eternal.
Is this a fair inference?

The eternal state does not begin until resurrection and the judgment day.

The question: in what state were they in then?

Good nite, even though is just past noon here... 12.24pm!

Hulan
Dear Bro. Sing, at the point of natural death – Ecc. 12:7 is very clear.
The body goes back to the dust of the ground TIMELY, till the 2nd Coming and End-Time, then – Phil. 3:21; 1st John 3;2; However, the SOUL and SPIRIT go immediately into Heaven’s Pure World into the very Throne Room of the Godhead, alert, awake and aware, enjoying the bliss of Eternal Life RIGHT THEN.

Sing
Dear Brother Hulan,
Ecc 12:7 says 'spirit' but you say 'soul and spirit.' Why?

Mt 25:46 informs that eternal life is entered and enjoyed at resurrection...

I am beginning to see that things just don't measure up to the Scriptures! Very disturbing!

Hulan
Elder Bro. Sing Lau, There is NO Scripture teaching or even implying
SOUL-SLEEPING. The Soul and Spirit are awake, alert and aware
of their NEW Surroundings in Heaven with Eternal Life ONLY, without
any TIMELY influences whatsoever. 

Sing
I am puzzled! What makes you think I am even thinking of soul-sleeping!

Does the hard truth that eternal life is entered and enjoyed at resurrection necessarily and inevitably lead to a soul-sleeping fable?

Hulan
Dear Sister Penny, Read Heb. 12:5—11 - Herein we find that TIMELY Chastisement from God is GOOD FOR US. It may seem like “non-joyous” and is “grievous” during the chastening.

However, the end-result is peaceable fruit.  

Pj
When we die, our soul returns to God and is not asleep. Our bodies sleep, but our souls arise. Then, on the resurrection, our bodies are raised incorruptible and are reunited with our souls.

Pj
I should have used spirit instead of soul in my last comment.

Dallas
1 Thessalonians 5:23 And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.

Paul evidently shows a distinction in our body, soul, and spirit. This is why I speak accordingly in phrases including body, soul and spirit, or spirit and soul, or soul and spirit, etc.

I don't know why others use the terms in this distinction, or if they don't, I do not know why they do not. 

Hulan
Bro. Sing Lau, I was not accusing you of anything. Several minor
points. 1. Ecc. 12:7 does only mention “spirit.” Now since we
cannot SEPARATE the Soul and Spirit - Heb. 4:12 – Only God can
separate them. Then I conclude that they BOTH leave the DEAD

BODY at the same moment. If not, then where does the SOUL go? Not to sleep, but it also is awake, aware and alert.

Next, 2 - Eternal and Everlasting both come from the same Greek Word - Eternal has no beginning nor ending, but Ever- lasting does have a beginning and no end. So CONTEXT is the only key to this understanding – such as John 3:15-16 – employs both words.

Next and last 3. There are varying degrees of TIMELY Benefits and Blessings for the more Obedient, such as the EARNEST OF our inheritance UNTIL the redemption of the purchased possession (including the Body) – Eph. 1:13-14 - The word UNTIL - expressly is the BODY – Rom. 8:23. EARNEST means – payment afore-time – a Spiritual or Heavenly taste, with understanding from the TRUE Gospel – Rom. 10:8 

Sing
Brother Hulan, I didn't feel accused at all <LOL> I am just puzzled how the two thoughts are connected???

Anyway, when the spirit and body are in union, we have a living soul. That's non-negotiable!

'And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.'
Man does not have a soul; man IS a living soul, of body and spirit in union. 

Hulan
Dear Bro. Dallas Eaton, The ETERNAL STATE begins at the POINT OF
Regeneration the New Birth – It is a MYSTERY - Col. 1:27.

Hulan
Dear Sis. Penny, the CONTEXT of John 11:11-14 – is expressly referring to the BODY, for that ONLY is what Jesus Resurrected from the Grave –

John 11;39—44. At this point the SOUL & SPIRIT of Lazarus came back into his BODY. His SOUL and SPIRIT were not dead.

Dallas
Thanks Brother Hulan, I would not argue or disagree with that, but the body remains dead even in regeneration of the spirit, I view the eternal state as in the Presence of the Glory of God.

I would not argue against your statement, but I would maintain that this present body of flesh I possess will not be the same eternal glorified body I shall be raised in, therein is the distinction I personally make, while I am at present (if regenerate) in an eternal state, in the flesh, I am not, the argument can be made, I think, that further the soul is eternal, so, the inner man, whether quickened, or dead, that inner man is in an eternal state.

Time is of no consequence as to whether I believe or disbelieve, except that where I am regenerate, I then am able to believe the truth, otherwise outside my condition of quickening, I remain in an eternal state of death in trespasses and sins.

