Things New and Old

Ancient truths revealed in the Scriptures are often forgotten, disbelieved or distorted, and therefore lost in the passage of time. Such ancient truths when rediscovered and relearned are 'new' additions to the treasury of ancient truths.

Christ showed many new things to the disciples, things prophesied by the prophets of old but hijacked and perverted by the elders and their traditions, but which Christ reclaimed and returned to His people.

Many things taught by the Apostles of Christ have been perverted or substituted over the centuries. Such fundamental doctrines like salvation by grace and justification have been hijacked and perverted and repudiated by sincere Christians. These doctrines need to be reclaimed and restored to God's people.

There are things both new and old here. "Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things"
2Ti 2:7.

Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Lessons from the Conversion of Cornelius


Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:
 35 But in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him.


Acts 10:1-11:18   Important Lessons from Cornelius the Gentile Centurion

Asking questions is a wonderful way to learn. It simulates thinking, and demands for credible answers – a process so necessary to learn the Scriptures and know its truth.

1. Descriptions of Cornelius BEFORE he ever met apostle Peter or heard the gospel:
- Acts 10:2 "A devout man, and one that feared God with all his house, which gave much alms to the people, and prayed to God alway."
- Acts 10:4 "Thy prayers and thine alms are come up for a memorial before God."
- Acts 10:22 " Cornelius the centurion, a just man, and one that feareth God, and of good report among all the nation of the Jews, was warned from God by an holy angel to send for thee into his house, and to hear words of thee."
- Acts 10:31 "Cornelius, thy prayer is heard, and thine alms are had in remembrance in the sight of God."
- Acts 10:33 "Immediately therefore I sent to thee; and thou hast well done that thou art come. Now therefore are we all here present before God, to hear all things that are commanded thee of God."

Are these descriptions of an un-regenerated or a regenerated man?
- Compare these descriptions with the description of ALL natural man in Romans 3:10-18.
- Dr Luke gives an extensive account of the CONVERSION of this Gentile centurion.


2. Was Cornelius a regenerated man when an angel of God spoke to him?

a.  If he was, how did this regeneration come about?
- Was it by something done to him, like preaching the gospel to him?
- Was it by something done by him, like hearing and believing the gospel, reading the Scriptures, etc?
- Was it directly by the Holy Spirit working directly upon him?

b.  If he was, what kind of life was birthed in him? Is it spiritual and eternal life?

c. If he wasn't how would you explain the descriptions of Cornelius before he met Peter to hear the gospel for the first time?

d. Can an un-regenerated man, a man without eternal life born in him by the Holy Spirit, believe the gospel?



3. Acts 11:13-14 ‘… call for Simon, whose surname is Peter; who shall tell thee words, whereby thou and all thy house shall be saved..’

a. Was Cornelius 'saved' in any way before he ever heard the gospel from Peter?
- If yes, in what sense?
- Can a man whom God has not saved behaves like Cornelius had been?
- In what sense is the preaching of the gospel necessary for a person to be saved - to be saved from what?

b. The Scriptures speaks of salvation in several aspects:  Only those who…
- HAVE BEEN SAVED (effectually called out of the state of sin and death to grace and eternal life) are among those who
- ARE BEING SAVED (through the ministry of the gospel from the consequences of sins in this life here and now), and
- SHALL BE SAVED (through the glorification at the second coming of Christ.)

c. Some examples of temporal salvation:
- When you are exhorted to work out your own salvation (Phi 2:12), what salvation is spoken of?
- What kind of salvation are God's regenerated people to work out in their lives? Eternal salvation? Or temporal salvation to those who HAVE BEEN SAVED by the grace of God?

- When apostle Paul told Timothy these words, "Take heed to yourself and to the doctrine. Continue in them, for in doing this you will save both yourself and those who hear you,' what salvation is spoken of? Eternal salvation? Or the temporal salvation to those who HAVE BEEN SAVED, i.e. those bestowed with eternal salvation at effectual call
- A faithful ministry will save the pastor and his believing hearers from the great evils of ignorance and darkness, false doctrines and false practices (with all the evil consequences) in this life.
- Could a preacher save (temporal deliverances though the ministry of the word)  himself and his believing hearers unless they HAVE BEEN SAVED eternally by the finished work of Christ applied to them at regeneration?

- When apostle Paul said these words, 'Nevertheless she will be saved in childbearing if they continue in faith, love, and holiness, with self-control' (1Ti 2:15), what salvation is spoken of? Eternal salvation? Or temporal salvation to those who HAVE BEEN SAVED, when believing women obey the gospel commands and play their biblical roles and save themselves from all sorts of miseries... and enjoy the blessings of God?


4. Acts 10:34-35: "Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons: But in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him."

a. When Peter was inspired to utter those momentous words, what glorious truths dawned upon him?

- In what sense God is no respecter of persons?

b. On what basis does God accept a man?
- On the basis of his hearing and believing the gospel?
- Or on the basis of the fear of God and the works of righteousness ?
- Or on the basis completely outside of the man?

c. What explains the fear of God and works of righteousness in a man who have not heard the gospel?

d. 'Whoever fears God and works righteousness' found in every nation who are nonetheless accepted (past tense) by God - have they heard the gospel?
- What is the explanation that there are men like Cornelius in every nation who fear God (simple present tense) and work righteousness (simple present tense) BUT who have not had the gospel brought to them?


5. Acts 11:18 “…When they heard these things, they held their peace, and glorified God, saying, Then hath God also to the Gentiles granted repentance unto life.."

a. 'Repentance to life' is a grace worked by the Spirit of God in the heart of a child of God. [‘Repentance to life’ is not the same as repentance leading to eternal life. Eternal life must precede repentance. ]
- The Jews, who had always believed that 'repentance to life' was granted solely to them only, were constrained to acknowledge that the same gift HAS ALSO been granted by God to the Gentiles.

b. Repenting and believing is the CONSEQUENCE, RESULT of the granting of the grace of  'repentance to life.' The grace of repentance and faith are bestowed to the elect at the regeneration unto eternal life.
- With the grace of repentance to life, those who hear the outward gospel call will respond in repentance and faith. There is spiritual life to animate the spiritual activity of repentance and faith.

c. Repentance indeed comes through the hearing of God's words... but repentance is IMPOSSIBLE without the PRIOR working of the grace of  repentance and faith to in the heart by the Holy Spirit.





Tuesday, December 25, 2012

Is it really Scriptures Alone or is that just a shibboleth?

Is it really Scriptures alone?

We read Christ's own words to the apostles:
19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen.

Wasn't there a deliberate divine purpose and wisdom for these:
- Jesus did not tell us his birth date, on purpose!
- Jesus' apostles did not tell us His birth date, on purpose!
- Jesus' apostles did not celebrate Jesus' birthday!
- Jesus' did not instruct us to celebrate his birthday!
- Jesus' apostles did not instruct us to celebrate His birthday!
- Jesus' apostles told us that we should celebrate Jesus' DEATH - NOT His birth!
 

Did Christ command the apostles to teach the NT believers to celebrate His birthday? Is there any evidence? I wish to know. Thank you.





120 Reasons Against Christmas

We Don't Celebrate Christmas Because . . .


. . .    the LORD condemns using pagan religious practices in His worship (Deut 12:29-31).
. . .    the LORD condemns adding to or taking away from His commandments (Deut 12:32).
. . .    the LORD condemns doing anything under green trees in His worship (Deut 12:1-4).
. . .    the LORD condemns the heathen use of decorated trees at a solstice (Jeremiah 10:1-4).
. . .    the LORD commands us to separate from and not touch pagan religion (II Cor 6:14-18).
. . .    the LORD commands us to come out of Roman Catholicism and her sins (Rev 18:4).
. . .    the LORD condemns turning to the left or right from His commandments (Deut 5:32-33).
. . .    the LORD told the apostles to teach us to observe only His commandments (Matt 28:20).
. . .    the LORD rejected David's worship for a small detail and killed Uzzah (II Sam 6:1-10).
. . .    the LORD rejected and killed Nadab and Abihu for offering different fire (Lev 10:1-7)

 Read the rest here:

http://www.letgodbetrue.com/bible/holidays/christmas.php 

May the Lord Jesus Christ have mercy upon all who take His holy name in vain. 



Monday, December 24, 2012

Charles H Spurgeon on Christmas


Hos 4:17
Ephraim is joined to idols: let him alone.