Jimmy
Then this concludes that the breath of life (soul and spirit) are eternal for all, sheep and goats, of which they will be separated on the Resurrection day according to God's Word!

Hulan
To All - Only the BODY sleeps in DEATH ref. the Child of God.
Notice in – Matt. 27:52 – After the Death of Christ on Calvary’s Cross – we find that MANY OF THE BODIES THAT SLEPT AROSE.

Chase Harrison
"Any way, when the spirit and body are in union, we have a living soul. That's non-negotiable!"

Bro. Sing, If this is always true and non-negotiable, then how do you explain the spirit and body of animals being united as one, yet we obviously believe that animals do not have souls?

"Who knoweth the spirit of man that goeth upward, and the spirit of the beast that goeth downward to the earth?" - Ecc 3:21

Hulan
Dear Bro. Dallas Eaton, You are pleasant to discuss with.
There can be NO ETERNAL STATE OF DEATH for the BODY, after Regeneration. Eternal means “death would never end.” In the End-Time – 2nd Coming RESURRECTION of the Body, it is CHANGED (not the Soul & Spirit, which has already been changed and becomes the INNER man at the Point of Regeneration – John 5:25).

1st Cor. 15:50---51; Phil. 3:21 - ONLY THE BODY. Yes, the INNER MAN is in an ETERNAL State even in the CORRUPT BODY – Read: Rom. 7:24-25.

Dallas
Thank you Brother Hulan, I agree and further believe 1 Cor. 15 indicates to us even the wicked shall be resurrected to Everlasting torment by the same power of the resurrection of Christ for the Glory of God

1 Corinthians 15:20-26 But now is Christ risen from the dead, and become the firstfruits of them that slept. 21 For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead. 22 For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. 23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ's at his coming. 24 Then cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power. 25 For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet. 26 The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death.

Bill
I can't help wondering if folks who believe in "no-hellism" think there is such a thing as "soul sleep?" I DO NOT believe Brother Sing is in any way suggesting soul sleep, nor no-hellism.  

Hulan
Dear Bro. Dallas, Yes, to your statement immediately below.

Paul states in 2nd Cor. 12:1-2 – that “whether in the body, or whether out of the body, I cannot tell: God knoweth – such an one caught up to the third heaven.” Notice Paul did NOT say he did NOT KNOW, but he could NOT TELL, as proved by Verse 4. The point is that Paul’s BODY was not in the 3rd Heaven, but His awareness – Spirit & Soul were keenly aware. This also proves there are THREE heavens.  

Hulan
Sister Penny, If the soul and/or spirit sleeps until the Morning of the Bodily Resurrection, the explain the teaching of – 1st Cor. 6:17 – This context does NOT teach anything about the body.

Hulan
TO ALL, DEATH simply means SEPARATION, not elimination into non-existence.
When the SOUL & SPIRIT depart the Body, the BODY becomes dead and inanimate.

Sing
"Any way, when the spirit and body are in union, we have a living soul. That's non-negotiable!"

Bro. Sing, If this is always true and non-negotiable, then how do you explain the spirit and body of animals being united as one, yet we obviously believe that animals do not have souls?
===========

Context, context, context, Sir!
God didn't make beasts LIVING SOULS.
He did make man a living soul.
Man IS a living soul. He does not have a soul, he has a spirit. 

Hulan
Dear Sis. Penny, the RESURRECTION is for the BODY to be RE-ENTERED with Life, but CHANGED from corruption to incorruption, from natural to spiritual, from weakness to strength, from an earthly image to a heavenly image – 1st Cor. 15:42---50.

The body is re-entered by the PURE, RIGHTEOUS and HOLY Soul & Spirit and
re-united WITH THE changed body – Phil. 3:21; 1st John 3:2.

Hulan
Dear Bro. Sing, Your statements below need some modifications. Eternal Life enters the Child of God at the point of the Regeneration and New Birth as the INWARD Man, and that never dies, but does LEAVE THE BODY at the point of SEPARATION therefrom. It is not re-united until the END-TIME and 2nd Coming of Christ. The Judgment Day is the pronouncement of the CHANGE OF THE BODY and reuniting of the Soul and Spirit to the Changed Body, and this all happens to those written in the Lamb’s Book of Life. 

Rev. 20:12—15

Hulan
Dear Bro. Sing Lau, Matt. 25:46 is referring to the MOMENT of the 2nd Coming and End-Time when ALL BODIES (John 5:28-29) are resurrected, then Matt. 25:31—34 takes place, then Verse 46 takes place. This all happens in a moment and twinkling of an eye – 1st Cor. 15:51-52.