“There is no reason upon earth beyond that of ecclesiastical custom why the 25th of December should be regarded as the birthday of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ any more than any other day from the first of January to the last day of the year; and yet some persons regard Christmas with far deeper reverence than the Lord’s Day. You will often hear it asserted that “The Bible and the Bible alone is the religion of the Protestants,” but it is not so. There are Protestants who have absorbed a great deal beside the Bible into their religion, and among other things, they have accepted the authority of what they call “the church,” and by that door, all sorts of superstitions have entered.

There is no authority whatever in the word of God for the keeping of Christmas at all, and no reason for keeping it just now except that the most superstitious section of Christendom has made a rule that December 25th shall be observed as the birthday of the Lord, and the church by law established in this land [England] has agreed to follow in the same track. You are under no bondage whatever to regard that regulation.  


We owe no allegiance to the ecclesiastical powers which have made a decree on this matter, for we belong to an old-fashioned church which does not dare to make laws, but is content to obey them. At the same time the day is no worse than another, and if you choose to observe it, and observe it unto the Lord, I doubt not he will accept your devotion: while if you do not observe it, but unto the Lord observe it not, for fear of encouraging superstition and will-worship, I doubt not but what you shall be as accepted in the non-observance as you could have been in the observance of it.”

Charles H. Spurgeon, his introductory comments before preaching on the birth of Jesus Christ, December 24th, 1876

Saturday, December 22, 2012

Reformed Folks REPUDIATE Justification by Free Grace

An abandoned house, rotting away.

Reformed Folks REPUDIATE
Justification by God's Free Grace alone,
but are OBSESSED with
Justification by their faith in Christ alone


Reformed Folks Repudiate Justification by Free Grace alone. They substitute it with the fable of Justification by their Faith alone in Christ alone!

From: sing
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 09:02:47 +0800
To: Ipoh East Church
Subject: some questions on 1689.11.1-2 to ponder
Dear Brothers,
Here is 1689.11.1

"Those whom God effectually calleth, He also freely justifieth,(1) not by infusing righteousness into them, but by pardoning their sins, and by accounting and accepting their persons as righteous;(2) not for anything wrought in them, or done by them, but for Christ's sake alone;(3) not by imputing faith itself, the act of believing, or any other evangelical obedience to them, as their righteousness; but by imputing Christ's active obedience unto the whole law, and passive obedience in His death for their whole and sole righteousness,(4) they receiving and resting on Him and His righteousness by faith, which faith they have not of themselves; it is the gift of God.(5)

You insist upon the LIE of your justification by God through your faith in Jesus Christ alone.
I suggest that you have repudiated the biblical teaching summarized in the confessional statement above.

When you are not too busy, please ponder on these questions a little while.

1. Do you believe that God justifies the ungodly (under condemnation) FREELY?

2. What does it mean, 'He also freely justifies'?

3. Or do you believe that God justifies CONDITIONED upon man's believing in Christ?

4. If justification is CONDITIONED upon man's faith (something wrought in him) is it still true that God justifies the condemned FREELY?

5. If justification is CONDITIONED upon man's act of believing in Christ (an act done by him) is it still true that God justifies the condemned FREELY?

6. Is the grace of faith something wrought in the effectually called by the indwelling Spirit?

7. Is the act of believing a work done by the effectually called? (read John 6:28)

8. Is it possible that the unjustified (still in the state of condemnation and dead) is able to believe in Christ in order to be justified by God?

9. Is it not SO PLAIN and OBVIOUS that God's act of justifying freely by His grace, and the justified's act of receiving and resting in Christ are separate and distinct - the former being prior to and which enables the latter?

But HORROR of HORROR, the reformed folks has conditioned the former on the latter, i.e receiving and resting on Christ and His righteousness is prior to, and the instrumental cause of God's act of justifying the condemned!!!

10. Is man's act of receiving and resting on Christ and His righteousness (i.e. when he has eternal life, since life must precede the activities of that life) the CONDITION for God's act of imputing Christ's righteousness (i.e. His active obedience unto the whole law, and passive obedience in His death) for his whole and sole righteousness while he was in an unjustified condemned state?
OR
Is man's act of receiving and resting on Christ and His righteousness the effect of, and the divinely appointed instrumental MEAN to evidence the prior justification that was entirely by free grace, CONDITIONED ON NOTHING, not even believing in Christ?

What do the lives of Abraham and Cornelius and host of others tell us?
'Faith is the sole instrument of justification' in 1689.11.2 MUST BE understood in the light of the above.

In what sense then is faith the sole instrument of justification by the FREE grace of God?

How is the justification by God's FREE grace brought to light or made manifest?

By the instrument of faith - i.e. receiving and resting in Christ and His righteousness for salvation.
The only consistent answer is that faith (receiving and resting in Christ and His righteousness for salvation) is the divinely appointed means, and the infallible proof and evidence of the work of justification wrought by God's FREE grace without faith.

The Old School Baptist knew the truth, and stated, "The reason why any are justified IS NOT because they have faith; but the reason why they have faith IS because they are justified."

But the new school baptists (or known as fullerites) who advocate justification by faith alone in Christ is teaching the exact opposite!

Reformed folks READING INTO the Confession as they do with the Scriptures.They are actually embracing Deformed doctrines.

Ponder on these questions.
your brother and servant in Christ,
pastor lau
---------

From: sing
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:36:52 +0800

To: Ipoh East Church
Cc: SDC Subject: justification and faith

Dear Brethren,
Please indulge me a few moments to point out something quite simple from the 1689 Confession of Faith. Tell me what you think. My suggestion is that you let the words of the 1689 speak for themselves. Words do have meaning.

1689.11.2 states, "Faith thus receiving and resting on Christ and His righteousness, is the alone instrument of justification;(6) yet it is not alone in the person justified, [it is not the only evidence of salvation] but ever accompanied with all other saving graces, and is no dead faith, but worketh by love.(7)
The words [it is not the only evidence of salvation] are Dr Peter Masters' commentary.
Consider the simple logic behind these words.

IF faith is not the only evidence of salvation, THEN faith is necessarily an evidence of salvation. Faith is an evidence of salvation, but it is not the only evidence of salvation.
Would you agree with these statements?

1. Faith which receives and rests (simple present tense) on Christ and His righteousness is not alone in the person justified (simple past tense).
- The simple grammar of the statement informs us that the divine act of justifying the person in effectual call to grace and salvation is PRIOR - logically and chronologically - to that person's act of receiving and resting on Christ and His righteousness in the gospel call.
- If justification by God had not taken place, would there by any thing to receive and rest on???

2. Faith which receives and rests (simple present tense) on Christ and His righteousness is ever accompanied with all other saving graces in the person justified.
- That is why saving faith (faith produced by the salvation bestowed by God through effectual calling) is never alone. It is ever accompanied by all other graces worked in those justified by God's free grace. Salvation bestowed by grace guarantees all other saving graces. The indwelling Spirit works all those saving grace, including the grace of faith. The ministry of the word is the divinely appointed to make manifest and nurture these saving graces.

3. These other saving graces in the person justified are often manifested EVEN BEFORE faith in Christ is manifested through hearing the gospel.
- Abraham in Gen 12-14 is a classic OT example of this. Abraham's life manifested many saving graces before the manifestation of faith in the promised seed in Gen 15:1-6!
- Cornelius is a classic NT example of this. Cornelius's life manifested many other saving grace before the manifestation of his faith in Christ through the preaching of Apostle Peter.
- These people were already effectually called (i.e. justified, regenerated and adopted, with the Holy Spirit given to dwell in them, who works all the saving graces) to grace and salvation EVEN BEFORE they were called to faith in Christ. Faith wrought by the ministry of the word further sanctifies an elect - wonderfully demonstrated in the case of Abraham and Cornelius.
- 'Further sanctifies' necessarily implies the PRIOR once-for-all definitive sanctification in the effectual call which separates an elect our of a state of sin and death to grace and salvation. Definitive sanctification makes further sanctification possible. The ministry of the word is a means toward the latter.
- Only those whom God has effectually called to grace and salvation, i.e. justified, regenerated and adopted, are able to hear the gospel and believe the good news of salvation - salvation is already true of them by grace. The gospel is good news of what God has done... NOT what God will do on condition that man do something. Spiritually dead man can't possibly act spiritually.

4. The ministry of the word draws out and manifest the grace of faith already in the heart of the person indwelt by the Holy Spirit of Christ. For that reason Apostle Paul describes the gospel ministry as "therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith' that of revealing the righteousness of God from faith to faith.'
- The question is, in the preaching of the gospel, the righteousness of God is revealed from whose faith to whose faith?
- It is revealed or made known or declared from the preacher who is not ashamed of the gospel (i.e. have great faith) to those hearers who have faith, even the hearers who have the Spirit of God dwelling in them to work the grace of faith to believe.
- It is not revealed from faith to unbelief… it is revealed from faith to faith… from a preacher who is not ashamed of the gospel to those who have spiritual life and have receive the gift of faith at regeneration. It is only those who have eternal life that are able to believe.

Enough said for now.

Is my understanding of your Church Confessional Standard in error?
If it is, then please kindly point it out to me. I am willing to learn and embrace the truth.

I have no use for standard reformed shibboleth that does not conform to the teaching of Scriptures as summarized in the Confession of Faith. Perhaps the Confession is in error; if so, then let us boldly say so and give adequate reasons and disown it as your Church's Confessional Standard.

Please consider these simple common sense thoughts carefully.
Feel free to disagree but please be kind enough to give some reasons.
sing

"And some believed the things which were spoken, and some believed not" Acts 28:24.


Ipoh East Church - I was instrumental to plant it, and ministered to it for several years. But when the Lord taught the truth more accurately, and I endeavored to teach them the same, they rejected the truth as explained above.... removed me as their overseeing Pastor.

And not long after the church disbanded.

Friday, December 14, 2012

A Massive Theological Blunder by the Reformed folks.

That's what happened with Calvinistic's doctrine of justification by faith alone!

A Massive Theological Blunder by the Reformed folks.

5. A Common Confusion with a Classic Case
Pastor Peter Kek (a Reformed Baptist) wrote: “To make sure that the point is not missed, Paul used Abraham’s case to illustrate. The question is: 'How and when was Abraham justified?' In other words, when was righteousness of Christ imputed to Abraham? When did this imputation take place? What do you say? “For what does the Scripture say? Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness”!!! (Romans 4:3). Now you tell me, when was righteousness imputed to Abraham?” [All emphasis original]

At first sight, these are powerful, impressive rhetorical questions, which seem to settle the dispute conclusively except that they are misguided rhetorical questions for three simple reasons.

First, the rhetorical questions wrongly assumed that Abram was a UN-justified man prior to this incident (Gen 15:1-6). This is a fundamental blunder. 
To realize that Abraham was already a justified man in this passage is an absolute necessity and prerequisite to a consistent and adequate interpretation. The passage is NO LONGER about Abraham’s justification before God, i.e., how Abraham secured his right standing with God through the imputed righteousness of Christ. 

The passage is about the just who shall live by faith – the major thesis laid down in Romans 1:17. Abraham’s faith is proof that he WAS already a justified man. Abraham is a classic illustration of this grand doctrine – ‘the just shall live by faith.’ Abraham was an already justified man in Gen 12-14. When God’s word concerning the promised seed was announced to him, he did believe. Believing in the promised seed he was blessed to consciously experience that wonderful personal assurance and confidence of righteousness and reconciliation before God. Yes, his faith was accounted to him for righteousness. As a result, he experienced the blessedness of having been declared righteous and forgiven. This is the experiential aspect of justification. His faith in the promised seed is accounted to him for righteousness – as a result, he personally and consciously experienced the blessedness of being justified and righteous in God’s sight. 

His faith in Christ did not secure His righteous standing with God. That righteous standing was bestowed upon him while he was still ungodly way back in Ur when he was dead in sin and in enmity against God. That justified state enabled him to believe – demonstrating the truthfulness of the grand biblical truth, “THE JUST SHALL LIVE BY FAITH.”


Secondly, the rhetorical questions wrongly assumed that there is the imputation of Christ’s righteousness spoken of in the passage. 
There is no imputation of Christ’s righteousness here. Look carefully. It does say that ‘it was accounted to him for righteousness.’ What was accounted to him for righteousness? Abraham’s faith was accounted to him for righteousness’ is hardly the same as ‘Christ’s righteousness was accounted to him for justification.’ It is an idea read into the passage, after a wrong assumption, and a colossally wrong assumption. The Confession was very careful to warn us of that common mistake of thinking that the accounting of faith for righteousness has anything to do with justification – ‘justification is not by imputing faith itself.’ (read 1689.1.1). One may be easily misled by the similar sound of the words when the sense of the words is different!


Finally, the rhetorical questions miss the whole point and purpose of this classic illustration. 
The purpose of the whole illustration IS NOT that Abram secured his justification, secured his right standing by means of his faith. The purpose IS that Abraham’s justified state is evidenced, demonstrated and declared to be so, vindicated i.e. justified by his faith in the promised seed. Abraham was the proof par-excellence of the truth that “the just shall live by faith.” Apostle Paul used Abraham not to show the unbelieving Jews or any Gentile how one may secure his justification or right standing before God. He used Abraham to show how a person may know and be known that he is among God’s justified, regenerated and adopted people. He used Abraham to illustrate the grand principle, the just shall live by faith, in dealing with the Jews who had insisted that they were spiritual children of Abraham but is unbelieving in Christ. Justification is purely an act of God’s free grace when God effectually calls an elect dead in sin to eternal life. An elect effectually called to eternal life is bestowed with the graces of repentance and faith. This enables him to believe in the blessed Saviour at the gospel call. When he believes, God is pleased to account the believing to him for righteousness. This results in the experience of blessedness spoken in Roman 4:6-8. This is NOT justification secured (at the cross) or applied (at effectual calling), but justification evidenced and experienced (at initial conversion).

Kerk's thesis “Justification by faith alone – that faith is the sole ‘instrument’ by which we receive the righteousness of Christ” sounds good, but its sense is inconsistent and inadequate, especially in light of his further statements to define its exact meaning. Justification is not by faith. Justification is by grace, secured and imputed (a legal transaction) to all the elect at the cross, and applied (a vital application) to each elect personally at God’s appointed and approved time, and evidenced and experienced by faith alone. There is absolutely nothing we can do to secure our justification before God. It is by free grace alone, and ‘free’ means ‘free,’ not ‘free’ on some conditions. The righteousness of Christ was applied to us when we were not able to exercise any faith whatsoever because we were spiritually dead in our sin when NO instrument was available to receive Christ’s righteousness.

God did not wait till we have faith for Him to impute, and apply Christ’s righteousness to us! He applied it at effectual call when we were ungodly and in enmity against Him. However, when an effectually called, justified and regenerated elect believes, like Abraham and Cornelius, it pleases God to account his believing to him for righteousness, i.e., to bless him to personally know and experience the blessedness of having been justified and forgiven, to consciously experience the blessedness of what God has already done. The good news is what God has already done, not what God will do if we do something. A man already justified by God’s free grace is called to evidence that justification by believing in the blessed Saviour, in order that he may consciously experience the blessedness of having been justified and forgiven. It is the blessed experience and enjoyment of peace with God, Romans 5:1.

Abraham is a classic illustration of this grand doctrine – ‘the just shall live by faith.’ Abraham was already a justified man in Gen 12-14. His life of walking with God is irrefutable proof of his justified state. When God’s word concerning the promised seed was announced to him, he did believe. Believing, he consciously experienced that wonderful personal assurance and confidence of righteousness and reconciliation before God. Yes, his faith was accounted to him for righteousness. As a result, he experienced the blessedness of being righteous and forgiven. This is the experiential aspect of justification. His faith in the promised seed is accounted to him for righteousness – as a result, he personally and consciously experienced the blessedness of being righteous and forgiven. His faith in Christ did not secure his righteous standing with God. That righteous standing was bestowed upon him while he was still ungodly, dead in sin and in enmity against God. That justified state enabled him to believe – demonstrating the truthfulness of the grand biblical truth, “the just shall live by faith.” Your thesis, it seems to me, is, “BY FAITH ONE IS JUSTIFIED AND LIVE.”

Justification is neither secured by works nor by faith. Justification is by the free grace of God while we were in ungodliness, a state in which believing is an utter impossibility. But justification by the free grace of God is evidenced both by works and faith. Abraham had works of righteousness in Gen 12-14. Cornelius had works of righteousness before meeting Apostle Peter. But justification by the free grace of God is uniquely evidenced by faith in the Lord Jesus Christ BEC AUSE our justification before God is BASED SOLELY upon the righteousness of Jesus Christ alone!!! Therefore we have the grand and repeated declaration of ‘the just shall live by faith.’ 