Hulan
SOUL - DEFINITIONS
Buck's Theological Dictionary:
SOUL: That vital, immaterial, active substance, or principle, in man, whereby he perceives, remembers, reasons, and wills. It is rather to be described as to its operations, than to be defined as to its essence. Various, indeed, have been the opinions of philosophers concerning its substance.

Oxford Universal Dictionary
SOUL: The seat of the emotions; The spiritual part of man considered in its moral aspect or in relation to God and His precepts. That which has immortality and survives after death and as susceptible of happiness or misery in a future state.

Noah Webster's 1828 Dictionary
SOUL: The spiritual, rational and immortal substance in man, which distinguishes him from brute beasts; that part of man which enables him to think and reason, and which renders him a subject of moral government. The immortality of the soul is a fundamental article of the Christian system.

Hulan
To All, There will be no animals, birds, fish, etc., in heaven – Read: Ecc. 3:20-21

Hulan
Dear Bro. Joe, Ref. Animals – go read WHY ANIMALS DIE, since they have NEVER sinned - Gen. 6:5—7 - God was so distraught and angry at MAN’S SIN in Adam, till he not only destroyed mankind, but the animals also.

According to God’s Will only EIGHT SOULS (beings) survived the Flood.
Gen. 7:21. Incidentally, the word SOUL in the K.J.T. is taught more than ONE way - The ENTIRE Human-Being; ONLY a 1/3 part of a Human-Being.

Many Scriptures on request for this declaration.

Dallas
Romans 8 would align with Gen. 6 as well, I think.

Sing
Brother Hulan, Death is separation, Life is union...
When spirit and body are in union, there is living soul, there is the state of vital union.

When man and God are in union of fellowship, there is the state of vital union with God. It is not a separate entity.

Hulan
Bro. Joe C., Rom. 8:29—33 only includes HUMAN-BEINGS and NOT all of them.
Read = Rom. 9:11-13. There is a great difference in – Ecc. 3:20-21 as to the totally different directions the SPIRIT of Humans and the SPIRIT of Animals
goes. This cannot be mis-understood. Your TOTAL attention, Soul, Spirit and Body will be 100 % attentive ONLY to the GODHEAD including PRAISE, ADORATION and HONOR to Jesus Christ, your Redeemer.

Dallas
Brother Hulan, correct me if I am wrong, the word creature in Romans 8:18-23 is referring to the creation, the whole creation being subject to the fall, the whole creation is subject to death, the whole creation groans to wit the redemption of the bodies of the saints in the resurrection, will this be the new heavens and netw earth that is spoken of in verse 21? I do not believe animals will be in heaven; but doesn't these passages at least indicate the whole of God's creation is groaning now, awaiting to witness the adoption of the bodies of the saints in the redemption of the body which is complete at the resurrection? How shall they '... be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God...' knowing they are not to be found in heaven.

Pj
I think the topic has digressed...

Cheri
The topic always digresses eventually, but this one is still edifying. enjoying reading!

Hulan
Dear Bro. Eaton, The WHOLE CREATION in this particular CONTEXT of Rom. 8:22 is that of the GENTILES and the JEWS together, and not the natural elements. Verse 23 proves this CONTEXT as it specifies = “And not ONLY THEY (The Gentiles), but ourselves (The Jews) also.”

The Jews were the FIRST-FRUITS of the Spirit.

Hulan
Dear Sis. Penny, I agree with you completely ref. the CHURCH is the CONTEXT.
My only point is that found in 1st Cor. 6:17- He that is joined to the Lord is ONE SPIRIT. This shows that the NATURAL Respiratory BREATH OF LIFE merges with the HOLY SPIRIT when we are IN THE SPIRIT - IN CHURCH. Incidentally, I am going to post some points on the SPIRIT vs. the SOUL.

Hulan
Dear Sis. Penny, since you are aware of the THIRD Heaven, would you care to DEFINE the 1st and 2nd Heaven?

Hulan
Dear Sis. Penny, your conception and analysis of 2nd Cor. 12 has many correct points and is with depth of understanding. However, you cannot have a 3rd ANYTHING without there being, first ONE & TWO.

So, I will send you my analysis, prepared many years ago, and has been approved by many Old Line P.B.’s as being correct, so I will publish it separately.

Hulan
Dear Sis. Penny Karn, Please send me your E-MAIL Address so I can 
send your my analysis on THREE HEAVENS.

Hulan
Dear Sis. Penny, You have listed a multitude of danglings, which must be answered individually, as each is connected, but please do not MIX
ETERNAL and TIMELY factors together. I will deal with each of your points as I have time today.

Love Only the Truth, Rightly Divided.