The gospel was preached to Abram, Gal 3:8. Abraham did believe on the promised seed. Cornelius believed on the Lord Jesus. But their works preceded their faith in the Saviour because they were already justified before their faith was drawn forth and evidenced by the gospel. The simple reason is that justification by grace is based solely upon the finished work of Christ. Therefore faith in the Lord Jesus Christ is the sole and unique instrument to evidence, to demonstrate, to prove the prior justification based solely upon the finished work of Christ. But faith is never alone in the person justified. It is accompanied by other saving graces even before faith is brought to light by the gospel.

I conclude that those who teach justification conditioned upon man’s act of faith fail to do justice to the Biblical evidence of Romans 4:1-8 where we are told that God justifies the ungodly and that faith evidences and certifies a justified state.
 ============


Thursday, December 13, 2012

2 Tim 1:9 & 1 Tim 4:16 Rightly Divided

Be exact! Rightly divide! Don't guess!

On Sep 20, 2007, at 10:25 PM, Jay wrote:


Dear ... Brothers,
I call your attention to an article from Elder C. H. Cayce's editorial writings, Volume IV, page 293, in which Elder Cayce introduced the following two verses and reasoned from them. He made some rather pointed and clear points regarding "new" versus "old" doctrine.

"Who hath saved us, and called us with an holy calling, not according to our works, but according to his own purpose and grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus before the world began," (2 Timothy 1:9, KJV)

"Take heed unto thyself, and unto the doctrine; continue in them: for in doing this thou shalt both save thyself, and them that hear thee." (1 Timothy 4:16, KJV)

In the first passage God has both saved and called us, and this work is "…not according to our works, but according to his own purpose and grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus before the world began."

However, in the second passage Timothy is urged to take certain actions in his ministry, and to teach certain things continually. By this precise action on his part Timothy is assured that he shall both save himself and those who hear (and presumably believe and follow) his teaching. Do we have two salvations under consideration, one wholly by God's purpose and grace, and the other by godly preaching and our obedience to it? Or do we have one salvation and a hopeless confusion as to who the real savior is?

As Elder Cayce points out, one interpretation leaves these two passages hopelessly contradicting each other, while the other interpretation harmonizes them fully.

Your thoughts?
Jay
=======

Brother Jay,
Interesting passages!!!
Some years ago a wise man taught me a simple but profound lesson - "note carefully the grammar of what you are reading." And that simple lesson is one thing that has helped me a great deal in rightly dividing the truth. I began to appreciate English grammar as never before. I used to be very upset with my English teachers for their exactness...

2 Tim 1:9 speaks of the salvation:
- ALREADY happened by God's free grace, in the effectual call,
- NOT conditioned on anything in us, of us, by us,
- ACCORDING to God's own purpose and grace in Christ Jesus, through Christ's life, death and resurrection, and glorification alone,
This salvation is THROUGH God's effectual call of us out of our native state of sin and death to that of grace and salvation, i.e. through the justification applied personally, regeneration and adoption.

1 Tim 4:16 speaks of a salvation:
- That has NOT YET happened, but SHALL happen,
- CONDITIONED upon the obedience of God's children,
- THAT a child of God must labour to attain for himself,
- THAT a child of God can attain for others through his ministry (e.g James 5;19-20).

Eternal salvation is the work of the ETERNAL God alone.
Temporal salvation is the work of God's children, in response to the grace of God their Father working in him.

Glory to our God for this perfect harmony of His word.

sing
=======

Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 10:38:24 PM

Brother Sing,
In one post you give us both a correct grammar lesson and a wise and-- I believe correct--Bible lesson. Here we have a tight contextual link; Paul is the author of both letters, he is writing to the same recipient, his beloved son in the ministry and in the faith. In one passage he clearly describes a salvation already secured by divine intent and work, and in the other passage with equal clarity he describes a salvation that is specifically contingent on the minister and his audience and is yet to be accomplished.

Blessings to you in the far east,
jay.
=======

On Sep 21, 2007, at 9:25 AM, sing wrote:

Dear Bee,
Received this interesting mail and, remembered you.
sing
=======

On Sep 21, 2007, at 9:17 PM, bee wrote:

Dear sing,
Things are getting clearer day by day. One of John Bunyan's sermons had made reference to 2 Tim 1:9 passage pointing out that salvation precedes calling. He, however, did not contrast this with the 1 Tim 4:16 passage. It's interesting.
In His grace,
Bee
=======

On Sep 22, 2007, at 12:02 AM, sing wrote:

Dear Bee,
I am glad things are getting clearer.
May our Lord use you to teach some RB 'Apolloses' the light the Lord is pleased to show you. Priscilla played an important role in the apostolic church - Acts 18:24-18, Romans 16:3-4. Doing so, you shall be instrumental bring salvation to them - 1 Tim 4:16; James 5:19-20.

Concerning Bunyan, it all depends on what kind of salvation precedes what kind of calling that he is talking about.

The effectual call unto eternal salvation precedes the gospel call unto conversion.
Eternal salvation must precede gospel call to conversion.
Temporal salvation follows after the gospel call to conversion.
Eternal salvation enables one to respond to the gospel call to experience temporal salvation.

Eternal salvation was DECREED before the foundation of the world, i.e. before effectual calling in time.

Eternal salvation was SECURED for all the elect at Christ's death and resurrection. All the elect are LEGALLY saved at the cross.

Eternal salvation is APPLIED to each individual elect personally at effectual call out of sin and death to grace and eternal life. Each effectually called elect is PERSONALLY saved too.

Each gospelly called elect, brought to faith in Christ through the gospel ministry, is EXPERIENTIALLY saved. This is temporal salvation.

At Christ second coming, ALL elect shall enter into their eternal inheritance, shall finally be saved.

just some thoughts,
sing
=======

On Oct 1, 2007, at 10:46 PM, bee wrote:

Dear sing,
Just a brief question. What is the relationship between temporal salvation and eternal salvation? So will all who have eternal salvation experience temporal salvation? Is the reverse true? Do non-Christians experience temporal salvation?

Not that clear yet,
Bee
=======

On Oct 3, 2007, at 10:40 AM, sing wrote:

Dear Bee,
Here is a very helpful post by Genie. He explains things far better.
sing
*******
Dear Members of FGF,

Fwd: Reconciling Scripture Truth (2 Timothy 1:9 and 1 Timothy 4:16)

There have been a few replies posted to the original post with the above title, and I wish to add some of my thinking in regard to this title.

The verse in 2 Timothy has the word "saved" in it, and the verse in 1 Timothy has the word "save".

From the simple wording it is easy to recognize that the "saved" as cited here in 2 Timothy is related to the action performed by God. The description of how this action takes place recognizes that God performs this action on purpose, by grace, and not according to the works of those being saved. This is properly recognized as the Unconditional Eternal Salvation of those elected of God before the world began. This is the Salvation that makes sure that every elect will eventually be in eternal heaven after time shall come to an end.

From the simple wording it is easy to recognize that the term "save" as cited here in 1 Timothy is a saving that involves the action of Timothy and also involves the actions of those to whom Timothy is speaking. To achieve this salvation Timothy must first of all take heed unto himself. He must also take heed unto the doctrine. When he has done this (taking sufficient heed) he not only saves himself but also he is the means of saving them that hear (heed) his message. This is properly recognized as Conditional Salvation. I also like to mention that this particular text uses the words "for" and "in" rather than merely the word "in". In fact, if you will look at the Interlinear translation, you will find that the original language has the "for" without the "in". I am not trying to make a big point out of this, but some of you younger ministers may not realize that there was much "squabbling" about the necessity of saying "in" and NOT "for" among some ministers in years gone by (and maybe still in some areas). It would not be amiss to also recognize that this salvation is a "time" salvation because it is NOT the Unconditional Eternal Salvation. This "time" salvation is a different salvation from the Eternal Salvation because it plays no part in achieving the Eternal Salvation. All the benefits of any conditional "time" salvation will be enjoyed "here and now" and will not have any part in transporting anyone to the eternal heaven.

Wherever there are children of God who live and die without the conditions of this verse from 1 Timothy being fulfilled there will examples of persons who never experience this particular saving. Of course, there are certain elect persons who are saved eternally without being able to fulfill these conditions---those dying in infancy, those aborted, those mentally incapable, and those who live and die in areas where there are no ministers who have taken heed to themselves and to the doctrine present to do the preaching. I do believe that there are elect persons embraced in this last category as well as the other categories mentioned.

I will not take the time to enter into a discussion of lessons in Chapters 3 and 4 of Hebrews. I will simply state that those examples found in those chapters do show how many of the children of God (Moses included) perished in the wilderness because of disobedience and unbelief. I will merely point out the conditions that need to be achieved to avoid perishing in our day. In fact the term "to day" is mentioned very pointedly in both of these chapters. Note words found in Hebrews 4:11-12: "Take heed, brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbelief, in departing from the living God. But exhort one another daily, while it is called To day; lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin." Then take particular notice of Hebrews 4:11: "Let us labour therefore to enter into that rest, lest any man falls after the same example of unbelief." This unbelief is actually a form of disobedience.

I will quote my favourite passage from the Appendix of the Fulton Convention:
"We believe the Scriptures teach that there is a time salvation received by the heirs of God distinct from eternal salvation, which does depend upon their obedience. The people of God receive their rewards for obedience in this life only. We believe that the ability of the Christian is the unconditional gift of God."

In this short paragraph, the framers of this appendix (to the 1689 CoF) recognized that there was a time salvation that was distinct from eternal salvation. It is obvious that they believed that the conditional salvation depended upon their obedience. They also very well knew that the eternal salvation was UNCONDITIONAL and that the time salvation was CONDITIONAL and therefore the salvations were not the same. This understanding is necessary for "rightly dividing the word of truth". Without making this proper understanding of the differences between UNCONDITIONAL ETERNAL SALVATION and CONDITIONAL TIME SALVATION, the reader of the Bible will experience many inconsistencies and some downright contradictions.

Your little brother,
genie
=======

On Oct 3, 2007, at 10:44 AM, sing wrote:

Dear Bee,
I asked those questions myself several years ago.
I will give brief answers. Feel free to ask further if they don't make sense. I wish the RB 'apolloses' are asking questions. Folks with inquiring mind is a dying species!

Both relate to the elect people of God only. Both are in the context of God's people only. Eternal salvation is solely the act of God's free and sovereign grace in delivering His elect from their eternal condemnation and ushering them to eternal glory. Temporal salvation is obtained and experienced in the life here and now by God's children through their obedience to God's will through the ministry of God's word. That's why a sound gospel ministry is very vital for the well-being of God's children in this life.

Apostle Paul said to the Romans, " Now the God of hope fill you with all joy and peace in believing, that ye may abound in hope, through the power of the Holy Ghost."
The temporal salvation of all joy and peace and abounding in hope is ONLY POSSIBLE in believing the truth of God - in doctrines and practices. I was preaching on this passage last Lord's day. See also the passage of 1Tim 4:16, and many others.

All of God's children (i.e. recipients of eternal salvation by God's free and unconditional grace) who have opportunity to work out their own salvation through the ministry of the word shall experience and enjoy temporal salvation of varying measures and degrees in the life here and now. But NOT ALL of God's children [i.e. those possessing eternal salvation] are outwardly called by the ministry of the word. Even some of God's children that were called by the ministry of the word remained in unbelief - e.g. some of those who perished in the wilderness, those elect Jews mentioned in Romans 10 and 11.

[by which I understand. "Will all who experience temporal salvation possess eternal salvation?" Eternal salvation logically and chronologically PRECEDES temporal salvation, so it is not rational to ask, 'Will all who have temporal salvation experience eternal salvation? ] Since, temporal salvation is used ONLY with respect to the children of God only, then those who experience temporal salvation through the ministry of the word do give evidence of their eternal salvation by God's free grace.

Temporal salvation is used ONLY with respect to the children of God only, and in relation to their response to the ministry of the word.

However, God the Creator exercises His moral government over His moral creatures, whether they are His children or not. There are moral principles that apply across the board to all men as man. There are temporal blessings in the material senses to all who observe the moral commands of God. Often the non-Christians experiences these temporal blessing because God blesses His people in their midst. Often it is because of God's children that temporal judgments are withheld from the communities or nations they dwell in.

What a 'brief' answer! Sorry.
sing
=======

On Oct 6, 2007, at 2:40 AM, Vincent wrote:

Brother Sing,
One of the questions you communicated in the sister’s post was as follows:


I believe the answer to her question may depend upon how one defines “temporal salvation.” When the term “time salvation” was popularized in the latter 1800s it meant that there were temporal blessings that God’s children would have or experience as a result of their willful obedience to God. Going with that definition and with what the Scriptures teach, I think we will have to say that all of God’s born again children possessing common mental abilities who live a sufficient amount of time in this world will indeed enjoy temporal blessings in their willful obedience to God and His commandments.

Back about 30 years ago, when I was pretty much a universalist, I would not have given you this answer. Those who espouse universalistic sentiments try to claim that almost every wicked person in the Bible and in the world is a born again but disobedient child of God who is just missing out on his “Time Salvation.” Time Salvation is the hobby-horse that universalistic minded brethren ride and I rode it hard in my youth. Any Scriptures speaking of hell, damnation or judgment which seemed to conflict with my universalistic views (because they seemed to teach that multitudes of people would not be saved), I would spiritualize those Scriptures to mean a timely hell, a timely damnation or a timely judgment upon the born again but disobedient children of God. Everything became "timely."

“Time Salvation” became the artifice I used to explain away any Scripture which seemed to conflict with my universalistic sentiments. Brethren who study the Scriptures from a foundation of universalistic sentiments have already concluded (before going to the Bible) that the millions of people in the world who have no devotion or reverence to God, who drink iniquity like water, are really born again and will be saved to heaven. Such men are forced to take the position that, although such characters are born of the Spirit of God, they have no change of deportment in their lives through the work of the Holy Spirit, nor through the use of God’s chastening rod upon them. And I was no exception.

In my universalistic mind-set, I was forced to take and attempt to defend the same conclusion. During that time of my life, I would have told you that millions of God’s born again children never enjoy any temporal blessings of obedience (time salvation) because there are millions of God’s born again children who are never obedient to God nor to His commandments. In order to claim that most all of the wicked characters in the Bible and in the world were born again and would be saved to heaven, I was forced to take this view. Considering all these “impenitent, unsanctified, born again children of God,” I pretty much held to the “Hollow Log” doctrine that the Holy Spirit resided in their hearts through the new birth but did not necessarily effect their outward deportment in life.

I also held that God’s chastisement upon such characters was ineffective and that He failed in His purpose of making them “partakers of His holiness” (Heb. 12:10). In other words, I denied the work of the Holy Spirit in the practical sanctification of the born again children of God, believing there were those who knew God spiritually (Heb 8:11) but were never engaged in keeping His commandments, that there were those who were made good trees by regeneration but never brought forth any good fruit in their lives nor did any works of righteousness. However, I am thankful that the Lord was merciful in delivering me from such universalistic sentiments and associated errors.

But what saith the Scriptures? According to Scripture, those to whom God will render eternal life are characterized as those who have a “patient continuance in well doing” (Rom. 2:7-9). Those who are good trees bring forth good fruit in their lives (Mat. 7:17). The children of God are manifested as His born again children in that they work righteousness in their life (those who work not righteousness being the children of the devil) (1 John 3:10). Those who spiritually know God keep His commandments (although not perfectly nor perpetually) while those who say they know God, and yet do not engage in keeping God’s commandments, are liars (i.e., they do not really know God spiritually) (1 John 2:4-5). A characteristic of those who will attain unto the resurrection of life is that “they have done good” (this being an evidence, not a cause) (John 5:29). “They that are Christ’s have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts” (Gal 5:24). God’s chastening rod brings forth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby (Heb. 12:6-11).

Now, if there are temporal salvations or blessings that are a result of a person 1) having a patient continuance in well doing, 2) crucifying the flesh with the affections and lusts, 3) bringing forth good fruit in his life, 4) keeping God’s commandments, and 5) working righteousness, then we would have to say that all of God’s born again children possessing common mental abilities who live a sufficient amount of time in this world will indeed enjoy temporal blessings in their willful obedience to God and His commandments.

I find that sometimes brethren forget (or do not realize) that the purpose of Christ’s dying for our sins upon the cross was NOT ONLY to deliver us from hell or the lake of fire in the world to come, BUT ALSO to “deliver us from this present evil world” (Gal 1: 4). The temporal deliverances we enjoy in our willful obedience to God are a result of Christ’s redemption on the cross and the sanctifying influences of the Holy Spirit in our lives. While we are prone to only focus on the eternal aspects of Christ’s work on the cross and the work of the Holy Spirit in imparting spiritual life, Scripture has much to say concerning the temporal blessings of redemption which have to do with our practical sanctification as we live here on earth.