Hulan
Dear Sis. Penny, Ref. you FIRST paragraph.
Rom. 9:11—13 has clear and definite teachings, and concisely presented in these three verses the DOCTRINE OF ELECTION, according to the PURPOSE OF GOD, which automatically eliminates MAN’S WORKS.

SECOND paragraph.
Rom. 9:6-7 – first notice that there is a vast difference between the GOD OF ISRAEL, and the ISRAEL OF GOD. This latter refers expressly to the TOTAL ELECT Family of God. Verse 7 = The NATURAL Family of Israel is fathered by the seed of Abraham teaching us that ALL of the NATURAL Family of Abraham does NOT represent the TOTAL Elect Children of God. However, the PROMISE was found in ISAAC as the PROMISED Child representing - Total Elect Family – Rom. 4:16; and Gal. 4:28. Also, notice in – Gal. 3:29 – states clearly - That to be Heirs according to the PROMISE, you must FIRST be IN CHRIST, then are ye Abraham’s Seed, but only in his son ISAAC.

This further proves that the ELECT and NON-elect are and can be from the SAME NATURAL family, as both Jacob and Esau were both the SEED OF ISAAC – Rom. 9:10.

THIRD paragraph - Being of the flesh, no matter WHO, does not represent the Elect Family of God; however, OUT OF ALL human families is from which God Elected His People, which is an innumerable number no man can number – Rev. 7:9. So Esau is a NATURAL seed only, and only in the family of the FALLEN nature of Adam is Esau found as a seed, but NOT as a PROMISED SEED of Isaac. Yes, Esau became a great nation, but representatively, NOT of the PROMISED seed – Read: Gen. 16 – within these 16 Verses of Chapter 16, we find that Abraham and Sarah doubted THE PROMISE, so they decided to HELP GOD fulfill His Promise, and their carnal WORKS brought forth, through the handmaid – Hagar the mocking Ishmaelite, who became a great nation, and in Verse 12 we find his history – “a wild man.” His hand will be against every man and every man’s hand against him, and he shall dwell in the presence of his brethren.” There is where the ISRAEL OF GOD and the GOD OF ISRAEL were separated, even today, these “seed of” Abraham are the enemy in the Middle East. Lastly, herein, God has NEVER needed the help of man to fulfill His PROMISE of WHO the Elect People are. Now, you ask WHY is Esau listed in the Bible? So you will KNOW there are some who are NOT of the ELECT, but we also know that by the Blood of Christ, OUT OF EVERY kindred, tongue, people and nation are the Elect – Not EVERY, but OUT OF every – Rev. 5:9.

FOURTH Paragraph - Herein God re-named Jacob to show the difference between the NATURAL Seed – the Sub-planter – Gen. 32:28; and that of the PRINCE OF GOD a SPIRITUAL Seed; Also read; Deut. 32:8-9. Herein ISRAEL (Jacob) represented only SPIRITUAL Jews, and NOT Esau WHATSOEVER. Next, God HATED Esau, even before he was born, and had not yet done any good or evil. Does God have a MIDDLE- GROUND temperament? Hate is hate and Love is Love. This “loveless” is an invention of man, and not in the K.J.T. of Divine Inspiration. 

RELATIONSHIP - You are either in God’s Family or you ARE NOT. If 
you are IN GOD’S Family of the Elect then there is a SPIRITUAL RELATIONSHIP, then and then only can there be FELLOWSHIP with God, and even the OBEDIENT Elect child, in the TRUE N.T. Church, we find a third level of FRIENDSHIP – James 2:23. This is very articulate Friendship, which only a REMNANT in the True  Church has. Read: Zeph. 3:12-13-14 This is the DAUGHTER OF Zion. Esau was not even in a RELATIONSHIP with God whatsoever.

FIFTH paragraph - The only person who has the ability, desire, zeal, unction, motivation, inclination or knowledge to WALK WITH GOD are those who are the BORN-AGAIN (Regenerated) Elect Child of God, with CORRECT GOSPEL KNOWLEDGE. This has NOTHING TO DO WITH the PURPOSE OF God’s ETERNAL Purpose of Eternal Heaven, but that of TIMELY GOSPEL Obedience.  

To finely and keenly delineate this fine point we do find that Jesus Christ did SET UP THE TRUE N.T. Church according the ETERNAL PURPOSE, which God did PURPOSE, but ONLY IN Christ Jesus our Lord – Eph. 3:10-11-12. Your last (5th) Paragraph is almost perfectly correct, so a BIG AMEN. Finally, I must again stress that Jacob and Esau do NOT represent TWO TYPES of God’s Children, but ONLY WITHIN those of JACOB are found the TWO TYPES.