Scripture teaches that Christ came into this world not only to be crucified on the cross to redeem us from the curse of the law (Gal 3:13), but also came to crucify the old man, to destroy the body of sin, that henceforth we should not serve sin (Rom 6:6). Christ not only came to redeem us from all iniquity, but also came to purify unto himself a peculiar people zealous of good works (Tit 2:14). Christ not only came to save us from the wrath to come (1 Thess 1:10), but also came to redeem us from our vain conversation (i.e. vain manner of living) (1 Pet 1:18). Christ not only came into the world to bear our sins in his own body on the tree to redeem us from the curse of the law (Gal 3:13), but he also came to bear our sins in his own body on the tree that we being dead to sin should live unto righteousness (1 Pet 2:24). Christ not only came to turn sin and ungodliness away from his people (Rom 11:26), but also came to turn His people away from ungodliness (Acts 3:26). Christ not only came to deliver us from eternal punishment, but also came to deliver us out of the hand of our enemies that we “might serve Him without fear, in holiness and righteousness before Him, all the days of our life” (Luke 1:74-75). This purpose of Christ is realized in our practical sanctification here in time through the power, blessing and work of the Holy Ghost who has made us new creatures in Christ, zealous of good works.

These temporal purposes of Christ’s death on the cross are accomplished through the blessings of the new birth (Eph 2:1-5) and by the sanctifying grace of the Holy Spirit (Phil 1:6) who effectually moves and motivates us to walk in God's statutes and to keep his laws (Eze 36:26-27). The Holy Spirit "works in us both to will and do of his good pleasure" (Phil 2:13). By His sovereign mercy and grace, the Lord has spoiled the strong man's house (Matt 12:29) that we be no more slaves to sin (Rom 6:14; 1 John 4:4-5).

The supposed grace that I believed in, as a quasi-universalist and “hollow logger,” which leaves the child of God under the dominion and power of Satan to relentlessly wallow in their sins, is not true grace. True grace not only saves us from the penalty of sin, but also reaches down and takes us out of the "mud-hole" of sin and puts us in a new direction. I am not talking here of sinless "perfection", but am rather talking of a new "direction". All of us will have sin in our members till the day we die, and we will always have struggles against sin, and may even turn our backs upon God and go into very horrible, grievous sins (we have Solomon as an example). Nevertheless, if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new (2 Cor. 5:17). The born again children of God (Eph. 2:1) are new creatures, created in Christ Jesus unto good works (Eph. 2:10).

Thus we find the Scriptures to teach that a child of God, by divine grace, will fear God (Jer 32:40; Rom 3:18), hate evil (Prov 8:13), mind the things of the Spirit (Rom 8:5), be zealous of good works (Tit 2:14), and love not the things of the world (1 John 2:15). This is the fruit of the Holy Spirit working in his life (Eze 36:27-28). There is a change of his affections, will, and desires from the things of the world to the things of God; he now hates the things he once loved (Pr 8:13) and loves the things he once hated (Ps 40:8); he now hates sin and loves holiness and longs to be free from sin and to be holy unto God, who works in him both to will and to do of his good pleasure (Phil 2:13).

It is evident that this change of the will, affections, and desires in regeneration will manifest itself in the life of the child of grace (Mat 7:17, 1 John 3:10). Although still a sinner, he will not continue in the habitual, careless, impenitent practice of sin as before his regeneration. He is morally unable to live such a life because the governing disposition of his soul has been changed and he now hates sin and loves righteousness. He now has an abiding fear of God in his heart (Jer 32:40), which is a loving respect for God with a hatred for sin (Prov 8:13) which motivates him to willingly depart from evil (Prov. 16:16). The sinner’s heart is circumcised to love the Lord his God (Deut 30:6; Rom. 2:28-29; 5:5) and God writes His laws in his heart and in his mind (Heb 8:10-11; 2 Cor 3:3). In regeneration, a person is "created in Christ Jesus unto good works" (Eph 2:10) and, as God works in him both to will and to do of his good pleasure (Phil 2:13), he will bring forth good fruit in his life (Matt 7:17), will have his fruit unto holiness, and the end everlasting life (Rom 6:22). Although the child of grace may, through the temptations of Satan and of his own sinful flesh, fall into grievous sins whereby he incurs God's displeasure, dishonors Christ, grieves the Holy Spirit (Eph 4:30), wounds his own conscience, and loses the sense of God's abiding love and the joy of his salvation (Ps 51:10-12), yet God will lovingly chasten him (Heb 12:6) that he might be a partaker of His holiness, it yielding the peaceable fruit of righteousness in his life (Heb 12:10-11). Although the child of grace will never attain to living a sinless life here on earth (Ecc 7:20; 1 John 1:8) and will verily have a warfare against sin until the day he dies, yet the Scriptures teach that the child of grace, having been saved by Christ to live unto righteousness (1 Pet 2:24), will be one who is zealous of good works (Tit 2:14), will mind the things of the Spirit (Rom. 8:5), will do works of righteousness (1 John 3:10), and will be engaged in keeping God's commandments (1 John 2:4).

May God Bless You and Yours,

Vincent
======

On Oct 8, 2007, at 8:52 AM, Bee wrote:

Dear sing,

Thanks to Brother Vincent for that comprehensive explanation. It's indeed a "thesis" reply to my brief question.

My follow up question is:
If temporal or time salvation is a 'hallmark' of someone with eternal salvation, does that mean a person must continually and consistently demonstrate the presence of temporal salvation throughout (and especially near the end of) his/her earthly pilgrimage in order to indicate that he/she has eternal salvation?

I have in mind the examples of Solomon and Lot (or even Aaron and Moses), who didn't seem to enjoy God's blessing toward the end of their earthly walks, and yet were clearly included as God's righteous ones. On the other hand, people like Asa, Jehoshaphat, Hezekiah, and a few other kings of Judah, who seemed to have enjoyed moments of temporal salvation and words of commendation from God, and yet I am not absolutely sure about their eternal salvation status. I have heard some who believe that Manasseh has eternal salvation because he repented near the end of his life and received God's commendation for that act (and I supposed it means also he enjoyed temporal salvation?). But I have doubt about this conclusion. Thus, I am still not clear of the exact relationship between these two "types" of salvation - pardon me for my slowness in understanding.

In other words, Could people without eternal salvation enjoy moments of temporal salvation (or God's blessings)?

In anticipation and appreciation of help to a hopelessly slow and somewhat confused learner. Just as I think I can see things clearly and understand the truth, another doubt is raised, and back again to confusion.


Clearer but still confused,
Bee
=======

On Oct 8, 2007, at 3:37 PM, sing wrote:

Dear Bee

May our Lord bless and keep you...

In the context of the subject we are talking about, I would say that the term 'temporal salvation' is used in the context of God's redemptive dealing with His children, and 'temporal blessings' is used in the context of God's providential dealing with His creatures. The former would embrace God's children only; the latter, all men as moral creatures of God.

God alone ultimately knows those who are His children, i.e. the recipient of eternal life by His free grace. "Nevertheless the foundation of God standeth sure, having this seal, The Lord knoweth them that are his." 2Ti 2:19.

The point of noting the clear distinction between eternal salvation by God's free and sovereign grace, and temporal salvation conditioned upon the obedience of God's children, IS NOT in order that we can distinguish 'temporal salvation' and 'temporal blessings' - since both are conditional. IT IS in order that we don't commit the SERIOUS AND GRIEVOUS ERROR that eternal salvation is somehow conditioned upon the obedience of man. The natural man has deep-rooted inclination and propensity towards that serious and grievous error. Even God's children are not spared from it.

For example, it is a serious and grievous error to teach that you must believe in order to have eternal life - i.e. your believing secure for you your eternal salvation. No, your believing secures for you your temporal salvation. The Scriptures repeatedly declare, "Whoever believes has eternal life." Therefore someone who believes in the Lord Jesus Christ as His Lord and Saviour is assured (a temporal salvation) that he POSSESSES eternal life. Believing is an evidence of the possession of eternal life. Assurance that one possesses eternal life is a great temporal salvation experienced and enjoyed THROUGH our act of believing.

Another example of a serious and grievous error is to believe that you must believe in order to be justified before God - i.e. believing secure for you your justification before God. No, believing secures for you temporal salvation. Scriptures declare, 'the just shall live by faith' [TOO many make this to read/mean 'by faith the condemned shall be justified and live.'] Therefore one who lives by faith in the Son of God is assured that he is among the JUST, i.e. those ALREADY justified of God's free grace. Faith in Christ Jesus is evidence of a justified state.

The point of rightly dividing the word of truth is not that we may distinguish our temporal salvation as God children, and our temporal blessings as God's creatures in common with the rest of mankind. The former is associated with the particular redemption of God's elect, the latter with the general providence of God's dealing with His moral creatures.

'Temporal blessings' do not give any indication of the possession of eternal salvation. Some of the most wicked and corrupt people enjoy so much material prosperity and health and wealth. These same people give no indication whatsoever of their interest in the person and works of our blessed Lord Jesus Christ.

May our Lord bless you richly and make you a blessing to many others.

sing

=======

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

The Effectual Call - as summarized in the 1689 CoF


https://www.facebook.com/notes/sing-f-lau/the-effectual-call-as-summarized-in-the-1689-cof/10150440572718484

The Effectual Call - as summarized in the 1689 CoF

The following are some brief commentary.

What is effectual calling?
This is what the old school Baptists summarized what the Scriptures teach. The chapter on Effectual Call has four paragraphs. They can be summarized as follows.

Para 1
The effectual call of ALL the ELECT stated and defined.

Para 2
a. The manner effectual call is APPLIED to each elect;
b. The relationship between the effectual call and the gospel call.
- The effectually called are enabled to answer the gospel call.
- Those effectually called elect who are capable of being outwardly called by the gospel.

Para 3
Those effectually called elect who are incapable of being outwardly called by the gospel.

Para 4
Those who are not effectually called, since NOT predestinated unto eternal life, but have the outward gospel call



Paragraph 1 - The effectual call stated, and defined.
Those whom God hath predestined unto life, He is pleased in His appointed and accepted time, effectually to call,(1) by His Word and Spirit, out of that state of sin and death in which they are by nature, to grace and salvation by Jesus Christ;(2) enlightening their minds spiritually and savingly to understand the things of God;(3) taking away their heart of stone, and giving unto them a heart of flesh:(4) renewing their wills, and by His almighty power determining them to that which is good, and effectually drawing them to Jesus Christ;(5) yet so as they come most freely, being made willing by His grace.(6)  1. Ro 8:30; 11:7; Eph 1:10-11, 2Th 2:13-14.   2. Eph 2:1-6.   3. Ac 26:18; Eph 1:17-18.   4. Eze 36:26.   5. Dt 30:6; Eze 36:27; Eph 1:19.   6. Ps 110:3; SS 1:4.

a. Please note carefully:
- Those whom God hath predestinated unto life refers to ALL the elect without exception; what is said in paragraph 1 is true of all the elect, without exception.
- The effectual call is the calling of an elect out of his NATIVE STATE of sin and death to that SPIRITUAL STATE of grace and salvation, wholly secured and merited by Jesus Christ alone.
- The effectual call requires the almighty power of the Triune God, that is, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit. This effectual call to a state of grace and salvation is, by the powerful and sovereign will of the Triune God (God, His Word and Spirit), without any assistance or cooperation of man, being dead in trespasses and sins.
- "His Word" here and "the ministry of the word" in paragraph 3 refer to different subjects; "His Word" in paragraph 1 refers to the life-giving eternal Word, John 1:1; "the ministry of the word" refers to the gospel preaching.
- The effectual call of an elect out of his NATIVE STATE of sin and death to that SPIRITUAL STATE of grace and salvation is a distinct act of the Triune God that is separate from and prior to the gospel call (i.e. the ministry of the word) which is a calling of the effectually called out of their state of ignorance and unbelief to a state of knowledge of the truth of their salvation by God's free grace, through faith in Christ Jesus.
- The former is the calling of the dead in trespasses and sins to grace and salvation by Jesus Christ.
- The latter is the calling of God's children from ignorance to faith in Christ.

b. And what transpires in the effectual call is carefully stated...
- “Enlightening their minds spiritually and savingly to understand the things of God; taking away their heart of stone, and giving unto them a heart of flesh: renewing their wills, and by His almighty power determining them to that which is good, and effectually drawing them to Jesus Christ; yet so as they come most freely, being made willing by His grace."
- Two SPECIFIC THINGS are mentioned here:
- Firstly: what is done to them: Enlightening the MIND...  Replacing the HEART... Renewing their WILLS, i.e., the WHOLE person is affected by the effectual call out of their native state of sin and death to that state of grace and salvation.
- Secondly: the good is determined for them by the almighty power of God. It is "by His almighty power", therefore it is ALWAYS and completely and immutably effectual... always accomplishes its purpose.

c. That which is good is the ETERNAL SALVATION bound up in the person and works of Jesus Christ.
- Each elect is effectually UNITED, by the almighty power of God, to Christ, the fount and spring of their eternal redemption.
: The 'drawing' spoken of here is WITHOUT the gospel means. It is the effectual drawing of the elect still dead in trespasses and sins to Christ by the almighty power of God to that state of grace and salvation.
- In this sense, the effectual drawing/calling is IRRESISTIBLE. Spiritually dead men are summoned to eternal life, the dead are quickened. Not even a man in enmity against God could possibly resist the free gracious act of the almighty God to raise him from his state of sin and death to that of righteousness and eternal life. It is like the dead Lazarus was SUMMONED to life.

d. A common and popular error concerning effectual call needs to be stated here.
- The Calvinists, nearly all of them being gospel regenerationists (i.e. preaching of the gospel is necessary for the Spirit’s work of regeneration), understand the effectual call as God's act of blessing their gospel preaching, making it effectual in bringing the dead to eternal life, and conversion to the truth of the gospel. They insist that effectual calling and conversion are twins, and the preaching is the umbilical cord that connects the two.
- Whether they like it or not, such an idea explicitly implies that without their preaching ministry, there would be no effectual call, i.e. the eternal salvation of God's elect is intimately bound up with their activities! Thus they unashamedly conditioned the eternal salvation of God upon the preaching activity of man.
- They are not contented to accept that their preaching ministry is to feed and nourish the lambs and sheep of God, those that God Himself has effectually called of their native state. They insist that they have an indispensable role in bringing lambs and sheep into being! i.e actively involved in the work of making lambs and sheep, instead of purely feeding them by their ministry of the word.

e. There is one VITAL issue in paragraph 1. It is contained in the phrase, "by His Word and Spirit". These are God's Agents of effectual call, bringing those in a state of sin and death to that of grace and salvation in Jesus Christ.
- So many new school Calvinists glibly take 'His Word' as referring to their ministry of the word or the written Scriptures. But that does violence to the whole paragraph and the chapter.
- The preached word (gospel proclaimed) blessed to the conversion of the already effectually called elect is vastly different from God’s Word (Christ) and Spirit who are the active Divine Agents in the effectual calling of the dead in trespasses and sins unto eternal life. The Word here is the eternal life-giving Logos, as in John 1:1-2.

f. We must not confuse the two. The word ‘word’ (whether with the upper or lower case ‘w’) SOUNDS exactly the same in each case, but the CONTEXT and the SENSE are entirely different. ‘Sound-byte-itis is a disease!
- A biblical distinction is the essence of sound theology. The Framers were clear, consistent and logical. Therefore ‘His Word’ can’t possibly mean ‘gospel preaching’ in a context of effectual calling unto eternal life and salvation.
- The gospel is not an instrument used in begetting eternal life in the elect. It is instrumental only in the conversion of those whom God has effectually called unto eternal life. It is instrumental in the gospel call of those already effectually called to faith in Jesus Christ.
- It is a massive theological blunder to think that Christ, the Word of God, is not active in the work of the new creation in effectual calling. The life-giving Logos is the way, the truth, and the life! He must not be usurped by the ministry of the word.

Q. What are the implications of the clause, “in His appointed and approved time”?
- Can any activity of man speed up the time of the effectual call of a man?
- Can the ministry of the word speed up the time of a man's conversion to Christ?

Q. Is “by His almighty power determining them to that which is good” (original wording) the same as “by His almighty power, causes them to desire and pursue that which is good” (Dr. Peter Master’s revision)? Why?
See here: Monergism degraded into Synergism http://things-new-and-old.blogspot.com/2011/05/monergism-degraded-into-synergism.html

Paragraph 2 - The manner effectual call is applied, and its relation to the gospel call. 
This effectual call is of God's free and special grace alone, not from anything at all forseen in man, nor from any power or agency in the creature,(7) being wholly passive therein, being dead in sins and trespasses, until being quickened and renewed by the Holy Spirit;(8) he is thereby enabled to answer this call, and to embrace the grace offered and conveyed in it, and that by no less power than that which raised up Christ from the dead.(9)   7. 2Ti 1:9; Eph 2:8.   8. 1Co 2:14; Eph 2:5; Jn 5:25.   9. Eph 1:19-20.

a. The manner the effectual call is applied is spelled out explicitly.
- This effectual call is further defined in its manner of application because of man's natural inclination to pervert and twist the gracious nature of it. It is attributed wholly, solely and completely to the free grace of God, and man’s role and gospel instrumentality are completely excluded.
- In effectual calling, man is entirely passive, being dead in trespasses and sins. In fact, he is actively in enmity and rebellion against God. No amount of preaching has any relevance to a man in such a state. God did not send the preacher to minister to the dead; He sent His preachers to FEED the living lambs and sheep (John 21:15f); those He Himself has effectually called out of their native state of sin and death.

b. The effectual call is POSITIVELY affirmed:
- Attributed to God's free and special grace alone... THUS excluding even the gospel ministry of the gospel preachers, and every human aid or activity! "Alone' means 'alone;' it does not mean 'alone PLUS a little assistance from men.'
- An elect is being quickened, from the state of death to eternal life. No one can do any good to the dead but the Life-giver Himself, and ALONE, without the deluded gospel regenerationists' aid or cooperation.
- The quickened is renewed... saving graces are worked by the indwelling Spirit in the effectually called. Without these saving graces worked in the heart by the indwelling Spirit of adoption, the quickened would still be quite impotent... made alive but still impotent, without strength or power.

c. The effectual call is NEGATIVELY denied:
- NOT from anything at all foreseen in man...
- NOT from any power or agency in the creature...
- Man being WHOLLY passive in the effectual call...
- Man being dead in sins and trespasses...
What more needs to be said! Every possible loophole for a man-assisted idea of effectual calling is excluded; INCLUDING the ministry of the word.

d. The relationship between the effectual call and the gospel call is clearly stated.
- The effectual call to grace and salvation thereby enables a man to answer the gospel call. 
- It is strange that many understand “he is thereby enabled to answer this call” as the effectual call enabling a man to answer to effectual call! That idea has already been completely repudiated in para 1, and the first part of para 2. A man DOES NOT answer to effectual call; he is completely passive.
- A man in the state of sin and death is simply completely passive in his effectual call to grace and salvation. The effectual call needs no man's answer to make it effectual!
- It is the gospel call that needs man's answer/response to make it effectual for the purpose it was ordained, i.e. conversion to the truth of their salvation by the free and sovereign grace. Only the effectually called of the Triune God can be gospelly called by the ministry of the word!
- It is in the gospel call that the Framers say "grace is offered and conveyed" - this is obviously different from the grace and salvation applied freely and effectually in the effectual call, in contrast to being 'offered' in the gospel call)!
- Let the misguided and foolish have fun trying to offer something very good to the dead! 

e. NOTE the word 'thereby.' It is an adverb, and means "by that means; as a result of." By the means of effectual calling, or as a result of the effectual calling, a man is enabled to answer the gospel call.
- That means the effectual call is already completed apart from the gospel call... finished and accomplished... thereby enabling the effectually called to answer to the gospel call, which is distinct and separate from the effectual call! The effectual call is already COMPLETED by free grace when he is enabled to answer... therefore that which he is enabled to answer cannot possibly be the effectual call.
- But the Calvinists’ addiction to and obsession with gospel regeneration blind them to this simple truth. They firmly believe that the effectual call is conditioned upon the gospel call; that is, no gospel call, no effectual call! This way, eternal salvation is conditioned upon their gospel ministry! Their popular mantra is that the effectual call and conversion are two sides of the same coin; they are a twin, and their gospel preaching is the umbilical cord connecting the two!

f. ‘The grace offered and conveyed in it’, that is, in the gospel.
- Grace leading to temporal salvation is indeed offered and conveyed in the gospel ministry. Believing the truth not only brings peace and joy and enlightenment, but it also saves a man from falsehood, deception, lies, and superstitions… see Titus 2:12.

Paragraph 3 - The effectually called who are incapable of being outwardly called by the gospel.
Elect infants dying in infancy are regenerated and saved by Christ through the Spirit;(10) who worketh when, and where, and how He pleaseth;(11) so also are all elect persons, who are incapable of being outwardly called by the ministry of the Word.   10. Jn 3:3,5-6. 11. Jn 3:8.

a. This paragraph deals with those effectually called who are incapable of being outwardly called by the ministry of the word, either because of their personal inabilities (infants, etc.) or outward circumstances (no opportunities to the ministry of the word). These elect are not left to perish in their sins. They are effectually called in exactly the same way described in para 1.
- This paragraph is a clear and plain repudiation of the popular error that effectual calling is conditioned upon the gospel calling… for such an idea will damn many of those predestinated unto life just because they are not capable of being OUTWARDLY called by the ministry of the word.
- ‘The Spirit who worketh when and where and how He pleaseth’ declares the absolute sovereignty of the work of regeneration, unrelated to the ministry of the gospel. Otherwise, His sovereignty is conditioned by it!
- Note that the gospel ministry is for the sentient children of God, those who are able to hear and perceive. The phrase “so also all other elect persons’ refers to those who are sentient, but who do not have the ministry of the word in their lifetime on earth. Not all of God's sentient elect have the opportunity to have the gospel ministry. This is to repudiate the popular notion of the gospel regenerationists, ‘no gospel call, no effectual, therefore no eternal salvation.’
- Note the distinction between ‘His Word’ in para 1, and ‘the ministry of the word’ in para 3! The former is in the context of the effectual call of the dead to life, and the latter is the gospel call to the conversion of the effectually called to the truth.
- John 3:8 "... so is everyone that is born of the Spirit" PRECLUDES the common ideas that there are different ways the Holy Spirit regenerates the elect, the "normal" way, and the "exceptional" way; i.e. the normal way is with the means of gospel preaching and the exceptional way is without the means of gospel preaching. No, the Lord says, "so is EVERYONE that is born of the Spirit."

b. The infants and all others spoken of in this paragraph ARE those God has predestined unto eternal life. So, it is redundant to say 'elect infant.' It is also presumptuous to claim "all infants dying in infancy are elect" for the paragraph claims no such thing.

Paragraph 4 - Those who are not effectually called, nor predestinated unto eternal life.
Others not elected, although they may be called by the ministry of the word, and may have some common operations of the Spirit,(12) yet not being effectually drawn by the Father, they neither will nor can truly come to Christ, and therefore cannot be saved:(13) much less can men that receive not the Christian religion be saved, be they never so diligent to frame their lives according to the light of nature and the law of that religion they do profess.(14)    12. Mt 22:14; 13:20-21; Heb 6:4-5. 13. Jn 6:44-45,65; 1Jn 2:24-25. 14. Ac 4:12; Jn 4:22; 17:3.

a  “… much less can men that receive not the Christian religion…”
- ‘Receive not” implies that they have the ministry of the word but they reject the truth of the gospel. Why do men reject the religion of Jesus Christ? They are not effectually drawn by God the Father.
- Those mentioned in para 3 do not have the ministry of the word - either because of their personal inabilities, or by outward circumstances - and, thus cannot be charged as those that ‘receive not’. ‘Receive not’ implies conscious refusal and rejection of what is presented and offered.

b. Only those who are effectually drawn by God can come to Christ through the gospel ministry.

Conclusion
The subsequent chapters show that Effectual Calling out of the native state of sin and death to that of grace and salvation involves justification (chapter 11), regeneration, and adoption together with the gift of the Spirit of adoption (chapter 12) - in that order and number.

All these three divine activities are absolutely necessary to bring a man in his native state of sin and death to that of grace and salvation: justification (applied personally) removes condemnation, regeneration removes death, and adoption removes alienation and bestows all the rights and privileges that belong to the children of God.

The distinction between the Effectual call by the Triune God, and the gospel call through the preachers must be understood. A biblical distinction is the essence of sound theology.

i. Effectual call - from the STATE of sin and death to that STATE of grace and salvation
- justification applied by God’s free grace,
- regeneration by the Spirit of God,
- adoption into God’s family, given the Spirit of adoption to dwell within, who works all the saving graces,
- thus enabled to answer the gospel call.
- distinct and prior to the gospel call.

ii. Gospel call – ministry of the word, converting from a state of ignorance and darkness to the knowledge and light of the gospel of Jesus Christ.
 - hearing, understanding, believing
- justification by faith in Christ, experiential with respect to self; evidential with respect to others.